Drug-induced Anaphylaxis Research Articles

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding drug allergy among healthcare providers in Eastern India

Background: Drug allergy (DA) or hypersensitivity is an immunologically mediated reaction producing stereotype symptoms which is challenging for health care providers (HCP). Objective of current study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of drug allergy among healthcare providers in eastern India. Methods: A 25-item self-administered DA questionnaire was developed and applied in our study. The questionnaire covered 3 domains: knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns. From July 2020 to September 2020, HCPs participated in the cross-sectional study. Results: A total of 237 HCPs participated in the study, and all questionnaires were analysed. Among the respondents, 226 (95.4%) were nurses, 9 (3.8%) were doctors and 2 (0.8%) were pharmacists. The majority of HCPs agreed that drug-induced immediate allergic reactions were IgE mediated 225 (94.9%), occur within 6 hours of drug administration (89.9%), and epinephrine was the first choice for drug-induced anaphylaxis (76.8%). 97.9% HCPs agreed that penicillin skin test was valuable to predict the allergic reaction. More than 80% of the respondents would take patients’ allergic history before drug administration, while 75.5% agreed that they recognize and manage drug allergy timely when it occurs. Conclusions: Drug allergy was often diagnosed and managed inadequately, regardless of practice location, employment status and speciality in eastern India. The HCPs demonstrated a low level of knowledge regarding DA. Advanced education is urgently needed for better understanding and filling the gaps that exist in the knowledge and clinical practice of DA.

Analysis of drug-induced anaphylaxis cases using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database – secondary publication

BackgroundThe epidemiology of drug-induced anaphylaxis using the Japanese nationwide database has been not reported, even though drugs are a common trigger of anaphylaxis. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological profile of cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis, including fatal cases, using the data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). MethodsWe extracted data regarding drug-related adverse events, between April 2004 and February 2018, published in JADER by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We analyzed cases of anaphylaxis occurring between January 2005 and December 2017. The drug classification was based on the Japanese Standard Commodity Classification. ResultsThere were 16,916 cases of anaphylaxis reported during the study period. Among them, 418 fatalities were registered. The incidence of drug-induced anaphylaxis and fatal cases was 1.03 cases/year per 100,000 population and 0.03 cases/year, respectively. The most frequent causes of anaphylaxis were diagnostic agents, including X-ray contrast media (20.3%), and biological preparations, such as human blood preparations (20.1%). In fatal cases, diagnostic agents (28.7%) and antibiotic preparations (23.9%) were the most commonly associated types of drugs. ConclusionsThe frequency of drug-induced anaphylaxis and fatalities in Japan remained unchanged over the 13-year period analyzed in this study. Diagnostic agents and biological preparations were the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis; however, fatalities were most frequently caused by either diagnostic agents or antibiotic preparations.

Recent insights into the mechanisms of anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis is an acute life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that can have a wide range of clinical manifestations. The most common triggers for anaphylaxis include food, medication, and venom. What is curious regarding anaphylaxis is how so many different agents can induce a severe systemic clinical response but only in a select subgroup of patients. Over the past decade, several important advances have been made in understanding the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to anaphylaxis, with mast cells (MCs) being an essential component. Classically, cross-linked immunoglobulin E (IgE) bound to its high- affinity receptor induces MC mediator release. However, toll-like, complement, or Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptors also activate mouse and human MCs. While anaphylaxis secondary to foods historically has been more extensively characterized clinically and mechanistically, more recent studies have shifted focus towardunderstanding drug-induced anaphylaxis. The focus of this review is to highlight recent basic science developments and compare what is currently known regarding anaphylaxis to food, medications, and venom.

Can clarithromycin be used without testing in patients with penicillin allergy?

