Drug Desensitization Research Articles

Rapid Drug Desensitization Protocol in Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to CFTR Modulator Drugs: When Every Day Counts.

Rapid Drug Desensitization Protocol in Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to CFTR Modulator Drugs: When Every Day Counts.

Successful Desensitization With ELX/TEZ/IVA

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was given US Food and Drug Administration approval based on its therapeutic benefits to treat patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who had at least 1 allele of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) with phenylalanine deleted at position 508 (F508del). The increase in genotyping studies has increased the frequency of use of CFTR modulators; however, severe allergic reactions to CFTR modulators have also been described. It is critical to avoid the offending medication and select alternative treatments while dealing with drug allergies. Drug desensitization may be taken into consideration in situations where there is no other option. This article describes home desensitization treatment for a patient with CF who developed a maculopapular rash following CFTR modulator medication. There are currently no alternative drugs for CFTR modulators, which are crucial for patients with CF, and limited experience is available with allergic reactions to these drugs. It is important to establish desensitization protocols in order to control drug reactions to CFTR modulators, which are vital for individuals with CF.

Retrospective analysis of rapid drug desensitization with biologic agents: A single center experience.

Following the increased use of biological agents, a subset of patients experiences hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). We reported our experience with rapid drug desensitization (RDD) to nine biologics (rituximab, infliximab, cetuximab, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, nivolumab, brentuximab, tocilizumab and filgrastim) and identified risk factors for breakthrough reactions (BTRs). This was a retrospective review (2013-2022) of patients with immediate HSRs to biological agents. Initial HSRs were classified as grade 1, 2, or 3 in their severity. Skin prick tests (SPT)/intradermal tests (IDT) were performed using implicated agents. The phenotypes of HSRs were defined as Type I, cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), mixed reactions (cytokine-release+type I) based on history, clinical presentations and skin tests with implicated biologicals. A 12-step RDD protocol was used. The study comprised 45 patients (F/M: 31/14, median age: 55 (range: 20-69)). Majority of the patients reacted at the first infusion (n: 29/45, 64.4%). The majority of initial HSRs were grade 3 (n: 24/45, 53.3%) and grade 2 (n: 21/45, 46.6%); none were grade 1. Initial reactions were presented as type I (n: 20/45, 44.4%), CRS (n: 12/45, 26.6%) and mixed (n: 13/45, 28.8%). A total of 258 RDDs were performed and 98.4% of them were completed successfully. BTRs occurred in 36/258 (13.9%) infusions of RDDs. There was no significant association between the BTRs and age, drug cycle, SPT and IDT positivity, gender, comorbidities, or atopy. In our experience, 98.4% of 258 RDDs to biologics were successfully completed; RDD was safe and effective for our population.

Rapid Desensitization to Antitumoral Agents. Result from a Retrospective Study, DESARCh.

Antitumoral drugs (ADs) can induce drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs). Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) protocols represent an important option to mitigate recurrent DHRs thus allowing the safe administration of ADs at therapeutic doses. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of the RDD protocols performed at our institution. The "DESARCh" study was a retrospective, observational study that included consecutive patients who underwent RDD protocols from January 2011 to December 2022 at IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria in Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy. The RDD protocol consisted of a 5-step protocol with 5 different concentrations of the drugs at 1:1, 1:10, 1:100, 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 dilution given intravenously over a 1-hour infusion each, with concentrations increasing from the most diluted to the most concentrated form, preceded by a 30-min premedication regimen. A total of 66 RDD protocols were administered to 25 female patients with ovarian (64%; n = 16/25), breast (12%; n = 3/25), endometrium (8%; n = 2/25), cervix (8%; n = 2/25), uterine (4%; n = 1/25) and fallopian tubes (4%; n = 1/25) cancers. A known history of atopy/allergy was reported by 36% (n = 9/25) of patients. Patients received RDD protocols because of DHRs to carboplatin (n = 23/66, 34.85%), paclitaxel (n = 18/66, 27.27%), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (n = 3/66, 4.55%), and trastuzumab (n = 22/66, 33.33%). DHRs were mild-moderate, severe and life-threatening in 60.72%, 28.57% and 10.71% of cases, respectively. The success rate of RDD protocols, defined as the rate of complete administration of full target dose with no breakthrough reactions, was 81.82% (n = 54/66). Success rate was lower for carboplatin compared to other drugs (65.22% vs 90.7%; P = .017678). The RDD protocol used in our institution was found to be safe, with a meaningful success rate. However, further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of DHRs and to enhance effectiveness, particularly for patients experiencing DHRs to platinum compounds. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Verona and Rovigo (Italy) with approval number 15476 on 10/03/2023 and it was registered with the Register of Observational Studies of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) (available since 31 January 2023), with ID n. 109, on 28/02/2023 (https://www.aifa.gov.it/en/registro-studi-osservazionali).

