Doses Of Rifapentine Research Articles

Population Pharmacokinetics of Rifapentine and Desacetyl Rifapentine in Healthy Volunteers: Nonlinearities in Clearance and Bioavailability

Rifapentine is under active investigation as a potent drug that may help shorten the tuberculosis (TB) treatment duration. A previous rifapentine dose escalation study with daily dosing indicated a possible decrease in bioavailability as the dose increased and an increase in clearance over time for rifapentine and its active metabolite, desacetyl rifapentine. This study aimed to assess the effects of increasing doses on rifapentine absorption and bioavailability and to evaluate the clearance changes over 14 days. A population analysis was performed with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Absorption, time-varying clearance, bioavailability, and empirical and semimechanistic autoinduction models were investigated. A one-compartment model linked to a transit compartment absorption model best described the data. The bioavailability of rifapentine decreased linearly by 2.5% for each 100-mg increase in dose. The autoinduction model suggested a dose-independent linear increase in clearance of the parent drug and metabolite over time from 1.2 and 3.1 liters · h(-1), respectively, after a single dose to 2.2 and 5.0 liters · h(-1), respectively, after 14 once-daily doses, with no plateau being reached by day 14. In clinical trial simulations using the final model, rifapentine demonstrated less-than-dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, but there was no plateau in exposures over the dose range tested (450 to 1,800 mg), and divided dosing increased exposures significantly. Thus, the proposed compartmental model incorporating daily dosing of rifapentine over a wide range of doses and time-related changes in bioavailability and clearance provides a useful tool for estimation of drug exposure that can be used to optimize rifapentine dosing for TB treatment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01162486.).

Rifapentine Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability in Children and Adults Treated Once Weekly With Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

In a phase 3, randomized clinical trial (PREVENT TB) of 8053 people with latent tuberculosis infection, 12 once-weekly doses of rifapentine and isoniazid had good efficacy and tolerability. Children received higher rifapentine milligram per kilogram doses than adults. In the present pharmacokinetic study (a component of the PREVENT TB trial), rifapentine exposure was compared between children and adults. Rifapentine doses in children ranged from 300 to 900 mg, and adults received 900 mg. Children who could not swallow tablets received crushed tablets. Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling was performed with 1 rifapentine concentration at 24 hours after drug administration (C24). Rifapentine area under concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated from a nonlinear, mixed effects regression model (NLME). There were 80 children (age: median, 4.5 years; range, 2-11 years) and 77 adults (age: median, 40 years; all ≥18 years) in the study. The geometric mean rifapentine milligram per kilogram dose was greater in children than in adults (children, 23 mg/kg; adults, 11 mg/kg). Rifapentine geometric mean AUC and C24 were 1.3-fold greater in children (all children combined) than in adults. Children who swallowed whole tablets had 1.3-fold higher geometric mean AUC than children who received crushed tablets, and children who swallowed whole tablets had a 1.6-fold higher geometric mean AUC than adults. The higher rifapentine doses in children were well tolerated. To obtain rifapentine exposures comparable in children to adults, dosing algorithms modeled by NLME were developed. A 2-fold greater rifapentine dose for all children resulted in a 1.3-fold higher AUC compared to adults administered a standard dose. Use of higher weight-adjusted rifapentine doses for young children are warranted to achieve systemic exposures that are associated with successful treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in adults.

Preliminary Pharmacokinetic Study of Repeated Doses of Rifampin and Rifapentine in Guinea Pigs

Substitution of rifapentine (RFP) for rifampin (RIF) in the standard antituberculous regimen reduces the time required to cure chronic tuberculosis (TB) infection in mice, but not in guinea pigs. In order to gain insight into these discrepant findings, we conducted a steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy guinea pigs to study the metabolism and autoinduction of RIF and RFP. Both RFP and RIF 25-desacetyl metabolites (desRFP and desRIF, respectively), were detected at low concentrations in the serum of guinea pigs. The metabolite concentrations in guinea pigs are much lower than those seen in humans at steady state.

Is it time to replace the tuberculin skin test with a blood test?

Is it time to replace the tuberculin skin test with a blood test?

