When one undertakes to study the distribution of Kansas fishes he encounters a peculiar situation. Since 1889 there have been published but three short papers bearing specifically on this subject. It seems strange that in a state of some 80,000 square miles, with a large variety of streams belonging to two great river systems, the study of fishes has not received more attention. Kansas ichthyology was given a good start by the work of Cragin, Gilbert, Graham, Hay and others about a half century ago, but for some reason the interest was not continued. To be sure, considerable collecting has been done between that time and now, but the results have not been published; nor has there been follow-up work and coordination of effort, such as has characterized, for example, the study of the amphibia and reptiles of the state. One of the principal purposes of this paper is to call attention to the need for collection and study of the fishes of our state. The northwestern part of Kansas is the only sizable portion of the state for which even a fair distributional picture can be presented at this time. More actual material is available from certain other areas, especially about Manhattan, Lawrence, Ottawa and Emporia; however, the problems of habitat variations, change in character of streams due to cultivation and pollution, subspecies variation and range overlapping are also much greater. Furthermore each of these centers is a part of a much larger general ecological set-up for which the data are quite incomplete. Parts of the state that need particularly to be represented by fish collections are: (1) The entire region southwest of a line from Ness City to Winfield; (2) the southern Flint Hills; (3) the glacial drift area, i. e., the part of the state north of the Kansas river and east of the Blue, and (4) the area including the lower reaches of the Republican, Solomon, Saline and Smoky Hill rivers.
Read full abstract