Basophil activation test is a complementary tool in the diagnosis of immediate reactions to platinum salts and taxanes.

Delabelling pathways offer confirmatory diagnosis and can prevent unnecessary second-line therapies or drug desensitization procedures after chemotherapeutic hypersensitivity reactions (CHT-HSRs). However, these pathways rely on risky invivo tests. Data on whether invitro tests could be helpful are scarce. We assessed the role of basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of HSRs to platin salts (PSs) and taxanes (TXs) in a well-defined population featuring varied endophenotypes and severities of HSRs. We conducted a 3-year-long multicentric, prospective study with 121 suspected-immediate CHT-HSR patients. The allergy workup included clinical history (initial reaction based on Type I, cytokine release syndrome, and mixed phenotype's symptoms and if unable to fit in any of these, as "indeterminate"), skin testing (ST), and drug provocation testing (DPT), provided risk assessment was favorable. Final diagnosis classified patients as "hypersensitive," "non-hypersensitive," or "inconclusive." We performed BAT using CD63 and CD203c as activation markers in patients and controls. Patients underwent DPT regardless of BAT results to prevent bias. ST positivity significantly correlated with skin involvement, Type I phenotype, cancer recurrence, and lifetime exposures before reactions. DPTs were negative in all indeterminate phenotype patients (p = .02) and those considered low-risk, whereas they were negative in 62% moderate-risk patients. 55% were confirmed as hypersensitive (mainly Type I reactions, p < .0001), 24% as non-hypersensitive (mainly TXs and indeterminate phenotypes), and 21% as inconclusive. BAT showed 79% sensitivity in Type I IgE-mediated reactions to PSs with a high correlation to ST. BAT is a promising tool for delabelling and endotyping CHT-HSRs, especially Type I reactions to PSs, possibly identifying patients at risk of positive DPT. ST seems useful in confirming CHT-HSRs, especially PS-induced reactions, and DPT remains the gold standard, being essential even in moderate-risk patients.

Transient Serpentine Supravenous Erythema During Rapid Drug Desensitization

Transient Serpentine Supravenous Erythema During Rapid Drug Desensitization

Drug Reactions and Desensitization to Chemotherapeutic Agents: An Overview and Case Study.

Certain chemotherapy agents have an increased potential to cause allergic reactions. These reactions can vary in severity from mild to severe, and a change in treatment may be suggested for the patient to avoid the causative.

The Role of the Allergist in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions

Chemotherapy-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions are one of the main problems for oncology physicians and chemotherapy patients. The hypersensitivity reaction can either cause the cessation of the first-line treatment and it may impair the final result and impede or decrease the chances for successful treatment. Chemotherapy drugs are foreign substances that are capable to inducing the various hypersensitivity reactions from mild cutaneous symptoms to severe respiratory distress and cardiovascular collapse. The original Gell and Coomb’s classification categorizes hypersensitivity reactions into four types according to the type of immune response and the effector mechanism responsible for cell and tissue injury. The most common reactions are caused by platinum compounds, taxanes, epipodophyllotoxins, and asparaginase. The use of biologicals is increasing now, and these drugs are frequent causes of hypersensitivity reactions too. Skin testing is a method of diagnosing drug hypersensitivity, but it has not been developed enough in the field of medical oncology where a variety of the antineoplastic agents may be caused hypersensitivity reactions. Drug desensitization is the benefitial therapy in patients with chemotherapyinduced hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs. This is useful for chemotherapy patients with malignancies and hematological diseases when no comparable alternative is available.

Prevention of allergic reactions during oxaliplatin desensitization through inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase

