Double-blind Period Research Articles

Cariprazine as a maintenance therapy in the prevention of mood episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder.

Cariprazine treats acute manic and depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder (BP-I), but its efficacy in preventing relapse of mood episode remains unknown. In this phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with BP-I with acute manic or depressive episodes (each with/without mixed features), were treated with cariprazine 3.0 mg/day during a 16-week open-label treatment period; those who achieved stable remission within 8 weeks and remained stable for at least another 8 weeks were randomized to receive cariprazine 1.5 or 3.0 mg per day or placebo in the double-blind treatment period for up to 39 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse of any mood episode. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Patients (440/896) enrolled in the open-label treatment period achieved stability criteria and were randomized to receive cariprazine 3.0 mg/day (n = 148), cariprazine 1.5 mg/day (n = 147), or placebo (n = 145) in the double-blind treatment period. Relapse rates were 17.9%, 16.8%, and 19.7% in the cariprazine 3.0 mg/day, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. Neither dose of cariprazine was more effective than placebo on the primary outcome (3.0 mg/day: HR = 0.89, [95% CI: 0.5, 1.5]; 1.5 mg/day: HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.5, 1.4]). The most frequently reported AEs (≥5%) were akathisia, headache, insomnia, and nausea in the open-label treatment period and increased weight and insomnia in the double-blind treatment period. In the open-label and double-blind treatment periods, 7.5% and 1.6% of patients experienced an AE leading to discontinuation. Cariprazine was not superior to placebo in the prevention of relapses in this study. Relapse rates were unusually low in the placebo group. Cariprazine was well-tolerated.

Apilimod dimesylate in C9orf72 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized phase 2a clinical trial.

Apilimod dimesylate is a first-in-class phosphoinositide kinase, FYVE-type zinc finger-containing (PIKfyve) inhibitor with a favourable clinical safety profile and has demonstrated activity in preclinical C9orf72 and TDP-43 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) models. In this ALS clinical trial, the safety, tolerability, CNS penetrance and modulation of pharmacodynamic target engagement biomarkers were evaluated. This phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, biomarker-end-point clinical trial was conducted in four US centres (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05163886). Participants with C9orf72 repeat expansions were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive twice-daily oral treatment with 125 mg apilimod dimesylate capsules or matching placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week open-label extension. Safety was measured as the occurrence of treatment-emergent or serious adverse events attributable to the study drug and tolerability at trial completion or treatment over 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in plasma and CSF and concentrations of apilimod dimesylate and its active metabolites and of pharmacodynamic biomarkers of PIKfyve inhibition [soluble glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (sGPNMB) upregulation] and disease-specific CNS target engagement [poly(GP)] were measured. Between 16 December 2021 and 7 July 2022, 15 eligible participants were enrolled. There were no drug-related serious adverse events reported in the trial. Fourteen (93%) participants completed the double-blind period with 99% dose compliance [n = 9 (90%) apilimod dimesylate; n = 5 (100%) placebo]. At Week 12, apilimod dimesylate was measurable in CSF at 1.63 ng/ml [standard deviation (SD): 0.937]. At Week 12, apilimod dimesylate increased plasma sGPNMB by >2.5-fold (P < 0.001), indicating PIKfyve inhibition, and lowered CSF poly(GP) protein levels by 73% (P < 0.001), indicating CNS tissue-level proof of mechanism. Apilimod dimesylate met prespecified key safety and biomarker end-points in this phase 2a trial and demonstrated CNS penetrance and pharmacodynamic target engagement. Apilimod dimesylate was observed to result in the greatest reduction in CSF poly(GP) levels observed to date in C9orf72 clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of once-daily dexfadrostat phosphate in patients with primary aldosteronism: a randomised, parallel group, multicentre, phase 2 trial

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is caused by autonomous aldosterone overproduction and characterised by uncontrolled hypertension. There are currently no treatments that targetaldosterone synthesis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel aldosterone synthase inhibitor, dexfadrostat phosphate, in patients with PA. This multi-centre, randomised, phase 2 trial was conducted between November 2019 and May 2022 (NCT04007406; EudraCT code 2019-000919-85). Adults with PA and an office systolic blood pressure of 145-190mmHg were included. After a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, participants were randomised 1:1:1 to receive oral dexfadrostat phosphate 4, 8, or 12mg once daily for an 8-week double-blind treatment period, followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo withdrawal period. Randomisation was conducted centrally and stratified by centre and sex. At the beginning and end of the treatment period, 24h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (aSBP) was recorded. Blood samples were taken every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were the change in aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) and mean 24h aSBP from baseline to the end of the treatment period in the combined dose group of all participants receiving any dose of dexfadrostat phosphate. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events over the entire study in all randomised participants who received at least one dose of dexfadrostat phosphate. In total, 35 participants received dexfadrostat phosphate and all participants completed the study. Twenty-six participants (74.3%) were male, the mean age was 51.9 years (SD 8.7), and most were White (n=32, 91.4%). The median ARR and the mean 24h aSBP significantly decreased from the beginning to the end of the treatment period in the combined dose group (ARR: 15.3 vs 0.6, least-squares mean [LSM] change in log-normal values-2.5, p<0.0001; aSBP: 142.6 vs 131.9mmHg, LSM change-10.7mmHg, p<0.0001). There were no safety concerns; all TEAEs were mild or moderate and there were no serious TEAEs. Dexfadrostat phosphate corrected the ARR and aSBP and was well tolerated in patients with PA, demonstrating the benefit of pharmacologically targeting the source of hyperaldosteronism. DAMIAN Pharma AG.

