Drug-eluting Stents Research Articles

Clinical impact of systemic inflammation across the spectrum of different high-sensitivity CRP values in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Systemic inflammation enhances atherosclerosis progression and is a well-established determinant of cardiovascular risk. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), the most widely available biomarker of inflammation, has indeed been associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, some heterogeneity exists in the threshold to define high hsCRP associated with increased cardiovascular risk, with the 2 and 3 mg/L cut-offs being used more commonly. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing PCI across the spectrum of baseline hsCRP values. Methods We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation from 2012 to 2022 at Mount Sinai Hospital (NY, USA). We excluded patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction or active cancer and those for whom baseline hsCRP was not available or was above 10 mg/L. Patients were stratified into three groups according to baseline hsCRP levels: <2.0, 2.0 to 3.0, and >3.0 mg/L. We estimated the risk of 12-month adverse events using the lowest hsCRP group (<2.0 mg/L) as reference. The primary endpoint was MACCE, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Secondary endpoints were MACCE individual components, target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis and bleeding. Results A total of 10,811 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 6,210 (57.4%) had hsCRP <2.0 mg/L, 1,624 (15.0%) between 2 and 3 mg/L and 2,977 (27.6%) >3.0 mg/L. Incidence of anemia, diabetes mellitus, peripheral and cerebrovascular artery disease, atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease increased stepwise across hsCRP groups. Moreover, patients with higher hsCRP tended to present more frequently with unstable angina and higher baseline LDL cholesterol levels. As regards procedural variables, coronary artery disease severity and PCI complexity did not differ significantly across groups. When compared with patients with hsCRP < 2, hsCRP > 3 mg/L was associated with a greater adjusted risk of MACCE (4.9% vs 2.4%; HR 1.75 % CI 1.35 - 2.28), all-cause death (2.5% vs 0.9%, HR 2.34, 95%CI 1.57-3.47) and MI (2.5% vs 1.3%; HR 1.58 95%CI 1.11-2.26) (Figure 1). Risks of stroke, TVR, stent thrombosis and bleeding did not significantly differ across hsCRP groups (Table 1) Conclusions In patients undergoing PCI, elevated hsCRP values exceeding 3 mg/L exhibit a more robust association with the risk of MACCE and all-cause mortality, as compared with both hsCRP < 2.0 and between 2.0 and 3.0 mg/L. In this context, the use of hsCRP might improve the stratification of patients associated with higher inflammatory burden.

Ten-year comparative long-term outcomes of PCI versus CABG in multi-vessel coronary artery disease

Abstract Background While coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been an alternative approach. The study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of PCI versus CABG in treating patients with CAD. Methods A total of 9569 patients with CAD (age 68.60±12.24 years, 81.7% men) who underwent PCI (n=7429) or CABG (n=1635) were retrospectively recruited from January 2000 to December 2014 at a tertiary medical center. Propensity score-matched analysis were conducted. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during a 10-year follow-up duration. Results During a median follow-up duration of 6.97±4.54 years, there were 1634 deaths. Crudely, there was no difference in 10-year mortality between PCI and CABG groups (26.3% vs. 23.02%; P= 0.135). After accounting for age, renal function, previous myocardial infarction, and heart failure, the 10-year survival rate remained similar between the two groups. The subgroup analysis showed inferior outcomes with PCI than CABG if any bare-mental stent (BMS) was used (10-year risk of mortality 36.1% vs. 24.7%; P= 0.032). In addition, CABG was also associated with better survival than PCI in diabetic subjects (10-year risk of mortality 24.9% vs. 30.9%, P=0.086). In contrast, PCI demonstrated superior long-term benefits in subjects with left main (LM) and single-vessel disease, whereas CABG showed better long-term outcomes for individuals with left main (LM) and multivessel disease. Conclusions PCI demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes with CABG in treating subjects with CAD when purely drug-eluting stents were used. Any use of BMS is not encouraged to treat patients with left main or multivessel CAD. In contrast, PCI was related to superior long-term survival among patients with LM and single-vessel disease.

