Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty Research Articles

Intravascular Lithotripsy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Severely Calcified Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease.

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty might be a valuable alternative to surgery for calcified common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease. Nonetheless, the 12 months performance of this treatment strategy remains unknown. This study reports on the 12 months outcomes of IVL with adjunctive DCB angioplasty for calcified CFA lesions. This is a retrospective single-center, single-arm study. Consecutive patients treated by IVL and DCB for calcified CFA disease between February 2017 and September 2020 were evaluated. The primary measure outcome of this analysis was primary patency. Procedural technical success (<30% stenosis), freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), secondary patency, and overall mortality were additionally analyzed. Thirty-three (n=33) patients were included in this study. The majority presented with lifestyle limiting claudication (n=20, 61%), 52% (n=17) of the patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 33% (n=11) had diabetes. The procedural technical success was 97% (n=32). A flow-limiting dissection post IVL was observed in 2 patients (6%) and a peripheral embolization in a single patient (3%), while the bail-out stenting rate amounted to 12% (n=4). No perforation was observed. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (interquartile range 2-3). At 12 months, the primary patency was 72%. The freedom from TLR and the secondary patency rates were 94% and 88%, respectively. The 12-month survival amounted to 100% and 75% (n=25) of the patients were asymptomatic or presented with mild claudication. The presence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; confidence interval (CI); 0.18-4.8, p=0.7) or CKD (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.29-5.8; p=0.72), as well as the use of a 7 mm IVL catheter (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.13-2.63; p=0.49) or of high-dose DCB (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.13-3.53; p=0.65) did not influence the primary patency. In this study, the combination of IVL and DCB angioplasty for calcified CFA disease was associated with low risk for periprocedural complications, acceptable 12 months clinical outcomes, and low rates of reinterventions. Intravascular lithotripsy in combination with DCB angioplasty can be an alternative to surgery in highly selected patients with CFA atherosclerotic disease. In this Cohort the combination therapy lead to acceptable clinical results and low reintervention rates at 12 months.

Predictors of recurrence after paclitaxel drug-coated balloon use for treating femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (PDCB) angioplasty has been shown to be an effective treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) at the femoropopliteal (FP) arteries. Long-term studies, however, have shown a progressive decrease in the patency rates following PDCB. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of stenosis recurrence after PDCB treatment of FP-ISR, and its immediate and mid-term outcomes. This prospective, non-randomized study included all chronic lower extremity ischemia patients of Rutherford class 3-6 who underwent PDCB angioplasty to treat >50% FP-ISR between June 2017 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was primary patency, defined as freedom from binary restenosis and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included 12-months freedom from CD-TLR and major adverse events (MAEs). A total of 73 symptomatic chronic limb ischemia patients (73 limbs including 63 with limb threatening ischemia) underwent PDCB angioplasty of FP-ISR lesions (13.7% Tosaka class I, 54.8% class II, and 31.5% class III). The mean ISR lesion length was 121.8 ± 52.7mm. Technical success was achieved in 70 (95.9%) patients. Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 12-months rates of primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR was 76.1% and 87.4%, respectively. At one year, MAEs occurred in eight patients (11.0%) including two deaths (2.7%), one major amputation (1.4%), and six (8.2%) surgical revascularizations. Multivariable analysis showed that Tosaka class III ISR (HR 4.51, CI: 1.31-15.53, p < 0.001) and reference vessel diameter (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18-080, p = 0.01) were independently associated with recurrent ISR. PDCB is safe and effective treatment of FP-ISR lesions. Occlusive ISR lesions and reference vessel diameter were independently associated with recurrent ISR stenosis after PDCB treatment.

