Recognition of biogeographical patterns depends on accurate knowledge of phylogenetic relationships. In tropical South America, where species richness is very high, but knowledge of relationships is rudimentary, numerous biogeographic patterns await discovery. Work to date has focused mostly on patterns in lowland Amazonia (see Haffer 1993 and references therein), although a few other patterns have been identified, such as the circum-Amazonian pattern (Remsen et al. 1991), Andean leapfrog pattern (Remsen 1984), and a variety of patterns associated with dry forest species (Willis 1992). With few exceptions (e.g. Cracraft and Prum 1988, Hackett 1993), pattern recognition has not been based on explicit phylogenies, but has made use of uncontroversial monophyletic taxa, such as single polytypic species, obvious species pairs, or allospecies groups. As knowledge of distributions and systematics of South American birds improves, we can expect new patterns to appear and old ones to be revised. Here, I present evidence from external morphology and voice that Hemitriccus spodiops (Yungas Tody-Tyrant) and lowland Amazonian H. minor (Snethlage's Tody-Tyrant) are sister taxa, and that both species equally and exclusively meet criteria for membership in the subgenus Snethlagea. This contradicts earlier views of relationships of H. spodiops and suggests a novel biogeographic link between the Amazonian lowlands and adjacent Andean foothills that is supported by several other presumed sister-species pairs. Hemitriccus spodiops is a tiny flycatcher endemic to Bolivia, known only from the lower montane moist forests (yungas) of the eastern slope of the Andes between 800 and 1,600 m. Published data on its natural history are limited to two brief species accounts (Remsen et al. 1982, Parker et al. 1991), and its taxonomic history also is relatively brief and straightforward. After its original description as Euscarthmus spodiops (Berlepsch 1901), it has been placed in a sequence of genera (Euscarthmornis, Idioptilon, and finally Hemitriccus; see Lanyon 1988b). These nomenclatural changes, however, apply to tody-tyrants in general and do not reflect any change in thinking about the position of spodiops within this group. Three authors have addressed the phylogenetic relationships of H. spodiops within the tody-tyrants. In
Read full abstract