Lens Dose Research Articles

How much do 68Ga-, 177Lu- and 131I-based radiopharmaceuticals contribute to the global radiation exposure of nuclear medicine staff?

The radiation exposure of nuclear medicine personnel, especially concerning extremity doses, has been a significant focus over the past two decades. This study addresses the evolving practice of NM, particularly with the rise of radionuclide therapy and theranostic procedures, which involve a variety of radionuclides such as 68Ga, 177Lu, and 131I. Traditional studies have concentrated on common radioisotopes like 99mTc, 18F, and 90Y, but there is limited data on these radionuclides, which are more and more frequently used. This study, part of the European SINFONIA project, aims to fill this gap by providing new dosimetry data through a multicenter approach. The research monitors extremity doses to hands, eye lens doses, and whole-body doses in nuclear medicine staff handling 68Ga, 177Lu, and 131I. It examines the type of activities performed and the protective measures used. The study extrapolates measured doses to annual doses, comparing them with annual dose limits, and assesses the contribution of these specific procedures to the overall occupational dose of nuclear medicine personnel. Measurements were conducted from November 2020 to August 2023 across nine hospitals. The highest whole-body, eye lens and extremity doses were observed for 68Ga. Average maximum extremity doses, normalized per manipulated activity, were found of 6200µSv/GBq, 30µSv/GBq and 260µSV/GBq for 68Ga, 177Lu and 131I, respectively. Average whole-body doses stayed below 60µSv/GBq for all 3 isotopes and below 200µSv/GBq for the eye lens dose. The variation in doses also depends on the task performed. For 68Ga there is a risk of reaching the annual dose limit for skin dose during synthesis and dispensing. This study's measurement campaigns across various European countries have provided new and extensive occupational dosimetry data for nuclear medicine staff handling 68Ga, 177Lu and 131I radiopharmaceuticals. The results indicate that 68Ga contributes significantly to the global occupational dose, despite its relatively low usage compared to other isotopes. Staff working in radiopharmacy hot labs, labeling and dispensing 177Lu contribute less to the finger dose compared to other isotopes.

Assessment of air dose distribution in the vertical plane for better occupational exposure management.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended a significant reduction of the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens. Reportedly, medical staff in charge of diagnostic imaging procedures may exceed the new dose limits for the eye lens. The use of dosimeters dedicated to the eye lens remains low, and dosimeters for the neck region were often used to assess eye lens doses. However, measurements by neck badges may overestimate or underestimate the recommended eye lens doses because the height of the neck differs from that of the eye. This study aimed to evaluate the air dose distribution in the vertical plane to understand the difference between neck and eye doses. H*(10) in the height of the eye position was 52.8% lower than that in the height of the neck position in the under-table position. Thus, the equivalent eye lens dose evaluated using a neck badge dosimeter may be overestimated.

Effects of Different Fields of View and Rotation Angles on Radiation Doses to Highly Radiosensitive Organs in Children Using Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a diverse 3D X-ray imaging technique that has enabled clear visualization of the teeth and surrounding structures. The most common diagnostic purpose of dental CBCT examination in children is ectopic eruption and impacted teeth, and a small field of view (FOV) is often used. Since it is difficult for children to control their body movements, reducing the rotation angle is effective. However, no studies have examined the effects of different rotation angles on radiation doses to highly radiosensitive organs in children using small FOVs. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of small FOVs (4 × 4 cm and 6 × 6 cm) and rotation angles (360° and 180°) on doses that highly sensitize organs in children using dental CBCT. The entrance surface doses to lenses, thyroid lobes, parotid glands, and sublingual glands of a pediatric whole-body phantom were measured. By reducing the FOV from 6 × 6 cm to 4 × 4 cm, the dose to the sublingual gland could be significantly decreased. Additionally, by reducing the rotation angle from 360° to 180°, the lens dose can be decreased significantly. As the rate of dose reduction varies among organs, it is important to consider the relative positions of different organs with respect to the FOV and the trajectory of the X-ray tube.

