Dose Of Sorafenib Research Articles

Ginkgo biloba extract in combination with sorafenib is clinically safe and tolerable in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BackgroundSorafenib is the only therapy shown to improve overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical efficacy of sorafenib is limited. Combination therapy targeting multiple signaling pathways may improve outcomes. Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) has exhibited antitumor activity in multiple human cancers. Hypothesis/purposeThis study was designed to evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of GBE combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Study designPatients with advanced HCC were treated with increasing doses of GBE in combination with sorafenib. MethodsWe first determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of GBE, then the patients were treated with GBE at the MTD to evaluate its safety and efficacy. 27 patients were enrolled in the first part of our study and treated with sorafenib 400mg twice daily (BID) and increasing doses (cohort 1: 60mg, cohort 2: 120mg, cohort 3: 240mg, cohort 4: 360mg) of GBE once daily (QD). An additional group of 32 new patients next to the 27 described before were accrued for the second part of our study, and all these 32 patients were eligible for the evaluation of toxicity and efficacy. ResultsNo patient in cohort 1 and 2 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). One of the ten patients in cohort 3 experienced a DLT. DLT occurred in two of the three initial patients in cohort 4. Cohort 3 (GBE 240mg QD plus sorafenib 400mg BID) was considered to be the MTD. Three patients had a partial response, 21 had stable disease, and 8 had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.5 and 11.6 months, respectively. Compared with previous study, the toxicities of the combination therapy were similar with those observed in sorafenib monotherapy, GBE in combination with sorafenib slightly improved OS. ConclusionsThe combination of GBE (240mg QD) and standard dose sorafenib (400mg BID) is safe and tolerable among patients with advanced HCC. Early signs of antitumor activity may warrant further development of this combination.

Evaluation of dose-efficacy of sorafenib and effect of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.

BackgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib are the therapeutic standard for intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients respectively. High costs with adverse events (AE) of sorafenib might limit sorafenib dosage, further affecting therapeutic response. To attain greatest benefit, we evaluated the efficacy of different doses and effect of TACE during and after sorafenib discontinuation in patients representing Child-Pugh Classification Class A with venous or extra-hepatic invasion.MethodsA total 156 patients met the criteria and were divided into Groups I (n = 52) accepting 800 mg/day; II (n = 58) accepting 800 mg/day and reduced to 400 mg/day owing to AE; and III (n = 46) accepting 400 mg/day. TACE was performed during and after sorafenib discontinuation and therapeutic response bimonthly to four-monthly was rated thereafter.ResultsMedian duration of sorafenib treatment and patients’ survival were 4.00 ± 0.45 and 7.50 ± 1.44 months in all cases; 2.50 ± 0.90 and 5.00 ± 1.10 months in Group I; 5.50 ± 1.27 and 16.50 ± 1.86 months in Group II; 4.00 ± 0.94 and 6.50 ± 2.49 months in Group III. Group II presented the best response and survival benefit (p = 0.010 and p = 0.011 respectively). Child-Pugh Classification score 5 (Hazard Ratio = 0.492, p = 0.049), absent AE (3.423, p = 0.015), tumor numbers ≤ 3 (0.313, p = 0.009), sorafenib duration ≤ 1 cycle (3.694, p = 0.004), and absent TACE (3.197, p = 0.008) significantly correlated with patient survival. TACE benefit appeared in separate and total cases during (p = 0.002, p = 0.595, p = 0.074, p = 0.002 respectively) and after discontinuation of sorafenib administration (p = 0.001, p = 0.034, p = 0.647, p = 0.001 respectively).ConclusionsLow-dosage sorafenib not only appeared tolerable and lowered economic pressure but also provided satisfactory results. TACE benefited patient’s survival during and after sorafenib discontinuation.

Clinical Efficacy of Sorafenib Combined with Low Dose Cytarabine for Treating Patients with FLT3+ Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

To study the efficacy and safety of sorafenib combined with low dose cytarabine for treating patients with FLT3(+) relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3(+) RR-AML). Seven patients with FLT3(+) RR-AML were treated with sorafenib and low dose cytarabine. The curative rate and adverse effects were observed in these patients. Out of 7 RR-AML patients after treatment, 5 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 2 patients achieved partial remission (PR), and the overall response rate (ORR) after one course of therapy was 100%. No severe bleeding, nausea, vomiting and other side effects were found in these patients. Sorafenib combined with low dose cytarabine can effectively induce the remission of FLT3(+) RR-AML patients, and is worth for further clinical trails to verify its safty and efficiency.

