You have accessJournal of UrologyBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Surgical Therapy & New Technology IV1 Apr 2017PD27-12 MULTICENTER INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF 180W LBO LASER PHOTO-VAPORIZATION IN MEN WITH VERY LARGE PROSTATES (PROSTATE VOLUME>200CC) Roger Valdivieso, Pierre-Alain Hueber, Malek Meskawi, Vincent Misrai, and Kevin Zorn Roger ValdiviesoRoger Valdivieso More articles by this author , Pierre-Alain HueberPierre-Alain Hueber More articles by this author , Malek MeskawiMalek Meskawi More articles by this author , Vincent MisraiVincent Misrai More articles by this author , and Kevin ZornKevin Zorn More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1233AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES According to EAU and AUA guidelines on management of male non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), PVP XPS is superior to TURP with regard to intra-operative safety and postoperative complication rates such as bleeding. The experience of the GL system with very large glands (>200mL) is very limited. In the present study, we aimed to describe perioperative results as well as functional outcomes and complications of photo-vaporization of prostate glands bigger than 200 cc using the GL system. METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained multi center database was performed to select subgroup of men having very large prostates (>200mL) treated with the Greenlight-XPS laser using PVP for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. IPSS, Qmax, PVR and PSA were measured at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Durability was evaluated using BPH re-treatment rate at 12, 24 and 36 months. Additionally complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS A total of 38 (9%) men had prostates larger than 200mL. Men with very large prostates were older (76 vs 72 years, p=0.05), had higher PSA levels (9.9 vs 6.2 ng/dL, p=0.005) and had more indwelling catheters (55.6 vs 41.3, p=0.001). Patients with very large prostates had longer OR lasing times (94 vs 52 min), less energy density delivered (2.8 vs 3.4 kJ/mL) and longer time to removal of catheter (48 vs 24 hours). In terms of complications men with very large prostates had more LUTS at 6 months and the re-treatment rate were the same at 2 years (4.9 vs 5%). Finally, functional outcomes were similar however very large prostates had a smaller PSA drop in comparison (28 vs 50%). CONCLUSIONS PVP Greenlight XPS-180W is an acceptable technique for very large prostates (>200mL). However, OR times, energy density delivery, PSA drop at two years of follow up, catheterization time and LUTS are a concern in this particular subgroup. This should be used for patient counseling and surgery planning. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e516 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Roger Valdivieso More articles by this author Pierre-Alain Hueber More articles by this author Malek Meskawi More articles by this author Vincent Misrai More articles by this author Kevin Zorn More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract