Summary of Facts and Inferences In speculating on the origin of the high-level marine drifts described in this and in previous papers, the following facts and inferences ought to be duly taken into consideration:— 1. High-level marine drifts, in addition to directly local stones and stones from neighbouring areas, consist to a greater or less extent of far-travelled erratic stones, while in none of them are the stones entirely local. 2. The stones are generally much rounded, and that frequently over large areas. 3. All the great drift-areas contain a considerable, and some of them a large percentage of granite, especially Eskdale granite, which is at least partly owing to the extent to which the Eskdale area is covered with granite fragments and pebbles in positions favourable to removal by floating ice. 4. All the great drift areas (so far as yet known) are situated on or towards the outer slopes of mountain districts. 5. In the interior of mountain districts high-level drifts are either absent or limited to patches. 6. The drift-areas are more or less bounded above and below, as well as longitudinally, by areas in which the stones are angular or subangular. 7. None of them are situated further south than latitudes in which both land ice and floating ice may at one time have existed. 8. In all the areas there is a tendency to a knoll-shaped configuration, and in a greater or less number of instances a tendency in the knolls to occupy perched positions. 9. The gravel and sand generally contains very few large boulders; but the latter are common in and on the surface of the clay, which generally overlies, but in many instances graduates (on the same horizon) into gravel and sand. 10. The shells found in the drift are almost universally fragmentary, and that often, if not generally, in proportion to the roundness of the associated stones. They are likewise often confined to particular spots, as if elsewhere they had never been present, or had been destroyed by the stranding of floating ice, as is the case on many Arctic sea-shores at the present day. 11. The idea of shell-fragments having been pushed up hill along with portions of existing sea-beds is opposed by so many facts as to render it altogether untenable. 12. The extent to which the form of the ground has been preserved since the close of the great submergence can only be explained by supposing that either the time which has elapsed since that event, or the rate of subaërial denudation during that time, has been overestimated; in other words, the denudation must have been slow in proportion to the length of time in order to account for the little-altered surface-configuration of the drift-areas described in this and in my former paper.
Read full abstract