Doses Of Sufentanil Research Articles

Comparison of a Small Dose of Oxycodone and Sufentanil for the Prevention of Sufentanil-Induced Cough during General Anesthesia Induction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Sufentanil is widely used during anesthesia induction. However, it can cause coughing via different mechanisms. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a small dose of oxycodone and sufentanil in suppressing sufentanil-induced cough (SIC) during general anesthesia induction. Methods Of the 174 patients scheduled for elective surgery, 144 were eligible and randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 48). Five minutes before sufentanil bolus (0.4 μg/kg), patients in group O received 0.02 mg/kg oxycodone intravenously within 5 s, those in group S received 0.02 μg/kg sufentanil within 5 s, and those in group N received an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline within 5 s. Sufentanil was diluted to 5 μg/ml and administered within 5 s after pretreatment. The incidence and severity of cough in the three groups were evaluated within 1 minute after sufentanil injection during the anesthesia induction. Their mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at T0 (after entering the operation), T1 (3 minutes after pretreatment), T2 (before intubation), and T3 (1 minute after intubation). Results The incidences of cough in group N, group O, and group S were 20 (41.6%), 7 (14.5%), and 6 (12.5%), respectively. Compared with group N, patients from group O and group S exhibited significantly reduced incidence and severity of cough, and the severity of cough in group O and group S was significantly reduced compared with group N (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the rangeability of MAP and HR were noted at the four time points in the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion. Preconditioning using intravenous oxycodone (0.02 mg/kg) or sufentanil (0.02 μg/kg) could represent an effective approach to reducing SIC in anesthesia induction and was associated with relatively stable hemodynamic state during general anesthesia. This trial is registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR1900021087.

Intraoperative lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a mechanistic, multicentre randomised clinical trial

BackgroundIntravenous lidocaine has been postulated to improve long-term survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer through anti-inflammatory effects, anti-tumour effects, or both. We investigated whether intraoperative lidocaine improves survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer and whether lidocaine modified the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), high levels of which are associated with poor prognosis. MethodsPatients undergoing pancreatectomy were randomly assigned to i.v. lidocaine (continuous intraoperative infusion of 2 mg kg−1 h−1, after 1.5 mg kg−1 bolus at induction of anaesthesia) or saline placebo. The co-primary outcomes were survival/disease-free survival 3 yr after surgery. Secondary outcomes (masked to treatment allocation) included intraoperative opioid (sufentanil) dose, postoperative complications, and circulating and tumour-associated NETs (immunofluorescence assay, enzyme-linked immune assay, or both). ResultsA total of 563 participants (34.6% female; median age, 64 yr) completed 3 yr of clinical follow-up. Overall, 283 participants were randomised to lidocaine infusion, and 280 participants were randomised to placebo. Infusion of lidocaine did not alter overall (hazard ratio [HR]=0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–1.17; P=0.79) or disease-free survival (HR=0.91; 95% CI, 0.71–1.17; P=0.44). Mean intraoperative sufentanil dose was reduced by lidocaine infusion (47.6 μg [4.6]) compared with placebo (68.4 μg [4.8]; P<0.001), but postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar between groups. Circulating NETs were lower after lidocaine infusion up to 3 days after surgery, but tumour-associated NETs were not altered by intraoperative treatment. ConclusionIn patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, intraoperative infusion of lidocaine did not improve overall or disease-free survival. Reduced formation of circulating NETs was absent in pancreatic tumour tissue. Clinical trial registrationNCT03245346; updated in Chi-CTR-2000035469.

Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery.MethodsWe included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsOur study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied.Trial registrationThe trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117).

Effect of ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.