Effects of abrocitinib on pruritus and eczema symptoms and tolerance in patients with moderate‑to‑severe atopic dermatitis in randomized, double‑blind and placebo‑controlled trials: A systematic review and a meta‑analysis.

Abrocitinib is a highly selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor that can block a multitude of inflammatory signaling pathways that underlie atopic dermatitis (AD). In addition, abrocitinib inhibits JAK1 signaling in sensory neurons to alleviate acute and chronic pruritus during AD. However, substantial variations in efficacy and safety risks remain due to variations in doses applied in clinical use. Therefore for the present study, differences in the efficacy and tolerability of 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib for treating pruritus and eczema symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe AD were evaluated compared with placebo. Specifically, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of abrocitinib compared with placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD were searched on Pubmed, E.B. Stephens Company, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Medical network, Web of Science and related Clinical Trials Registry up to November 2023. In total, two researchers evaluated the quality of the included literature according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety indicators in a cross-comparison of the effects exerted by placebo and 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib. A total of 1,825 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included across five double-blind, placebo RCTs. Compared with the placebo group, during the double-blind trial period, significant improvements were observed in the investigator's global assessment score, response rate of eczema area and severity index (EASI)-50, EASI-75, EASI-90 and pruritus numerical rating scale (P-NRS) in the 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib groups (P<0.05). However, pairwise control analysis of the 100 and 200 mg group yielded significant differences (P<0.05) in all of the aforementioned therapeutic indicators except for the P-NRS score. In terms of safety, compared with the placebo group, there were significantly higher incidence of nausea, upper respiratory tract viral infection, infections and infestations in the 100 mg abrocitinib group (P<0.05). In addition, there were significantly higher incidence of nausea, gastrointestinal disorder, headache and dizziness in the 200 mg group (P<0.05). There were also significant differences in the incidence of nausea, gastrointestinal disorder and dizziness between the 100 and 200 mg groups (P<0.05). For patients with moderate-to-severe AD, oral administration of 100 or 200 mg abrocitinib once/day was concluded to ameliorate skin pruritus and eczema symptoms to varying degrees, with the efficacy significantly superior at the 200 mg dose. However, the risk of a number of adverse reactions, such as headache, dizziness, nausea and gastrointestinal dysfunction, is also significantly increased. Therefore, patients should be made aware of the risk of adverse drug effects prior to the administration of long-term high abrocitinib doses. Furthermore, large-scale, multi-center, rigorous clinical trials remain necessary to validate the findings from the present study.

Maintenance of Investigator's Static Global Assessment Response with Once-Daily Crisaborole in Participants with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

Treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) often fail to achieve lasting disease control. In the CrisADe CONTROL phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04040192), participants aged ≥ 3months with mild to moderate AD treated with once-daily (QD) crisaborole, following initial treatment success with crisaborole twice daily (BID), had longer periods of flare-free maintenance, a higher number of flare-free days, and a lower number of flares compared with those who received vehicle. The study was an exploratory analysis of data on the maintenance of response per Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA; ISGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear]) during the CrisADe CONTROL study through week 52. Exploratory endpoints were the time to ISGA response during the open-label run-in period, and the maintenance of ISGA response and the severity and duration of flares during the double-blind maintenance period. Outcomes were stratified by age (participants aged 3months to < 12years and ≥ 12years) and duration of crisaborole BID treatment (< 4weeks or ≥ 4weeks) during the open-label run-in period. During the open-label run-in period, the median time to ISGA response was 41.5days. From week 4 to week 52 of the double-blind maintenance period, the proportion of participants who maintained ISGA response was greater with crisaborole versus vehicle, and this difference was statistically significant up to week 36 (P < 0.05). Duration of flare periods during the maintenance period were 54.1 and 54.0days for the vehicle and crisaborole-treated groups, respectively. Numerically fewer crisaborole-treated participants experienced a flare with an ISGA score of ≥ 2 compared with vehicle-treated participants (64.8% vs. 74.4%, respectively). Findings were comparable across most subgroups. Adult and pediatric participants with mild to moderate AD at baseline who had achieved responder criteria (treatment success) with crisaborole BID during the run-in period maintained response per ISGA with crisaborole QD during the double-blind maintenance period through week 52. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04040192.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation improves quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BackgroundThe neural cells in the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PWP) display aberrant synchronized oscillatory activity within the beta frequency range. Additionally, enhanced gamma oscillations may serve as a compensatory mechanism for motor inhibition mediated by beta activity and also reinstate plasticity in the primary motor cortex affected by Parkinson’s disease. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can synchronize endogenous oscillations with exogenous rhythms, thereby modulating cortical activity. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the addition of tACS to multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (MIRT) can improve symptoms of PWP so as to enhance the quality of life in individuals with Parkinson’s disease based on the central-peripheral-central theory.MethodsThe present study was a randomized, double-blind trial that enrolled 60 individuals with Parkinson’s disease aged between 45 and 70 years, who had Hoehn-Yahr scale scores ranging from 1 to 3. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the tACS + MIRT group or the sham-tACS + MIRT group. The trial consisted of a two-week double-blind treatment period followed by a 24-week follow-up period, resulting in a total duration of twenty-six weeks. The primary outcome measured the change in PDQ-39 scores from baseline (T0) to 4 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks (T4) after completion of the intervention. The secondary outcome assessed changes in MDS-UPDRS III scores at T0, the end of intervention (T1), T2, T3, and T4. Additional clinical assessments and mechanistic studies were conducted as tertiary outcomes.DiscussionThe objective of this study is to demonstrate that tACS can enhance overall functionality and improve quality of life in PWP, based on the framework of MIRT. Additionally, it seeks to establish a potential correlation between these therapeutic effects and neuroplasticity alterations in relevant brain regions. The efficacy of tACS will be assessed during the follow-up period in order to optimize neuroplasticity and enhance its potential impact on rehabilitation efficiency for PWP.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071969. Registered on 30 May 2023.