BackgroundAcute infusion reactions to oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic used to treat gastrointestinal cancers, are observed in about 20% of patients. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) protocols often allow the continuation of oxaliplatin in patients with no alternative options. Break-through symptoms including anaphylaxis can still occur during RDDs. ObjectiveTo evaluate if pretreatment with acalabrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can prevent anaphylaxis during a RDD in a patient sensitized to oxaliplatin. MethodsA 52-year-old male with locally advanced gastric carcinoma developed anaphylaxis during his 5th cycle of oxaliplatin. As he required 6 additional cycles to complete his curative-intent treatment regimen, he underwent RDD to oxaliplatin but still developed severe acute reactions. The risks and benefits of adding acalabrutinib prior to and during a RDD, were reviewed and he elected to proceed. ResultsWith acalabrutinib taken prior to and during the RDD, the patient was able to tolerate oxaliplatin RDDs without complication. Consistent with its mechanism of action, acalabrutinib completely blocked the patient’s positive skin prick response to oxaliplatin. Acalabrutinib did not alter the percentage of circulating basophils (1.24% versus 0.98%) prior to the RDD but protected from basopenia (0.74% versus 0.09%) after the RDD. Acalabrutinib was associated with a drastic reduction in the ability of basophils to upregulate CD63 in vitro following incubation with oxaliplatin (0.11% versus 2.38%) or polyclonal anti-human IgE antibody (0.08% versus 44.2%). ConclusionsFive doses of acalabrutinib 100mg orally twice daily starting the evening 2 days before and continuing through a RDD allowed a sensitized patient to successfully and safely receive oxaliplatin.

Correction: Drug Desensitization Update: Key Concepts and Mechanisms

Correction: Drug Desensitization Update: Key Concepts and Mechanisms

Severity of the initial acute drug reaction does not necessarily predict the severity of symptoms that may develop during a rapid drug desensitization to a platinum-based agent.

Severity of the initial acute drug reaction does not necessarily predict the severity of symptoms that may develop during a rapid drug desensitization to a platinum-based agent.

Single center experience with more than 600 drug desensitization in Colombia.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) have a significant impact on both, patient and their treating physicians; it is considered a public health concern. The history of allergy to drugs, limits therapeutic options and will lead to the use of more expensive and potentially less effective options. Drug desensitization (DD) is considered as a procedure with a positive impact on the prognosis of the patient's disease. The objective of this study is to describe the experience with a substantial number of drugs desensitization in a fourth level center in Cali, Colombia. An observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted. Patients with DHRs who underwent a standardized institutional DD protocol, between March of 2012 and May of 2023, were included. Two hundred forty-one patients were included. The median age was 47.8 years (4-88). One hundred fifty-six (64.7%) were women, including three who were pregnant. A total of 641 DDs were performed. The most frequent groups of drugs for which the desensitization was performed were monoclonal antibodies in 83 patients (34.4%), chemotherapeutic agents in 53 (21.6%), NSAIDs in 44 (18.2%), and antibiotics in 42 (17.4%). Eighty-seven patients (36.1%) experienced hypersensitivity to the culprit drug on first exposure, while 154 (63.9%) exhibited reactions during subsequent cycles. The main clinical presentation that gave rise to desensitization was anaphylaxis in 125 patients (51.8%), followed by cutaneous symptoms in 106 patients (44%). The predominant observed endophenotype was type 1 in 188 patients (78.3%), followed by mixed type in 46 patients (19.2%). Breakthrough reactions were observed in 50 patients (20.7%). Tolerance to DD was achieved in 636 of the procedures (99.2%), allowing the continuity of treatment of choice for the underlying disease. Most desensitized patients were women with type I reactions. Monoclonal antibodies were the most frequent culprit drugs. DD in patients with DHRs is a useful, safe and effective procedure. The administration of the implicated drug had a positive impact on the course of the disease in these patients.

Delayed drug hypersensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drug: a new desensitization scheme.

Tuberculosis is a communicable illness and one of the leading causes of death, especially in developing countries like Turkey. One of the problems that must be managed well in the treatment of tuberculosis is drug hypersensitivity. The first-line agents are very important for the success of treatment. Alternative drugs are more toxic and less successful in treatment. Therefore, it is very important to be able to include first-line drugs in the post-hypersensitivity regimen. At this point, the success of desensitization comes to the fore. There are fewer studies on rapid drug desensitization in delayed-type drug hypersensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drugs. The primary aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in drug-sensitive cases; the secondary aim was to determine the appropriate treatment management. This was a retrospective study. Demographic features, tuberculosis diagnostic indicator, clinical signs of developing a hypersensitivity reaction, reaction time, desensitization scheme and treatment were evaluated. A total of 41 tuberculosis cases were included in the study. Twenty-six of the cases were male; mean age (mean ± SD) 55.44 ±16.93 years; 70.7% of them were diagnosed bacteriologically; 70.7% of them were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis. The most common skin finding was maculopapular drug eruption. The development time (mean ± SD) of the reaction in patients who developed a reaction was 34.93 ±39.62 days. The responsible agent could be identified in 15 reactions. The most common drug responsible for the reaction was rifampicin. Successful desensitization was achieved in 19 (46.3%) cases with the sensitive regimen. The duration of treatment was 8.97 ±3.44 months. When evaluated in terms of treatment results, cure and treatment completion were accepted as treatment success. In this case, 30 (73.2%) patients successfully completed the treatment. Our study is one of the largest series in which delayed-type hypersensitivity develops under tuberculosis treatment and the desensitization scheme is recommended. A practical, easy desensitization scheme had been shared in this paper.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Taxanes: A Multicenter Study for Outcomes and Safety of Rapid Drug Desensitization.

