PurposeFor lung SBRT, 4DCT is often used to delineate target volumes, whereas organs at risk (OARs) are typically outlined on either average intensity projection (AIP) or mid-ventilation (MidV = 30% phase) images. AIP has been widely adopted as it represents a true average, but image blurring often precludes accurate contouring of critical structures such as central airways. Here we compare AIP vs MidV planning for centrally located tumors via respiratory motion-inclusive (RMI) plans to better evaluate dose delivered throughout the breathing cycle. MethodsIndependently contoured and optimized AIP and MidV plans were created for 16 treatments and rigidly copied to each of the 10 breathing phase-specific CT image sets. Resulting dose distributions were deformably registered back to the MidV image set (used as reference due to clearer depiction of anatomy compared to motion-blurred AIP) and averaged to create RMI plans. Doses to central OARs were compared between plans. ResultsMean absolute dose differences were low for all comparisons (range 0.01 – 2.87 Gy), however, individual plans exhibited differences > 20 Gy. Dose differences >5 Gy were observed most often for plan comparisons involving AIP-based plans (MidV vs AIP 23, AIP RMI vs AIP 12, MidV RMI vs AIP RMI 7, and MidV RMI vs MidV 8 times). Inclusion of respiratory motion reduced large dose differences. Standard OAR thresholds were exceeded up to five times for each plan comparison scenario and always involved PBT D4cc tolerance dose. AIP-based contours were larger by on average 3-15%. ConclusionLarge dose differences were observed when plans with AIP-based contours were compared with MidV-based contours indicating that observed dose differences were likely due to contoured volume differences rather than the effect of motion. Because of blurring with AIP images, MidV RMI-based planning may offer a more accurate method to determine dose to critical OARs in the presence of respiratory motion.
Read full abstract