Impact of calcification on clinical outcomes after drug‐coated balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease: Assessment using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system

To investigate whether the severity of calcification assessed by the peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS) was associated with clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions. We retrospectively analyzed 733 limbs with intermittent claudication of 626 patients, who underwent DCB angioplasty for de novo femoropopliteal lesions between January 2017 and February 2021 at sevencardiovascular centers in Japan. The patients were categorized using the PACSS classification (grades 0-4: no visible calcification of the target lesion, unilateral wall calcification < 5 cm, unilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, bilateral wall calcification < 5 cm, and bilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, respectively). The main outcome was primary patency at 1 year. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to explore whether the PACSS classification was an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. The distribution of PACSS was grade 0 in 38%, grade 1 in 17%, grade 2 in 7%, grade 3 in 16%, and grade 4 in 23%. The 1-year primary patency rates in these grades, respectively, were 88.2%, 89.3%, 71.9%, 96.5%, and 82.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis disclosed that PACSS grade 4 (hazard ratio: 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.15-2.87, p = 0.010) was associated with restenosis. The PACSS grade 4 calcification was independently associated with poor clinical outcomes after DCB angioplasty for de novo femoropopliteal lesions.

Comparative efficacy and safety of four common balloon angioplasty techniques for an arteriovenous fistula or graft stenosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Balloon angioplasty could decrease restenosis of hemodialysis vascular access. The present study investigated the comparative effects and safety of commonly available balloon angioplasty techniques for treating patients with failing autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs) stenosis. A comprehensive literature search, including an updated search of PubMed and Embase (via Ovid) and screening of published meta-analyses, was conducted. Primary patency at 6 and 12 months was the primary outcome, and the incidence of complications was the secondary outcome. The random-effects model was used to conduct all statistical analyses, which were performed using RevMan 5.3 and ADDIS 1.16.8. A total of 20 eligible studies involving four balloon angioplasty techniques were entered into the final analysis. Although the direct meta-analysis indicated that cutting balloon angioplasty (CtBA) significantly improved primary patency at 6 [odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27 to 2.86] and 12 (OR, 1.56; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.15) months compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA), this was not supported by network meta-analysis, which suggested that CtBA was associated with a higher risk of complications compared with drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DcBA) [OR, 0.05; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.00 to 0.83], high-pressure balloon angioplasty (HBA) (OR, 0.04; 95% CrI: 0.00 to 0.69), and CBA (OR, 0.11; 95% CrI: 0.02 to 0.59). Subgroup analysis of AVFs did not detect any significant differences. In failing AVF and AVG stenosis, HBA might be a preferential option as it is related to a lower risk of complications and has numerically higher primary patency than DcBA and CBA. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Management of Restenosis after Stenting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

The optimal alternative treatment strategy to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in left main (LM) coronary artery disease remains uncertain. We retrospectively screened all intervention reports from an intervention database and extracted those mentioning an LM stent. We then manually confirmed reports involving LM ISR and divided them into two groups, those in which the patient received a new drug-eluting stent (new-DES) strategy, and those in which the patient received a drug-coated balloon (DCB) only. A composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and each individual endpoint were compared. We also performed a brief analysis of similar designed studies. Between the new-DES (n = 40) and DCB-only (n = 22) groups, during median respective follow-up times of 581.5 and 642.5 days, no significant statistical differences were detected in MACEs (50.0% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.974), cardiovascular death (27.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.214), nonfatal myocardial infarction (30.0% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.835), or target lesion revascularization (35.0% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.542). We analyzed four similar studies and found comparable MACE findings (odds ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.44-1.67). Our findings support both DCB angioplasty and repeat DES implantation for LMISR lesions in patients who were clinically judged to be unsuitable for CABG; the treatments achieved comparable clinical results in terms of MACEs in the medium term.

Serial quantitative angiographic study of target lumen enlargement after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for native coronary artery disease.

Target lumen enlargement (TLE) or "late lumen enlargement" is often encountered after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCB). To date, the prognosis of coronary arterial lesions with or without TLE has not been clearly elucidated. This study aimed to assess the long-term prognosis of coronary arterial lesions with or without TLE observed within 1 year (early TLE) after DCB angioplasty using serial quantitative angiographic follow-up. One hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients (de novo coronary arterial lesions, 251) who underwent follow-up angiography within 1 year after DCB angioplasty (early follow-up, median: 6 months) were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 97 patients (125 lesions) also underwent angiography more than 1 year after DCB angioplasty (late follow-up, median: 37 months). TLE was defined as an increase in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) after PCI at each follow-up. Early TLE was detected in 142 lesions (56.6%). Of these, 76 lesions were also evaluated at late follow-up. TLE persisted even at late follow-up in 67 of the 76 lesions (88.2%). An increase in MLD in early TLE (+) lesions was observed in the period between post-PCI and early follow-up (1.84 ± 0.06 vs. 2.12 ± 0.07 mm, p < 0.001) but not between early and late follow-up (2.12 ± 0.07 vs. 2.16 ± 0.07 mm, p = 0.74). In contrast, 49 of 109 lesions without early TLE were evaluated at late follow-up, of which 28 lesions (57.1%) showed TLE at late follow-up. The MLD of early TLE (-) lesions (n = 49) significantly increased from early (1.63 ± 0.061 mm) to late follow-up (1.84 ± 0.06 mm) (p < 0.001). No aneurysms were found in any of these cases. Early TLE was observed in more than half of the lesions, with the majority remaining at late follow-up. Alternatively, half of the lesions without early TLE showed late TLE, occurring biphasically after DCB angioplasty.

Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease: The SPARTAN-LMS Study.

The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients treated with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) or second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for de novo unprotected left main stem (LMS) disease. Previous studies comparing the treatment of LMS disease suggest that the mortality for DES PCI is not worse than CABG. There are limited data from studies investigating the treatment of de novo LMS disease with DCB angioplasty. We compared the all-cause and cardiac mortality of patients treated with paclitaxel DCB to those with second-generation DES for de novo LMS disease from July 2014 to November 2019. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and propensity-matched analyses. A total of 148 patients were treated with either a DCB or DES strategy. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality in the DCB group (19.5%) compared to the DES group (15.9%) (HR 1.42 [0.61-3.32], p = 0.42). Regarding cardiac mortality, 2 (4.9%) were recorded for the DCB group and 7 (6.5%) for the DES group (HR 1.21 [0.31-4.67], p = 0.786); for target vessel myocardial infarction, there were 0 (0%) for the DCB group and 7 (6.5%) for the DES group; and for target lesion revascularisation, there were 3 (7.3%) in the DCB group and 9 (8.3%) in the DES group (HR: 0.89 [0.24-3.30]). p = 0.86. These remained not significant after propensity score matching. We found no difference in the mortality outcomes with DCB angioplasty compared to second-generation DES, with a median follow-up of 33 months. DCB can therefore be regarded as a safe option in the treatment of LMS disease in suitable patients.

Comparing the impact of the loss of patency between treatment with drug-coated balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent placement

ObjectiveTo compare the results of endovascular treatment with drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in atherosclerotic lesions in the femoropopliteal artery, as well as to assess restenotic patterns. MethodsClinical data from 617 cases treated with DES or DCB for femoropopliteal diseases were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective cohort study. From these, 290 DES and 145 DCB cases were extracted by propensity score matching. Outcomes investigated were 1- and 2-year primary patency, reintervention, and restenotic pattern and its impact on symptoms in each group. ResultsThe primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years in the DES group were superior to those in the DCB group (84.8% and 71.1% vs 81.3% and 66.6%, P = .043), whereas there was no significant difference in freedom from target lesion revascularization (91.6% and 82.6% vs 88.3% and 78.8%, P = .13). Compared with what was measured before the index procedures, exacerbated symptoms, rate of occlusion, and an increase in the occluded length at loss of patency were more frequent in the DES group than in the DCB group. The odds ratios were 3.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.49; P = .012), 3.61 (1.09-11.9; P = .036), and 3.82 (1.15-12.7; P = .029), respectively. On the other hand, the frequency of an increase in lesion length and requirement of target lesion revascularization were similar between the two groups. ConclusionsPrimary patency was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years in the DES than in the DCB group. However, DES were associated with exacerbated clinical symptoms and complicated lesion characteristics at the point of loss of patency.

Intraplaque wiring enables drug-coated balloons to be utilized for percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries.

