Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption Research Articles

Double plasma molecular adsorption system for Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: A case report

BACKGROUND Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are very serious skin allergies, with an etiology related to infections and medication. Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 has also been considered to cause SJS/TEN. CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a woman in her thirties who took acetaminophen after contracting COVID-19. After 3 d of fever relief, she experienced high fever and presented with SJS/TEN symptoms, accompanied by intrahepatic cholestasis. Three days of corticosteroid treatment did not alleviate the skin damage; therefore, double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) therapy was initiated, with treatment intervals of 48 h. Her skin symptoms improved gradually and were resolved after seven DPMAS treatments. CONCLUSION DPMAS therapy is beneficial for abrogating SJS/TEN because plasma adsorption and perfusion techniques reduce the inflammatory mediators (e.g. , tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 and-12) speculated to be involved in the pathology of the skin conditions.

Analysis of curative effect and short-term survival rate of plasma exchange and double plasma molecular adsorption combined with half-volume plasma exchange in the treatment of liver failure

Objective: To investigate how plasma exchange (PE) and double plasma molecular adsorption combined with half-volume plasma exchange (DPMAS + half-volume PE) affect the curative effect and short-term survival rate in liver failure. Methods: Data from 181 cases of liver failure caused by different etiologies from January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2020, were selected. Patients were divided into a PE treatment alone group and a DPMAS + half-dose PE treatment group. The laboratory indicators with different models of artificial liver before and after treatment and the survival rates of 7, 14, 28, and 90 days after discharge were observed in the two groups. Measurement data were analyzed by t-tests and rank sum tests. Categorical data were analyzed by χ (2) test. Results: Non-biological artificial liver therapy with different models improved the liver and coagulation function in the two groups of patients with liver failure (P < 0.05 in PTA% intra-group). The coagulation function was significantly improved in the PE treatment alone group compared with that in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group [PT after treatment: (20.15 ± 0.88) s in the PE treatment alone group, (23.43 ± 1.02) s, t = -2.44, P = 0.016 in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group; PTA: 44.72% ± 1.75% in the PE treatment alone group, 35.62% ± 2.25%, t = 3.215 P = 0.002 in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group]. Bilirubin levels were significantly decreased in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group compared to the PE treatment alone group [total bilirubin after treatment: (255.30 ± 15.64) μmol/L in the PE treatment alone group, (205.46 ± 9.03) μmol/L, t = 2.74, P = 0.07 in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group; direct bilirubin after treatment: (114.74 ± 7.11) μmol/L in the PE treatment alone group, (55.33 ± 3.18) μmol/L, t = 7.54, P < 0.001) in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group]. However, there was no significant effect on leukocytes and neutrophils after treatment with different models of artificial liver (P > 0.05) in the two groups, and platelets decreased after treatment, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (t = -0.15, P = 0.882). The inflammatory indexes of the two groups improved after treatment with different models of artificial liver (P < 0.05], and the 28 and 90 d survival rates were higher in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group than those of the PE treatment alone group (28 d: 60.3% vs. 75.0%, χ (2) = 4.315, P = 0.038; 90 d: 56.2% vs. 72.5%. χ (2) = 10.355 P < 0.001). DPMAS + half-dose PE group plasma saving was 1385 ml compared with PE treatment alone group (Z = -7.608, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both DPMAS+half-dose PE and PE treatment alone have a certain curative effect on patients with liver failure. In DPMAS+half-dose PE, the 28-day survival rate is superior to PE treatment alone, and it saves plasma consumption and minimizes blood use in clinic.