Association Between Early Clinical Responses and Long-Term Outcomes With Ruxolitinib Cream Treatment in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

In the TRuE-AD1/2 studies, patients aged ≥12 years with atopic dermatitis (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 2/3; 3%–20% affected body surface area) were randomized (2:2:1) to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for an 8-week, double-blind period followed by a 44-week long-term safety (LTS) period of as-needed ruxolitinib cream. This analysis examines associations between Week 8 responder status to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream with LTS outcomes. At Week 8, 57.0% (244/428) of LTS-evaluable patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream achieved IGA–Treatment Success (IGA-TS; IGA 0/1 with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline); 66.6% (285/428) achieved ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from baseline (EASI-75); 45.8% (196/428) achieved Itch numerical rating scale 0/1 (NRS 0/1). For patients with ≥2 visits (every 4 weeks) during LTS, mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were 83.2% vs 59.7%, 82.2% vs 54.9%, and 77.3% vs 70.1% for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were similar regardless of time to achieve IGA-TS (83.4%/77.4%/81.9% for those achieving at Week 2/4/8), EASI-75 (80.7%/78.8%/81.6%), and Itch NRS 0/1 (75.8%/70.7%/72.8%). During LTS, mean (SD) cumulative treatment-free days due to complete clearance were 149.2 (86.43) vs 104.0 (89.10), 146.4 (88.43) vs 95.9 (83.55), and 142.6 (87.58) vs 124.4 (91.47) for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Percentage of treatment-free days between study visits (between Weeks 8 and 12 vs Weeks 48 and 52) among Week 8 responders and nonresponders increased from 44.1% to 50.2% and from 16.3% to 42.3% for IGA-TS; from 41.2% to 49.9% and from 14.9% to 40.6% for EASI-75; from 39.8% to 49.4% and from 29.9% to 46.0% for itch NRS 0/1. In summary, efficacy responses achieved with 8-week ruxolitinib cream treatment are associated with higher disease control in LTS; however, nonresponders approach similar disease control with continued treatment. As-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy demonstrated substantial long-term disease control regardless of time to first response achievement.

Impact of Oral, Selective, Allosteric Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, Deucravacitinib, on Psoriasis in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a Phase 2 Trial