Impact of procedural and patient-related risks on 1-year outcomes for patients with 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent implantation

Abstract Background While early de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short DAPT are becoming standard treatments for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the impact of procedural and patient-related risks on clinical outcomes of PCI for patients receiving the above DAPT regimen has never been established. Purpose To evaluate the impact of procedural and patient-related risk factors on 1-year cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) implantation. Methods Using data from the multi-centre regional-wide REIWA registry, we assessed clinical outcomes according to each risk factor and compared between patients with and without either procedural or patient-related risk factors. The primary end point was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major or minor bleeding), which was same with that for STOPDAPT-2 trial. Procedural risk was defined as a factor of complex PCI which was previously published and included the follows: treatment of three vessels, three or more lesions, three or more stents, bifurcation with two stents, long stenting (total stent length >60 mm) and target of chronic total occlusion. Additionally, patient-related risk factors were defined as chronic kidney disease, anaemia, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure and advanced age (≧75 years). Results Among 1,202 patients treated BP-DES with 1-month DAPT, 276 patients (23.0%) had at least one procedural factors and 510 patients (42.4%) had one or more patient-related risks. Compared with each risk factor, patients with patient-related risk factor were more likely to have higher NACE rates, whereas low NACE rates were observed in patients with each procedural risk factor (Figure 1). In addition, during 1-year follow-up, patients with patient-related risk factors had a significantly higher incidence of NACE compared with patients without such risks (4.90 % vs. 1.73 %, p = 0.002) (Figure 2). However, no significant differences in NACE rates was observed between patients with and without procedural risk factors (2.54% vs. 3.24%, p = 0.555). Conclusion In patients undergoing BP-DES implantation and 1 month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, patient-related risk factors had an impact on 1-year clinical outcomes, while procedural risk factors no longer had small impact on those outcomes.

Impact of symptom-to-balloon time on long-term prognosis: a 3-year follow-up study in non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with complex lesions

Abstract Background Because no data are available, we compared clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), stratified based on the presence of complex lesions, according to symptom-to-balloon time (SBT, <48 h versus ≥48 h), undergoing newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Methods From the KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)-NIH dataset, a total of 4373 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI were enrolled and stratified into two groups: the complex group (2106 patients; SBT <48 h, 1365; SBT ≥48 h, 741) and the non-complex group (2267 patients, SBT <48 h, 1573; SBT ≥48 h, 694). The primary outcome was the 3-year all-cause death rate, and the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death (CD), recurrent MI, and any repeat revascularization. Results The rates of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.656; p = 0.009) and cardiac death (aHR, 0.633; p = 0.037) in the complex group, and the rate of all-cause death (aHR, 0.773; p = 0.036) in the total study population, were significantly lower for patients with SBT <48 h than for those with SBT ≥48 h. In the non-complex group, all clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the SBT <48 h and SBT ≥48 h groups. In the SBT ≥48 h group, the complex group exhibits higher rates of all-cause death, any repeat revascularization, and MACE than those of the non-complex group Conclusions Reducing SBT was more effective in decreasing 3-year mortality in NSTEMI patients with a complex group compared to the non-complex group.

Synthetic Flavonoid 3,7-Dihydroxy-Isoflav-3-Ene (DHIF) Reduces In-Stent Restenosis in an Atherosclerotic Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic Rabbit Stent Model.

Inflammation is a major component of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and the formation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). A novel flavonoid, DHIF, attenuates reactive oxygen species and nf-κB signaling and has potential to limit ISR via antioxidant action. While current drug eluting stents (DESs) perform well in clinical practice, new therapies to prevent ISR without dependance on cytotoxic drugs are warranted. Our objective was to test whether DHIF reduces ISR in a hyperlipidemic rabbit aorta model of ISR via attenuated inflammatory responses. WHHL rabbit aortas (n = 24) were denuded. Six weeks after injury, stents were implanted into the denuded aortas. DHIF was dissolved in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and administered orally with two doses. CMC served as a control. The animals were sacrificed six weeks after stenting. ISR was evaluated from stent histomorphometry and immunohistology was used to assess the inflammatory and antiproliferative effects of the treatment. ISR was reduced from 20.9 ± 3.0% in controls to 15.2 ± 2.4% (p = 0.0009) and 16.4 ± 2.1% (p = 0.004) in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. The neointimal area covered by macrophages was 32 ± 9.3% in the controls, 17.2 ± 5.9% (p = 0.005) in the low-dose group and 19.4 ± 7.9% (p = 0.008) in the high-dose group. DHIF significantly reduces ISR and local inflammation in stented arterial regions and could be used to reduce ISR when bare metal stents are used. Targeting local inflammation in the arterial wall may provide a way to reduce ISR in a clinical setting and further studies are warranted.

Stent Underexpansion Is an Underestimated Cause of Intrastent Restenosis: Insights From RESTO Registry.