Safety and efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system with sequential low-volume plasma exchange in intermediate-stage hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Current evidence suggests that the mortality rate of intermediate-stage hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) remains high. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) with sequential low-volume plasma exchange (LPE) treatment in intermediate-stage HBV-related ACLF. This prospective study recruited intermediate-stage HBV-related ACLF patients and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04597164). Eligible patients were randomly divided into a trial group and a control group. Patients in both groups received comprehensive medical treatment. Patients in the trial group further received DPMAS with sequential LPE. Data were recorded from baseline to week 12. 50 patients with intermediate-stage HBV-related ACLF were included in this study. The incidence of bleeding events and allergic reactions in the trial group was 12% and 4%, respectively, with no other treatment-related adverse events. The levels of TBIL and PT-INR, and MELD scores after each session of DPMAS with sequential LPE were significantly lower than those before treatment (all p<0.05). The 12-week cumulative liver transplantation-free survival rates in the trial and control groups were 52% and 24%, respectively (p=0.041). The 12-week cumulative overall survival rates in the trial and control groups were 64% and 36%, respectively (p=0.048). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in liver transplantation-free survival (p=0.047) and overall survival (p=0.038) between the trial and control groups. COX regression analysis indicated that BUN (p=0.038), DPMAS with sequential LPE (p=0.048) and COSSH-ACLF II score (p<0.001) were significant risk factors for mortality. DPMAS with sequential LPE treatment is safe and effective for patients with intermediate-stage HBV-related ACLF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption System with Sequential Low-dose Plasma Exchange in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-related Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure: A Prospective Study.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (LPE) in treating early hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). Clinical data of patients with HBV-ACLF were prospectively collected, including patients in a DPMAS with sequential LPE (DPMAS+LPE) group and those in a standard medical treatment (SMT) group. The primary endpoint was death or liver transplantation (LT) at 12 weeks of follow-up. Propensity-score matching was performed to control the effects of confounding factors on prognosis between the two groups. After 2 weeks, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen levels, and Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B score, were significantly lower in the DPMAS+LPE group than those in the SMT group (p<0.05). After 4 weeks, laboratory parameters of the two groups were similar. The cumulative survival rate of the DPMAS+LPE group was significantly higher than that of the SMT group at 4 weeks (97.9% vs. 85.4%, p=0.027), but not at 12 weeks (85.4% vs. 83.3%, p=0.687). Cytokine levels were significantly lower in 12-week survival group than in the death-or-LT group (p<0.05). Functional enrichment analysis showed that downregulated cytokines were mainly involved in positive regulation of proliferation and activation of lymphocytes and monocytes, regulation of immune effect response, regulation of endotoxin response, and glial cell proliferation. DPMAS+LPE significantly improved the 4-week cumulative survival rate, and ameliorated the inflammatory response in patients. DPMAS+LPE may be a promising modality for patients with early HBV-ACLF.

Influencing factors for hypotension in patients undergoing double plasma molecular adsorption system artificial liver support therapy

Influencing factors for hypotension in patients undergoing double plasma molecular adsorption system artificial liver support therapy

Efficacy and Economic Evaluation of Nonbiological Artificial Liver Therapy in Acute-on-chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure.

Nonbiological artificial liver (NBAL) is frequently used as a first-line treatment for hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of comprehensive medical treatment, plasma exchange (PE), and double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) plus half-dose PE (DPMAS+PE) in patients with HBV-ACLF. A total of 186 patients with HBV-ACLF randomly received comprehensive medical treatment, PE, or DPMAS+PE and were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into four subgroups based on the pretreatment prothrombin activity (PTA): Group I (PTA>40%), group II (PTA 30-40%), group III (PTA 20-30%), and group IV (PTA<20%). The main outcome measures were 28 day effectiveness; 90 day liver transplantation-free survival; change of biochemical parameters; and CER. DPMAS+PE treatment was associated with significantly higher 28 day effectiveness and 90 day liver transplantation-free survival compared with PE treatment in patients with group I liver failure. Clearance of serum total bilirubin (TBIL), AST, and creatinine (Cr) were significantly higher in the DPMAS+PE group than in the PE group. For subjects with group I liver failure, DPMAS+PE treatment had advantages of lower CER values and better cost-effectiveness. Compared with comprehensive medical treatment and PE alone, DPMAS with half-dose sequential PE treatment more effectively improved TBIL, AST, and Cr in HBV-ACLF patients, improved 28 day effectiveness and 90 day survival rates in patients with group I liver failure, and was more cost effective. DPMAS+PE is a viable NBAL approach for treatment of HBV-ACLF.