Introduction: Deucravacitinib (DEUC), an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) who are candidates for systemic therapy. DEUC was superior to apremilast and placebo (PBO) in two phase 3 trials in patients with moderate to severe PsO. DEUC was efficacious on multiple measures of arthritis severity vs PBO in a phase 2 trial in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had ≥1 PsO lesion (≥2 cm). In patients with body surface area (BSA) involvement ≥3% at baseline (80% of patients in this trial), a greater proportion achieved PASI 75 with DEUC (6 mg QD: 42.4%, P=0.01; 12 mg QD: 59.6%, P&lt;0.0001) vs PBO (20.4%) at Week 16. This analysis evaluated the impact of DEUC on PsO in patients with PsA in the phase 2 trial (NCT03881059).&#x0D; Methods: The phase 2 double-blind PsA trial randomized patients (N=203) 1:1:1 to PBO, DEUC 6 mg once daily (QD), or DEUC 12 mg QD. After Week 16, patients could enroll in an optional, double-blind period until Week 52. DEUC-treated patients achieving minimal disease activity at Week 16 continued DEUC to Week 52. PsO disease activity measurements were assessed.&#x0D; Results: Baseline PsO characteristics were comparable across groups. At Week 16, significant decreases from baseline in mean PASI were observed with DEUC vs PBO in patients with baseline BSA ≥3%-&lt;10% or PASI ≤12 even with very low baseline PASI scores, and also in those with baseline BSA ≥10% and PASI &gt;12. Significant decreases in PASI from baseline were observed with DEUC vs PBO in patients with background csDMARD use (DEUC 6 mg, -4.0 and 12 mg, -4.9 vs PBO, -2.3; both P&lt;0.05) and those without csDMARD use (-3.7 and -4.0 vs -2.5, respectively; both P&lt;0.001). At Week 16, greater proportions of DEUC vs PBO patients achieved PASI ≤1 with baseline BSA ≥3% (DEUC 6 mg: 32.2%; DEUC 12 mg: 44.2%; PBO: 18.5%) and in patients with baseline BSA ≥10% and PASI &gt;12 (23.1%; 28.6%; 0.0%). In patients with baseline BSA ≥3%, decreases in mean PASI at Week 16 were maintained through Week 52 in patients continuing DEUC 6 mg (absolute PASI score, Week 16: 2.39, Week 52: 1.22) and 12 mg (Week 16: 0.64, Week 52: 0.24).&#x0D; Conclusion: DEUC significantly improved PsO in patients with PsA, regardless of baseline PsO severity and background csDMARD use. Improvement was comparable to that observed in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D;

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the Phase3 KEEPsAKE1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) require treatment providing durable long-term efficacy in different disease domains as well as safety. We present 100-week efficacy and safety results of risankizumab in patients with active PsA and previous inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). KEEPsAKE1 (NCT03675308) is a global phase3 study, including a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled and ongoing open-label extension periods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive risankizumab 150mg or placebo at baseline and weeks4 and 16. After week24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12weeks thereafter. Patients were evaluated through 100weeks. Endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% reduction in American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20), minimal disease activity (MDA; defined as ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and other measures. Overall, 828/964 (85.9%) patients completed week100. For patients receiving continuous risankizumab, 57.3%, 70.6%, and 64.3% achieved ACR20 at weeks24, 52, and 100, respectively. For the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 33.5% achieved ACR20 at week24 but increased after switching to active treatment at weeks52 (63.7%) and 100 (62.1%). In ACR20 responders at week52, 81.2% of both treatment cohorts maintained response at week100. MDA was achieved by 25.0%, 38.3%, and 38.2% of the continuous risankizumab cohort at weeks24, 52, and 100. In the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 10.2% achieved MDA at week24, increasing at weeks52 (28.0%) and 100 (35.2%). MDA response was maintained at week100 in week52 responders in the continuous risankizumab (75.5%) and placebo/risankizumab cohorts (78.2%). Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Risankizumab was generally well tolerated through 100weeks. For patients with active PsA who are csDMARD-IR, risankizumab demonstrated durable long-term efficacy and was generally well tolerated, with a consistent long-term safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03675308.

Bimekizumab Efficacy through Year 1 in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who Had Not Achieved a PASI 90 Response by Week 16: A Pooled Analysis from Four Phase 3/3B Trials

Introduction: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a commonly used tool for evaluating skin clearance; patients with ≥90% reduction from baseline PASI (PASI 90) have a level of skin clearance that has been associated with improved quality of life.1 Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A.2 High PASI 90 response rates have been observed with BKZ, maintained through three years, across four phase 3/3b trials and an open-label extension (OLE).3–7 Here, we evaluate PASI response through Year 1 in patients who had not had a PASI 90 response during at least one visit up to and including Week 16, in four phase 3/3b trials of BKZ in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. &#x0D; Methods: Data were pooled from the double-blinded 52-week BE VIVID,3 56-week BE READY,4 56-week BE SURE,5 phase 3 trials, and the 48-week double-blind period of the BE RADIANT6 phase 3b trial. Included patients were randomized to BKZ 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Week 16 and then received either BKZ 320 mg Q4W or Q8W maintenance dosing until end of Year 1 (Week 52 for BE VIVID; Week 48 for other trials). Results are reported as observed case (OC).&#x0D; Results: Of the 1,362 patients randomized to BKZ across four phase 3/3b trials, 92.6% (n=1,261) had a PASI 90 response during at least one visit up to and including Week 16 while 7.1% (n=97) had not. PASI response was unavailable for 4 patients. The median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline PASI among the 97 patients without a PASI 90 response by Week 16 was −77.3 (−89.7, +20.0) at Week 16 (n=78) and −92.9 (−100, +90.7) at Year 1 (n=51).&#x0D; Overall, 61.9% (60/97) of patients without a PASI 90 response by Week 16 completed their respective phase 3/3b trials and entered an OLE. By Year 1, 55.0% (33/60) achieved PASI 90 during at least one visit.&#x0D; Conclusion: While the vast majority (92.6%) of patients treated with BKZ had a PASI 90 response during at least one visit up to Week 16, a large proportion of patients without a PASI 90 response by Week 16 who completed the phase 3/3b trials and entered an OLE had a PASI 90 response during at least one visit up to Year 1 (55.0%).