Objective:To observe the effect of Ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine prior administration on hemodynamics and postoperative sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair.Methods:100 male patients aged 60 to 80 years old, a line to elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, were randomly divided into four groups: control group (Group A) and dezocine group (Group B), ketorolac tromethamine group (Group C), ketorolac tromethamine combined with dezocine group (Group D). Patients were administrated with 0.1 mg/kg dezocine in Group B, 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac in Group C, 0.1 mg/kg dezocine, and 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac in Group D, and with an equal dose of normal saline in group A. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of patients in 4 groups were recorded at each time point as follows, T0 (enter the operating room), T1 (before skin resection), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), mesh placement (T3), and laryngeal mask extraction (T4). Operation time, awakening time (time from drug withdrawal to consciousness recovery), the dosage of propofol, sufentanil, remifentanil, and intraoperative vasoactive drug dosage were recorded to compare. Visual analog scale score and sedation Ramsay score were evaluated 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation.Results:There was no significant difference in operation time, anesthesia recovery time, sufentanil dosage, and vasoactive drugs among all groups. The amount of propofol in Group B and D was less than that in Group A and C (P < .05), and there was no difference between Group B and D, A and C (P > .05). The amount of remifentanil in Group B, C, and D was less than that in Group A (P < .05), and Group D was less than B and C (P < .05). After extubation, HR and MAP were significantly higher than before (P < .05). Compared with T0, HR and MAP increased in each group at T4, but MAP and HR in Group D increased the least (P < .05). There were significant differences between Group B, C, D, and A, MAP and HR fluctuated little during extubation (P < .05), but there was a significant difference between Group D and B, C (P < .05). Visual analog scale scores of Group B, C, and D were lower than those of A at 1, 6, and 12 hours after surgery (P < .05), and there was a significant difference between Group D, and B, C (P < .05). Ramsay scores in Group B and D were higher than those in A and C at 1 and 6 hours after the operation (P < .05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among groups.Conclusion:The prophylactic use of ketorolac tromethamine and dezocine before laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can reduce hemodynamic disorder during anesthesia recovery, increase postoperative sedative and analgesic effects.

Effect of sedative premedication with oral midazolam on postanesthesia care unit delirium in older adults: a secondary analysis following an uncontrolled before-after design

BackgroundSedative premedication with benzodiazepines has been linked with prolonged recovery and inadequate emergence during the immediate postoperative period. We aimed to analyze the association between postanesthesia care unit (PACU) delirium and sedative premedication with oral midazolam.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data before (midazolam cohort) and after (non-midazolam cohort) implementation of a restrictive strategy for oral premedication with midazolam. From March 2015 until July 2018, we included patients 60 years and older, who underwent elective radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to premedication with midazolam, preoperative anxiety, and a history of neurological disorders. Patients, who were scheduled for postoperative admission to the intensive care unit, were excluded. Between 2015 and 2016, patients received 7.5 mg oral midazolam preoperatively (midazolam cohort). Patients included between 2017 and 2018 did not receive any sedative medication preoperatively (non-midazolam cohort). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PACU delirium.ResultsPACU delirium rates were 49% in the midazolam cohort (n = 214) and 33% in the non-midazolam cohort (n = 218). This difference was not statistically significant on multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 0.847 [95% CI 0.164; 4.367]; P = 0.842). Age (OR 1.102 [95% CI 1.050; 1.156]; P < 0.001), the cumulative dose of sufentanil (OR 1.014 [95% CI 1.005; 1.024]; P = 0.005), and propofol-sufentanil for anesthesia maintenance (OR 2.805 [95% CI 1.497; 5.256]; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with PACU delirium.ConclusionMidazolam for sedative premedication was not significantly associated with PACU delirium. The reduction in the incidence of PACU delirium throughout the study period may be attributable to improvements in perioperative management other than a more restrictive preoperative benzodiazepine administration.