Dose-Ranging Comparison of Rifampin and Rifapentine in Two Pathologically Distinct Murine Models of Tuberculosis

In previous experiments, replacing the 10-mg/kg of body weight daily dose of rifampin with 7.5 to 10 mg/kg of rifapentine in combinations containing isoniazid and pyrazinamide reduced the duration of treatment needed to cure tuberculosis in BALB/c mice by approximately 50% due to rifapentine's more potent activity and greater drug exposures obtained. In the present study, we performed dose-ranging comparisons of the bactericidal and sterilizing activities of rifampin and rifapentine, alone and in combination with isoniazid and pyrazinamide with or without ethambutol, in BALB/c mice and in C3HeB/FeJ mice, which develop necrotic lung granulomas after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Each rifamycin demonstrated a significant increase in sterilizing activity with increasing dose. Rifapentine was roughly 4 times more potent in both mouse strains. These results reinforce the rationale for ongoing clinical trials to ascertain the highest well-tolerated doses of rifampin and rifapentine. This study also provides an important benchmark for the efficacy of the first-line regimen in C3HeB/FeJ mice, a strain in which the lung lesions observed after M. tuberculosis infection may better represent the pathology of human tuberculosis.

Effects of Four Different Meal Types on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Rifapentine in Healthy Male Volunteers

Rifapentine and its primary metabolite, 25-desacetyl rifapentine, are active against mycobacterium tuberculosis. The objectives of this study were to describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifapentine and 25-desacetyl rifapentine in fasting and fed states. Thirty-five male healthy volunteers were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, sequential, five-way crossover study. Participants received a single 900-mg dose of rifapentine after meals with high fat (meal A), bulk and low fat (meal B), bulk and high fat (meal C), high fluid and low fat (meal D), or 200 ml of water (meal E). Venous blood samples were collected over 72 h after each rifapentine dose, and plasma was analyzed for rifapentine and 25-desacetyl rifapentine using high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using NONMEM. Compared with the fasting state, meal A had the greatest effect on rifapentine oral bioavailability, increasing it by 86%. Meals B, C, and D resulted in 33%, 46%, and 49% increases in rifapentine oral bioavailability, respectively. Similar trends were observed for 25-desacetyl rifapentine. As meal behavior has a substantial impact on rifapentine exposure, it should be considered in the evaluation of optimal dosing approaches.

Rip Van Winkle Wakes Up: Development of Tuberculosis Treatment in the 21st Century

The increase in drug-resistant tuberculosis and the global pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus infection-related tuberculosis threaten global tuberculosis control. There are needs for improved therapy in all aspects of tuberculosis treatment: treatment of latent infection, active drug-susceptible disease, and particularly, drug-resistant disease. Fortunately, at this time of great need, the field of tuberculosis drug development has reemerged after >30 years of inactivity. I review the specific needs for new treatment regimens, the pathways of tuberculosis drug development, and the agents that are currently in clinical development. There is renewed interest in the rifamycin class; studies in the mouse model suggest that higher doses of rifampin or rifapentine may markedly improve the treatment of drug-susceptible disease. Fluoroquinolones may allow shorter treatment durations for drug-susceptible disease, though initial phase 2B trials have shown inconsistent activity. Novel drugs, such as TMC207, OPC-67683, PA824, SQ109, and PNU-100480, may improve the treatment of drug-resistant and drug-susceptible tuberculosis.

Repeated Administration of High-Dose Intermittent Rifapentine Reduces Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin Plasma Concentrations

Moxifloxacin- and rifapentine-based regimens are under investigation for the treatment of tuberculosis. However, rifapentine may induce enzymes that metabolize moxifloxacin, resulting in decreased moxifloxacin concentrations. In this phase I, two-period, sequential-design study, 13 subjects received 400 mg moxifloxacin daily for 4 days followed by daily moxifloxacin coadministered with 900 mg rifapentine thrice weekly. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed after the 4th and 19th doses of moxifloxacin and after the 1st and 7th doses of rifapentine. For moxifloxacin, the mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) decreased by 17.2% (P = 0.0006) when the drug was coadministered with rifapentine, and the mean half-life (t(1/2)) decreased from 11.1 to 8.9 h (P = 0.0033). For rifapentine, the mean AUC(0-48) after seven thrice-weekly doses decreased by 20.3% (P = 0.0035) compared to the AUC(0-48) after the first dose, and the mean t(1/2) decreased from 18.5 to 14.8 h (P = 0.0004). The AUC(0-48) for the 25-desacetyl-rifapentine metabolite diminished 21%. Two days after completing the study drugs, one subject developed a fever and hepatitis, and another developed a flu-like illness with a rash. In conclusion, rifapentine modestly reduced moxifloxacin concentrations. Changes consistent with rifapentine autoinduction of metabolism were seen. Adverse reactions in two subjects may have represented rifamycin hypersensitivity syndrome, although some features were atypical.