A 52-week efficacy and safety study of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ENHANCE-M extension study.

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. After 24 weeks of a randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 101) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 99) added to metformin, all patients received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day plus metformin for an additional 28 weeks during the open-label extension period. Eighty-two patients continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 77 were switched from dapagliflozin to enavogliflozin (switch group). All adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild in severity. In the maintenance group, ADRs (cystitis and vaginal infection) were reported in two patients (2.44%) during 52 weeks. In the switch group, ADR (hypoglycaemia) was reported in one patient (1.30%) during a 28-week open-label extension period. At week 52, glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.85% and 29.08 mg/dl, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < .0001 for both), and by 0.81% and 32.77 mg/dl, respectively, in the switch group (p < .0001 for both). At week 52, 68.92% of patients from the maintenance group and 64.29% from the switch group achieved glycated haemoglobin <7%. A significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio was observed at week 52, by 58.81 g/g and 63.77 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < .0001). Enavogliflozin added to metformin was tolerated well for up to 52 weeks and provided continual glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, along with a significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio.

Efficacy and safety results after >3.5 years of treatment with the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor evobrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Long-term follow-up of a Phase II randomised clinical trial with a cerebrospinal fluid sub-study

Background: Evobrutinib – an oral, central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant, and highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor – has shown efficacy in a 48-week, double-blind, Phase II trial in patients with relapsing MS. Objective: Report results of the Phase II open-label extension (OLE; up to week 192 from randomisation) and a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sub-study. Methods: In the 48-week double-blind period (DBP), patients received evobrutinib 25 mg once-daily, 75 mg once-daily, 75 mg twice-daily or placebo (switched to evobrutinib 25 mg once-daily after week 24). Patients could then enter the OLE, receiving evobrutinib 75 mg once-daily (mean (± standard deviation (SD)) duration = 50.6 weeks (±6.0)) before switching to 75 mg twice-daily. Results: Of 164 evobrutinib-treated patients who entered the OLE, 128 (78.0%) completed ⩾192 weeks of treatment. Patients receiving DBP evobrutinib 75 mg twice-daily: annualised relapse rate at week 48 (0.11 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04-0.25)) was maintained with the OLE twice-daily dose up to week 192 (0.11 (0.05–0.22)); Expanded Disability Status Scale score remained stable; serum neurofilament light chain fell to levels like a non-MS population (Z-scores); T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion numbers remained low. No new safety signals were identified. In the OLE, evobrutinib was detected in the CSF of all sub-study patients. Conclusion: Long-term evobrutinib treatment was well tolerated and associated with a sustained low level of disease activity. Evobrutinib was present in CSF at concentrations similar to plasma.

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of mogamulizumab with open-label extension study in a minimum number of patients with human T-cell leukemia virus type-1-associated myelopathy

Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease. This multicenter, randomized phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 0.3 mg/kg intravenous mogamulizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting-CC chemokine receptor 4, every 12 weeks in HAM/TSP patients. This study comprised a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period, 24-week open-label period, and extension treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥ 1-grade improvement in the Osame motor disability score (OMDS). Secondary endpoints were changes in HTLV-1 proviral load, 10-m timed walk, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neopterin levels, and safety. The exploratory endpoint was CSF chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) levels. Thirty-four and 33 patients were randomized to mogamulizumab and placebo arms, respectively. At the end of the double-blind period, no significant difference was found in the OMDS improvement rate or other secondary efficacy endpoints assessing motor activities. However, the mogamulizumab arm showed a significant decrease in HTLV-1 proviral load (− 59.39 ± 29.91% vs. placebo 2.32 ± 36.31%) and CSF neopterin (p < 0.001)/CXCL10 levels (p = 0.004). The baseline OMDS pattern and the 60–80% HTLV-1 proviral load reduction were sustained through the open-label and extension treatment periods. Although a higher incidence of rash (69.2%) was reported, the safety profile was similar compared with a previous phase 1/2a study. We found no significant difference in clinical benefit; however, mogamulizumab may provide long-term clinical benefit by preventing disease progression, as CSF neopterin/CXCL10 levels are associated with long-term prognosis in HAM/TSP.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03191526 (registered date: 6-June-2017).

Extended Safety and Tolerability of Darolutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Adverse Event Time Course in ARAMIS.

Patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) are usually asymptomatic and seek treatments that improve survival but have a low risk of adverse events. Darolutamide, a structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor (ARi), significantly reduced the risk of metastasis and death versus placebo in ARAMIS. We assessed the extended safety and tolerability of darolutamide and the time-course profile of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to ARis and androgen-suppressive treatment. Patients with nmCRPC were randomized 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554). After trial unblinding, patients could receive open-label darolutamide. Tolerability and TEAEs were assessed every 16 weeks. Time interval-specific new and cumulative event rates were determined during the first 24 months of the double-blind period. Darolutamide remained well tolerated during the double-blind and open-label periods, with 98.8% of patients receiving the full planned dose. The incidence of TEAEs of interest in the darolutamide group was low and ≤2% different from that in the placebo group, except for fatigue. When incidences were adjusted for exposure time, there were minimal differences between the darolutamide double-blind and double-blind plus open-label periods. The rate of initial onset and cumulative incidence of grade 3/4 TEAEs and serious TEAEs were similar for darolutamide and placebo groups over 24 months. Extended treatment with darolutamide was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. Most ARi-associated and androgen-suppressive treatment-related TEAEs occurred at low incidences with darolutamide, were similar to placebo, and showed minimal increase over time with continued treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02200614.

Inhibition of CD40L with Frexalimab in Multiple Sclerosis

BackgroundThe CD40–CD40L costimulatory pathway regulates adaptive and innate immune responses and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Frexalimab is a second-generation anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody being evaluated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.MethodsIn this phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 4:4:1:1 ratio, participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive 1200 mg of frexalimab administered intravenously every 4 weeks (with an 1800-mg loading dose), 300 mg of frexalimab administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks (with a 600-mg loading dose), or the matching placebos for each active treatment. The primary end point was the number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging at week 12 relative to week 8. Secondary end points included the number of new or enlarging T2-weighted lesions at week 12 relative to week 8, the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions at week 12, and safety. After 12 weeks, all the participants could receive open-label frexalimab.ResultsOf 166 participants screened, 129 were assigned to a trial group; 125 participants (97%) completed the 12-week double-blind period. The mean age of the participants was 36.6 years, 66% were women, and 30% had gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline. At week 12, the adjusted mean number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions was 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 0.4) in the group that received 1200 mg of frexalimab intravenously and 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.6) in the group that received 300 mg of frexalimab subcutaneously, as compared with 1.4 (95% CI, 0.6 to 3.0) in the pooled placebo group. The rate ratios as compared with placebo were 0.11 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.38) in the 1200-mg group and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.56) in the 300-mg group. Results for the secondary imaging end points were generally in the same direction as those for the primary analysis. The most common adverse events were coronavirus disease 2019 and headaches.ConclusionsIn a phase 2 trial involving participants with multiple sclerosis, inhibition of CD40L with frexalimab had an effect that generally favored a greater reduction in the number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions at week 12 as compared with placebo. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of frexalimab in persons with multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04879628.)

Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study.

The Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by a burning sensation in the oral mucous membranes. The etiology and pathophysiology of BMS is largely unexplained. To date, there is no evidence-based treatment strategy for BMS. Cranial electrical stimulation (CES) represents a non-invasive treatment option with a low side effect profile that is approved for the treatment of pain, depression, anxiety disorder and insomnia. It has shown efficacy in studies for chronic pain such as fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of CES in combination with local transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct therapy in patients with BMS compared to sham stimulation. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study enrolled 22 patients, aged 18 years and over, with the diagnosis of BMS meeting the ICHD-3 criteria from August 2020 to June 2021. The study duration was 4 weeks (28 days) per participant. After randomization, the active group participants (n = 11) received a 100 μA CES treatment for 60 min a day whereas the devices in the Sham group did not emit electricity. Simple linear regression was used to determine whether the interventions promoted significant differences in pain intensity. The linear regression showed that the period of stimulation significantly predicted decrease in the intensity of pain in the active group [β = -0.036; t(26) = -7.219; p < 0.001] as in the sham group [β = -0.026; t(26) = -2.56; p < 0.017]. With the applied cutoff of 30% pain reduction within the stimulation period, both the active and sham groups had 36% responders (n = 4) (Fisher's exact test, p = 1.00). In both groups (active stimulation and sham group), a significant decrease in the intensity of pain, somatic symptoms and an improvement in sleep quality over the study period was observed. Subjects reported no adverse events during the study. Although CES is an easily applicable and safe therapeutic option for chronic facial pain, active stimulation was not superior to sham stimulation. Among other reasons, this could be due to the short double-blinded treatment period, duration of the daily stimulation session or the small sample size.

533 - Long-term 5-year safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis including over 7000 patient-years of exposure