Model selection and curative effect judgment criteria for artificial liver in the treatment of liver failure

Artificial liver is one of the effective methods to treat liver failure. Patients with liver failure are critically ill and have great individualized differences. Therefore, the specific program for the treatment of liver failure with artificial liver should be individualized. The commonly used non-biological artificial liver models include simple plasmapheresis, double filtration plasmapheresis, plasma filtration with dialysis, double plasma molecular adsorption system, molecular absorbent recirculating system, hemodiafiltration, continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, hybrid, etc. The curative effect should be properly judged from patient's symptoms, laboratory test indicators, survival rate and other aspects after artificial liver therapy.

Establishment of a predictive model for the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with plasma exchange and double plasma molecular adsorption system alone or in combination

Establishment of a predictive model for the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with plasma exchange and double plasma molecular adsorption system alone or in combination

Application of double plasma molecular adsorption system in children with acute liver failure

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of double plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) in the treatment of pediatric acute liver failure (PALF). Methods A prospective analysis was performed on the medical data of children with PALF who were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Hunan Children's Hospital, from March 2018 to June 2020. The children were randomly divided into two groups:plasma exchange group (PE group) and DPMAS group (n=18 each). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical indices after treatment, laboratory markers before and after treatment, and adverse events after treatment. Results Compared with the PE group, the DPMAS group had a significantly lower number of times of artificial liver support therapy and a significantly shorter duration of ICU stay (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in laboratory markers between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, both groups had reductions in the levels of total bilirubin, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α, and the DPMAS group had significantly greater reductions than the PE group (P 0.05). The PE group had a significant increase in albumin, while the DPMAS group had a significant reduction in albumin (P 0.05). Conclusions DPMAS is safe and effective in the treatment of PALF and can thus be used as an alternative to artificial liver support therapy.

Sequential versus mono double plasma molecular adsorption system in acute-on-chronic liver failures: A propensity-score matched study.

Efficacy of sequential double plasma molecular adsorb system (DPMAS) and plasma exchange (PE) on patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been rarely reported. We hereby reported the outcomes of a consecutive cohort of ACLF patients treated with sequential and mono DPMAS. Patients treated with artificial liver support system between January 2011 and December 2016 in XiJing hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A toal of 125 ACLF patients either received mono (DPMAS only) or sequential DPMAS (PE followed by DPMAS) therapy. One to one propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to compare the effects of sequential and mono DPMAS on survival and liver function. After PSM, 80 patients were included with 40 patients in each group. Sequential therapy achieved significantly higher removal of total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase than mono DPMAS, but stabilized international normalized ratio. The effects of both regimens on white blood cell, platelet, creatinine, and liver function scores were similar. Survival rate on 90-day was 50% in the sequential group and 47.5% in the mono group. For ACLF patients, sequential DPMAS and PE seemed to have a better effect on liver function improvement but provided no survival benefit compared with mono DPMAS.

Humanistic Care Nursing Mode for Severe Hyperbilirubinemia Patients Who Undergoing Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption System and Plasma Exchange

Objective: To assess humanistic care nursing mode for severe hyperbilirubinemia patients who undergoing double plasma molecular adsorption system and plasma exchange. Methods: 124 participants were diagnosed with severe hyperbilirubinemia and were received combined treatment, include that double plasma molecular adsorption system and Plasma exchange. They were randomly assigned to control group (n = 62) and intervention group (n = 62). We collect the participant information by Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, Self-rating depression scale and the Short Form-36. The information include the satisfaction of patients, anxiety status, depression status and quality of life. Result: In patient satisfaction research, the intervention group has more very good level assessment than that of control group (41 vs 32). Also, control group has more good level assessment than that of intervention group (18 vs 8). In anxiety and depression research, intervention group has better improvement in anxiety status, it is from 56.4±6.7 to 45.3±5.1. In quality of life research, the intervention group has greater improvement than that of control group in every domain. Conclusion: humanistic care nursing mode provide better improvement in mental health aspect of patient. It significantly improved anxiety and depression, and improved overall quality of life after treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Plasma Adsorption Plus Plasma Exchange Therapy for Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Pilot Study