Evaluation of radiation dose to the lens in interventional cardiology physicians before and after dose limit regulation changes.

In response to the International Commission on Radiological Protection, which lowered the lens equivalent dose limit, Japan lowered the lens dose limit from 150 mSv y-1to 100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv y-1, with this new rule taking effect on 1 April 2021. DOSIRIS®is a dosimeter that can accurately measure lens dose. Herein, we investigated lens dose in interventional cardiology physicians 1 year before and after the reduction of the lens dose limit using a neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter measurements. With an increase in the number of cases, both personal dose equivalent at 0.07 mm depth [Hp(0.07), neck dosimeter] and personal dose equivalent at 3 mm depth [Hp(3), lens dosimeter] increased for most of the physicians. The Hp(3) of the lens considering the shielding effect of the Pb glasses using lens dosimeter exceeded 20 mSv y-1for two of the 14 physicians. Protection from radiation dose will become even more important in the future, as these two physicians may experience radiation dose exceeding 100 mSv/5 years. The average dose per procedure increased, but not significantly. There was a strong correlation between the neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter scores, although there was no significant change before and after the lens dose limit was lowered. This correlation was particularly strong for physicians who primarily treated patients. As such, it is possible to infer accurate lens doses from neck doses in physicians who primarily perform diagnostics. However, it is desirable to use a dosimeter that can directly measure Hp(3) because of the high lens dose.

Radiation dose analysis in interventional neuroradiology of unruptured aneurysm cases

This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses (peak skin dose (PSD) and bilateral lens dose) for each interventional neuroradiology procedure. A direct measurement system consisting of small radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter chips and a dosimetry cap made of thin stretchable polyester was used for radiation dosimetry. The mean PSDs for each procedure were 1565 ± 590 mGy (simple technique coil embolization (STCE) cases), 1851 ± 825 mGy (balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) cases), 2583 ± 967 mGy (stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) cases), 1690 ± 597 mGy (simple flow-diverter stenting (FDS) cases), and 2214 ± 726 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The mean PSD was higher in SACE cases than in STCE, BACE, and simple FDS cases. Moreover, the PSD exceeded 2000 mGy and 3000 mGy in 46 (67.6%) and 19 (27.9%) SACE cases, respectively. The left lens doses for each procedure were 126 ± 111 mGy (STCE cases), 163 ± 152 mGy (BACE cases), 184 ± 148 mGy (SACE cases), 144 ± 60 mGy (simple FDS cases), and 242 ± 178 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The left lens dose in SACE cases was higher than that in STCE cases and exceeded 500 mGy in 3 (4.4%) patients. In FDS + coiling cases, the mean PSD and left lens dose were 2214 ± 726 mGy and 242 ± 178 mGy, respectively. The left lens dose was higher than that in the STCE and BACE cases, with two (15.4%) patients receiving doses >500 mGy in FDS + coiling cases. The detailed data obtained in this study are expected to contribute to the promotion of radiation dose optimization.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters for predicting radiation-induced cataract in paediatric patients.

This study compared the predictive ability of radiation-induced cataract between maximum point dose of the lens (Lens Dmax) ≥7 Gy, mean lens dose (Lens Dmean) ≥7 Gy, Lens Dmax ≥10 Gy, and Lens Dmean ≥10 Gy. Patients aged 3-18 years received cranial irradiation or radiation therapy at head and neck area between January 2010 and December 2019 at our institute were included. Patients without baseline and/or follow-up eye examination were excluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified potential predictors and Cox regression analysed correlations between potential factors and cataract occurrence. Sixty-three patients (122 eyes) were analysed. Cataracts were detected in 14 eyes (11.5%). Median follow-up time was 4 years (range 0.5-10 years), with cataract developing in a median of 2.5 years (range 0.3-7 years). Three patients (21.4%) developed grade ≥3 cataract. Lens Dmean ≥10 Gy was associated with cataract formation. Lens Dmean ≥10 Gy showed the highest ability for predicting radiation-induced cataract in paediatric patients. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) suggested that changing lens dose constraint from Dmax <7 Gy to Dmean <10 Gy would miss 7% of cataract cases but avoid 28% of unnecessary restrictions. Adopting a mean lens dose <10 Gy was suggested as a constraint for lens dose.

