Introduction The number of fluoroscopically guided invasive diagnostic and interventional urology procedures is increasing during the last few years. This leads to higher staff doses in comparison with other radiology procedures. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate staff doses in fluoroscopically guided invasive diagnostic and interventional urology procedures. All the data were collected in Emergency Hospital “N. I. Pirogov” on an old fluorography unit with X-ray tube over the table. Materials and methods Staff doses for intravenous pyelogram (IVP), percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) and ureteral “double-J” stenting were estimated with the system RaySafe i2 . It contains four dosimeters, with a wireless connection to a real time display. The dosimeters were worn on the unprotected upper part of the body and measured the personal dose equivalent H p (10). In order to evaluate the dose of the eye lense in personal dose equivalent H p (3) two methods were used: thermoluminescent dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations. Results The highest staff dose for PN and “double-J” is received by the urologist (116.7 μSv and 42.6 μSv, respectively), while for the IVP the radiographer has the highest exposure (20.7 μSv). First results for the dose of the eye lense show values of 1.63 mSv for left eye and 5.67 mSv for right eye. Each member of the medical staff was on a different position in respect to the X-ray tube and the patient which is the main reason for the differences in the staff doses. Conclusion The variations in the mean staff doses are mostly due to the interventions themselves, their complexity and the individual treatment of every patient. RaySafe i2 is very useful and educational system. It can be a helpful tool for decreasing radiation exposure to medical staff. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank RaySafe for the kindly submitted for temporary use i2 system.