Background: Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) might be at risk for citrate accumulation during plasma adsorption plus plasma exchange (PE) therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of RCA during double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) plus PE therapy for patients with ACLF. Method: A prospective nonrandomized controlled pilot study was conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients with ACLF were enrolled to heparin anticoagulation (HA) group and RCA group. Serial blood samples were taken. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Results: Twenty-four patients with 94 sessions of HA and 28 patients with 106 sessions of RCA were enrolled. RCA method did not affect the therapeutic efficacy, the function of extracorporeal circulation, and the prognosis of these patients. The occurrences of citrate accumulation in RCA group were 0.0, 67.0, 100.0, 34.0, and 0.0% before DPMAS therapy, at the end of DPMAS therapy, immediately after PE therapy, 2 h after PE therapy, and the next morning, while that in HA group were 0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 7.4, and 0.0%, respectively. The occurrences of citrate accumulation at the end of DPMAS therapy and at 2 h after PE therapy in RCA group were much higher than that in HA group (67.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.000; 34.0 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.000, respectively). Although the trend of citrate accumulation in RCA group was much more obvious than that in HA group during and after DPMAS plus PE therapy (p = 0.000), the values on the next morning were similar between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). The main alteration of acid–base status was metabolic alkalosis with no difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions: RCA might be safe and effective in patients with ACLF receiving plasma adsorption plus PE therapy. RCA method might offer an alternative anticoagulation method for them.

Therapeutic effect of double plasma molecular adsorption system and sequential half-dose plasma exchange in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.

ObjectiveThe artificial liver support system (ALSS) is used frequently as a first‐line treatment for hepatitis B virus‐associated acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (HBV‐ACLF). This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) with sequential half‐dose plasma exchange (PE) (DPMAS+PE) and full‐dose PE in patients with HBV‐ACLF.MethodsA total of 131 hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with HBV‐ACLF and underwent DPMAS+PE or PE were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment methods used, they were divided into PE group (n = 77) and DPMAS+PE group (n = 54). The main evaluation indexes included the change of liver function and the 28‐days liver transplant‐free survival rates after the different treatments.ResultsThere were no significant differences on severity of illness between PE group and DPMAS+PE group (P > 0.05). The total bilirubin (TBIL) levels immediately after treatment, and at 24 and 72 hours after treatment were markedly decreased in DPMAS+PE group than that in PE group (52.3 ± 9.4% vs 42.3 ± 7.2%, P < 0.05; 24.2 ± 10.0% vs 13.5 ± 13.0%, P < 0.05; 24.8 ± 13.1% vs 14.9 ± 14.9%, P < 0.05; respectively). The 28‐days survival rates was 62.3% and 72.2% in PE and DPMAS+PE groups (P = 0.146). Furthermore, the 28‐days survival rates were significantly higher in DPMAS+PE group than that in PE group (57.4% vs 41.7%, P = 0.043) in the intermediate‐advanced stage patients.ConclusionCompared with PE alone, DPMAS+PE might more effectively improve temporary TBIL in ACLF patients, and improve the 28‐days survival rates in HBV‐ACLF patients with intermediate‐advanced stage. Therefore, DPMAS+PE may be an available ALSS treatment for HBV‐ACLF patients.