This study aimed to determine whether drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty following intraplaque wiring and the use of modified balloons is safe and effective in the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). DCB is an alternative therapeutic option without the limitations of permanent vascular implants. However, its efficacy in CTOs has yet to be confirmed. The combination of modified balloons and DCB can be effectively applied when the intraplaque passage of the guidewire is achieved in CTOs. Data from 124 consecutive CTO lesions (105 patients) treated at our hospital between February 2016 and December 2020 were screened for inclusion and retrospectively analyzed. Among the 118 lesions successfully recanalized, intraplaque wiring was achieved in 108, and 85 were treated by the DCB-only approach following cutting/scoring balloon dilatation. Follow-up data were available for 82 lesions (71 patients). The median occlusion length was 18.5 mm, and the J-CTO score was 1.7 ± 0.9. No in-hospital major adverse cardiac events occurred, including abrupt vessel closure. During the median 29-month follow-up period, target lesion revascularization was performed for 10 lesions. Follow-up coronary angiography (8.7 ± 3.9 months after the index procedure) was performed for 64 lesions, demonstrating late lumen loss of -0.15 mm (interquartile range -0.4 to 0.23 mm), binary restenosis (diameter stenosis ≥50%) in 12 lesions (18.8%), and late lumen enlargement in 37 (57.8%). The DCB-only approach following the use of modified balloons is a promising strategy for coronary CTOs when intraplaque wiring is achieved.

Thrombectomy approach for access maintenance in the end stage renal disease population: a narrative review.

This article reviews current practices and outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy techniques for the treatment of thrombosed arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and fistulas (AVFs). Arteriovenous (AV) access allows patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to receive hemodialysis. Thrombosis of AV access can lead to delay in hemodialysis or abandonment of access requiring dialysis catheter placement. Endovascular approach has become the preferred treatment option for thrombosed access over surgery. Interventions include removal of thrombus from the AV circuit and treatment of the underlying anatomical abnormality, such as an anastomotic stenosis. Thrombolysis, or the act of dissolving thrombus, is performed by using infusion catheters or pulse injector devices for the administration of fibrinolytic agents. Thrombectomy, or the mechanical removal of thrombus, is performed by using embolectomy balloon catheters, rotating baskets or wires, rheolytic and aspiration mechanisms. Adjunctive methods such as cutting balloon angioplasty, drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, and stent placement are also used to treat stenoses in the AV circuit. Complications of these procedures include vessel rupture, arterial embolism, pulmonary embolism (PE), and paradoxical embolism to the brain. This narrative review article was written based on literature search from electronic databases, including PubMed and Google Scholar. The understanding of thrombectomy techniques and their potential complications is essential in the management of patients with thrombosed AV access.

Choosing the right treatment for the right lesion, Part II: a narrative review of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and its evolving role in dialysis access maintenance.

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) seek to inhibit restenosis in treated hemodialysis access lesions by delivering an anti-proliferative agent (paclitaxel) into the vessel wall. While DCBs have proven effective in the coronary and peripheral arterial vasculature, the evidence for their use in arteriovenous (AV) access has been less robust. In part two of this review, a comprehensive overview of DCB mechanisms, implementation, and design is provided, followed by an examination of the evidence basis for their use in AV access stenosis. An electronic search was performed on PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCBs and plain balloon angioplasty from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2022 published in English. As part of this narrative review, a review of DCB mechanisms of action, implementation, and design is provided, followed by a review of available RCTs and other studies. Numerous DCBs have been developed, each with unique properties, although the degree to which these differences impact clinical outcomes is unclear. Target lesion preparation, achieved by pre-dilation, and balloon inflation time have proven important factors in achieving optimal DCB treatment. Numerous RCTs have been performed, but have suffered from significant heterogeneity, and have often reported contrasting clinical results, making it difficult to draw conclusions on how to implement DCBs in daily practice. On the whole, it is likely there is a population of patients who benefit from DCB use, but it is unclear which patients benefit most and what device, technical, and procedural factors lead to optimal outcomes. Importantly, DCBs use appears safe in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. DCB implementation has been tempered by the lack of clear signal regarding the benefits of DCB use. As further evidence is obtained, it is possible that a precision-based approach to DCBs may shed light onto which patients will truly benefit from DCBs. Until that time, the evidence reviewed herein may serve to guide interventionalists in their decision making, knowing that DCBs appear safe when used in AV access and may provide some benefit in certain patients.