Effect of additional equipotent fentanyl or sufentanil administration on recovery profiles during propofol-remifentanil\u2013based anaesthesia in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundIn clinical practice, sufentanil has a stronger sedative effect on patients than fentanyl at equivalent doses. This study hypothesized that, at equivalent doses, patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery (GLS) receiving fentanyl would have an earlier emergence from anaesthesia (EA), a shorter time to extubation (TE), and a better degree of wakefulness. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of equipotent doses of fentanyl and sufentanil on the quality of emergence in patients undergoing GLS. MethodsOne hundred seven patients scheduled for GLS under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups and were induced with 0.35 µg/kg sufentanil (Group S; n = 55) or 3.5 µg/kg fentanyl (Group F; n = 52). When the GLS was almost over, the patient's abdominal cavity was flushed with warm saline, and 5 µg of sufentanil or 50 µg of fentanyl in a double-blind manner was intravenously injected into the patients. The primary outcomes of the study included EA, TE, the rate of leaving the surgical bed voluntarily and the incidence of endotracheal tube tolerance. The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scores at 15 and 30 min in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), as well as other adverse events, including nausea and vomiting, itching, delirium, dizziness, chills, and respiratory depression (SpO2 < 95%) in the PACU, were evaluated as secondary outcomes.ResultsThere were no statistically significant dissimilarities between the two groups with respect to baseline characteristics. For recovery, the EA (9.0 ± 4.8 min vs. 8.9 ± 3.0 min; P = 0. 146), TE (9.5 ± 4.7 min vs. 9.0 ± 3.0 min; P = 0.135), rate of leaving the surgical bed voluntarily (31.18% vs. 38.46%; P = 0.976), and incidence of endotracheal tube tolerance (94.55% vs. 96.15%; P = 0.694) were not significantly different between the two groups. In the PACU, the 15-min RSS score (2.07 ± 0.38 vs. 2.15 ± 0.36; P = 0.125), the 30-min RSS score (2.02 ± 0.13 vs. 2.04 ± 0.19; P = 0.207), the 15-min VRS score (0.50 ± 0.57 vs. 0.67 ± 0.55; P = 0.295), and the 30-min VRS score (0.45 ± 0.50 vs. 0.75 ± 0.52; P = 0.102) were not significantly different between Groups S and F. No adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, delirium, and tremors, occurred in either group. The rates of respiratory depression (1.82% vs. 1.92%; P = 0.968) and dizziness (0.00% vs. 4.85%; P = 0.142) were not different between Groups S and F in the PACU.ConclusionsThe majority of patients scheduled for GLS were able to rapidly and smoothly emerge from anaesthesia. After surgery, similar outcomes, including EA, TE, the incidence of endotracheal tube tolerance, the rate of leaving the surgical bed voluntarily, RSS scores, VRS scores, and adverse events in the PACU, were achieved for the patients between the two anaesthetic protocols.

Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation to treat pulmonary nodules under conscious analgosedation with sufentanil: A single-center clinical experience.

The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) to treat pulmonary nodules under conscious analgosedation with sufentanil. February to May 2021, 124 patients with 151 pulmonary nodules were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent 124 sessions of MWA. Sufentanil (0.25 μg/kg) was injected intravenously before MWA. The technical success was 100% and no procedure-related deaths. The dosage of sufentanil was 16.6 ± 3.0 μg. The mean tumor diameter in the enrolled patients was 1.3 ± 0.8 cm. The intraoperative mean numerical rating scale (NRS) was 2.2 ± 1.7. Among the patients with NRS >3, seven patients had nodules adjacent to the pleura, while in ten patients, they were not adjacent. The mean systolic, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate of patients were 139.1 ± 23.5 mmHg, 77.8 ± 12.3, and 76.1 ± 13.4 times/min, respectively, before sufentanil injection. The mean lowest systolic, lowest diastolic blood pressure, and lowest heart rate intraoperative were 132.9 ± 22.0 mmHg, 76.1 ± 12.1, and 74.0 ± 13.5 times/min. Twenty-six patients had mild adverse events including nausea (6.45%, 8/124), dizziness (2.42%, 3/124), vomiting(4.03%, 5/124), nausea and dizziness (2.42%, 3/124), nausea with vomiting and dizziness (2.42%, 3/124), urinary retention (1.61%, 2/124) and respiratory depression (0.81%, 1/124). Sufentanil is a feasible, safe, and effective analgesic for MWA in patients with pulmonary nodules. It can be used for clinical promotion.

Transverse thoracic muscle plane block as a routine strategy for cardiac enhanced recovery after surgery in sternotomy: A retrospective analysis.