BackgroundPenicillin hypersensitivity is a common cause of suspected and proven drug allergy and drug-induced anaphylaxis in medical records and causes social and economic burdens. ObjectiveSince the rate of clarithromycin hypersensitivity is low in the general population, we aimed to investigate whether clarithromycin can be prescribed to patients with penicillin allergy without a provocation test. MethodsThe medical records of 186 patients referred to our clinic between 2015 and 2021 with a history of penicillin allergy were evaluated retrospectively. Patients having a history of at least two immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions with penicillin antibiotics or having a history of immediate-type hypersensitivity with penicillin and diagnosed by positive penicillin V/G specific IgE and/or penicillin skin tests were included in the study. Penicillin skin tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Concentrations of serum specific IgE against phenoxymethylpenicillin (penV) and benzylpenicillin (pen G) were determined using The Phadia CAP System FEIA method. An oral drug provocation test with clarithromycin was performed in all patients. ResultsThe data of 64 patients diagnosed with penicillin allergy and who underwent clarithromycin oral provocation test were analyzed. Oral provocation test with clarithromycin was positive in only two of these patients (3%). These two patients had a history of multidrug hypersensitivity, and one of them also had food and venom allergies. ConclusionWe suggest that clarithromycin can be given without an oral provocation test when an alternative antibiotic is required in patients with penicillin allergy and without multidrug hypersensitivity.

DOCK2 regulates MRGPRX2/B2-mediated mast cell degranulation and drug-induced anaphylaxis

Drug-induced anaphylaxis is triggered by the direct stimulation of mast cells (MCs) via Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2; mouse ortholog MRGPRB2). However, the precise mechanism that links MRGPRX2/B2 to MC degranulation is poorly understood. Dedicator of cytokinesis 2 (DOCK2) is a Rac activator predominantly expressed in hematopoietic cells. Although DOCK2 regulates migration and activation of leukocytes, its role in MCs remains unknown. We aimed to elucidate whether-and if so, how-DOCK2 is involved in MRGPRX2/B2-mediated MC degranulation and anaphylaxis. Induction of drug-induced systemic and cutaneous anaphylaxis was compared between wild-type and DOCK2-deficient mice. In addition, genetic or pharmacologic inactivation of DOCK2 in human and murine MCs was used to reveal its role in MRGPRX2/B2-mediated signal transduction and degranulation. Induction of MC degranulation and anaphylaxis by compound 48/80 and ciprofloxacin was severely attenuated in the absence of DOCK2. Although calcium influx and phosphorylation of several signaling molecules were unaffected, MRGPRB2-mediated Rac activation and phosphorylation of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) were impaired in DOCK2-deficient MCs. Similar results were obtained when mice or MCs were treated with small-molecule inhibitors that bind to the catalytic domain of DOCK2 and inhibit Rac activation. DOCK2 regulates MRGPRX2/B2-mediated MC degranulation through Rac activation and PAK1 phosphorylation, thereby indicating that the DOCK2-Rac-PAK1 axis could be a target for preventing drug-induced anaphylaxis.

Drug related severe anaphylaxis investigation: A Tunisian retrospective study

IntroductionAnaphylactic shock is the most serious manifestation of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Although this event is rare, its gravity warrants a major interest in identifying the drug in question. AimThe aim of the study was to describe clinical features, etiologic approach and allergological assessment performed in patients referred for exploration of drug-induced severe anaphylaxis. MethodsRetrospective study between January 2000 and July 2021, including patients referred to the allergology consultation of the pneumo-allergology department “C” of the AbderrahmanMami hospital of Ariana in Tunis, for exploration of drug-induced severe anaphylaxis. ResultsTwo hundred ninety patients were referred for exploration of drug hypersensitivitymanifestations, 54 patients presented with suspected drug-induced severe anaphylaxis. The average age was 33.52 years [6–72 years]. Twenty patients were male and 34 were female (sex ratio=0.6). Twelve patients had a family history of drug allergy. The average time to onset of signs of anaphylaxis compared to the start of treatment was 9.52 days [1–26 days], the average time to onset of signs of anaphylaxis compared to the last drug intake was 49minutes [10-240minutes]. After excluding 2 patients in whom the allergological assessment was carried out after 20 years, the average time taken to perform the allergological assessment was 8.59 months. The drugs incriminated were: beta-lactams (n=29), anti-tuberculosis drugs (n=9), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=4), general anesthetics (n=6) and acetaminophen (n=6). The subsequent course of action was to eliminate the offending drug in 45 patients, and ultra-rapid desensitization to anti-tuberculosis drugs in 9 patients. ConclusionDrug-induced severe anaphylaxis is not rare. The identification of the offending drug makes it possible to avoid it and to offer alternatives to this treatment.