Lesion Characteristics Associated with Loss of Primary Patency After Endovascular Therapy for Common Femoral Artery Lesions

PurposeTo identify lesion characteristics associated with restenosis after endovascular therapy (EVT) for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in real-world practice.Materials and MethodsWe included 751 Japanese patients with PAD who underwent CFA EVT. Data were from a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry study. The association of lesion characteristics with the risk of restenosis was investigated with the Cox proportional hazards regression model.ResultsLesions extended to the external iliac artery in 10.0% of patients, were isolated in the CFA in 59.9%, and involved the bifurcation in 30.1%. Chronic total occlusion was noted in 21.1%, and 99% stenosis, in 19.9%. Among the limbs with CFA lesions, 16.4% had a history of CFA EVT. Mean total lesion length was 32 ± 15 mm, and reference vessel diameter, 7.3 ± 1.4 mm. Plain old balloon angioplasty, drug-coated balloon angioplasty, and stent implantation were performed in 56.3, 23.2, and 20.5% of patients, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 10.4 ± 9.5 months. Rates of freedom from restenosis and reintervention at 1 year were 78.2 and 86.6%, respectively. Lesion characteristics independently associated with restenosis were history of CFA EVT, reference vessel diameter less than 6 mm, and lesion length greater than or equal to 50 mm; adjusted hazard ratios were 1.63 (P = 0.007), 1.93 (P = 0.006), and 1.71 (P = 0.018), respectively.ConclusionHistory of CFA EVT, smaller reference vessel diameter, and longer lesion length are independent risk factors for restenosis after CFA EVT.Level of EvidenceLevel 3.

Slow-flow phenomenon after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for lower-extremity arteries is associated with lack of prescribing of calcium channel blockers

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between prescription drugs and the slow-flow phenomenon after drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Of 30 patients, five (17%) presented with the slow-flow phenomenon. Patients with the slow-flow phenomenon were significantly less commonly prescribed calcium channel blockers than those without the slow-flow phenomenon (P = 0.03). There was no intergroup difference in the prescription of angiotensin II receptor blockers and β-blockers. The clinical outcomes, including restenosis, thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and death, did not differ between groups during the 10-month observation period.

A Hybrid In Silico &amp; In Vitro Approach To Study Coating Transfer In Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

A Hybrid In Silico &amp; In Vitro Approach To Study Coating Transfer In Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

Neointimal characteristic changes following drug-coated balloons in lesions with repeated revascularization.

Since their emergence, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been used widely to treat in-stent lesions with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, despite their superior efficacy to balloon angioplasty, how DCBs affect neointimal characteristics is poorly understood. We aimed to assess the neointimal characteristic changes following DCB treatment. Using optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), we serially observed the in-stent lesion site just after and 1 year after DCB angioplasty in 12 lesions of 11 patients with repeated revascularization. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as lipid-laden neointima with or without calcification in the stented lesion. Progression or regression of neoatherosclerosis, newly formed neointimal calcification, newly formed uncovered strut and newly formed evagination were assessed. Tiny tissue protrusion was also recorded as mushroom-like protrusion. Underlying stents were first-generation (n = 5) or newer (n = 7) drug-eluting stents (DESs) with implantation durations ranging from 1 to 15 years (median 8 years). Surprisingly, two-thirds of the lesions (67%, 8 of 12) showed progression of neoatherosclerosis, while a quarter of lesions (25%, 3 of 12) showed regression of neoatherosclerosis. The maximal lipid arc increased from 122° to 174°. Newly formed neointimal calcification was observed in 2 of 12 lesions (16%). Newly formed uncovered struts (33%; 4 of 12) and newly formed evaginations (33%; 4 of 12) were not rare. Mushroom-like protrusion was found in a quarter of lesions (25%; 3 of 12). Our study demonstrated that a considerable number of lesions showed varied neointimal characteristic changes in a small number of patients. Further studies in a larger population are needed to understand the clinical impact of these findings.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for an acute anastomotic stenosis after coronary artery bypass grafting.

aDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Harima-Himeji General Medical Center, Himeji bDepartment of Exploratory and Advanced Search in Cardiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan Received 31 October 2022 Accepted 26 November 2022. Correspondence to Tomofumi Takaya, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Harima-Himeji General Medical Center, 3-264 Kamiya-cho, Himeji, Japan, Tel: +81 79 289 5080; fax: +81 79 289 2080; e-mail: [email protected]

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The optimal endovascular therapy for vein graft stenosis (VGS) following infrainguinal arterial bypass is yet to be established. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have rapidly improved the inferior patency outcomes of angioplasty using a conventional plain balloon (PB). This study compares the efficacy of DCBs and PBs for the treatment of infrainguinal VGS. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Multiple electronic searches were conducted in consultation with a health science librarian in September 2022. Studies describing the comparative outcomes of angioplasty using DCBs and PBs in the treatment of infrainguinal VGS were eligible. Datasets from one randomized controlled trial and two cohort studies with a total of 179 patients were identified. The results indicated no significant difference in target lesion revascularization between DCBs and PBs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.28; p = 0.21), with no significant heterogeneity between studies. Additionally, differences in primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and graft occlusion were not significant. Subgroup analysis showed similar effects for different DCB devices. In conclusion, DCBs showed no significant benefit in the treatment of VGS compared to PBs. Given the small population size of this meta-analysis, future trials with a larger population are desired.

Midterm safety and efficacy of elective drug-coated balloon angioplasty in comparison to drug-eluting stents for unrestrictive de novo coronary lesions: A single center retrospective study

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of elective drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for unrestrictive de novo coronary stenosis in daily practice is not fully understood, especially in comparison to those of drug-eluting stents (DESs). MethodsA total of 588 consecutive de novo coronary stenotic lesions electively and successfully treated with either DCB (n = 275) or DESs (n = 313) between January 2016 and December 2019 at our medical center were included. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary angiographic efficacy endpoint was angiographic restenosis frequency, defined as a follow-up percent diameter stenosis of >50. The endpoints were compared after baseline adjustment using propensity score matching. In addition, the frequency and predictors of late lumen enlargement (LLE), defined as minus late luminal loss, were examined in 201 crude angiographic follow-up lesions after DCB angioplasty. ResultsA total of 31 baseline parameters were adjusted to analyze 177 lesions in each group. The TLF frequencies (DCB group: 9.6 % during a mean observational interval of 789 ± 488 days vs. DES group: 10.2 %, 846 ± 484 days, p = 0.202) and cumulative TLF-free ratios of both groups were not significantly different (p = 0.892, log-rank test). The angiographic restenosis frequency in the DCB group (6.3 %, n = 128) was not significantly different from that of the DES group (10.1 %, n = 100, p = 0.593). LLE was observed in 45.3 % of entire lesions, and a type-A dissection was a significant predictor of LLE among 23 variables (odds ratio: 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.31–6.95, p = 0.010). ConclusionsThe present single-center retrospective study revealed statistically equivalent midterm clinical safety and angiographic efficacy among both elective DCB angioplasty and DESs placements in the treatment of unrestrictive de novo coronary lesions. In our daily practice environment, LLE was achieved in approximately half after DCB angioplasty.

Acute interventions-dialysis shunt recanalization

An arteriovenous fistula is vital for patients who need regular hemodialysis. Continuous patency and sufficient functionality determine quality of life and associated morbidity and mortality of patients. Following successful hemodialysis shunt creation, intimal hyperplasia and consecutive thrombosis or complete occlusion may cause different types of shunt dysfunctionality or even critical failure. Immediate shunt recanalization and revision by using an endovascular-first approach is crucial for long-term survival of hemodialysis fistula. There are several mechanisms available for catheter-based thrombus removal to unmask the typically underlying shunt stenosis. Primary technical recanalization success rates are very similar for clot cleaning. Treatment of intimal hyperplasia is preferably addressed by using drug-coated balloon angioplasty to allow for increased shunt patency compared to plain old balloon angioplasty. Stents and stent grafts are only used for resistant or repeated short-term recurrence of severe stenosis. Finally, surgical revision has a classical role in case of repeated failure of endovascular measures.