Pharmacokinetics of Rifapentine in Children

Rifapentine is a rifamycin antibiotic approved for the treatment of pulmonary infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Although the pharmacokinetics of rifapentine has been investigated in adolescents and adults, no studies have assessed the pharmacokinetics of this drug in children or infants. Twenty-four children (7.1 +/- 3.3 years; mean +/- 1 SD, 27.9 +/- 11.9 kg) were enrolled in this open label study. Children received a single oral dose (10 to <30 kg body weight received 150 mg; 30 to <60 kg body weight received 300 mg), followed by repeated blood sampling (n = 11) for 32 hours. Rifapentine and 25-desacetyl rifapentine were quantitated by a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a model-independent approach. A significant difference in dose-normalized area under the curves (AUC0-n and AUC0-infinity) was observed between children receiving the 150 and 300 mg doses, which was accounted for by differences in age between the dosing arms. In separate analyses, including data from adults, further age-dependence in total body exposure (reflected by AUC) and elimination was observed. Adverse events associated with rifapentine were mild and included gastric distress (n = 1) and vomiting (n = 2). Given a comparable weight-normalized dose, rifapentine exposure estimates are lower in children than those reported in adults, suggesting that a larger weight-normalized (ie, mg/kg) dose of rifapentine is needed in children.

Weekly Moxifloxacin and Rifapentine Is More Active Than the Denver Regimen in Murine Tuberculosis

Treatment of tuberculosis with an efficacious once-weekly regimen would be a significant achievement in improving patient adherence. Currently, the only recommended once-weekly continuation phase regimen of isoniazid plus rifapentine (10 mg/kg) is inferior to standard twice-weekly therapy with isoniazid plus rifampin and is, therefore, restricted to non-high-risk patients. The substitution of moxifloxacin, a new 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, for isoniazid and an increase in the dose of rifapentine could augment the activity of once-weekly regimens. To test this hypothesis we evaluated the sterilizing activity of improved once-weekly rifapentine-based continuation phase regimens in a murine model that mimics the treatment of high-risk patients with tuberculosis. The bactericidal activity of standard daily therapy and standard intermittent therapy ("Denver" regimen) was also assessed to evaluate the effect of intermittent drug administration during the initial phase of therapy. After 2 mo of treatment, lung colony-forming unit counts were 1 log(10) lower in mice treated with standard daily therapy than with the Denver regimen. During the continuation phase, the sterilizing activity of once-weekly moxifloxacin plus rifapentine (15 mg/kg) was significantly greater than that of the predominantly twice-weekly Denver regimen of isoniazid plus rifampin. No significant difference in sterilizing activity was detected between once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (15 mg/kg) and the Denver regimen. These results suggest that the efficacy of the once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine continuation phase regimen can be increased by substituting moxifloxacin for isoniazid and by increasing the dose of rifapentine to a clinically acceptable level of 15 mg/kg.

The Early Bactericidal Activities of Rifampin and Rifapentine in Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Comparison of the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of rifapentine and its pharmacokinetics with those of rifampin to determine the cause of poor clinical response and regrowth between doses, leading to rifamycin monoresistance at relapse. Determination of the dose size of rifapentine that gives sufficient drug exposure to prevent regrowth. EBA study over initial 5 days of treatment of 123 patients, half at Durban and half at Cape Town, who received single rifapentine doses of 300, 600, 900, or 1,200 mg rifapentine or five daily doses of 150, 300, or 600 mg rifampin, with a pharmacokinetic study on 58 patients measuring standard parameters for each dose size of rifamycin and their desacetyl metabolites. The EBAs for both rifamycins were similar, with a linear relationship to log dose at lower doses and a curvilinear response at higher doses giving a plateau at 1,136 mg rifapentine. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) divided by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) agreed well for both rifamycins on the assumption that the only free 2% of free rifapentine and the 14% of free rifampin after plasma binding were active in the lesions. Only the free proportions of the rifamycins were active in lesions. From consideration of the pulse size and the duration of the postantibiotic lag, a 1,200-mg dose of rifapentine seemed necessary to improve response and to prevent regrowth between doses, and hence rifamycin monoresistance.