Impact of Patient Head Posture on Lens Radiation Exposure During Cerebral Angiography.

Cerebral angiography remains crucial for detailed characterization and preoperative assessments for intracranial aneurysm. Despite its diagnostic importance, cerebral angiography poses challenges due to its invasiveness, the risk of neurological complications, and radiation exposure. To investigate the impact of head posture on lens radiation exposure during cerebral angiography, this study focused on the correlation between radiation doses to the eye lens, head flexion angles, and head size. A retrospective analysis was performed on 20 patients who underwent cerebral angiography for unruptured intracranial aneurysms between October and November 2022. Radiation doses to the lens, which were measured in a prior prospective study using photoluminescent glass dosimeters, were analyzed alongside head flexion angles, anteroposterior (AP) head diameters, and kerma-area product (KAP) to evaluate their correlation with lens radiation exposure. The lateral radiation source is located on the left side of the patients. The cohort consisted of 20 patients (60% female, mean age: 62.3 ± 9.9 years). The radiation dose to the left eye (the eye closer to the x-ray source) was 2.8 times higher than that to the right eye (9.18 ± 3.31 mGy vs. 3.3 ± 0.60 mGy, P < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was observed between the left eye lens dose and head flexion angle (R = 0.815, P < 0.001). While the AP head diameter significantly correlated with the flexion angle, it showed no significant correlation with lens dose. The KAP was inversely correlated with both the left lens dose (R = -0.597, P = 0.005) and the flexion angle (R = -0.689, P < 0.001). Our findings underscore the significant impact of head posture on lens radiation exposure during cerebral angiography. Adjusting head positioning may provide a practical approach to reduce radiation exposure to the lens. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the left lens received more radiation than the right, likely due to the X-ray source being on the left side of the patient. AP = anteroposterior; KAP = kerma-area product, PLD = photoluminescent glass dosimeter.

Effect Of Protective Eyewear on Physicians' Lens Exposure during Fluoroscopy.

The ICRP 2011 Seoul Statement recommended a reduction in the dose limit for lens exposure to 100 mSv for 5 y and 50 mSv for 1 y. Based on this recommendation, the dose limit for lens exposure was lowered in Japan with the revision of the Ionization Regulations, which took effect in April 2021. In the present study, lens doses were measured during fluoroscopic procedures performed in four departments (Urology, Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, and Orthopedics). Lens doses were measured without protective eyewear for 6 mo (pre-intervention) and then with protective eyewear for the next 6 mo (post-intervention). Monthly doses were collected and lens doses before and after the use of protective eyewear were calculated as the lens dose per unit time. The use of protective eyewear reduced the lens dose per unit time by approximately two thirds. In all departments, the lens dose was slightly lower after than before the intervention. A significant difference was observed in lens doses between the pre- and post-intervention periods in the Urology department. The present results demonstrated the effectiveness of protective eyewear in daily practice. Therefore, the use of protective eyewear is recommended during fluoroscopic procedures.

A Multicentric study on a dosimetric comparison of extended SSD technique, VMAT-Based and helical tomotherapy (HT) for total body irradiation (TBI)