Therapeutic decisions and treatment with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: final analysis of GIDEON study in Italy

Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is the only targeted agent approved for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after demonstration to increase overall survival compared to placebo in two randomized phase III study. GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in HCC and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) is the largest, global, non-interventional, prospective study of patients with uHCC (n>3200) treated with sorafenib in real-life clinical practice conditions. Here we report the final analysis of safety and efficacy in the Italian cohort of patients. Patients with unresectable HCC who are candidates for systemic therapy, and for whom a decision has been made to treat with sorafenib, are eligible for inclusion. Patients demographics disease characteristics and treatment history were recorded at baseline visit. Sorafenib dose, concomitant medications, performance status, liver function, adverse events and efficacy (survival and response rate) were collected throughout the study. In the Italian cohort of the GIDEON study 278 patients were included in 36 centers. The global rate of adverse events was 81%. Drug-related events accounted for 67%, mostly of grade 1 and 2, and only 8% were classified as serious. The most common were diarrhea (24%), fatigue (23%), dermatological (14%), rash/exfoliation (10%), hypertension (9%), hemorrage/bleeding of gastrointestinal tract (6%). Overall survival was 14.4 months and time to progression 6.2 months. Objective responses were observed in 14 patients (5%) with 3 complete responses (1%). Stable diseases of at least 6 weeks were observed in 113 patients (41%) with a 30% of disease control rate. The safety profile of sorafenib in terms of rate and type of adverse events is similar to that emerged in the global international GIDEON study as well as in the pivotal registration studies.

Real-Life Experience of Sorafenib Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea: From GIDEON Data.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to report real life experiences of sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea, using a subset of data from GIDEON (Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in HCC and of Its Treatment with Sorafenib; a large, prospective, observational study).Materials and MethodsBetween January 2009 and April 2012, a total of 497 patients were enrolled from 11 sites in Korea. Of these, 482 patients were evaluable for safety analyses. Case report forms of paper or electronic version were used to record safety and efficacy data from all patients.ResultsMore patients of Child-Pugh A received sorafenib for > 8 weeks than did patients of Child-Pugh B (55.5% vs. 34.3%). Child-Pugh score did not appear to influence the starting dose of sorafenib, and approximately 70% of patients both in Child-Pugh A and B groups received the recommended initial daily dose of 800 mg (69.0% and 69.5%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 8.5 months and 2.5 months. In Child-Pugh A patients, the median OS and TTP were 10.2 months and 2.5 months. The most frequent treatment-emergent drug-related adverse event was hand-foot skin reaction (31.7%), followed by diarrhea (18.0%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both Child-Pugh A (85.4%) and Child-Pugh B (84.8%) patients.ConclusionSorafenib was well tolerated by Korean HCC patients in clinical settings, and the safety profile did not appear to differ by Child-Pugh status. Survival benefit in Korean patients was in line with that of a previous pivotal phase III trial (SHARP).

Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30.

We previously found that a low dose of sorafenib had a prometastatic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was caused by downregulation of TIP30 expression. More recently, metformin has been shown to have potential as a preventive and therapeutic agent for different cancers, including HCC. This study evaluated whether the combination of sorafenib and metformin is sufficient to revert the expression of TIP30, thereby simultaneously reducing lung metastasis and improving survival. Our data show that the combination of sorafenib and metformin inhibits proliferation and invasion in vitro, prolongs median survival, and reduces lung metastasis of HCC in vivo. This effect is closely associated with the upregulation of TIP30, partly through activating AMP‐activated protein kinase. Thioredoxin, a prometastasis factor, is negatively regulated by TIP30 and plays an essential role during the process of HCC metastasis. Overall, our results suggest that metformin might be a potent enhancer for the treatment of HCC by using sorafenib.