The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze and evaluate the effect of transverse thoracic muscle plane (TTP) block as a routine analgesic strategy for cardiac enhanced recovery after surgery in sternotomy.Patients received TTP block after general anesthesia and tracheal intubation were included in this study. The baseline clinical data of the patients, intraoperative use of sufentanil, internal mammary artery separating time, the postoperative duration of invasive ventilation, visual analogue scale, the compression times of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in the first 3 days after surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded.A total of 104 cases was included and divided to G group (without TTP block) and TTP group (with TTP). Sufentanil use (sufentanil dose/min, sufentanil dose/kg body weight, sufentanil dose/[min kg]) in TTP group was significantly lower than that of G group. In G group, intraoperative use of sufentanil was correlated to the duration of anesthesia (P = .035). The postoperative visual analogue scale pain scores and the compression times of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in the TTP group were significantly decreased compared with G group (P < .01). The postoperative duration of invasive ventilation of patients with normal and mildly impaired pulmonary function was significantly correlated to the use of sufentanil (P = .027, .009).TTP block has certain analgesic effect and can reduce sufentanil use in medium-length cardiac surgery and postoperative use of opioids. It is indicated that TTP block can be used as a routine enhanced recovery after surgery strategy for sternotomy in cardiac surgery.

Associations of Fentanyl, Sufentanil, and Remifentanil With Length of Stay and Mortality Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Background: As the first-line treatment for mechanically ventilated patients with critical illness, fentanyl and its analogs (e.g., sufentanil and remifentanil) are commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and potency of these agents differed. Their effects on clinical outcomes have not been well-understood. Materials and Methods: Using a well-established registry, we conducted a cohort study. Patients who consistently underwent mechanical ventilation (MV) for more than 24 h were identified. We used a time-varying exposure definition, in which we coded each type of opioids as prescribed or not prescribed on each day from initiation of MV to extubation and ICU discharge. We used Fine-Gray competing risk models to compare the effects of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil on hazards for extubation, ventilator mortality, ICU discharge, and ICU mortality. All models were adjusted using a combination of fixed-time and time-varying covariates. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Results: A total of 8,165 patients were included. There were, respectively, 4,778, 4,008, and 2,233 patients receiving at least 1 day of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil dose. Compared to fentanyl, sufentanil was associated with shorter duration to extubation (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI, 1.20–1.41) and ICU discharge (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI, 1.38–1.92), and remifentanil was associated with shorter duration to extubation (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% CI, 1.40–1.84) and ICU discharge (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI, 1.43–2.84). No significant differences in time to extubation (Hazard ratio 1.14, 95% CI, 0.92–1.41) and ICU discharge (Hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI, 0.81–2.14) were found between sufentanil and remifentanil. No differences were observed between any two of the agents regarding ventilator mortality or ICU mortality. The effects were similar in patients with versus without surgery. Conclusion: Sufentanil and remifentanil may be superior to fentanyl in shortening the time to extubation and ICU discharge. The effects on ventilator mortality and ICU mortality appeared similar across these agents, while further research is warranted.

Renoprotective Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine in Renal Transplantation.

Background Renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation may be influenced by many reasons. This study was designed to evaluate whether the administration of dexmedetomidine (Dex) could ameliorate renal function and prognosis after kidney transplantation. Methods A total of 65 patients were divided into Dex group (n = 33) and Con group (Con, n = 32). Dex group intravenously received an initial loading dose of 0.6 μg/kg Dex for 15 min before anaesthesia induction, followed by a rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h until 30 min after kidney reperfusion. By contrast, Con group received saline. The concentration of urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), serum creatinine (Cr), blood urea, urine output, β2 microglobulin (β2-MG), Cystatin C (CysC), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was recorded and compared between two groups during the course of the hospitalization or follow-up. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), vasoactive drugs, and anaesthetics were recorded during the operation. Pain degree was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) after operation. Delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, length of hospital stay, and mortality were compared between groups. Results The concentration of KIM-1 in Dex group was lower than Con group at 2 h (P = 0.018), 24 h (P = 0.013), 48 h (P < 0.01), and 72 h (P < 0.01) after reperfusion. MAP of Dex group after tracheal intubation (P = 0.012) and incision (P = 0.018) and HR after intubation (P = 0.021) were lower than that of Con group. The dosage of sufentanil during operation in Dex group was less than Con group (P = 0.039). Patients that used atropine in Dex group were more than Con group (P = 0.027). Patients who received Dex presented with lower VAS scores at 6 h (P = 0.01) and 12 h (P = 0.002) after operation. Concentration of serum Cr and blood urea had no significant differences between groups before operation and on postoperative day 1 to 6. Urine output was recorded for 6 days after operation and had no differences between groups. Also, no differences were identified between two groups in urea, Cr, β2-MG, CysC, and eGFR in the first 3 months after operation. Incidence of DGF after operation was detected no difference between groups, while length of hospital stay in Dex group was less than Con group (P = 0.012). Conclusion Dex can decrease kidney injury marker level, attenuate perioperative stress, relieve the dosage of sufentanil and postoperative pain, and reduce length of hospital stay. However, Dex is not associated with changes in prognosis in the first 3 months after transplantation.