Despite improvement in devices, in-stent restenosis remains a frequent and challenging complication of percutaneous coronary interventions. The RESTO (Morphological Parameters of In-Stent Restenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT [Optical Coherence Tomography]; study NCT04268875) was a prospective multicenter registry including patients presenting with coronary syndromes related to in-stent restenosis. All patients underwent preintervention OCT analysis, which led to analysis of in-stent restenosis phenotype, number of strut layers, and presence of stent underexpansion. The primary end point was the in-stent restenosis type according to the OCT morphological classification. The 1-year incidence of target vessel failure (a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) was assessed. The study included 297 patients. The culprit stent was a drug-eluting stent in 74.2% of cases. OCT analysis revealed the presence of neoatherosclerosis in 57% (52% calcified), neointimal hyperplasia in 43% (58% homogeneous), stent underexpansion (minimal stent area <4.5 mm2) in 43%, and multiple stent layers in 30%. The prepercutaneous coronary intervention OCT analysis modified the operator's strategy for management in 30% of cases. Treatment involved drug-eluting stent implantation in 61.6% and drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in 36.1% of cases with only 63.2% optimal results. The 1-year target vessel failure incidence was 11% (95% CI, 9%-13%). Residual postpercutaneous coronary intervention stent underexpansion was associated with significantly higher target vessel failure incidence (19% [95% CI, 14%-24%] versus 7% [95% CI, 5-9], P=0.01). OCT identified neoatherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia in comparable proportions. Stent underexpansion was frequent and favored subsequent adverse clinical outcomes.

“Ostial Lesion of the Left Main Coronary Artery: PCI vs. CABG?"—A Case Report and Literature Review

For many years, coronary artery bypass grafting has been the primary method for revascularizing significant left main coronary artery disease. However, recent advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents have proven to be a viable and effective alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting for treating this condition. In this report, we present a case of a patient with ischemic heart disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Coronary angiography revealed a lesion at the ostial left main coronary artery. Following successful primary angioplasty and the placement of a drug-eluting stent, the patient’s left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from 26% to 59%, indicating a significant enhancement in cardiac function post-procedure.

First experience of implantation of a new-generation bioresorbable stent in a young patient with coronary artery disease: a case report

Implantation of a drug-eluting stent into the area of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesion is a generally accepted and widespread method of coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment. However, rigid metallic frame in artery is associated with disrupted vascular biomechanics and neointimal proliferation in response to foreign material. These processes can lead to restenosis and/or late thrombosis of the implanted stent and, as a consequence, to the recurrence of CAD symptoms, as well as to adverse cardiovascular events. One of the options for solving the above problems is the implantation of bioresorbable stents. This technique already has an evidence base and is increasingly being introduced into routine clinical practice in certain groups of patients. The article presents a case of successful balloon angioplasty and stenting of the right coronary artery with a new-generation bioresorbable stent in a young patient with CAD.

A Snapshot on Clinical Trials on Zotarolimus DES: A Repurposing Drug against Myocardial Infarction

AbstractMyocardial infarction is the permanent death (necrosis) of heart muscle caused by a lack of oxygen for an extended period of time (ischemia). Since the very first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was done 40 years ago, the science of interventional cardiology has advanced dramatically. The above progression began with a balloon catheter attached to a fixed wire, advancing to bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), second- and third-generation biodegradable polymer-based DES. Ultimately, bioabsorbable stents are still in development. Zotarolimus is a new pharmacologic therapy with a similar reprint address; for example, the antirestenosis agent sirolimus has recently been investigated as part of a stent platform combined with a biomimetic phosphorylcholine and BioLINX polymer for its biological activity, as well as its usefulness as an antiproliferative agent. Several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus drug-eluting stent (Z-DES). Medtronic Medical Devices, a global leader in medical technology (United States), and Abbot Global Health Care and Research began clinical trials on the Z-DES in 2002 and will continue through 2021 (INDIA). Endeavor (E-Zes), Resolute (R-Zes), Resolute Integrity (I-Zes), and Resolute Onyx are the different forms of Z-DES that Medtronic has tested in clinical trials. In comparison to other DES, Z-DES was found to be safe in these clinical trials done across multiple nations and in a diverse demographic. This review helps understand the overall clinical trial of Z-DES.