Sorafenib Plus Ixabepilone as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Sarah Cannon Research Institute Phase I/II Trial

BackgroundThe purposes of the present phase I/II trial were (1) to define tolerable doses of ixabepilone and sorafenib when used in combination and (2) to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and MethodsThe eligible patients had human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative MBC and had not received previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. All patients received ixabepilone intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle; sorafenib was administered orally twice daily. Patients in phase II received the maximum doses identified in phase I. The patients were reevaluated after the completion of 3 treatment cycles; treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. A total of 67 patients were required in phase II to demonstrate increased median progression-free survival from 4.2 to 6.2 months (90% power, α = 0.05). ResultsTen patients entered the phase I portion; the maximum tolerated doses were ixabepilone 32 mg/m2 and sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. A total of 76 patients were treated at the phase II dose. The median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.5-6.3 months). The overall response rate was 37%. The regimen was difficult to tolerate for many patients; 20 patients discontinued because of toxicity, and dose reductions were frequent. The common toxicities included neutropenia, fatigue, rash, and neuropathy. ConclusionThe combination of ixabepilone and sorafenib was poorly tolerated as first-line treatment of patients with MBC. The activity of the combination was similar to the activity previously reported with single-agent ixabepilone or taxanes. Further development of this combination is not recommended.

BIOSHARE multicenter neoadjuvant phase 2 study: Results of pre-operative sorafenib in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)—From GERCOR IRC.

252 Background: This open-label, multicenter, phase II study aimed at investigating the activity of sorafenib including radiological, pathological and biological changes in tumor from patients with resectable HCC. Methods: Preoperative administration of sorafenib 400 mg bid for 4 weeks was followed by surgery. Primary endpoints were antitumor activity and histological changes on paired tumor samples and plasma biomarkers between baseline and post sorafenib. Secondary endpoints were safety, R0 surgery and post-surgical complications. Results: Among 30 patients enrolled, 28 were evaluable for safety. Neoadjuvant sorafenib was not feasible in 3 patients (early limiting toxicities). Twenty-five patients (21 men; median age: 61.5 years) were evaluable for the primary endpoints. Baseline median tumor size was 37 mm and 21 patients (84%) had a single lesion. Median duration and dosing of sorafenib were 28 days and 793 mg/day respectively. Overall, the safety profile of preoperative sorafenib was good. According to RECIST criteria, all patients showed stable disease. Among 19 patients evaluated according to mRECIST and Choi criteria, objective responses were observed for 6 (32%) and 10 (53%) patients respectively. All evaluable patients went on liver resection and no unexpected complication occurred. R0 tumor resection was achieved in 22 patients (88%). Surgical specimen showed macrovascular and microvascular invasion in 12% and 48%, respectively. Intratumor necrosis was observed in 17 (68%) surgical specimen with necrosis ≥ 50% in 24 % of cases. Blood biomarkers analysis showed a trend toward increased angiogenesis biomarkers (VEGF-A, VEGF-C and PlGF) after sorafenib treatment. Biomarkers from pre- and post-treatment tissue will be presented during the meeting. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant sorafenib displays a favorable toxicity profile and yields significant activity in patients with resectable HCC. BIOSHARE trial also allows exploration of drug effects on tumor biology. Clinical trial information: NCT01182272.

Sorafenib and irinotecan combination for pre-treated RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A multicentre randomized phase II trial (NEXIRI 2).

635 Background: Sorafenib and irinotecan (NEXIRI regimen) showed promising activity with a disease control rate (DCR) of 65% in heavily pretreated mutated (mt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in a phase I/II trial (Samalin et al. 2014).This multicentre randomized phase II trial aimed to determine the 2-month progression-free survival rate (2-PFS) of NEXIRI versus irinotecan or sorafenib monotherapy in mtRAS mCRC patients after failure of all approved active drugs at the time of the study. Methods: Patients PS ≤ 1 with progressive measurable and non-resectable mtKRAS (then RAS) mCRC pre-treated with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidines and bevacizumab (none regorafenib), were randomized in 3 arms: NEXIRI (irinotecan IV 120 (C1), 150 (C2) and 180mg/m² (C3) if diarrhea grade < 1 in a biweekly regimen combined with a fixed dose of sorafenib, 400mg twice daily) versus irinotecan alone (180mg/m²) versus sorafenib alone until progression or toxicity, with cross over to NEXIRI at progression for the monotherapy arms. The primary endpoint was the 2-PFS (RECIST v1.1). Pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetics and pathologic translational studies were undertaken. Results: We included 173 patients (median age 62 [31-82]; PS 0/1: 38/61%) between 2012/09 and 2014/07 in 17 French centres. Main results are shown below (median follow-up 17.5 months). Conclusions: We confirmed the NEXIRI regimen efficacy in a randomized study for refractory mtRAS mCRC patients. These results justify comparing this combination to regorafenib or TAS 102 monotherapies in this population. Ancillary studies are ongoing to identify biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT01715441. [Table: see text]