Ultrasound-guided single thoracic paravertebral nerve block and erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo explore the effect of a single preoperative ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy.MethodsSeventy-two patients aged 40–70 years who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into the control group (Group C), the TPVB group (Group T) and the ESPB group (Group E). The primary observation indicators included the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively at rest and with a cough. The secondary observation indicators included the intraoperative sufentanil consumption, anesthesia awakening time and extubation time, the sufentanil consumption in the analgesic pump, and flurbiprofen ester consumption for remedial analgesia within 48 h after surgery and the incidence of postoperative adverse events.ResultsThe intraoperative sufentanil consumption, anesthesia awakening time, and extubation time were lower in groups T and E than those in group C (p < 0.05). Patients in group T had lower VAS scores at rest and with a cough at 1, 6, and 12 h postoperatively than in group C at the same time points (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest at 1 and 6 h postoperatively and coughing status at 1, 6, and 12 h postoperatively were lower in group E than in group C at the same time points (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe ultrasound-guided preoperative single TPVB and ESPB for thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy could both reduce the postoperative pain VAS score and reduce the dose of perioperative sufentanil and postoperative remedial analgesics.

Clinical Efficacy for Small Dose of Propofol and Sufentanil Intravenous Anesthesia in Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

This paper is to discuss the clinical efficacy for small dose of propofol and sufentanil intravenous anesthesia in endoscopic variceal ligation. 62 patients of endoscopic variceal ligation treated in our hospital from April 2013 to October 2014 are selected to be randomly divided into control group and observation group. The contrastive analysis for anesthetic effect was made after giving sufentanil+propofol to control group and small dose of sufentanil+propofol to observation group. Incidence rates of hyoxemia and hypotension in the observation group were respectively 3.23 % and 6.45 %, far less than the 38.71 % and 16.13 % in the control group. Therefore, the coincidence time of patients in the observation group was significantly short than that in the control group, showing a significant difference (p<0.05). Small dose of propofol+sufentanil applied in endoscopic variceal ligation works well and has a relatively high safety.

Dexmedetomidine Combined with Femoral Nerve Block Provides Effective Analgesia Similar to Femoral Nerve Combined with Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a severe traumatic procedure, and femoral nerve block (FNB) combined with a sciatic nerve block (SNB) is widely used in TKA. However, injury of the sciatic nerve is clinically reported. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) could reduce stress and inflammation, as well as improve pain in TKA. This study aims to observe the analgesic impact of DEX combined with FNB in TKA.MethodsEighty-eight patients undergoing TKA were included and randomly divided into two groups: DF group (FNB combined with DEX 0.6μg/kg before surgery, followed by DEX 0.2–0.4μg/kg/h until articular closure) and SF group (FNB combined with SNB). Each nerve was blocked with 0.375% ropivacaine 20mL, and all patients received general anesthesia routinely. The primary endpoint was the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score during activities at postoperative 24 hours.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the pain VAS scores at any time point. The mean duration of analgesia for patients with rescue analgesic requests was comparable between the two groups: 25.4 ± 6.3 hours in the DF group vs 24.8 ± 6.4 hours in the SF group (two-sample t-test, p=0.738). The total dose of sufentanil was similar between groups (P=0.355). The maintenance dose of propofol and dose of rescue analgesics were comparable (all P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in the incidence of adverse events. However, the time to extubate in the DF group was significantly longer than those in the SF group (P<0.001).ConclusionDEX combined with FNB could provide effective analgesia similar to SNB combined with FNB in TKA.Clinical Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 17, 2019 (identifier: ChiCTR1900027552).

Isoflurane promotes early spontaneous breathing in ventilated intensive care patients: A post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized trial.