Abstract Introduction/Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itch and eczematous skin lesions, impacting individuals at any age. There is a need for AD treatments that provide rapid itch relief and skin clearance that are safe for long-term use. Upadacitinib is a selective, reversible oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor approved in multiple countries for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults and adolescents. Objectives We evaluated the long-term safety for up to 5 years of upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg use in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD, based on the results of integrated data from three ongoing global pivotal Phase 3 studies. Materials &amp; Methods The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up studies are ongoing pivotal Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo once daily alone (Measure Up 1 and 2) or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At Week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg during the double-blinded period continued their assigned treatment in the blinded extension (BE) period, whereas patients receiving placebo were re-randomized 1:1 to receive either upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg in the BE period (upadacitinib treatment for up to 260 weeks). Results A total of 2683 patients (2154 adults, 529 adolescents) who received at least 1 dose of upadacitinib (15 mg,1337; 30 mg,1346) were included in the integrated analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESI) were analyzed as exposure-adjusted rates per 100 patient-years (PY) for the entire treatment period to adjust for potentially different durations of follow-up. Rates of AESIs were similar at the 1-year analysis and up to 5-year analysis for upadacitinib for: serious infections, 15 mg, 2.3 (1 yr) and 2.2 (5 yrs)/30 mg, 2.8 (1 yr) and 2.6 (5 yrs); opportunistic infections, 15 mg, 1.6 (1 yr) and 1.7 (5 yrs)/30 mg, 1.9 (1 yr) and 2.2 (5 yrs); active tuberculosis, &amp;lt;0.1 at both timepoints for both doses; herpes zoster, 15 mg, 3.5 (1 yr) and 3.1 (5 yrs)/30 mg, 5.2 (1 yr) and 5.5 (5 yrs); non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), 15 mg, 0.3 (1 yr) and 0.4 (5 yrs)/30 mg, 0.4 (1 yr) and 0.3 (5 yrs); malignancy excluding NMSC, 15 mg, 0.1 (1 yr) and 0.3 (5 yrs)/30 mg, 0.5 (1 yr) and 0.4 (5 yrs); gastrointestinal perforations, 15 mg, 0 at both time points/30 mg, 0 (1 yr) and &amp;lt;0.1 (5 yrs); adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 15 mg, 0.1 (1 yr) and 0.2 (5 yrs)/30 mg, &amp;lt;0.1 at both timepoints; adjudicated venous thromboembolic events (VTE), &amp;lt;0.1 for both doses at 1 year and 0.1 for both doses at 5 years. Rates of adverse events leading to death were: 15 mg, 0 (1 yr) and &amp;lt;0.1 (5 yrs)/30 mg, &amp;lt;0.1 at both timepoints. Rates of serious infection at both timepoints and doses remained low (&amp;lt;3.0 E/100PYs). Upadacitinib was well-tolerated by both adults and adolescents. Conclusions The integrated analysis of long-term safety data for up to 5 years indicates that rates of AESIs remained low throughout treatment with upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. There were no new safety risks. The current safety analysis continues to support a favorable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD for up to 5 years of treatment, including over 7000 years of patient exposure.

484 - Phase 2 trial in progress - lirentelimab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments

Abstract Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory dermatitis that affects approximately 16.5 million (7.3%) adults in the US, of which around 6.6 million (40%) have moderate-to-severe disease. The current standard of care includes topical treatments supplemented with corticosteroids with and without immunosuppressants. Patients with AD inadequately controlled by topical treatments and immunosuppressants are often treated with biologics and/or JAK inhibitors. Some patients do not have an adequate clinical response or are unable to tolerate these treatments prompting the need for novel therapies. Study Rationale Mast cells (MCs) and eosinophils (eos) are implicated in the pathogenesis of AD. Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin (Siglec)-8 is expressed selectively on MCs and eos; engagement with an antibody results in broad inhibition of MC activation and eos depletion. Lirentelimab (AK002) is a humanized, nonfucosylated IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to Siglec-8. Preclinical data demonstrates that lirentelimab can broadly inhibit multiple modes of mast cell stimulation that drive AD pathogenesis. Lirentelimab, administered every 4 weeks as an infusion (IV), has been tested in over 600 healthy volunteers and patients with inflammatory and allergic diseases; in those with concomitant AD, improvements in AD were observed. Overall, lirentelimab IV has been well-tolerated; the most common AE being infusion related reactions (IRRs) typically associated with the initial infusions. In a phase 1 study, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of lirentelimab was well-tolerated with no IRRs. The results of these studies provide a strong rationale for conducting this phase 2 proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lirentelimab SC in adults with moderate–severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments (NCT05155085, “ATLAS”). Key Inclusion/Criteria Adults (18-80 years) are eligible for screening if they have had chronic AD presented for ≥3 years with moderate-to-severe symptoms defined as: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16, involvement of ≥10% of the Body Surface Area (BSA), and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3, documented recent history of inadequate response to treatment with medications such as topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, or PDE4 inhibitors (crisaborole), and biologic-naïve or biologic-exposed (secondary loss of response, intolerance, or lack of access). The complete list of inclusion/exclusion criteria will be presented. Study Design 130 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 7 SC injections of 300mg lirentelimab or placebo every two weeks and then followed for 12 weeks after the last dose. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve EASI-75 at week 14 (2 weeks after last dose) compared with baseline. All patients who receive study medication will be included in the safety analysis. Secondary endpoints include percent change in EASI at week 14 from baseline and proportion of patients with IGA of 0 or 1 and a 2-point improvement at week 14 compared to baseline. Patients who complete the study (day 99 visit of double-blind period) will be given the option to enroll in an open-label extension (OLE) for 7 doses of 300mg lirentelimab SC for 12 weeks. Qualified participants will receive medication, lab tests and medical care related to the study at no cost. Study Sites This study is currently enrolling in the USA and Germany. Please visit clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05155085) or email atlas.info@allakos.com to learn more about this study.