Latin American anaphylaxis registry

BackgroundRecent data about clinical features, triggers and management of anaphylaxis in Latin America is lacking. ObjectiveTo provide updated and extended data on anaphylaxis in this region. MethodAn online questionnaire was used, with 67 allergy units involved from 12 Latin-American countries and Spain. Among data recorded, demographic information, clinical features, severity, triggering agents, and treatment were received. ResultsEight hundred and seventeen anaphylactic reactions were recorded. No difference in severity, regardless of pre-existing allergy or asthma history was found. Drug induced anaphylaxis (DIA) was most frequent (40.6%), followed by food induced anaphylaxis (FIA) (32.9%) and venom induced anaphylaxis (VIA) (12%). FIA and VIA were more common in children-adolescents. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) were the most frequent drugs involved. Milk (61.1% of FIA) and egg (15.4% of FIA) in children, and shellfish (25.5% of FIA), fresh fruits (14.2% of FIA), and fish (11.3% of FIA) in adults were the most common FIA triggers. Fire ants were the most frequent insect triggers, and they induced more severe reactions than triggers of FIA and DIA (p < 0.0001). Epinephrine was used in 43.8% of anaphylaxis episodes. After Emergency Department treatment, epinephrine was prescribed to 13% of patients. ConclusionsDrugs (NSAIDs and BLA), foods (milk and egg in children and shellfish, fruits and fish in adults) and fire ants were the most common inducers of anaphylaxis. Epinephrine was used in less than half of the episodes emphasizing the urgent need to improve dissemination and implementation of anaphylaxis guidelines.

Drug-induced Anaphylaxis.

Drug hypersensitivity is increasing worldwide as the consumption of drug is increasing. Many clinical presentations of drug hypersensitivity are complex and take place in the setting of illness and/or polypharmacotherapy. To review the most recent findings in the diagnosis and management of immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions. Studies were selected based on their relevance, originality and date of publication. The understanding of endotypes, biomarkers and phenotypes has improved the categorization of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. In this review, we discussed the short- and long-term management of anaphylaxis with a special focus on in vivo and in vitro diagnostic methods. Moreover, the clinical management of drug-induced anaphylaxis, the role of hidden allergens and the importance of delabeling are discussed. Endophenotyping is crucial to correctly diagnose and treat patients with immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions, preventing future episodes through drug desensitization.

Professional Liability in Anaphylactic Shock Cases: Case Report

Drug-induced fatal anaphylaxis is a common challenge in the last period because of the claim of medical malpractice in these cases. Medical malpractice emerges usually during drug administration by the healthcare provider because of the failure to recognize the allergic condition or failure to apply precautions regarding preventive measures or failure to apply appropriate resuscitation measures at a suitable time for saving the patient’s life. So, the current presentation of case reports aims to show the professional liability of healthcare providers during dealing with anaphylactic shock in two different situations. Therefore, the job description of every involved healthcare provider should be outlined based on the determination of the legal and professional rules to identify any healthcare provider who breached the duty. In addition, the pillars of professional liability should be recognized while dealing with these medical malpractice issues and different medical errors in cases of anaphylactic shock. Thus, the role of the forensic expert is an application of the mentioned rules to identify shortcomings aspects that lead to medical malpractice wherein medical errors may be caused by a shortage of medical knowledge, lack of care, workplace disorganization, or miscommunication among healthcare providers or with the patient besides an unsuitable workplace environment.

Different phenotypes of drug-induced anaphylaxis-Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry.