Taxanes can cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which pose a significant challenge in the treatment of malignancies. Patients who are eligible for rapid drug desensitization (RDD) can continue treatment; however, some patients experience breakthrough reactions (BTRs). Data about risk factors for BTRs during RDDs in patients with HSRs to taxanes are limited. This was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with immediate-HSRs to taxanes. Initial HSRs were classified as grade 1, 2, or 3 based on severity. Prick/intradermal skin tests were performed with implicated taxanes. A 12-step protocol was used during RDD. The study comprised 75 patients (F/M: 63/12, mean age 49.92 ± 11.72 years, 43 HSRs to paclitaxel, 32 HSRs to docetaxel). The majority of reactions (86.7%) occurred during the first or second exposure. The prevalence of drug allergy history was higher in patients with paclitaxel HSR than in those with docetaxel HSR, although it was not statistically significant (23.3% vs. 6.3%). The initial HSRs were mostly grade 2 (n = 50, 66.7%) or grade 3 (n = 22, 29.3%). Skin tests with implicated taxanes were done on 48 patients, and the rate of positive response in patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 initial HSRs were 50%, 17.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. . A total of 255 RDDs were completely performed, although BTRs occurred in 27 (grade 1, 55.6%; grade 2, 40.7%; grade 3, 3.7%). There were no statistically significant correlations between the risk of BTR and age, drug cycle, gender, positivity of skin test or atopy. The step reduction was successfully done on 9 eligible patients with mild or moderate HSRs during the 12-step RDDs. Our experience demonstrates a 100% success rate in completing the 255 RDDs for taxanes, affirming the safety and efficacy of the RDD within the study population.

Hypersensitivity reactions with first-line antituberculosis drugs and outcomes of rapid desensitizations

BackgroundData about drug hypersensitivity reactions with first-line antituberculosis drugs and their management is limited. Rapid drug desensitization seems to be an appropriate management. ObjectiveEvaluate the efficacy of the rapid desensitization protocols in patients who had a reaction phenotypically compatible with immediate-type drug hypersensitivity with first-line antituberculosis drugs and identify possible risk factors of breakthrough reactions during the protocols. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of active tuberculosis patients who had a reaction phenotypically compatible with immediate-type drug hypersensitivity with first-line antituberculosis drugs and underwent desensitization with the drugs used during the reaction. Characteristics of drug hypersensitivity and breakthrough reactions, and outcomes of rapid desensitizations were recorded. ResultsOne hundred and seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Most of the initial reactions (n = 132, 73.7%) occurred within the first week of treatment and were mild (n = 146, 81.6%). A total of 690 desensitizations were performed. Desensitizations were successfully completed without any breakthrough reaction in 103 (57.5%) patients and in 29 of 36 (80.6%) patients after a breakthrough reaction. The overall success of desensitizations were found to be 95% (132 of 139 patients). Most of the breakthrough reactions (84%) were mild. Sixteen patients had breakthrough reactions with multiple drugs. Although pyrazinamide was the most common culprit of breakthrough reactions and had the lowest desensitization success, it had the highest rate of a single breakthrough reaction (p < 0.001). Timing of the initial reaction and concomitant breakthrough reaction with ethambutol were found to have increased the risk for breakthrough reaction caused by rifampicin (p = 0.017 and p = 0.010 respectively). ConclusionThe rapid desensitization protocols used in this study provide a successful and effective management of the patients with a reaction phenotypically compatible with immediate-type drug hypersensitivity with first-line antituberculosis drugs.