Use of Onyx Frontier™ for intracranial stenting in stroke patients: A multicenter retrospective study.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) carries a high risk of recurrence despite aggressive medical management. The aim of our study is to present our initial experience with the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) for AIS due to ICAD. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study describing the technical feasibility, safety, and performance of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent in patients with acute intracranial vessel occlusion due to ICAD across three comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. We included 23 patients in our study (mean age 67.3 [10.7]; females: n = 13/23, 56.5%). Most patients were Black (n = 14/23, 60.9%). The most common site of vessel occlusion was the M1 branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) (n = 14/23, 60.9%), followed by the vertebrobasilar system (n = 5/23, 21.7%), and the internal carotid artery (n = 3/23, 13.0%). Treatment with the Onyx Frontier™ stent was associated with a final mTICI score ≥2b for 100% of patients, with no vessel perforations or distal embolization. None of the patients had any restenosis or re-treatment over a median follow-up of 3.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 7.8). All cases required a single stent except for one, where two were deployed. Transfemoral access was used in most cases (n = 18/23, 78.3%), with one in-hospital death due to access site complication (n = 1/23, 4.3%). This is the largest multicenter cohort study demonstrating the feasibility and safety of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted zotarolimus-eluting stent to treat symptomatic AIS due to ICAD.

Intercoronary communication: a rare coronary anomaly.

Intercoronary communication also known as coronary arcade or coronary cascade is a rare coronary artery anomaly with an incidence of only 0.002% in patients undergoing angiography. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing this rare anomaly and highlights its clinical significance. We report a case of intercoronary communication in a 56-year-old female who presented with acute chest pain and ST-segment depression in the lateral leads. High-sensitivity troponin-T was elevated and transthoracic echocardiography revealed normal left ventricular function with no regional wall motion abnormality. Hence, the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome - non-st-elevation myocardial infarction was considered. Coronary angiography revealed a 95% focal stenosis in the major obtuse marginal artery (OM). The right coronary artery (RCA) angiogram revealed a single abnormal channel communicating the right posterolateral branch (PLV) and the distal left circumflex artery (LCX) with retrograde opacification of the proximal LCX, left main coronary artery (LMCA) and left aortic sinus. After she underwent revascularization with the drug-eluting stent to the OM. CT-coronary angiography confirmed the presence of intercoronary communication (ICC) between the right posterolateral branch and the distal LCX artery. No active intervention was done for the ICC. Over a year of follow-up, our patient remained asymptomatic. Angiographically and anatomically, collaterals and intercoronary communications should be differentiated. Obstructive coronary artery disease leads to the development of collaterals, which are typically less than 1mm in diameter, multiple and tortuous. However, ICC tends to be single and straight, usually seen without obstructive disease with unidirectional or bidirectional flow. Histologically, collaterals consist of endothelium supported by poorly organized collagen, muscle and elastic fibers. Meanwhile, ICCs resemble epicardial vessels in that they have a well-defined muscular layer. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing this rare coronary anomaly and distinguishing it from collaterals to help in accurate diagnosis. Although they can provide an efficient blood supply to the jeopardized myocardium and can aid as a channel during coronary interventions, they can also cause myocardial ischemia by coronary steal.

First case report of a percutaneous coronary intervention with intracoronary lithotripsy in a heavily calcified and tortuous right coronary artery using the R-One+ robotic system

Abstract Background Advancement in interventional techniques has significantly improved the ability of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat complex coronary artery disease. Despite these advancements, coronary artery calcification poses a substantial challenge during PCI, contributing to increased risks of procedural complications, prolonged procedure duration, an increase in radiation exposure dose for both patients and physicians. Recently, robotic PCI has emerged, allowing physicians to remotely control and deliver wires and catheters, leading to a notable reduction of the operator radiation exposure and a decrease in the risk of operator physical injuries such as back pain. Case summary We report the first robotic PCI with the R-One+™ robotic system using intracoronary lithotripsy for lesion preparation of two heavily calcified lesions in a tortuous right coronary artery of a 60-year old male patient followed by double drug-eluting stent implantation. Discussion Robotic PCI with the R-One+™ system can not only manage wires, balloons or stent systems but can also precisely position more bulky catheters such as intracoronary lithotripsy catheters to the target site even in the presence of a tortuous access.

Contemporary Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Angioplasty: A Comprehensive Review.

