The effects of seed-coloring agents, background colors, and their interactions on the acceptance of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seeds by varied thrushes (Ixoreus naevius), Oregon juncos (Junco hyemalis), and California quail (Lophortyx californicus) were measured by presenting the treatments on a rotating feeding carousel. Seeds treated with coloring agents generally were accepted less than untreated seeds. Background colors and the interaction between the seed treatments and background colors did not significantly alter acceptance. Coloring agents that added texture to the seeds were generally the least preferred, and two of these, Monastral Fast Green and animal charcoal, were the least preferred by the three species tested. The addition of coloring agents such as Monastral Fast Green or animal charcoal to rodenticide-treated Douglas fir seeds may deter acceptance by birds during initial encounters on artificial seedings. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 40(4):769-774 Approximately 34,000 ha of forest land in the Pacific Northwest are seeded each year to promote conifer regeneration. One of the major factors affecting successful regeneration is seed losses to seed-eating mammals and birds. Operational practice is to treat the seeds with a rodenticide to reduce seed losses to mammals, and to overcoat the treated seeds with aluminum powder or Monastral Fast Green (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [reference to trade names does not imply endorsement of commercial products by the U.S. Government]) to dry, lubricate, and label the seeds, and to deter consumption by birds. The bird-deterrent properties of Monastral Fast Green or aluminum powder on conifer seeds, frequently implied in the literature (Spencer 1954, Hooven 1970, Radvanyi 1970), presumably are based on the colored-bait studies reported by Kalmbach (1943) and Kalmbach and Welch (1946). The latter workers concluded that the addition of unnatural colors to toxic oatgroat baits reduced avian acceptance, the degree of aversion being related to the coloring agents and avian species tested. In contrast, Mann (1959) stated that the addition of aluminum powder had no effect, good or bad, on acceptance of conifer seeds by birds. Endrin and/or aluminum residues found in 64,samples from the carcasses of 88 varied thrushes, 4 Oregon juncos, and 1 California quail discovered on 3 California seedings (W. E. Dodge 1968, unpubl. spec. rep., Denver Wildl. Res. Ctr.) supported Mann's statement. These contrasting opinions and results emphasized the need to evaluate the deterrent properties of coloring agents on conifer seeds. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of seed-coloring agents and background colors on the acceptance of Douglas fir seeds by representative species of seed-eating birds. Background colors were i cluded in the study to determine if the interaction between background and seed treatments would alter the effectiveness of the coloring agents. The study was conducted during 1971 at the Forest-Animal Damage Research Station, Olympia, Washington, a field station of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center. I gratefully acknowledge R. M. Anthony, Forest-Animal Damage Research Station, 1 Present address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Damage Research Station, Hilo, Hawaii 96720. J. Wildl. Manage. 40 (4):1976 769 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.130 on Wed, 23 Nov 2016 04:52:53 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 770 SEED ACCEPTANCE BY BIRDs Pank for assistance with the collection of the data and D. McCaughran, Quantitative Science Center, University of Washington, for assistance with the statistical analyses. METHODS AND MATERIALS
Read full abstract