Plasma exchange combined with double plasma absorption therapy improve the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) combined with double plasma absorption and simple PE in the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 251 cases of acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver treatment since January 2015. Changes in clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and complications of the patients before and after different modes of treatment were compared and short-term efficacy was tracked. In accordance with different data, t-test, Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The effectiveness of low-volume PE combined with double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) and equal amount of PE combined with DPMAS was significantly better than simple PE (83.7%, 84.05% and 82.15 vs 55.6%, P < 0.05) in early stage of liver failure. In late-stage of liver failure, there was no significant difference in the treatment efficiency of each group (P > 0.05). Bilirubin and bile acid levels were significantly decreased in combined treatment groups than that to simple PE group (P < 0.05). PTA and albumin improvement rate of DPMAS PE groups were significantly lower than that of simple PE group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in adverse reactions between each group. Conclusion: PE combined with DPMAS improves the treatment efficiency of early hepatic failure and decrease dosage of plasma when compared with simple PE. A beforehand DPMAS treatment after PE treatment can improve the adverse effects of DPMAS on blood coagulation function and albumin levels.

Clinical study of combined blood purification therapy for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome complicated with liver failure

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of artificial liver technique - double plasma molecular adsorption(DPMAS) combined with continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) in the treatment of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS) patients with liver failure. Methods From April 2014 to October 2016, in the Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital emergency ICU hospitalized MODS combined with liver failure patients were enrolled in this study. On the basis of comprehensive medical treatment, these patients were randomly(random number) divided into CRRT control group(23 cases) and DPMAS + CRRT treatment group(22 cases). Blood biochemical, coagulation index, inflammatory factor and severity score of two groups were comparied before and 72 h after treatment. Results The levels of alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), blood amine(NH3), creatinine(CREA), interleukin-6(IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), heart rate(HR), APACHEⅡ score and SOFA score in CRRT control group were statistically different before and after treatment (P 0.05); In the DPMAS + CRRT treatment group, the levels of ALT, AST, NH3, CREA, IL-6, TNF-α, HR, APACHEⅡand SOFA scores were significantly different before and after treatment (P 0.05). Conclusions Because of the combination of double plasma adsorption, besides the advantages of CRRT, DPMAS+CRRT can remove bilirubin and bile acid which can not be removed by CRRT, also improve coagulation function. The clearance efficiency of inflammatory factors is also higher, and the severity score is reduced more significantly. Key words: Double plasma molecular adsorption; Continuous renal replacement; Combined blood purification; Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; Liver failure

Clinical effect of combined artificial extracorporeal liver support therapy for toxic hepatic failure

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of plasma exchange (PE) versus double plasma molecular adsorption system combined with PE (DPMAS+PE) in the treatment of toxic hepatic failure. Methods: A total of 67 patients with toxic hepatic failure who were admitted during the same period of time were divided into PE group, DPMAS+ PE group, and control group. The 22 patients in the PE group were treated with PE alone, and the 24 patients in the DPMAS+PE group were given DPMAS combined with PE. The clinical out-come was compared between the three groups. Results: Both treatment groups had significantly higher clinical response rate and 24-week survival rate than the control group. After treatment, both treatment groups had significant reductions in the serum levels of total bilirubin (TBil) , direct bilirubin (DBil) , alanine aminotransfer-ase (ALT) , and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) , and the PE group had significant reductions in the albumin (Alb) level and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (P<0.05) ; the DPMAS+PE group showed no sig-nificant changes in the Alb level and APTT (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in TBil, DBil, ALT, and AST between the two treatment groups after treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the PE group had significantly higher Alb level and APTT than the DPMAS + PE group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, both treatment groups had significant reductions in TBil, DBil, ALT and AST after treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion: The two artificial liver support techniques can significantly improve patients' liver function and in-crease their survival rate, and the combined artificial liver support technique can reduce the amount of plasma used.

Clinical application of double plasma molecular adsorption system in treatment of acute liver failure

Clinical application of double plasma molecular adsorption system in treatment of acute liver failure

Clinical application of subclavian catheterization in severe hepatitis: a clinical analysis of 506 cases

Objective To summarize the complications of subclavian catheterization in severe hepatitis patients and to investigate clinical safety and treatment. Methods Five hundred and six cases of severe hepatitis,who underwent subclavian catheterization before non- bioartificial liver operation like double plasma molecular adsorption system,were enrolled. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions were under close observation and recording. Results Of all patients,492(97. 2%) were punctured and catheterized successfully,and 38(7.5%) developed complications,including local hematoma and bleeding at puncture sites(15 cases),catheter infection(13 cases),and catheterization into the subclavian artery(10 cases). Conclusion Subclavian catheterization has a high success rate,and is sufficient to meet the need of clinical rescue and treatment. Most complications would not interfere with treatment outcome after proper disposal. Subclavian catheterization can be safely applied to severe hepatitis patients with coagulation disturbance.