Drug Desensitization Update: Key Concepts and Mechanisms

Drug Desensitization Update: Key Concepts and Mechanisms

A novel 2-step process for the management of inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels

BackgroundInpatient beta-lactam allergy labels may increase the unnecessary use of aztreonam and non–beta-lactam antibiotics, which can then lead to more adverse events and increased health care costs, ObjectiveTo assess the impact of a novel 2-step process (medication history review followed by risk stratification) on rates of beta-lactam delabeling, aztreonam use, and desensitizations on pediatric, adult, and obstetrics inpatients at a tertiary academic center. MethodsWe prospectively collected data on 700 patients who received inpatient consultation from the Beta-Lactam Allergy Evaluation Service between August 2021 and July 2022. Patients were delabeled either by medication review alone, drug challenge alone if with a low-risk history, or penicillin skin test followed by drug challenge if with a high-risk history. Generalized linear regression modeling was used to compare aztreonam days of therapy in the intervention year with the 2 prior years. Drug desensitizations were assessed by electronic chart review. ResultsMost of the patients (n = 656 of 700, 94%) had more than or equal to 1 beta-lactam allergy label removed, clarified, or both; 77.9% of these patients (n = 511 of 656) had 587 beta-lactam allergy labels removed. Nearly one-third (n = 149, 27.6%) had 162 allergy labels removed solely by medication history review. All 114 penicillin skin tests performed had negative results, and 98% (8 of 381) of the patients who underwent any drug challenge passed. Only 5.7% of the delabeled patients were relabeled. There was a 27% reduction in aztreonam use (P = .007). Beta-lactam desensitizations were reduced by 80%. ConclusionA full-time inpatient beta-lactam allergy service using medication history review and risk stratification can safely and effectively remove inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels, reduce aztreonam use, and decrease beta-lactam desensitizations.

A Modified Basophil Activation Test for the Clinical Management of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Paclitaxel: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) to taxanes are observed in 6% and 4% of gynecologic and breast cancer patients, respectively. Drug desensitization is the only option, as no comparable alternative therapy is available. Surfactants in the taxane formulation have been implicated in the immunopathogenesis of iHSRs, although sporadic skin test (ST) positivity and iHSRs to nab-paclitaxel have suggested the involvement of the taxane moiety and/or IgE-mediated pathomechanisms. In vitro diagnostic tests might offer insights into mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes. The aim of the present study was to address this unmet need by developing a novel basophil activation test (BAT). The study included patients (n = 31) undergoing paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy. Seventeen patients presented with iHSRs to paclitaxel (iHSR-Taxpos), and eleven were tolerant (iHSR-Taxneg). Fourteen patients presented with iHSRs to carboplatin (iHSR-Plpos), and fourteen were tolerant (iHSR-Plneg). The BAT median stimulation index (SI) values were 1.563 (range, 0.02-4.11; n = 11) and -0.28 (range -4.88-0.07, n = 11) in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg, respectively. The BAT median SI values were 4.45 (range, 0.1-26.7; n = 14) and 0 (range, -0.51-1.65; n = 12) in iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg, respectively. SI levels were not associated with iHSR severity grading. Comparing BAT results in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg showed the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to be 0.9752 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 90.91% of iHSR-Taxpos patients and 90.91% of iHSR-Taxneg patients. Comparing BAT results for iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg showed the area under the ROC curve to be 0.9286 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 78.57% of iHSR-Plpos patients and 91.67% of iHSR-Plneg patients. Most iHSR-Taxpos patients for which ST was available (10/11) scored ST-negative and BAT-positive, whereas most iHSR-Plpos patients for which ST was available (14/14) scored both BAT- and ST-positive. This suggested the intervention of non-IgE-mediated mechanisms in iHSR-Taxpos patients. Consistent with this view, an in silico molecular docking analysis predicted the high affinity of paclitaxel to the degranulation-competent MRGPRX2 receptor. This hypothesis warrants further in vitro investigations. In conclusion, the present study provides preliminary proof-of-concept evidence that this novel BAT has potential utility in understanding mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes.

Drug desensitization: mechanisms and pharmacological candidates

Drug desensitization: mechanisms and pharmacological candidates

Rapid drug desensitization to taxanes: a descriptive study from Turkey.

To present the characteristics of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) among taxane recipients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and to describe the results of rapid drug desensitization (RDD). A retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 patients who were treated with taxane for NSCLC and were found to be hypersensitive to taxane. All patients were administered the standard 3-bag, 12-step RDD protocol following the development of DHR. RDD success was evaluated separately for each cycle, and successful RDD was defined as the completion of the cycle with application of 12 steps of the desensitization protocol and the absence of early and/or late reactions afterwards. Among 45 patients hypersensitive to taxane 43 (95.6%) successfully received taxane cycles with desensitization. Failed RDD occurred in only 2 (4.4%) patients. The total number of desensitization cycles was 183, of which 181 (98.9%) were successful. The mean age of patients with successful desensitization was 59.42 ± 10.48 years and 37 (86.0%) of them were male. RDD is a reliable procedure that enables effective administration and completion of first-line taxane treatments in taxane-sensitive patients.