Spontaneous breathing is desirable in most ventilated patients. We therefore studied the influence of isoflurane versus propofol sedation on early spontaneous breathing in ventilated surgical intensive care patients and evaluated potential mediation by opioids and arterial carbon dioxide during the first 20h of study sedation. We included a single-center subgroup of 66 patients, who participated in a large multi-center trial assessing efficacy and safety of isoflurane sedation, with 33 patients each randomized to isoflurane or propofol sedation. Both sedatives were titrated to a sedation depth of -4 to -1 on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale. The primary outcome was the fraction of time during which patients breathed spontaneously. Baseline characteristics of isoflurane and propofol-sedated patients were well balanced. There were no substantive differences in management or treatment aside from sedation, and isoflurane and propofol provided nearly identical sedation depths. The mean fraction of time spent spontaneously breathing was 82% [95% CI: 69, 90] in patients sedated with isoflurane compared to 35% [95% CI: 22, 51] in those assigned to propofol: median difference: 61% [95% CI: 14, 89], p<.001. After adjustments for sufentanil dose and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure, patients sedated with isoflurane were twice as likely to breathe spontaneously than those sedated with propofol: adjusted risk ratio: 2.2 [95%CI: 1.4, 3.3], p<.001. Isoflurane compared to propofol sedation promotes early spontaneous breathing in deeply sedated ventilated intensive care patients. The benefit appears to be a direct effect isoflurane rather than being mediated by opioids or arterial carbon dioxide.

Factors affecting sufentanil consumption for intravenous controlled analgesia after hepatectomy: retrospective analysis

BackgroundPain control after hepatectomy is usually achieved by opioids. There are significant individual differences in the amount of opioids used after hepatectomy, and the metabolism of opioids is liver-dependent. The purpose of our study was to explore the possible risk factors for opioid consumption during the first 48 h after surgery.MethodsIn a retrospective study design involving 562 patients undergoing open or laparoscopic hepatectomy, all patients were treated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) along with continuous and bolus doses of sufentanil for a duration of 48 h after surgery during the time period of August 2015 and February 2019. The primary endpoint was high sufentanil consumption 48 h after hepatectomy, and patients were divided into two groups: those with or without a high PCA sufentanil dosage depending on the third quartile (Q3). The secondary endpoint was the effect of a high PCA sufentanil dosage on various possible clinical risk factors. The relevant parameters were collected, and correlation and multivariate regression analyses were performed.ResultsThe median operation time was 185 min (range, 115–250 min), and the median consumption of sufentanil 48 h after the operation was 91 μg (IQR, 64.00, 133.00). Factors related to the consumption of sufentanil at 48 h after hepatectomy included age, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative infusion (red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma), pain during movement after surgery (day 1 and day 2), preoperative albumin, and postoperative blood urea nitrogen. Age (≤ 60 and > 60 years), extent of resection (minor hepatic resection and major hepatic resection), surgical approach (laparoscope and open) and operation time (min) were independent risk factors for sufentanil consumption at 48 h postoperatively.ConclusionAge younger than 60 years, major hepatic resection, an open approach and a longer operation are factors more likely to cause patients to require higher doses of sufentanil after hepatectomy, and the early identification of such patients can increase the efficacy of perioperative pain management.

Continuous infusion of lidocaine in pediatric colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Background:Propofol is commonly used for providing procedural sedation during pediatric colonoscopy. Intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine can mitigate visceral pain and reduce propofol requirements during surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of i.v. lidocaine on perioperative propofol and sufentanil dose, pulse oxygen saturation, postoperative pain score, and recovery time during pediatric colonoscopy.Methods:We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and enrolled 40 children aged from 3 to 10 years who underwent colonoscopy. After titration of propofol to achieve unconsciousness, the patients were given i.v. lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg later 2 mg/kg/ hour) or the same volume of saline. Sedation was standardized and combined propofol with sufentanil. The primary outcome variables were intraoperative propofol and sufentanil requirements, and the number of oxygen desaturation episodes. Secondary outcome variables were recovery time after colonoscopy and post-colonoscopy pain.Results:Lidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in propofol requirements: (median (quartile) 1.8 (1.5-2.0) vs. 3.0 (2.8-3.3) mg/kg respectively; P < 0.001) and sufentanil requirements: (median (quartile) 0.06 (0.05-0.08) vs. 0.1 (0.1-0.1) μg/kg respectively; P < 0.001). The number of subjects who experienced oxygen desaturation below 95% in the lidocaine group was also significantly less than that in the control group: 1 vs. 6 (P = 0.04). The mean (SD) recovery time was significantly shorter in the lidocaine group: (19.2 (2.6) vs. 13.3 (2.6) min respectively; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-colonoscopy pain.Conclusion:Continuous infusion of lidocaine resulted in reduction of propofol and sufentanil requirements, recovery time, and risk of hypoxemia during pediatric colonoscopy.

