Double Decoupling Method Research Articles

Druglike Molecules Binding to Large Membrane Proteins: Absolute Binding Free Energy Computation.

In this research, we employed the alchemical double-decoupling method alongside restraining potentials, coupled with the FEPMD method, to ascertain the standard binding free energy of a drug-like molecule termed BHQ and three analogous compounds engineered with progressive addition of bulky para-alkyl groups binding to SERCA (Ca2+-ATPase of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum). Integral transmembrane proteins represent crucial drug targets in numerous therapeutic interventions, presenting computational challenges due to their considerable system sizes. Our approach integrated the generalized born potential method and the spherical solvent boundary potential method, allowing us to explicitly focus on the active binding site while treating the remainder of the system implicitly. We evaluated contributions to the standard binding free energy from distinct interaction potentials: electrostatic, repulsive, dispersive, and restraining potentials, computed separately. The resulting absolute binding free energy of BHQ (11.63 kcal/mol) closely aligns with experimental measurements (10.56 kcal/mol). Notably, an accurate estimation of the absolute binding free energy was achieved for the simplest analog, created with the addition of a single para-methyl group. However, the analog with two para-methyl groups exhibited the highest binding free energy, which disagreed with experimental results. Determining the binding free energy of the BHQ analog engineered with three para-methyl groups presented challenges in convergence and resulted in the lowest free energy among the three.

Combining Alchemical Transformation with a Physical Pathway to Accelerate Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations of Charged Ligands to Enclosed Binding Sites.

We present a new approach to more accurately and efficiently compute the absolute binding free energy for receptor-ligand complexes. Currently, the double decoupling method (DDM) and the potential of mean force method (PMF) are widely used to compute the absolute binding free energy of biomolecular complexes. DDM relies on alchemically decoupling the ligand from its environments, which can be computationally challenging for large ligands and charged ligands because of the large magnitude of the decoupling free energies involved. In contrast, the PMF method uses a physical pathway to directly transfer the ligand from solution to the receptor binding pocket and thus avoids some of the aforementioned problems in DDM. However, the PMF method has its own drawbacks: because of its reliance on a ligand binding/unbinding pathway that is free of steric obstructions from the receptor atoms, the method has difficulty treating ligands with buried atoms. To overcome the limitation in the standard PMF approach and enable buried ligands to be treated, here we develop a new method called AlchemPMF in which steric obstructions along the physical pathway for binding are alchemically removed. We have tested the new approach on two important drug targets involving charged ligands. One is HIV-1 integrase bound to an allosteric inhibitor; the other is the human telomeric DNA G-quadruplex in complex with a natural product protoberberine buried in the binding pocket. For both systems, the new approach leads to more reliable estimates of absolute binding free energies with smaller error bars and closer agreements with experiments compared with those obtained from the existing methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of the new method in overcoming the hysteresis often encountered in PMF binding free energy calculations of such systems. The new approach could also be used to improve the sampling of water equilibration and resolvation of the binding pocket as the ligand is extracted.

A Suite of Advanced Tutorials for the GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Software [Article v1.0

This tutorial describes the practical use of some recent methodological advances implemented in the GROMOS software for biomolecular simulations. It is envisioned as a living document, with additional tutorials being added in the course of time. Currently, it consists of three distinct tutorials. The first tutorial describes the use of time-averaged restraints to enforce agreement with order parameters derived from NMR experiments. The second tutorial describes the use of extended thermodynamic integration in the double-decoupling method to compute the affinity of a small molecule to a protein. The molecule involved bears a negative charge, necessitating the application of post-simulation corrections. The third tutorial is based on the same molecular system, but computes the binding free energy from a path-sampling method with distance-field distance restraints and Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations. The tutorials are written for users with some experience in the application of molecular dynamics simulations.

Absolute Protein Binding Free Energy Simulations for Ligands with Multiple Poses, a Thermodynamic Path That Avoids Exhaustive Enumeration of the Poses.

We propose a free energy calculation method for receptor-ligand binding, which have multiple binding poses that avoids exhaustive enumeration of the poses. For systems with multiple binding poses, the standard procedure is to enumerate orientations of the binding poses, restrain the ligand to each orientation, and then, calculate the binding free energies for each binding pose. In this study, we modify a part of the thermodynamic cycle in order to sample a broader conformational space of the ligand in the binding site. This modification leads to more accurate free energy calculation without performing separate free energy simulations for each binding pose. We applied our modification to simple model host-guest systems as a test, which have only two binding poses, by using a single decoupling method (SDM) in implicit solvent. The results showed that the binding free energies obtained from our method without knowing the two binding poses were in good agreement with the benchmark results obtained by explicit enumeration of the binding poses. Our method is applicable to other alchemical binding free energy calculation methods such as the double decoupling method (DDM) in explicit solvent. We performed a calculation for a protein-ligand system with explicit solvent using our modified thermodynamic path. The results of the free energy simulation along our modified path were in good agreement with the results of conventional DDM, which requires a separate binding free energy calculation for each of the binding poses of the example of phenol binding to T4 lysozyme in explicit solvent. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ligand Selectivity in the Recognition of Protoberberine Alkaloids by Hybrid-2 Human Telomeric G-Quadruplex: Binding Free Energy Calculation, Fluorescence Binding, and NMR Experiments.

