The incidence of second esophageal primary tumors in patients diagnosed as having squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck varies in the literature. However, in large series, an incidence of about 1% to 2% is commonly reported. This relatively low overall incidence has led some authors to question the traditional use of panendoscopy, including the use of either rigid or flexible esophagoscopy to screen for simultaneous second primary tumors of the esophagus in patients with head and neck cancer. Arguments in this regard cite the exposure of most patients to unnecessary additional risk from potential complications and prolonged operating time associated with endoscopy, as well as reduced cost-effectiveness from the routine use of such procedures in which the overall positive yield is low. In addition, an increased survival advantage in the small percentage of patients with head and neck cancer diagnosed as having a simultaneous esophageal malignancy vs those patients who are subsequently diagnosed at a later date as having an esophageal primary lesion has not been demonstrated in retrospective studies, and prospective studies specifically addressing this issue are currently lacking. Barium swallow has been demonstratedtobearelativelysafeandinexpensiveprocedurethat iseasilyperformedandhasbeendescribed in the radiological and thoracic surgery literature as having a diagnostic accuracy of greater than 90% in identifying thepresenceofesophagealpathological features. Levine et al found a sensitivity rate of esophagography of 96%inaseriesof50patientswithcarcinomaof theesophagusandesophagogastric junction. In addition, this studyreviewedanadditional2484patientswhounderwentbariumesophagographyovera1-yearperiod.Endoscopywasrecommendedin26patients (1%) to rule out malignant tumor, 11 (42%)ofwhomwereeventuallyfound to have cancer. Those authors subsequently concluded that barium studies, particularly those using doublecontrast techniques, achieved good sensitivityaswell as satisfactorypositive predictive yield in those cases in whichendoscopywasrecommended. Although it might be expected that the sensitivity of esophagography decreases in cases of early esophageal malignancies, the use of esophagography to detect even relatively small esophageal lesions also finds some support within the literature. Moss et al assessed the accuracy of esophagrams in the detection of small esophageal carcinoma (,3.5 cm). In this article, the radiographic studies of 35 patients, 11 of whom showed evidence of small esophageal carcinomas with the remainder having either benign lesions or normal findings, were presented without accompanying history to 4 clinical radiologists. Although the exact diagnosis was made in only 8 (73%) of 11 patients with carcinoma, abnormal results indicating the need for further endoscopy were detected in 10 (94%) of 11 patients with small esophageal carcinoma, supporting esophagography’s role in the detection of smaller and presumably earlierstage esophageal malignancies. Nino-Murcia et al carried out a double-blind prospective study of 182 patients diagnosed as having head and neck carcinoma, 148 of whom underwent both esophagography and esophagoscopy in an effort to compare the 2 procedures in the detection of simultaneous esophageal carcinoma. Concordance of findings between the 2 procedures was found in 86% of patients. One case of simultaneous esophageal cancer was found in this series and was detected by both methods. FurtherAmit Agrawal, MD Barry L. Wenig, MD, MPH
Read full abstract