Drugs are a frequent cause of severe anaphylactic reactions. Here, we analyze a large dataset on drug induced anaphylaxis regarding elicitors, risk factors, symptoms, and treatment. Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry (2007-2019) with 1815 reported cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis were studied accordingly. Drugs are the third most frequent cause of anaphylaxis reported in the Anaphylaxis Registry. Among the eliciting groups of drugs analgesics and antibiotics were far most often reported. Female and senior patients were more frequently affected, while the number of children with DIA was low. DIA patients had symptoms affecting the skin and mucous membranes (n=1525, 84.02%), the respiratory (n=1300, 71.63%), the cardiovascular (n=1251, 68.93%) and the gastrointestinal system (n=549, 30.25%). Drugs caused significant more severe reactions, occurred more often in medical facilities and led to increased hospitalization rates in comparison to food and insect venom induced anaphylaxis. Adrenaline was used more often in patients with DIA than in anaphylaxis due to other causes. Patients with skin symptoms received more antihistamines and corticosteroids in the acute treatment, while gastrointestinal symptoms led to less adrenaline use. The study contributes to a better understanding of DIA, with a large number of cases from Europe supporting previous data, e.g., analgesics and antibiotics being the most frequent culprits for DIA. Female gender and higher age are relevant risk factors and despite clear recommendations, the emergency treatment of DIA is not administered according to the guidelines.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced anaphylaxis infrequent in 388 patients with mastocytosis: A two-center retrospective cohort study.

Anaphylaxis is a well-known feature of mastocytosis, particularly in relation to hymenoptera venom stings. It is therefore hypothesized that mastocytosis patients may also be predisposed to severe hypersensitivity reactions to certain medications including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). For this reason, these patients are usually discouraged from using these drugs. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence and evaluate the severity of NSAID-related hypersensitivity reactions among patients with mastocytosis. A retrospective study was conducted among a total of 388 (≥18 years old) consecutive patients from two independent European mastocytosis centers, in Sweden and Italy. Patients underwent a thorough allergy work-up where self-reported NSAID-hypersensitivity reactions were re-evaluated by an allergist in the first cohort (202 patients) and results were validated in the second cohort (186 patients). Overall frequency of NSAID-hypersensitivity was 11.3% in the total study cohort. Most patients reacted with cutaneous symptoms (89%), whereas severe hypersensitivity reactions were infrequent with only 11 patients (2.8%) experiencing anaphylaxis. All NSAID-related hypersensitivity reactions had occurred before mastocytosis was diagnosed. There was no difference between the groups regarding gender, baseline tryptase levels or presence of atopy, asthma/rhinitis. Our study indicates an approximate 4-fold increased prevalence of NSAID hypersensitivity among mastocytosis patients compared to the general population. However, most NSAID reactions were limited to the skin as the prevalence of overall anaphylaxis was infrequent. Our results support that mastocytosis patients with a known tolerance to NSAIDs can continue using these medications without special precautions, whereas those with a prior reaction to NSAIDs should undergo thorough allergy work-up, including drug challenges.

Intraoperative chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis suggesting an immunoglobulin-E-dependent mechanism indicated by basophil activation tests: two case reports

BackgroundAlthough chlorhexidine allergy has been shown to be mediated by immunoglobulin (Ig) E, few reports investigated the mechanism of chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis using basophil activation tests (BATs).Case presentationA 79-year-old man underwent cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms and high serum tryptase and histamine levels. Skin tests showed positive results only for chlorhexidine. Subsequently, BATs demonstrated that the causative agent was likely chlorhexidine. The inhibitory effect of wortmannin, an inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, on basophil activation suggested an IgE-dependent mechanism underlying chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis.An 89-year-old man underwent inguinal hernioplasty under general anesthesia. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms and high serum tryptase and histamine levels. Skin tests and BATs with wortmannin were performed, showing similar results to case 1.ConclusionsBATs suggested an IgE-dependent mechanism for chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis and might be useful for investigating the mechanisms underlying drug-induced anaphylaxis.