The human telomeric G-quadruplex (G4) is an attractive target for developing anticancer drugs. Natural products protoberberine alkaloids are known to bind human telomeric G4 and inhibit telomerase. Among several structurally similar protoberberine alkaloids, epiberberine (EPI) shows the greatest specificity in recognizing the human telomeric G4 over duplex DNA and other G4s. Recently, NMR study revealed that EPI recognizes specifically the hybrid-2 form human telomeric G4 by inducing large rearrangements in the 5′-flanking segment and loop regions to form a highly extensive four-layered binding pocket. Using the NMR structure of the EPI-human telomeric G4 complex, here we perform molecular dynamics free energy calculations to elucidate the ligand selectivity in the recognition of protoberberines by the human telomeric G4. The MM-PB(GB)SA (molecular mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann/Generalized Born) Surface Area) binding free energies calculated using the Amber force fields bsc0 and OL15 correlate well with the NMR titration and binding affinity measurements, with both calculations correctly identifying the EPI as the strongest binder to the hybrid-2 telomeric G4 wtTel26. The results demonstrated that accounting for the conformational flexibility of the DNA-ligand complexes is crucially important for explaining the ligand selectivity of the human telomeric G4. While the MD-simulated (molecular dynamics) structures of the G-quadruplex-alkaloid complexes help rationalize why the EPI-G4 interactions are optimal compared with the other protoberberines, structural deviations from the NMR structure near the binding site are observed in the MD simulations. We have also performed binding free energy calculation using the more rigorous double decoupling method (DDM); however, the results correlate less well with the experimental trend, likely due to the difficulty of adequately sampling the very large conformational reorganization in the G4 induced by the protoberberine binding.

Using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Simulation to Compute Binding Affinities of DNA G-Quadruplex Ligands.

We provide a practical guide for using molecular dynamics simulation to compute the binding affinity of small molecules in complex with G-quadruplex DNA. Such calculations have a number of applications, such as rescoring docking results and validating docked poses, to inform the discovery of G-quadruplex binders with high affinity and selectivity. This chapter describes two binding free energy protocols: the double decoupling method (DDM) and the potential of mean force method (PMF). We illustrate the application of the two methods using a recent case study of the binding of quindoline with the c-MYC G-quadruplex DNA. For this system, the two methods yield absolute binding free energies within ~2kcal/mol of the experimental value. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these binding free energy methods.

Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.

This study reports the results of binding free energy calculations for CB[8] host-guest systems in the SAMPL6 blind challenge (receipt ID 3z83m). Force-field parameters were developed specific for each of host and guest molecules to improve configurational sampling. We used quantum mechanical (QM) implicit solvent calculations and QM force matching to determine non-bonded (partial atomic charges) and bonded terms, respectively. Free energy calculations were carried out using the double-decoupling method (DDM) combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange method (HREM) and Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) method. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the predicted values using DDM with respect to the experimental results was 4.32kcal/mol. The coefficient of determination (R2) and Kendall rank coefficient (τ) were 0.49 and 0.52, respectively, highest of all submissions. In addition, these were compared to the results obtained by umbrella sampling (US) and weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM). Overall, DDM achieved a higher prediction accuracy than the US method. Results are discussed in terms of parameterization and free energy simulations.

Comparing alchemical and physical pathway methods for computing the absolute binding free energy of charged ligands.

Accurately predicting absolute binding free energies of protein-ligand complexes is important as a fundamental problem in both computational biophysics and pharmaceutical discovery. Calculating binding free energies for charged ligands is generally considered to be challenging because of the strong electrostatic interactions between the ligand and its environment in aqueous solution. In this work, we compare the performance of the potential of mean force (PMF) method and the double decoupling method (DDM) for computing absolute binding free energies for charged ligands. We first clarify an unresolved issue concerning the explicit use of the binding site volume to define the complexed state in DDM together with the use of harmonic restraints. We also provide an alternative derivation for the formula for absolute binding free energy using the PMF approach. We use these formulas to compute the binding free energy of charged ligands at an allosteric site of HIV-1 integrase, which has emerged in recent years as a promising target for developing antiviral therapy. As compared with the experimental results, the absolute binding free energies obtained by using the PMF approach show unsigned errors of 1.5-3.4 kcal mol-1, which are somewhat better than the results from DDM (unsigned errors of 1.6-4.3 kcal mol-1) using the same amount of CPU time. According to the DDM decomposition of the binding free energy, the ligand binding appears to be dominated by nonpolar interactions despite the presence of very large and favorable intermolecular ligand-receptor electrostatic interactions, which are almost completely cancelled out by the equally large free energy cost of desolvation of the charged moiety of the ligands in solution. We discuss the relative strengths of computing absolute binding free energies using the alchemical and physical pathway methods.

Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.

Molecular docking is a powerful tool used in drug discovery and structural biology for predicting the structures of ligand–receptor complexes. However, the accuracy of docking calculations can be limited by factors such as the neglect of protein reorganization in the scoring function; as a result, ligand screening can produce a high rate of false positive hits. Although absolute binding free energy methods still have difficulty in accurately rank-ordering binders, we believe that they can be fruitfully employed to distinguish binders from nonbinders and reduce the false positive rate. Here we study a set of ligands that dock favorably to a newly discovered, potentially allosteric site on the flap of HIV-1 protease. Fragment binding to this site stabilizes a closed form of protease, which could be exploited for the design of allosteric inhibitors. Twenty-three top-ranked protein–ligand complexes from AutoDock were subject to the free energy screening using two methods, the recently developed binding energy analysis method (BEDAM) and the standard double decoupling method (DDM). Free energy calculations correctly identified most of the false positives (≥83%) and recovered all the confirmed binders. The results show a gap averaging ≥3.7 kcal/mol, separating the binders and the false positives. We present a formula that decomposes the binding free energy into contributions from the receptor conformational macrostates, which provides insights into the roles of different binding modes. Our binding free energy component analysis further suggests that improving the treatment for the desolvation penalty associated with the unfulfilled polar groups could reduce the rate of false positive hits in docking. The current study demonstrates that the combination of docking with free energy methods can be very useful for more accurate ligand screening against valuable drug targets.

Prediction of Ligand Binding Affinity by the Combination of Replica-Exchange Method and Double-Decoupling Method.

A prediction method for ligand binding affinities to proteins is proposed. We first predict the structures of protein-ligand complex by the replica-exchange umbrella sampling or its extension. We then calculate ligand binding affinities based on these predicted ligand-protein bound structures by the double-decoupling method. As a test of the effectiveness of the proposed method, we applied it to the system of the oncoprotein MDM2 and a ligand. The value of the predicted binding affinity turned out to be in good agreement with that from experiments.

Absolute free energy of binding of avidin/biotin, revisited.

The binding of biotin to avidin is one of the strongest in nature with absolute free energy of binding, ΔA(0) = -20.4 kcal/mol. Therefore, this complex became a target for a large number of computational studies, which all, however, are based on approximate techniques or simplified models and have led to a wide range of results Therefore, ΔA(0) is calculated here by rigorous statistical mechanical methods and models that consider long-range electrostatics. (1) We apply our method, "hypothetical scanning molecular dynamics with thermodynamic integration" (HSMD-TI) to avidin-biotin modeled by periodic boundary conditions with particle mesh ewald (PME). (2) We apply the double decoupling method (DDM) to this system modeled by the spherical solvent boundary potential (SSBP) and the generalized solvent boundary potential (GSBP). The corresponding results for neutral biotin, ΔA(0) = -29.1 ± 0.8 and -25.2 ± 0.5 kcal/mol are significantly lower than the experimental value; we also provide the result for a charged biotin, ΔA(0) = -33.3 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. It is plausible to suggest that this disagreement with the experiment may stem from ignoring the (positive) contribution of a mobile loop that changes its structure upon ligand binding.

Calculation of the Absolute Free Energy of Binding and Related Entropies with the HSMD-TI Method: The FKBP12-L8 Complex