Yttrium-90 resin microspheres as an adjunct to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

PurposeThe safety and efficacy of the combined use of sorafenib and yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y90 RMS) to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well established. We determined the incidence of adverse events with this combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC at our institution and analyzed the treatment and survival outcomes.Materials and methodsWe reviewed the records of 19 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class B or C HCC who underwent treatment with Y90 RMS (for 21 sessions) while receiving full or reduced doses of sorafenib between January 2008 and May 2010. Therapy response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We evaluated median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as hepatic and extrahepatic disease PFS and incidence of adverse events.ResultsThe median patient age was 67 years, and portal or hepatic venous invasion was present in eight patients (42%). Ten patients received reduced doses of sorafenib. The median Y90 radiation activity delivered was 41.2 mCi. The partial response of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was observed in four patients (19%). The median hepatic disease PFS was 7.82 months, extrahepatic disease PFS was 8.94 months, OS was 19.52 months, and PFS was 6.63 months. Ninety days after treatment with Y90 RMS, five patients (26%) had grade II adverse events and four patients (21%) had grade III adverse events.ConclusionOS and PFS outcomes were superior to those observed in prior studies evaluating sorafenib alone in patients with a similar disease status, warranting further study of this treatment combination.

Phase I dose-escalation study of sorafenib plus S-1 in refractory solid tumors.

745 Background: S-1 is a new oral fluoropyrimidine-derived combo and has been shown activity in patients with various cancers in phase II/III studies. Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenesis activities and has been approved for the first-line treatment of advanced HCC, RCC and radioactive iodine-resistant thyroid cancer. In xenograft mouse models, sorafenib showed its activity to enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum dose of S-1 in combination with standard dosing of sorafenib in patients with refractory solid tumors was conducted. Methods: Eligible patients would receive escalating dose (30, 35 and 40 mg/m2, twice daily) of S-1 in a standard 3+3 phase I study design. Treatment was consisted of continuous sorafenib 400 mg bid plus S-1 30-40mg/m2 bid, D1-14, every 21 days per cycle. DLTs were assessed during the first two cycles of treatment, and treatment would be continued until disease progression, the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Results: A total of 13 patients were included, 7 in 30 mg/m2 dose level and 6 in 35 mg/m2 dose level. DLT occurred in 2 of 6 patients with 35 mg/m2 twice daily, manifested as grade 3 skin rash and prolonged grade 2 hand-foot-skin reaction in one each; while there was no DLT observed in 30 mg/m2 cohort. Seven patients achieved durable tumor control, included one pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patient who had a sustained PR for 27.9 months, and durable stable diseases (>6 months of progression-free survival) in 3 out of 4 colorectal cancer patients, 2 of 2 biliary tract cancer patients and 1 of 2 pancreatic cancer patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of S-1 in this combination was 30mg/m2 bid. Preliminary results suggested sorafenib/S-1 combination is feasible and deserves for further exploration in refractory advanced gastrointestinal tract cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT01128998.

Phase I study of pre-operative continuous 5-FU and sorafenib with external radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma

PurposeThe standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy. Sorafenib works synergistically with radiation and inhibits Ras/Raf, PDFGR, and VEGFR. This phase I study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sorafenib with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods and materialsPatients with confirmed stage II or III rectal cancer were recruited in 4 cohorts of 3 patients per dose level, with an expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose. A 3+3 dose escalation design was used. Radiation was given in 28 fractions at 1.8Gy (50.4Gy) day 1–5 at all dose levels. Initial dose of sorafenib was 200mg qd and titrated up to 400mg BID to determine the MTD. Standard dose of infusional 5-FU was used (225mg/m2/24h). Patients underwent surgery 6–10weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. ResultsBetween August 2011 and August 2014, 17 patients (median age of 54years) were enrolled. After toxicities requiring dose interruptions were observed in cohort 1 (2 patients with grade 2 (G2) and grade 3 (G3) hand foot skin reaction and 1 patient with G2 mucositis), the protocol was amended, changing administration of chemotherapy and sorafenib from daily to days 1–5 only. With the amended protocol, the primary G3 toxicity was hypertension in 2 patients at the 200-mg adjusted dose level (day1–5) and 1 patient at the 400-mg twice daily dose level. One patient had G3 ALT elevation at 400mg, and no grade IV toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, mucositis, nausea, fatigue, and proctitis. No perioperative complications were seen. Two patients refused to undergo surgery. The pathological complete remission (pCR) rate was 33%, and downstaging was observed in 85.7% of patients. Median neoadjuvant rectal cancer score was 8.7. ConclusionsWith the changed dosing schedule, this regimen was very well tolerated. The tumor pCR and downstaging rates are encouraging and support further clinical investigation of this regimen.

Inducing tolerability of adverse events increases sorafenib exposure and optimizes patient's outcome in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Various grades of adverse events are associated with sorafenib and have recently been considered as a surrogate of response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this prospective study was to measure the efficacy of a sorafenib dose reduction regimen, adjusted on patient's tolerability, and aimed at increasing the exposure to the drug. A total of 73/140 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib developed relevant adverse events (grade ≥2) and were managed with a tolerable-adverse-event-protocol consisting of a drug stepwise dose reduction adjusted on patient's tolerability. The remaining 67 patients with toxicity grade 0-1 (minor adverse event group) were managed conventionally with just symptomatic treatment. Median follow-up was 7 months. By adopting the tolerable-adverse-event-protocol, 48% of patients meant to transiently or definitively interrupt the drug were kept on treatment. Macrovascular invasion with/out extra-hepatic spread (HR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.8; P = 0.001) and sorafenib exposure <2 months (HR = 4, 95% CI: 2.5-6.4; P < 0.0001) were independently related to a worse survival. Overall disease control rate, time to progression and survival were: 63.5%, 6 and 9.1 months respectively. The tolerable-adverse-event-protocol group experienced a more favourable outcome with respect to the minor adverse event group as for disease control rate (78% vs. 48%: P < 0.0001), time to progression (9.5 vs. 3 months; HR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.5, P < 0.0001) and survival (12.5 vs. 5.7 months; HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6; P < 0.0001). In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib dose adjustments based on inducing tolerability of relevant adverse events prolong drug exposure and maximize survival.

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer.

418 Background: Various chemotherapeutic regimens have been examined. However, there is no effective regimen, and some studies have been stopped because of severe adverse events. Therefore, maintenance of quality of life is also important. This study examine the anti-cancer effects, changes in the quality of life (QoL), and safety of combined therapy of low dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in these patients. Methods: Twenty patients were treated with gemcitabine (700 mg/m2 on day 1), paclitaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 1), and sorafenib (400 mg/day on days 8–22). QoL and pain relief were evaluated using the short-form survey (SF)-36 and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Data on QoL and pain were collected on the day before the first cycle was started and 8 weeks after starting the therapy. A total of 124 cycles were administered and the median (IQR) number of treatment cycles per patient was 5 (3–8) cycles. Results: Among 20 patients, 12 and 8 patients were received as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. In 2nd-line therapy, median / interquartile range of VAS scores after therapy (2 / 2–3) significantly decreased (p = 0.012) compared to their pretreatment levels (3 / 2–5). Likewise, a significant decrease was also found in 3rd-line therapy (5/ 4–6 to 3/ 2–3, p = 0.028). Similar findings were confirmed by the bodily pain score from the SF-36 survey. A decrease in analgesic consumption was seen in three patients (17.6%), and 2 patients (11.8%) was improved the pain without increasing the dose. Complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease were found in 0 (0.0%), 1 (5.0%), and 13 patients (65%), respectively. The period of overall survival after starting of this therapy was 7 (5–11) months. Three patients (15.0%) stopped therapy because of grade 3 fatigue and hand-foot reactions. Conclusions: Combined therapy of low dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib was well tolerated. QoL was maintained and improvements in their pain levels were found after treatment. We suggest that this treatment regimen is worthy of consideration as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy for patients with CDDP-resistant UC. Clinical trial information: 000010957.