Pharmacokinetics of rifapentine in children

Rifapentine (RIF) is a rifamycin antibiotic approved for the treatment of pulmonary infections caused by M. tuberculosis that has potential therapeutic advantages over existing rifamycins. This study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of RIF in children. Methods 24 children (7.1± 3.3 yr; 27.9± 11.9 kg) were enrolled in this open label study. Children received a single oral dose of RIF (150 or 300 mg) followed by repeated blood sampling (n=11) over 32 hr and quantitation of RIF and 25-desacetyl rifapentine (DRF) by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a model independent approach. Results Due to a large degree of intersubject variability, no relationship was observed between weight-normalized dose and exposure. A weak, albeit significant, relationship was observed between age and dose-normalized AUC0-n and AUC0-∞ (r2=0.22, p=0.02). Similarly, age appeared to account, in part, for the extent of DRF formation (r2=0.27, p=0.01). In contrast, no correlation was observed between age and dose-normalized Cmax or Vd/F. Adverse events related to the administration of RIF were mild and included stomach ache (n=1) and vomiting (n=2). Conclusions RIF appears to be well tolerated in children 2–12 yr. Given a comparable weight normalized dose, RIF exposure estimates are slightly lower in children than reported for adults. However, putative pharmacodynamic targets for highly susceptible isolates appear to be achieved in the majority of children receiving a RIF dose of 5–10 mg/kg. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77, P30–P30; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.008

Rifapentine: Its Role in the Treatment of Tuberculosis

Objective: To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of the newest antitubercular drug, rifapentine. Data Sources: A MEDLINE search using key terms such as rifapentine, rifampin, isoniazid, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and pyrazinamide was conducted for the time period 1966-November 1998. Study Selection: Animal data were used for basic information and human studies were selected for inclusion if they were randomized, controlled studies assessing efficacy, or if they were single- or multiple-dose studies assessing the pharmacokinetics of rifapentine. Background articles on the pathophysiology of tuberculosis and cost of care and noncontrolled studies assessing drug interactions were also included. Data Synthesis: Compared with an oral solution, the relative bioavailability of rifapentine is 70% following oral administration of tablets. Food increased bioavailability by 55%. Rifapentine accumulated significantly in human macrophages, and its elimination half-life was longer than that of rifampin. Comparative studies of rifapentine and rifampin in humans during intensive- and continuation-phase treatment of tuberculosis suggest that at currently accepted doses, rifapentine was slightly less effective than rifampin. The most significant drug interaction with rifapentine involves indinavir. Adverse events of rifapentine may occur less frequently at the currently recommended 600-mg dose compared with rifampin; however, the difference was not statistically significant. If only drug costs were evaluated during the six-month treatment of tuberculosis, rifapentine is more expensive than rifampin. Conclusions: Rifapentine can be administered twice weekly during the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment and then once weekly during the continuation phase of treatment. This may improve patient adherence over some other treatments and possibly reduce costs of treatment by preventing development of resistant tubercular strains due to non-adherence. Rifapentine is well tolerated, with most patients experiencing adverse effects at a similar rate as rifampin. Rifapentine induces cytochrome P450 somewhat less than rifampin, although few drug interaction studies have been done with rifapentine. Its efficacy at the currently approved dosage of 600 mg may be slightly lower than that of rifampin. Studies are needed to determine whether equal or greater efficacy can be achieved with higher doses of rifapentine. Rifampin is less expensive than rifapentine. Further pharmacoeconomic studies are needed to evaluate costs of relapse and failure in patients receiving these agents.