Alirocumab in Pediatric Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Many pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) cannot reach recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations on statins alone and require adjunct lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); the use of alirocumab in pediatric patients requires evaluation. To assess the efficacy of alirocumab in pediatric patients with inadequately controlled HeFH. This was a phase 3, randomized clinical trial conducted between May 2018 and August 2022 at 43 centers in 24 countries. Pediatric patients aged 8 to 17 years with HeFH, LDL-C 130 mg/dL or greater, and receiving statins or other LLTs were included. Following consecutive enrollment into dosing cohorts, 25 of 99 patients screened for dosing every 2 weeks (Q2W) failed screening; 25 of 104 patients screened for dosing every 4 weeks (Q4W) failed screening. A total of 70 of 74 Q2W patients (95%) and 75 of 79 Q4W patients (95%) completed the double-blind period. Patients were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous alirocumab or placebo and Q2W or Q4W. Dosage was based on weight (40 mg for Q2W or 150 mg for Q4W if <50 kg; 75 mg for Q2W or 300 mg for Q4W if ≥50 kg) and adjusted at week 12 if LDL-C was 110 mg/dL or greater at week 8. After the 24-week double-blind period, patients could receive alirocumab in an 80-week open-label period. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 in each cohort. Among 153 patients randomized to receive alirocumab or placebo (mean [range] age, 12.9 [8-17] years; 87 [56.9%] female), alirocumab showed statistically significant reductions in LDL-C vs placebo in both cohorts at week 24. Least squares mean difference in percentage change from baseline was -43.3% (97.5% CI, -56.0 to -30.7; P < .001) Q2W and -33.8% (97.5% CI, -46.4 to -21.2; P < .001) Q4W. Hierarchical analysis of secondary efficacy end points demonstrated significant improvements in other lipid parameters at weeks 12 and 24 with alirocumab. Two patients receiving alirocumab Q4W experienced adverse events leading to discontinuation. No significant difference in adverse event incidence was observed between treatment groups. Open-label period findings were consistent with the double-blind period. The findings in this study indicate that alirocumab Q2W or Q4W significantly may be useful for reducing LDL-C and other lipid parameters and be well tolerated in pediatric patients with HeFH inadequately controlled with statins. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03510884.

(123) Preliminary Efficacy of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% in an Exploratory, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Trial for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder

Abstract Introduction Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) is a persistent or recurrent inability to attain, or to maintain until completion of the sexual activity, an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement that causes marked distress or interpersonal difficulty. The biologic mechanisms leading to FSAD are similar to male erectile dysfunction. Objective To test the preliminary efficacy of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% among women with FSAD in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, exploratory Phase 2b study. To describe, using validated 28-day recall instruments, changes in sexual function with treatment, and to validate exploratory sexual function questionnaires in a placebo-controlled trial. Methods Healthy pre-menopausal women, aged 18-years or older and their sexual partners, if applicable, were screened and provided written informed consent. An individual clinical interview with each volunteer was conducted in order to establish that FSAD was present and was the primary sexual dysfunction concern. Women at risk of pregnancy used effective contraception during the study. Women or their partners were excluded if they had un-controlled hypertension, a history of serious cardiac events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke), orthostatic hypotension or other serious medical co-morbidities. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were measured by the arousal sensation domain of the sexual function questionnaire (SFQ28) and question 14 of the female sexual distress scale (FSDS). After a one-month, no drug, run-in period, and a one-month, single-blind placebo, run-in period, 200 eligible women were randomized to receive Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% (n=101) versus placebo cream (n=99). Participants applied 2 grams of the investigational product to the clitoris, vestibule, labia minora and anterior distal vagina 10 – 20 minutes prior to each partnered or un-partnered sexual experience. During the 12-week, double-blind treatment period, participants were seen monthly and completed validated, 28-day recall questionnaires. Efficacy was also measured by a 12-question Arousal Diary (AD), completed within 24 hours of each sexual experience. Results Volunteers (n=833) underwent informed consent in this ethics board (Advarra Pro 00049161) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved study (IND 119922), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04948151). There were 1131 Sildenafil and 951 placebo exposed sexual experiences recorded in the AD during the double-blind treatment period. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women had a higher proportion of satisfactory sexual events than placebo users. At 12-weeks of use, there was improvement in the co-primary endpoint of arousal sensation consistent with how women reported meaningful improvement in an exit interview at the end of the study, although this did not achieve statistical significance. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women showed improvements in pre-specified exploratory endpoints that evaluated various aspects of the sexual experience including desire (p=0.02), arousal lubrication (p = 0.059) and orgasm (p=0.066) after 8 weeks of product use. Conclusions Data from this exploratory, placebo-controlled study of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% for the treatment of FSAD in healthy premenopausal women support further clinical development of this first potential treatment for FSAD. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Sciences and Technologies (SST), LLC. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Dare Bioscience and SST LLC.