The hypothetical scanning molecular dynamics (HSMD) method is used here for calculating the absolute free energy of binding, ΔA(0) of the complex of the protein FKBP12 with the ligand SB2 (also denoted L8) - a system that has been studied previously for comparing the performance of different methods. Our preliminary study suggests that considering long-range electrostatics is imperative even for a hydrophobic ligand such as L8. Therefore the system is modeled by the AMBER force field using Particle Mesh Ewald (PME). HSMD consists of three stages applied to both the ligand-solvent and ligand-protein systems. (1) A small set of system configurations (frames) is extracted from an MD trajectory. (2) The entropy of the ligand in each frame is calculated by a reconstruction procedure. (3) The contribution of water and protein to ΔA(0) is calculated for each frame by gradually increasing the ligand-environment interactions from zero to their full value using thermodynamic integration (TI). Unlike the conventional methods, the structure of the ligand is kept fixed during TI, and HSMD is thus free from the end-point problem encountered with the double annihilation method (DAM); therefore, the need for applying restraints is avoided. Furthermore, unlike the conventional methods, the entropy of the ligand and water is obtained directly as a byproduct of the simulation. In this paper, in addition to the difference in the internal entropies of the ligand in the two environments, we calculate for the first time the external entropy of the ligand, which provides a measure for the size of the active site. We obtain ΔA(0) = -10.7 ±1.0 as compared to the experimental values -10.9 and -10.6 kcal/mol. However, a protein/water system treated by periodic boundary conditions grows significantly with increasing protein size and the computation of ΔA(0) would become expensive by all methods. Therefore, we also apply HSMD to FKBP12-L8 described by the GSBP/SSBP model of Roux's group (implemented in the software CHARMM) where only part of the protein and water around the active site are considered and long-range electrostatic effects are taken into account. For comparison this model was also treated by the double decoupling method (DDM). The two methods have led to comparable results for ΔA(0) which are somewhat lower than the experimental value. The ligand was found to be more confined in the active site described by GSBP/SSBP than by PME where its entropy in solvent is larger than in the active site by 1.7 and by 5.5 kcal/mol, respectively.

Elucidating the Energetics of Entropically Driven Protein–Ligand Association: Calculations of Absolute Binding Free Energy and Entropy

The binding of proteins and ligands is generally associated with the loss of translational, rotational, and conformational entropy. In many cases, however, the net entropy change due to binding is positive. To develop a deeper understanding of the energetics of entropically driven protein-ligand binding, we calculated the absolute binding free energies and binding entropies for two HIV-1 protease inhibitors Nelfinavir and Amprenavir using the double-decoupling method with molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent. For both ligands, the calculated absolute binding free energies are in general agreement with experiments. The statistical error in the computed ΔG(bind) due to convergence problem is estimated to be ≥2 kcal/mol. The decomposition of free energies indicates that, although the binding of Nelfinavir is driven by nonpolar interaction, Amprenavir binding benefits from both nonpolar and electrostatic interactions. The calculated absolute binding entropies show that (1) Nelfinavir binding is driven by large entropy change and (2) the entropy of Amprenavir binding is much less favorable compared with that of Nelfinavir. Both results are consistent with experiments. To obtain qualitative insights into the entropic effects, we decomposed the absolute binding entropy into different contributions based on the temperature dependence of free energies along different legs of the thermodynamic pathway. The results suggest that the favorable entropic contribution to binding is dominated by the ligand desolvation entropy. The entropy gain due to solvent release from binding site appears to be more than offset by the reduction of rotational and vibrational entropies upon binding.

Computational analysis of protein hotspots.

Mapping protein hotspots and analysis of the binding free energy associated with each hotspot can provide critical information for drug design. In the present study, we have performed computational analysis for the two known hotspots in thermolysin. Our data showed that the free energy double-decoupling method can determine the binding free energy of different probe molecules associated with the same hotspot or different hotspots with the same probe molecule. The less expensive cosolvent mapping method can be used to readily identify known protein hotspots without prior knowledge and also provide a good estimate of the binding free energy, as compared to the more expensive free energy double-decoupling method. Hence, the combination of the cosolvent mapping method to identify potential protein hotspots followed by more rigorous calculation of the binding free energy associated with each hotspot using the double-decoupling method can provide very useful information for drug design.

Standard Free Energy of Releasing a Localized Water Molecule from the Binding Pockets of Proteins: Double-Decoupling Method

Localized water molecules in the binding pockets of proteins play an important role in noncovalent association of proteins and small drug compounds. At times, the dominant contribution to the binding free energy comes from the release of localized water molecules in the binding pockets of biomolecules. Therefore, to quantify the energetic importance of these water molecules for drug design purposes, we have used the double-decoupling approach to calculate the standard free energy of tying up a water molecule in the binding pockets of two protein complexes. The double-decoupling approach is based on the underlying principle of statistical thermodynamics. We have calculated the standard free energies of tying up the water molecule in the binding pockets of these complexes to be favorable. These water molecules stabilize the protein-drug complexes by interacting with the ligands and binding pockets. Our results offer ideas that could be used in optimizing protein-drug interactions, by designing ligands that are capable of targeting localized water molecules in protein binding sites. The resulting free energy of ligand binding could benefit from the potential free energy gain accompanying the release of these water molecules. Furthermore, we have examined the theoretical background of the double-decoupling method and its connection to the molecular dynamics thermodynamic integration techniques.