The interventional treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) has undergone significant improvements thanks to technological innovations. Nowadays, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is the standard of care for the treatment of CAD. Nevertheless, the non-negligible incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and suboptimal results in various anatomical settings has led to the development of drug-coated balloons (DCBs). DCBs are catheter-based balloons whose surface is coated with an anti-proliferative drug (mainly Paclitaxel or Sirolimus) loaded onto the balloon surface with different technologies and dose concentrations. In the beginning, these devices were used for the treatment of ISR showing an excellent efficacy profile in the inhibition of intimal hyperplasia. Subsequently, several studies evaluated their use in other angiographical and clinical contexts such as de novo lesions, small vessel disease, diffuse coronary disease, bifurcation lesions, acute coronary syndromes, high-bleeding risk and diabetic patients. This comprehensive review aims to describe the main DCB platforms on the market, their fields of application with the main supporting studies and their future perspectives.

ELLIS Study: Comparative Analysis of Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty and Intravascular Lithotripsy on Drug-Eluting Stent as Assessed by Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Stent underexpansion is a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention, critically impacting patient outcomes. While excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) are increasingly used to address this issue, their full impact on the integrity of drug-eluting stents remains unclear, raising concerns about their safety and efficacy. This in vitro study assessed the effects of ELCA and IVL on the structural integrity of drug-eluting stents using scanning electron microscopy. Nine stents, 5 Onyx Frontier (with durable circumferential polymer coating) and 4 Cre8 (polymer-free), were implanted in a 3-dimensional coronary artery simulator following standardized protocols. After implantation, treatments with saline-ELCA, contrast-ELCA, IVL, and high-pressure balloon dilatation were applied. A comprehensive evaluation of the stent surface was performed at 60-fold magnification. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed significant differences in polymer damage between the techniques. High-pressure balloon dilatation and contrast-ELCA exhibited substantial polymer fragmentation and detachment compared with IVL, saline-ELCA, and conventional dilatation. High-pressure balloon dilatation demonstrated the highest incidence of polymer shaving and overcoating. No significant alterations were observed in polymer-free stents, regardless of the technique used. IVL and saline-ELCA applied immediately after stent implantation produce minimal polymer damage, whereas high-pressure balloon dilatation and contrast-ELCA cause significant damage to the polymer coating. The integrity of polymer-free drug-eluting stent appears stable regardless of the technique used. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications.

Long-term efficacy of drug-coated balloon-based treatment for de novo left anterior descending artery disease

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are increasingly utilized in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but their effectiveness in coronary artery disease (CAD) needs further exploration. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of a DCB-based strategy for de novo left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease. Patients with de novo LAD lesions treated with DCB alone or combined with drug-eluting stents (DES) and were retrospectively enrolled from 2010 to 2023 (n = 268). The comparator group consisted of patients treated with second-generation DES from a Korean multicenter registry (n = 4,147). The primary endpoint was three-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion thrombosis, and major bleeding. In the DCB-based group (n = 268), 218 (81.3%) received DCB-only, while 50 (18.7%) underwent a hybrid approach. After propensity score-matching of 243 paired subjects, baseline characteristics were balanced. The DCB-based PCI reduced overall stent burden by 86.7% and significantly lowered the risk of MACE at three years compared to DES-only PCI (4.5% vs. 7.6%, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.90; p = 0.020). The most significant reduction was in major bleeding. The DCB-based approach offers an alternative to DES-only strategy for LAD PCI by reducing three-year MACE risk, supporting its use in treating de novo CAD.

A case report of acute myocardial infarction with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) affecting the lungs, liver, and brain. Owing to its rarity and diagnostic challenges, early identification is often elusive. Underdiagnosis and prolonged diagnostic delays are prevalent. Here, we present the case of a 63-year-old male who presented with chest pain and was diagnosed with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Subsequently, he underwent placement of a drug-eluting stent in the right coronary artery (RCA). However, recurrent postoperative epistaxis resulted in severe anemia, prompting further investigation leading to the diagnosis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia through comprehensive medical history and genetic testing. Future studies are warranted to evaluate reperfusion strategies in HHT patients presenting with myocardial infarction.

Early vascular healing after neXt-generation drug-eluting stent implantation in Patients with non-ST elevation acute Coronary syndrome: a randomized optical coherence Tomography imaging study (EXPECT).