Rifapentine: Its Role in the Treatment of Tuberculosis

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of the newest antitubercular drug, rifapentine. A MEDLINE search using key terms such as rifapentine, rifampin, isoniazid, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and pyrazinamide was conducted for the time period 1966-November 1998. Animal data were used for basic information and human studies were selected for inclusion if they were randomized, controlled studies assessing efficacy, or if they were single- or multiple-dose studies assessing the pharmacokinetics of rifapentine. Background articles on the pathophysiology of tuberculosis and cost of care and noncontrolled studies assessing drug interactions were also included. Compared with an oral solution, the relative bioavailability of rifapentine is 70% following oral admninistration of tablets. Food increased bioavailability by 55%. Rifapentine accumulated significantly in human macrophages and its elimination half-life was longer than that of rifampin. Comparative studies of rifapentine and rifampin in humans during intensive- and continuation-phase treatment of tuberculosis suggest that at currently accepted doses, rifapentine was slightly less effective than rifampin. The most significant drug interaction with rifapentine involves indinavir: the maximum concentration and AUC of indinavir are reduced by 55% and 70%, respectively, when rifapentine is coadministered with indinavir. Adverse events of rifapentine may occur less frequently at the currently recommended 600-mg dose as compared with rifampin; however, the difference was not statistically significant. If only drug costs were evaluated during the six-month treatment of tuberculosis, rifapentine is more expensive than rifampin. Rifapentine can be administered twice weekly during the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment and then once weekly during the continuation phase of treatment. This may improve patient adherence over some other treatments and possibly reduce costs of treatment by preventing development of resistant tubercular strains due to nonadherence. Rifapentine is well tolerated, with most patients experiencing adverse effects at a similar rate as rifampin. Rifapentine induces cytochrome P450 somewhat less than rifampin, although few drug interaction studies have been done with rifapentine. Its efficacy at the currently approved dosage of 600 mg may be slightly lower than that of rifampin. Studies are needed to determine if equal or greater efficacy can be achieved with higher doses of rifapentine. Rifampin is less expensive than rifapentine. Further pharmacoeconomic studies are needed to evaluate costs of relapse and failure in patients receiving these agents.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of rifapentine in women.

Gender can be an important variable in the absorption and disposition of some drugs. In this open-label study, 15 healthy, nonsmoking women received a single 600-mg oral dose of rifapentine. Plasma samples were obtained at frequent intervals for up to 72 hr after the dose to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of rifapentine and its active metabolite, 25-desacetyl-rifapentine. Peak plasma rifapentine concentrations (Cmax) were observed 5.9 hr after ingestion of the single dose. The mean area under the rifapentine plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0-->infinity)] was 325 micrograms.hr ml and the mean elimination half-life (t1/2) was 16.3 hr. Plasma concentrations for the 25-desacetyl metabolite peaked at 15.4 hr after the rifapentine dose and declined with a terminal half-life of 17.3 hr. These rifapentine and 25-desacetyl-rifapentine PK data in women were compared to data generated previously in healthy men. Striking similarities in the PK profiles of parent drug and metabolite were found in the two populations. Mean differences in rifapentine CL/F (12%) and t1/2 (2%) were small. The only adverse event reported in the female subjects was discoloration of the urine. Based on these PK and safety data, no dosage adjustments for rifapentine based on gender are recommended.

Induction of mixed function oxidase activity in man by rifapentine (MDL 473), a long-acting rifamycin derivative.

The effects of rifapentine (MDL 473) administration on hepatic mixed function oxidase activity in man have been investigated in six healthy volunteers. Administration of rifapentine (600 mg 48 h-1) for 10 days resulted in a significant reduction in antipyrine half-life (from 13.2 +/- 1.0 h to 7.7 +/- 0.4 h) and a corresponding increase in its total body clearance (from 41.8 +/- 5.5 ml min-1 to 67.4 +/- 5.6 ml min-1). Twelve days after stopping rifapentine administration, these values had largely returned to base-line. 24-Hour excretion of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol was significantly increased, by approximately three-fold, following administration of rifapentine for 10 days. Again, 12 days after stopping drug administration, 6 beta-hydroxycortisol excretion had returned to pretreatment values. Clearance of antipyrine to its three oxidative metabolites was increased by rifapentine administration, although the increase for 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine was not significant. The greatest increase (+140%) was observed for norantipyrine. Twelve days after the last dose of rifapentine, all values had returned to control levels. It is concluded that, like rifampicin, rifapentine is a potent inducer of mixed function oxidase activity in man and that the possibility of clinically significant drug interactions should be anticipated in the therapeutic use of this compound.