The key role of pulse wave transit time to predict blood pressure variation during anaesthesia induction.

ObjectiveTo establish the relationship between pulse wave transit time (PWTT) before anaesthesia induction and blood pressure variability (BPV) during anaesthesia induction.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients that underwent elective surgery. Invasive arterial pressure, electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, heart rate and bispectral index were monitored. PWTT and BPV were measured with special software. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, sufentanil and rocuronium.ResultsA total of 54 patients were included in this study. There was no correlation between BPV and the dose of propofol, sufentanil and rocuronium during anaesthesia induction. Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that PWTT (r = –0.54), age (r = 0.34) and systolic blood pressure (r = 0.31) significantly correlated with systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV). Only PWTT (r = –0.38) was significantly correlated with diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV). Patients were stratified into high PWTT and low PWTT groups according to the mean PWTT value (96.8 ± 17.2 ms). Compared with the high PWTT group, the SBPV of the low PWTT group increased significantly by 3.4%. The DBPV of the low PWTT group increased significantly by 2.1% compared with the high PWTT group.ConclusionsPWTT, assessed before anaesthesia induction, may be an effective predictor of haemodynamic fluctuations during anaesthesia induction.

Study on the Effect of Different Doses of Hydromorphone on the Time Response and Postoperative Analgesia of Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Suprailiac Fascia Inguinal Block.

Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of hydromorphone under the guidance of ultrasound on ropivacaine blocking the superior inguinal iliac fascia and postoperative analgesia. Methods From January 2020 to June 2021, 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups, 30 patients in each one. Ultrasound-guided superior inguinal iliac fascia block was performed in the patients of the 3 groups before operation. The L group: 0.3% ropivacaine 30 ml; the H1 group: 0.3% ropivacaine + 25 μg/kg hydromorphone 30 ml; the H2 group: 0.3% ropivacaine + 50 μg/kg hydromorphone 30 ml. The time until the occurrence of pain, pain intensity, sufentanil remedial dose, the number of PCIA presses, and effective times were compared among the 3 groups. The VAS and Ramsay scores of 3 groups were recorded at 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h after operation. Results The time from the end of surgery to the appearance of pain in the H2 group was higher than that in the H1 group and the L group, and the time in the H1 group was higher than that in the L group (P < 0.05). The VAS score in the H2 group was lower than that in the H1 group and the L group, and the VAS score in the H1 group was lower than that in the L group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores of 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h after operation in the H2 group were lower than those of the H1 group and the L group, and the H1 group was lower than the L group (P < 0.05). The Ramsay scores at 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h after operation in the H2 group and the H1 group were higher than those in the L group (P < 0.05), and the difference was not statistically significant in the H2 group and the H1 group (P > 0.05). The remedial dosage of sufentanil, times of PCIA compression, and effective times in the H2 group were lower than those in the H1 group and the L group, and the level in the H1 group was lower than that in the L group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of adverse reactions in the L group, the H1 group, and the H2 group were 13.33%, 23.33%, and 30.00%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion 25 μg/kg and 50 μg/kg hydromorphone used in the ultrasound-guided superior inguinal iliac fascia block can enhance the time effect of ropivacaine and improve analgesic effects, with good safety. In addition, time effect and analgesic effect of 50 μg/kg hydromorphone in enhancing ropivacaine were more obvious.