PurposeIn study, it was aimed to evaluate the dose volume histograms (DVH) of extended SSD technique, VMAT-based, and helical tomotherapy plans dosimetrically in a multi-institutional context to achieve higher plan quality and to harmonize total body irradiation plans. MethodsFour different clinical centers participated in the study. The CT images of ten patients were used in this study. During the first phase, ten patients enrolled for TBI were planned by multiple centers according to a common protocol. During the second phase, all centers shared their plans’ DVHs. Treatment plans were evaluated according to the critical organ dose limits. Statistical analysis was performed in the SPSS (version 22.0) program (p < 0.05). ResultsIn study, the results indicated that there was a statistically significant and considerable difference in the dose coverage of PTV, beam delivery time and MU, lens doses, and kidney doses between the four techniques (p < 0.001). The mean lung doses of the four centers were below 10 Gy. No significant difference in maximum liver doses between plans was obtained. ConclusionIn conclusion, although four treatment techniques were suitable for TBI treatment, more homogeneous dose distribution, and lower critical organ doses were obtained with the tomotherapy technique. However, treatment time, MU, and dose rate for lung were disadvantages of the tomotherapy technique. When it comes to deciding on the TBI treatment method, it need to be reviewed some important points. It is needed to sufficient data on long-term results to be able to standardize TBI techniques between centers.

Modification of algorithm for accurate estimation of Hp(3) based on response of head TLD badge calibrated using ISO cylindrical phantom.

In India, the prevailing approach to eye lens dosimetry is the placement of an existing dosemeter on the forehead region after slight modification serves as a dedicated Eye Lens Dosemeter. A methodology for estimating the eye lens dose in terms of the Hp(3) has been previously explored employing an algorithm based on the response characteristics of this dosemeter using ISO slab phantom. It was observed that the performance of the dosemeter in terms of Hp(3) using previous algorithm showed under response at higher angles of incidence and photon beams of energy < 200keV. Further, study was conducted to modify the algorithm following the latest ISO recommendations. This involved generation of data from the response of existing dosemeter on a cylindrical phantom. The results of this study revealed better performance of the newly established algorithm in estimating eye lens dose in terms of Hp(3) when compared to the earlier algorithm.

Evaluation of Radiation Doses Received by Physicians during Permanent 198Au Grain Implant Brachytherapy for Oral Cancer

Brachytherapy is a practical, effective procedure for the local treatment of cancer; it delivers a high radiation dose to a limited tissue volume while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. Although the clinical benefit of brachytherapy is clear, there have been very few studies on the radiation dose received by physicians during the procedure. Furthermore, no study has investigated the eye radiation dose received by physicians performing 198Au grain (seed) brachytherapy, using an eye dosimeter. Recently, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended significantly reducing the occupational lens dose limit, from 150 to 20 mSv/yr (100 mSv/5 years). Therefore, it has become essential to evaluate the eye radiation doses of medical workers. We evaluated the eye radiation dose of a brachytherapy physician performing 198Au permanent grain implantation for tongue cancer; this is the first study on this topic. The maximum eye dose was ~0.1 mSv/procedure, suggesting that it is unlikely to exceed the ICRP limit (20 mSv/yr) for the lens, unless many procedures are performed with inappropriate radiation protection. To reduce the dose of radiation received by 198Au grain brachytherapy physicians, it is necessary to use additional lead shielding equipment when preparing the treatment needles, i.e., when loading the grains. This study provides useful information on radiation exposure of physicians conducting 198Au permanent grain brachytherapy.

Occupational eye lens dose among nuclear medicine workers in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia

Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation remains a major concern in nuclear medicine, especially given the possible health risks posed to medical personnel. Additionally, since the occupational eye dose limit was lowered in 2011 to an equivalent dose of 20 mSv/yr, new implications have extended to roles within nuclear medicine units. The goal of this investigation was to determine the current occupational radiation eye doses for nuclear medicine employees. Methods: A 5 yr retrospective assessment was performed on staff members involved in all nuclear medicine imaging from different categories. Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) badges were used to measure occupational dose. The H-lens values were calculated for each staff member during this period. Results: Significant differences were observed between individual staff members in terms of H-lens values. They were significantly higher among hot lab technicians than among NIC (p &lt; 0.001) and NM (p &lt; 0.0001) technicians. Conclusions: Although none of the participants exceeded the eye dose limit for ionizing radiation exposure, there was significant variation in exposure across various roles and expertise. The annual average eye dose ranged from 0.2 mSv to 2.9 mSv, which is within the advised dose limit.