TRAUMATIC “ANGIOEDEMA”: EXTENSIVE SUBCUTANEOUS EMPHYSEMA MASQUERADING AS ANGIOEDEMA

<h3>Introduction</h3> COVID 19 pandemic related precautions have resulted in suboptimal physical examination of the patients which may have affected the patient care and training of medical professionals. We present a case of a patient whose subcutaneous emphysema was misdiagnosed as angioedema. <h3>Case Description</h3> 25 years old female with cerebral palsy and developmental delay presented to hospital in June, 2020 with asymmetric left facial and periorbital swelling which developed an hour after her regular Depo-Provera injection. She had elevated blood pressure readings with tachycardia without hives, respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms. Facial swelling did not improve after IM epinephrine, IV steroids and antihistamines. Flexible laryngoscopy noted mild edema of lingual surface of the epiglottis. Allergy service was consulted to evaluate for drug-induced anaphylaxis. Our physical examination revealed significant asymmetric periorbital edema, neck and chest swelling with distant breath sounds and distinct palpable crepitus. Serum Trytpase and C1-Estrase inhibitor levels were normal at 3.2ug/L and 28 mg/dl, respectively. Emergent imaging was recommended, which demonstrated multiple rib fractures, pneumomediastinum with extensive chest wall subcutaneous emphysema tracking to extra-cranial soft tissue. Patient was intubated and chest tube was placed due to concerns for airway compromise. She stayed in ICU for one week before being discharged to home. <h3>Discussion</h3> Facial edema, concerning for angioedema, is potentially life threatening condition and an allergic reaction should be higher on the differential diagnoses. Our case represents a learning opportunity regarding other potentially life threatening conditions that can mimic angioedema, requiring higher index of clinical suspicion and thorough physical examination.

Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update

Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update

Risk factors of anaphylaxis in Korea: Identifying drug-induced anaphylaxis culprits using big data.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis is a fatal medical condition whose incidence has been increasing continuously. Due to differences between genetic backgrounds and health care systems, different populations may be prone to various causative drugs. Using the Health Insurance Service and Assessment Service database, we investigated culprit drugs for drug-induced anaphylaxis and common medication risk factors in the Korean general population. We collected medical prescription histories within 3 days prior to anaphylaxis between January 2011 and December 2019 from the HIRA database. Designed as a case-crossover study, the attributable visits (case visits) were matched to medical visits (control visits) with the drug sets for each visit. We collected a list of medication risk factors for anaphylaxis and calculated the risk ratio of each agent using the chi-square test and conditional logistic regression analysis. A total of 159,473 individuals were listed in the database with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis in the HIRA from 2011 to 2019. After evaluating the suitability of control visits for matching with a case visit, 8168 subjects and 767 drugs were analyzed. The chi-square analysis identified 31 drugs as potential risk factors for drug-induced anaphylaxis in Korea. After applying a conditional logistic regression analysis for each agent, 5 drugs were found to be the common medication risk factors for drug-induced anaphylaxis: cefaclor, iopromide, iohexol, iomeprol, and tolperisone. We found 5 medication risk factors that showed the highest risk of drug-induced anaphylaxis and their degree of risk using an objective methodology in the Korean general population.

Economic burden of drug-induced anaphylaxis: what can we do better?

This systematic review evaluates published data related to the economic burden of drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) to understand preventive cost saving measures that could reduce the burden of these conditions. Although DIA has a relevant societal impact, there are limited and heterogenous available data related to its cost. Direct costs related to the management of acute phase of DIA was estimated by $529.6 to $3125, depending on the number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations, emergency kits and transports in ambulance. Direct costs of investigations of DIA varied from $288 to $2292.95 and the desensitization was estimated by $6796. Main variables for this were: personnel, allergy screening procedures, medical consumables and space cost. The mean indirect cost was based on a mean absenteeism of 3 days per DIA corresponding to $381.2. More than reviewing the published data, we were able to identify variables that, if correctly managed, can reduce the economic burden of DIA, such as adjusting the timing of referral and etiological diagnosis, identification of potential risk and/or co-factors, correct written recommendations to patients. The evidence presented highlights the need of optimization of healthcare patients to patients suffering from DIA.

Global patterns of drug allergy-induced fatalities: a wake-up call to prevent avoidable deaths.