MATrix LABoratory Algorithm in Ultrasound Image-Guided General Drug Anesthesia along with Lumbar and Sacral Plexus Block in Hip Replacement under

Objective. The study aimed to explore the application of ultrasound image-guided general drug anesthesia combined with lumbar and sacral plexus block based on MATrix LABoratory (MATLAB) algorithm in hip arthroplasty and to study its clinical effect. Methods. The classic geodesic active contour (GAC) algorithm and the improved fuzzy clustering level set algorithm were used to segment ultrasound images of waist plexus, and then their segmentation effects were compared. Both algorithms are from the MATrix LABoratory (MATLAB) platform. A total of 60 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty were selected and randomly enrolled into control and experimental groups. The control group accepted general drug anesthesia, and the experimental group accepted ultrasound-guided lumbar and sacral plexus block combined with general anesthesia. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate at t0 (before anesthesia), t1 (before ventilation), t2 (when the skin was incised), t3 (when the prosthesis was implanted), t4 (when the incision was closed), and t5 (at the end of ventilation) were observed, and the intraoperative sufentanil dosage and 24 h analgesic dosage, the incidence of postoperative delirium, and the incidence of cognitive dysfunction were recorded. Results. The improved fuzzy clustering level set algorithm was better than the GAC model algorithm in image segmentation and running time. In contrast with the control group, the average arterial pressure and heart rate of the experimental group at the four time points of t1, t2, t3, and t5 were obviously reduced ( P &lt; 0.05). In contrast with the control group, the amount of sufentanil and analgesics in the experimental group was obviously reduced ( P &lt; 0.05), and the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium was obviously reduced ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion. The improved fuzzy clustering level set algorithm is superior to the GAC model in image segmentation and running time. Under its guidance, the lumbar and sacral plexus block combined with general anesthesia has a good clinical effect in hip arthroplasty, which is better than simple general anesthesia.

Comparative study of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock

To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam on the endogenous plasma catecholamine levels and the dosage of exogenous norepinephrine (NE) to maintain blood pressure in patients with septic shock. From January 2018 to December 2019, patients admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University who needed invasive mechanical ventilation and had a stay of more than 48 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock and received DEX or midazolam for sedation were enrolled in this study. The hemodynamic data, arterial blood lactic acid (Lac) level, arterial blood gas analysis and vasoactive drug dose at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours after entering the ICU were dynamically recorded, and the plasma catecholamine levels at 0, 24, 48 hours after entering the ICU were recorded. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on ICU-admission were calculated. The parameters of prognosis were collected. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 12 in the DEX group and 12 in the midazolam group. There were similar dynamic trends in heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference (Pv-aCO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), and Lac level of patients between the two groups. Only the 12-hour CVP and 72-hour Pv-aCO2 in the DEX group were significantly higher than those in the midazolam group [CVP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 13±3 vs. 10±3, Pv-aCO2 (mmHg): 9.4±5.2 vs. 4.8±2.2, both P < 0.05], and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of patients in the DEX group at 48 hours and 72 hours was significantly higher than that in the midazolam group (mmHg: 95±10 vs. 86±10, 96±9 vs. 88±7, both P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality or in-hospital mortality between the DEX group and the midazolam group [duration of mechanical ventilation (days): 5.6 (3.8, 9.5) vs. 10.5 (5.9, 15.0), ICU mortality: 16.7% vs. 33.3%, in-hospital mortality: 25.0% vs. 41.7%, all P > 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the dosage of propofol or sufentanil between the DEX group and the midazolam group [propofol (mg/kg): 0 (0, 9.35) vs. 4.07 (0, 13.75), sufentanil (μg/kg): 6.26 (4.90, 9.80) vs. 8.32 (3.52, 9.34), both P > 0.05]. The levels of plasma NE, dopamine and dobutamine in the DEX group at 48 hours were significantly lower than those in the midazolam group [NE (ng/L): 1 850.12 (342.16, 2 938.05) vs. 4 596.60 (3 310.56, 5 546.84), dopamine (ng/L): 119.10 (60.47, 200.71) vs. 275.40 (214.61, 418.88), dobutamine (ng/L): 51.20 (36.85, 75.59) vs. 98.97 (85.65, 107.10), all P < 0.05], but the amount of NE required to maintain MAP between 65 mmHg and 75 mmHg in the DEX group and the midazolam group was similar [μg/kg: 1 922 (1 170, 4 887) vs. 2 466 (2 043, 3 438), P > 0.05]. DEX can reduce plasma catecholamine levels in patients with septic shock more than midazolam, and does not increase the dose of exogenous NE, and has a smaller effect on hemodynamics in patients with septic shock than midazolam.