Dose-Painting Proton Radiotherapy Guided by Functional MRI in Non-enhancing High-Grade Gliomas

AimsThis study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and evaluate the dosimetric effect and clinical impact of dose-painting proton radiotherapy (PRT) guided by functional MRI in non-enhancing high-grade gliomas (NE-HGGs). Materials and methodsThe 3D-ASL and T2 FLAIR MR images of ten patients with NE-HGGs before radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. The hyperintensity on T2 FLAIR was used to generate the planning target volume (PTV), and the high-perfusion volume on 3D-ASL (PTV-ASL) was used to generate the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) volume. Each patient received pencil beam scanning PRT and photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). There were five plans in each modality: (1) Uniform plans (IMRT60 vs. PRT60): 60Gy in 30 fractions to the PTV. (2)–(5) SIB plans (IMRT72, 84, 96, 108 vs. PRT72, 84, 96, 108): Uniform plan plus additional dose boost to PTV-ASL in 30 fractions to 72, 84, 96, 108 Gy. The dosimetric differences between various plans were compared. The clinical effects of target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were assessed using biological models for both tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). ResultsCompared with the IMRT plan, the D2 and D50 of the PRT plans with the same prescription dose increased by 1.27–4.12% and 0.64–2.01%, respectively; the R30 decreased by > 32%; the dose of brainstem and chiasma decreased by > 27% and >32%; and the dose of normal brain tissue (Br-PTV), optic nerves, eyeballs, lens, cochlea, spinal cord, and hippocampus decreased by > 50% (P < 0.05). The maximum necessary dose was 96GyE to achieve >98% TCP for PRT, and it was 84Gy to achieve >91% TCP for IMRT. The average NTCP of Br-PTV was 1.30% and 1.90% for PRT and IMRT at the maximum dose escalation, respectively. The NTCP values of the remaining OARs approached zero in all PRT plans. ConclusionThe functional MRI-guided dose escalation using PRT is feasible while sparing the OARs constraints and demonstrates a potential clinical benefit by improving TCP with no or minimal increase in NCTP for tissues outside the PTV. This retrospective study suggested that the use of PRT-based SIB guided by functional MRI may represent a strategy to provide benefits for patients with NE-HGGs.

Comparison of pediatric lens scattered dose measurements between axial 40-mmand helical 160-mmdetector widthcomputed tomographyscan modes.

Reports comparing field lens doses between helical scans with a 40-mm detector width and axial scans with a 160-mm detector width using different computed tomography (CT) scanners are currently scarce. To compare scatter doses for lenses between a helical scan with a 40-mm detector width and an axial scan with a 160-mm detector width when using different CT scanners in the context of pediatric chest examinations. Two different CT machines were used: Revolution CT (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with a 256-row, 0.625-mm multidetector; and Aquilion ONE GENESIS Edition (Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) with a 320-row, 0.5-mm multidetector. Three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms were used, with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed on the left and right lenses. The scatter dose values measured by the OSLDs were compared between a helical scan with a 40-mm detector width and an axial scan with a 160-mm detector width during pediatric chest CT examinations. Median equivalent doses for the helical and axial scans were 0.12 and 0.12 mSv/mGy for the newborn, 0.17 and 0.16 mSv/mGy for the 1-year-old, and 0.18 and 0.15 mSv/mGy for the 5-year-old, respectively, when using the Revolution CT. With the Revolution CT, no significant differences were observed in the scatter doses between helical and axial scans in the newborn and 1-year-old phantoms. However, the lens scatter dose for the helical scan was approximately 20-35% higher than that for the axial scan in the 5-year-old phantom (P<0.01). The median equivalent doses of eye lenses for the helical and axial scans were 0.12 and 0.07 mSv/mGy for the newborn, 0.07 and 0.05 mSv/mGy for the 1-year-old, and 0.14 and 0.12 mSv/mGy for the 5-year-old, respectively, when using the Aquilion ONE. With the Aquilion ONE, lens scatter doses for the helical scan were approximately 70%, 40%, and 30% higher in the newborn, 1-year-old, and 5-year-old phantoms, respectively, than those for the axial scan (P<0.01). When using the Aquilion ONE, lens scatter doses for the helical scan were significantly higher in all three phantoms than those for the axial scan. In contrast, when using the Revolution CT, the lens scatter dose for the helical scan was significantly higher in the 5-year-old phantom than that for the axial scan. These results suggest that although scattered doses may vary with respect to the CT scanner and body size, they are generally lower in the case of axial scans.