Clinical experience of double plasma molecular absorption with a combination of two hemoperfusion machines in treatment of liver failure

To evaluate the effect of the double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) with a combination of two hemoperfusion machines in treatment of liver failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted. The clinical data from 42 patients with liver failure admitted to Tianjin Second People's Hospital from September 2012 to September 2013 were enrolled. Patients received 166 courses of blood purification treatment, including 97 courses of plasmapheresis (PE) and 69 courses of DPMAS. The DPMAS treatment was performed with a combination of two hemoperfusion machines, with one a blood pump and the other a plasma pump, for 2-3 hours. Liver function, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), electrolytes and blood routine were determined before and after treatment. Adverse reactions were observed and the nursing experiences were summarized. The survival rate of 42 liver failure patients was 64.29%, and the total bilirubin (TBil), NH3, total bile acid (TBA) and TNF-α were decreased and the albumin (ALB) was increased after PE and DPMAS. Further analysis of the rate of changes after treatment (after treatment/before treatment×100%) showed that when compared with that in DPMAS, the TBil and TBA were decreased significantly in PE [TBil: (62.21 ± 5.51)% vs. (64.39 ± 4.61)%, t=2.683, P=0.008; TBA: (77.10 ± 4.44)% vs. (85.91 ± 6.95)%, t=9.952, P=0.000], and the level of ALB was elevated significantly in PE when compared with that in DPMAS [(113.12 ± 2.90)% vs. (101.87 ± 2.91)%, t=24.602, P=0.000]. NH3 and TNF-α were decreased in both groups withe no statistical significance [NH3: (79.59 ± 5.72)% vs. (80.56 ± 7.56)%, t=0.934, P=0.351; TNF-α: (61.66 ± 4.67)% vs. (62.73 ± 3.67)%, t=1.638, P=0.108]. The blood electrolytes and routine blood test showed that there was no significant change before and after treatments in DPMAS group (K⁺: 3.92 ± 0.83 mmol/L vs. 3.91 ± 0.82 mmol/L, t=0.501, P=0.618; Na⁺: 136.89 ± 5.69 mmol/L vs. 136.74 ± 5.83 mmol/L, t=1.077, P=0.285; Cl⁻: 96.58 ± 3.33 mmol/L vs. 96.55 ± 3.27 mmol/L, t=0.245, P=0.807; white cell count: 5.22 ± 0.93 × 10⁹/L vs. 5.43 ± 1.11 × 10⁹/L, t=1.125, P=0.265; hemoglobin: 110.97 ± 19.20 g/L vs. 112.69 ± 19.67 g/L, t=0.643, P=0.522; platelet count: 105.28 ± 26.82 × 10⁹/L vs. 101.96 ± 3.08 × 10⁹/L, t=0.727, P=0.470). Sixty-four out of the 69 courses of DPMAS treatment were successfully completed, and 5 times were ended because of line coagulation. There was no uncomfortable symptom complained by 53 patients during the treatment. Hypotension occurred for 3 times, and discomfort and nausea during treatment were complained for 9 times. Low fever occurred 4 times after treatment. Those uncomfortable symptoms were relieved spontaneously or by symptomatic treatment. Psychological nursing care should be given to the patients before and after DPMAS to relieve anxiety. Circulating tubes should be well rinsed to prevent line coagulation. General condition of the patient should be closely monitored in order to adjust therapeutic measures. DPMAS could be effectively performed with a combination of two hemoperfusion machines without inadvertent side reactions, and it is safe in operation with smaller amount of plasma.