Early vascular healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with better outcomes and lower incidence of in-stent thrombosis. To examine vascular healing response in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus angiography alone. Sixty patients were randomized 1:1:1 to OCT-guided PCI with 3-month OCT follow-up (O3 group, n = 20), angiography-guided PCI with 3-month OCT follow-up (A3 group, n = 20), or angiography-guided PCI with 6-month OCT follow-up (A6 group, n = 20). The primary endpoint was the proportion of covered struts at 3- or 6-month follow-up. The proportion of covered struts in the O3 group was significantly higher than in the A3 group (95.2% vs. 92.3%, p < 0.001), but lower than in the A6 group (95.2% vs. 97.4%, p < 0.001). The O3 group had a lower proportion of incomplete strut apposition (ISA) than the A3 group (0.46% vs. 0.76%, p = 0.006), and higher than the A6 group (0.46% vs. 0.27%, p = 0.018) at follow-up. The optimal cut-off value of ISA after implantation of DES for predicting stent coverage at 3 and 6-month follow-up was 200μm and 308μm, respectively. Only one patient experienced target lesion revascularization in the A3 group during a 3-year clinical follow-up. In patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI with DES, OCT guidance achieved higher strut coverage compared with angiography guidance at 3-month follow-up. However, the difference in the strut coverage between the OCT-guided group and the angiography-guided group at 6 months indicates that the degree of endothelialization may be more time-dependent instead of invasive device guidance.

Renal Function-Stratified Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - Post Hoc Analysis From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), remains unknown. We conducted a prespecified post hoc analysis of the HOST-IDEA trial, randomizing patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES to 3- to 6-month or 12-month DAPT. In all, 1,997 patients were grouped by their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): high (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2), intermediate (60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF) and major bleeding. The low eGFR group had the highest rates of NACE, TLF, and major bleeding compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.001). Rates of NACE were similar in the 3- to 6-month and 12-month DAPT in the high (2.9% vs. 3.2%; P=0.84), intermediate (2.1% vs. 2.8%, P=0.51), and low (8.9% vs. 9.1%; hazard ratio 0.99; P=0.97; Pinteraction=0.88) eGFR groups. TLF and major bleeding events showed similar trends. In patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES, 3- to 6-month DAPT was comparable to 12-month DAPT for clinical outcomes regardless of renal function.

Ostial left main disease tackled with a percutaneous coronary intervention using a second-generation drug-eluting stent: A case report

Abstract: The hospital emergency admitted a middle-aged male who had previously undergone stenting in the left anterior descending (LAD) and right coronary arteries due to severe central chest pain radiating to both arms. A two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiogram showed septal hypokinesia, and coronary angiography showed a 70% ostial left main (LM) stenosis. The LAD coronary artery had a patent stent, but the mid-right coronary artery had a totally occluded stent. The chest pain increased during coronary angiography, and the patient consented to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a second-generation drug-eluting stent. The patient was discharged in a stable condition. The evolution and the current approach of PCI compared to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for LM coronary disease based on randomized trials are discussed.

Long-term outcomes of DCB and DES for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in relation to the vessel size.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCB) or drug-eluting stents (DES) are well-established treatments for in-stent restenosis, however little is known about the impact of vessel size on the outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of DCB versus DES in DES in-stent restenosis depending on the vessel size. Consecutive patients with DES in-stent restenosis who underwent PCI between January 2010 and February 2018 entered the registry with a long-term follow-up. Patients who received DCB at the index procedure were compared with those who received DES in three subgroups depending on the vessel size (≤2.5 mm; 2.5-3.5 mm; >3.5 mm). Data were analyzed using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier estimator plots. Among 1,374 patients with DES in-stent restenosis, 615 were treated with DES and 759 with DCB. After propensity score matching, we analyzed 752 patients in the DES and DCB groups at a long-term follow-up. The risk of DOCE did not differ significantly between the DES and DCB groups, both in the overall population (HR 0.85; 95%CI [0.58; 1.26], log-rank p = 0.41) and when divided into small (HR 0.84; 95%CI [0.36; 1.95], log-rank p = 0.70), medium-sized (HR 0.90; 95%CI [0.49; 1.65], log-rank p = 0.73), and large-sized (HR 0.81; 95%CI [0.42; 1.53], log-rank p = 0.50) coronary arteries. The incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the overall DES population (HR 4.03; 95%CI [2.40; 6.79], log-rank p < 0.001) and subgroup of small (HR 5.54; 95%CI [1.80; 17.02], log-rank p = 0.003), medium-sized (HR 4.37; 95%CI [1.92; 9.94], log-rank p = 0.009) and large-sized coronary arteries (HR 3.26; 95%CI [1.35; 7.86], log-rank p = 0.02). DES and DCB strategies are comparable methods of treating ISR regardless of the diameter of the treated vessel in a long-term follow-up.