To identify patterns and key issues though a systematic review in order to support prevention strategies and reduce avoidable deaths related to drug-induced anaphylaxis (DAF). DAF rate has been estimated by 0.13-0.53/106 population/year. General global trends of DAF are increasing over time, mostly occurring at healthcare settings (62%) with a similar gender distribution and an average age of 53 years. Antibiotics, anaesthetics, radio-contrast media and NSAIDs were the most frequently implicated agents. Main comorbidities were personal history of drug allergy, cardiovascular diseases and asthma. Main manifestations were cardiovascular and respiratory commitments. Use of adrenaline is mentioned in only 29% of the articles. DAF is increasing worldwide and most cases are iatrogenic. This first systematic review of DAF identified key gaps and served as a wake-up call to prevent avoidable deaths. Phenotype at risk for DAF was represented by patients aged more than 54 years, with personal history of drug allergy/hypersensitivity with no or incomplete allergological work-up, cardiovascular disease and/or asthma with need of hospitalization and/or frequent healthcare assistance. Additional risk for those who need frequent use of intravenous antibiotics and/or undergoing surgery or image investigation with radiocontrast media.

Psychological Distress and Drug Provocation Test-Related Anxiety Levels of Pediatric Patients and Their Parents.

Background: Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are the gold standard for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR). To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous study reporting DPT-related anxiety levels in children and their parents. This study aimed to determine the difference in pre- and post-DPT anxiety levels of parents and children who were informed of the possibility of another DHR during the DPT, and to evaluate the relationship between parental psychological distress and anxiety levels. Methods: The study included children who underwent DPT in our clinic between July 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, and accompanying parents who consented to participate. Age-appropriate State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scales were used to assess levels of state and trait anxiety in the patients and parents. The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) was used to screen for psychological symptoms in parents. Results: Data were collected from the parents of 69 children who underwent DPTs. The patients' median age was 7.28 (interquartile range: 4.52-10.06) and their parents' mean age was 35.28 ± 5.38 years. Anxiety-related data were collected from 21 pediatric patients. The children and parents had higher state anxiety scores before DPT compared to after DPT. There was a positive correlation between the parents' trait anxiety and pre-DPT state anxiety scores. In addition, parental pre-DPT state anxiety scores were positively correlated with SCL-90-R general severity index, somatization, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and depression subscale scores. Conclusion: The risk of allergic reaction in DPT may cause anxiety. A high level of parental anxiety before DPT, which gradually decreased after negative test results, was associated with history of drug-induced anaphylaxis in their children and high trait anxiety. Appropriate evaluation of patients and parents before DPT and providing detailed information may be important to reduce this anxiety.

COVID-19 vaccination in the setting of mastocytosis—Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine is safe and well tolerated

COVID-19 vaccination in the setting of mastocytosis—Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine is safe and well tolerated

The Etiology, Clinical Features, and Severity of Anaphylaxis in Childhood by Age Groups

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially fatal systemic hypersensitivity reaction with an acute onset. Etiology, clinical presentation, risk factors, comorbidities of pediatric anaphylaxis may vary depending on the age of the child. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the etiology, clinical features, management of anaphylaxis in infants, preschoolers, school-age children, and adolescents. Methods: The patients presenting with anaphylaxis between January 2015 and December 2018 in a single pediatric tertiary hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, the triggers, sign-symptoms, severity, and the management of anaphylaxis were recorded. Results: 239 patients were included in the study, 62.3% of whom were boys. The median age was 6.7 (IQR 2.33–12.83) years. 23.8% of the patients were infants, 15.5% were preschoolers, 33.5% were school-age children, and 27.2% were adolescents. Anaphylaxis mostly occurred at home. The most common causative agents were foods (39.3%), drugs (30.1%), and venoms (15.9%) of all cases. Main food allergens were cow’s milk and hen’s eggs in infants, cow’s milk and tree nuts in preschoolers, and tree nuts and legumes in school-age children. Cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) were recorded mostly with antibiotics (40.3%), followed by NSAIDs (23.6%). The primary trigger of anaphylaxis was foods in infants and preschoolers and drugs in school-age children and adolescents. There was no difference between age groups in terms of the system involved and severity. Severe anaphylaxis was more common with DIA. Adrenaline was used in 69.8% of all cases with no significant difference between age groups. Conclusion: Etiology and symptoms of anaphylaxis may differ between age groups. Raising awareness, educating patients and their parents on anaphylaxis and its management is essential.