Relationship between assistant’s lens exposure and dose information during computed tomography examinations

According to International Commission of Radiological Protection, the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens for occupational exposure is recommended to be 20 mSv yr−1, averaged over 5 years, with no single year above 50 mSv. Some studies reported the measurement of assistant’s lens exposure in diagnostic computed tomography (CT) examinations, but further investigation is still required in the association between the lens dose for assistants and various dose parameters. Therefore, we measured the assistant’s lens exposure using small optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. The type of occupation, type of assistance, total scan time, total mAs, total scan length, and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded and analyzed in association with air kerma at the lens position. The assistance was classified into four types: ‘assisted ventilation,’ ‘head holding,’ ‘body holding,’ and ‘raising patient’s arm.’ The air kerma of lens position was not significantly different for each assistance type (p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test). Further, the lens doses for assistants correlated with DLP, but with various strengths of correlation with the assistance type and were influenced by the distance from the CT gantry. In conclusion, lens dose during assistance and DLP demonstrated the strongest correlation. ‘Raising patient’s arm’ and ‘head holding’ exhibited stronger correlations, which required less table movement during the CT scan than ‘assisted ventilation’ and ‘body holding’.

Comparison of shielding effects of over-glasses-type and regular eyewear in terms of occupational eye dose reduction

Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70–0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians’ eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.

Estimating brain and eye lens dose for the cardiologist in interventional cardiology-are the dose levels of concern?

To establish conversion coefficients (CCs), between mean absorbed dose to the brain and eye lens of the cardiologist and the air kerma-area product, PKA, for a set of projections in cardiac interventional procedures. Furthermore, by taking clinical data into account, a method to estimate the doses per procedure, or annual dose, is presented. Thermoluminescence dosimeters were used together with anthropomorphic phantoms, simulating a cardiologist performing an interventional cardiac procedure, to estimate the CCs for the brain and eye lens dose for nine standard projections, and change in patient size and x-ray spectrum. Additionally, a single CC has been estimated, accounting for each projections fraction of use in the clinic and associated PKA using clinical data from the dose monitoring system in our hospital. The maximum CCs for the eye lens and segment of the brain, is 5.47 μGy/Gycm2 (left eye lens) and 1.71 μGy/Gycm2 (left brain segment). The corresponding weighted CCs: are 3.39 μGy/Gycm2 and 0.89 μGy/Gycm2, respectively. Conversion coefficients have been established under actual scatter conditions, showing higher doses on the left side of the operator. Using modern interventional x-ray equipment, interventional cardiac procedures will not cause high radiation dose levels to the operator when a ceiling mounted shield is used, otherwise there is a risk that the threshold dose values for cataract will be reached. In addition to the CCs for the different projections, methods for deriving a single CC per cardiac interventional procedure and dose per year were introduced.

Developing methodology to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff

Due to epidemiological evidence on the increasing incidence of cataracts in interventional doctors, The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended decreasing the eye lens dose limit from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. Thus, The current status of dose assessment for healthcare workers shows that it requires more precise measurements of eye lens dose. we have researched Investigating dosimetric characteristics of OSLD nanoDot and Inlight type, using a multi–filter technique to determine the average air kerma of the incident beam and other essential dosimetric factors such as the relative energy responses and conversion coefficients from the air kerma to personal dose equivalent operational quantities Hp(d). Based on it developed the methodologies to evaluate eye lens dose for medical staff, especially high-risk subjects such as interventional doctors. Results show that 3 methods to evaluate eye lens dose have been deployed in the cardiovascular intervention department: directly by nanoDot dosimeter, indirectly by personal dosimeter (Inlight), and quick method based on the relationship with exposure duration. In one case, the doctor exceeded the threshold dose of 20 mSv/year without protective measures. Besides that, the risk of cataracts is possible when considering the cumulative dose for 30 years of work.