Predictive factors for sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Predictive factors for sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) using ordered logistic regression analysis were studied. This retrospective analysis evaluated patients admitted to a university hospital in Japan from May 2008 through October 2013. Patients age 20 years or older with relapsed or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, or gastrointestinal stromal tumor resistant to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Data were manually collected from patients' clinical records and included sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, initial daily dose of sorafenib, duration of sorafenib use, concomitant medications, number of metastases, sites of metastases, physical examination findings, and type of cancer. Laboratory test values related to the patient's medical condition that seemed to influence HFSR or the absorption and pharmacologic effects of sorafenib were also collected. HFSR severity was also assessed. Univariate ordered logistic analysis was performed for HFSR severity outcomes and each candidate independent variable. A multivariate ordered logistic regression model was then constructed using a stepwise forward selection procedure. Data were screened for multicollinearity. Data from 113 patients were evaluated. This analysis identified duration of sorafenib use (odds ratio [OR], 0.0531), use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (OR, 0.351), ECOG performance status (OR, 0.555), C-reactive protein level (OR, 17.74), and male sex (OR, 0.403) as significant factors for the occurrence of HFSR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that short duration of sorafenib use, avoidance of PPIs, good ECOG performance status, high C-reactive protein level, and female sex were predictive factors for the development of HFSR.

Phase 1 Trial of Sorafenib and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To determine the maximally tolerated dose of sorafenib delivered before, during, and after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carinoma (HCC). Eligible patients had locally advanced Child-Pugh class A HCC, showed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and were ineligible for standard local-regional therapies. Sorafenib was dose escalated in 2 strata: (1) low effective irradiated liver volume (veff) < 30% and (2) high veff 30%to 60%. Sorafenib (400 mg daily = dose level 1) was administered for 12 weeks, with 6 fractions SBRT delivered weeks 2 and 3, and escalation to full dose (400 mg twice daily) after 12 weeks as tolerated. Standard 3 + 3 cohorts with dose escalation of sorafenib were planned. Sixteen patients (4 low veff, median dose 51 Gy; 12 high veff, median dose 33 Gy) were treated at 2 sorafenib dose levels. Of those patients 75% were had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, and 63% had main branch portal vein invasion. In the low veff stratum, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 4 patients treated with SBRT and sorafenib 400 mg. Inb the high veff stratum: 2 of 3 evaluable patients treated with sorafenib 400 mg experienced DLT (grade 3 large bowel bleed and grade 4 bowel obstruction 51 and 27 days, respectively, after SBRT). One of 6 evaluable patients at dose level -1 (200 mg once daily) experienced a grade 3 tumor rupture at week 5. Median overall survival and in-field local progression have not been reached. Worsening of Child-Pugh liver function class was seen in 6 of 12 patients in the high veff stratum. Significant toxicity was observed in the high veff stratum, and concurrent SBRT with sorafenib is not recommended outside a clinical trial.

Prospective Study of Peri-Transplant Use of Sorafenib As Remission Maintenance for FLT3-ITD Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation

▪Background: FLT3 ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia remains a therapeutic challenge with very few patients experiencing prolonged disease free survival after standard therapies. FLT3 inhibitors have thus far demonstrated limited single agent activity in this disease. However, administration of FLT3 inhibitors during a state of minimal residual disease and a reconstituting immune system offers a promise of improved disease control.Methods: We designed a prospective trial for patients FLT3 ITD AML undergoing allogeneic transplant, to evaluate the safety, tolerability and outcome of the FLT3 ITD inhibitor sorafenib administered pre- and post-allogeneic transplant. To be eligible, patients needed to be in remission prior to transplant. At the discretion of the treating physician, sorafenib could be started prior to transplant after confirmation of remission and continued until three days prior to the start of the preparative regimen. Otherwise, all patients were started on sorafenib 200 mg twice a day, no earlier than Day +30 and no later than Day +120 post-transplant, after documented engraftment (Plts >50K, ANC >500). Dosing of sorafenib was based on individual patient tolerance: in tolerant patients sorafenib was escalated to 400 mg twice a day while dose reductions occurred for Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in a stepwise manner (200 mg BID, 200 mg QD, 200 mg QoD) until a tolerable dose was identified.Results: We have accrued to date 28 patients with a median age of 54, with FLT ITD AML undergoing allogeneic transplant who were started on sorafenib in the peri-transplant period (8 pre-transplant). Ten patients underwent myeloablative conditioning and received a transplant from a matched related donor (5), a matched unrelated donor (2) or a haploidentical donor (3). Eighteen patients underwent non-myeloablative conditioning and transplant using either a haploidentical donor (10), a matched sibling donor (4), a matched unrelated donor (3) or an umbilical cord blood donor (1). The median duration of post transplant follow up for active patients is 450 days (range, 107-1192 days). The median duration of sorafenib therapy for all patients is 252 days (range, 52-1081). The tolerability of sorafenib in the peri-transplant period varied among patients: 6 patients tolerated the maximum dose of sorafenib at 400 mg twice a day, 14 patients were maintained on 200 mg twice a day, seven patients were maintained on 200 mg daily and one patient was maintained on 200 mg every other day. Six patients died in the post-transplant period with three deaths due to relapsed leukemia and three from transplant-associated toxicity. No primary or secondary graft failures were observed but 9 patients developed grade 2 or higher GVHD (1-4 weeks after starting sorafenib) requiring escalation of immunosuppression therapy. Overall 5 pts have relapsed so far. Three of these patients were off therapy at the time of relapse. One patient relapsed with FLT3 ITD leukemia 117 days after stopping sorafenib at the 24 month planned stoppage time and is now back in remission after resuming sorafenib.Correlative studies evaluating FLT3 inhibition via a plasma inhibitory activity (PIA) assay showed consistent inhibition of FLT3 at all tolerability-determined dosing levels, suggesting that dosing can be safely adjusted in patients having adverse events without loss of FLT3 inhibition. Consistent with this finding was the fact that the adjusted sorafenib trough concentration exposure accounting for the active metabolite (sorafenib + (14.59*sorafenib N-oxide)) was highly variable (70% CV) and not statistically different across all dosing levels. Exploratory analysis of minimal residual disease monitoring, and of T regulatory cell populations and their relation to GVHD in the pre- and post-treatment peripheral blood, are ongoing.Conclusion: Sorafenib is well tolerated in the post-transplant setting irrespective of the conditioning intensity or the donor source. Our findings indicate that sorafenib dosing should be individualized in the post-transplantation setting according to patient tolerability. This approach results in effective in vivo FLT3 inhibition, and yields encouraging survival results, with 15 of 28 patients currently on therapy without relapse. This data supports the further study of sorafenib in a larger cohort to determine its overall effectiveness in preventing FLT3 ITD AML relapse post allogeneic transplant. [Display omitted] [Display omitted] DisclosuresOff Label Use: Sorafenib for off label usage in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

SY13-3 - Relationships between sorafenib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy

Sorafenib is an orally active multikinase inhibitor for a variety of cellular molecules including VEGFR-2, PDGFR, c-KIT, FLT-3, and BRAF. The recommended dose of sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and thyroid cancer is 400 mg twice daily. Notably, sorafenib shows a large inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability after oral administration. Therefore, a suboptimal exposure to sorafenib could result in a decreased anti-tumor activity, while a greater exposure to sorafenib could be related to the development of sorafenib-induced adverse events such as hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension. However, it has not been adequately examined the association between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib under real-life practice conditions. In this symposium, we will summarize recent findings on the relationships between sorafenib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy in the clinical setting.

Adjuvant sorafenib for liver cancer: wrong stage, wrong dose

Adjuvant sorafenib for liver cancer: wrong stage, wrong dose

Sorafenib treatment for recurrent stage T1 bilateral renal cell carcinoma in patients with Von Hippel- Lindau disease: A case report and literature review.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome is associated with multiple recurrences and a young age at diagnosis. Therefore the primary goal of treatment is to stabilize the disease, minimizing the surgical resection and preserving the renal function in the patients with VHL who have developing RCC nodules after initial treatment. This is the first case report of VHL disease, with long-term stable disease, treated with a half dose of sorafenib after surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for multiple recurrent stage T1 masses. We discuss the efficacy and safety of low-dose sorafenib treatment and review RCC in a patient with VHL disease.