Dose rate conversion coefficients for ocular contamination in nuclear medicine: A Monte Carlo simulation with experimental validation.

Since 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has recommended an annual eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv for radiation workers, averaged over 5 years, with no year exceeding 50 mSv. However, limited research has been conducted on dose rate conversion coefficients (DCCs) for direct contamination of the eye. This study aimed to accurately determine DCCs for the eye lens and cornea for ocular contamination with radionuclides used in nuclear medicine. DCCs for 37 radionuclides used in nuclear medicine were determined using two different methods. Method 1 involved conducting Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of an ICRU cylinder to determine the absorbed dose at a depth of 3mm resulting from a point source. The accuracy of this simulation approach was validated by experimental thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements for 18F, 68Ga, 99mTc, and 177Lu. In method 2, average DCCs were calculated for the eye lens (complete and radiosensitive parts) and the cornea for both a point source and thin surface contamination centered on the cornea using MC simulations on the adult mesh-type reference computational phantom of the eye from the ICRP (MRCP). DCCs determined from TLD measurements showed excellent agreement (deviations: +1.4%, +4.7%, -3.1%, and -2.5% for 18F, 68Ga, 99mTc, and 177Lu, respectively) compared to MC simulations of the experimental set-up. For the 37 radionuclides, DCCs of the complete eye-lens for a point source ranged from 2.53×10-7 to 4.15×10-2 mGy MBq-1 s-1 for the adult MRCPs, being substantially smaller compared to DCCs determined via MC simulations of a ICRU cylinder. In general, point source and surface contamination showed comparable DCCs for the eye lens. Radionuclides emitting low-energy beta radiation or conversion electrons (e.g., 177Lu, 99mTc) showed low DCCs as the radiation does not penetrate to the depth of the eye lens, while radionuclides emitting high-energy beta radiation (e.g., 90Y) showed high DCCs. Overall, DCCs for the radiosensitive part of the eye lens were larger (up to a factor of 3) compared to the complete eye lens. DCCs for the cornea were larger than for the eye lens with a factor that strongly depended on the emitted radiation type. Especially alpha emitters (e.g., 211At, 223Ra) showed high DCCs for the cornea because of the short range of alpha radiation, leading to local maxima in the cornea and not reaching the eye lens. DCCs at a depth of 3mm in an ICRU cylinder and adult MRCP DCCs for both the complete and sensitive parts of the eye lens and cornea were determined for 37 radionuclides having applications in nuclear medicine. These DCCs are highly useful in radiation safety assessments and radiation dose calculations in ocular contamination incidents.

Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application

Different radiotherapy treatment techniques can be used in whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This study aims to investigate the dosimetric advantages of the anterior isocenteric (AI) technique which is produced as an alternative to the central isocentric (CI) technique. 25 whole brain patients were included in this retrospective study. Plans were made with two treatment techniques for each patient. One central isocenter (CI) was made using a conventional helmet field (HF) to center the whole brain, which is the isocenter of the target volume. An automatic margin of 5 mm was given to the planning target volume (PTV) with multileaf collimators (MLC) for both plans. For CI and AI techniques, a total dose of 30 Gy was given in 10 fractions with 6 MV photon energy. The two planning techniques were compared dosimetrically. The dose homogeneity index (DHI) had lower values in the AI plan according to CI plans significantly (p=0.049). There was a 6,57% difference between CI and AI planning techniques for the maximum dose of the right lens. For the minimum dose and mean dose AI plans significantly had lower values according to the CI plan (p=0.001 and p=0.028 respectively). In this dosimetric study, we found that the AI treatment technique for WBRT was superior to the CI technique for DHI and organs at risk. We recommended to use the AI technique, especially to better protect organs at risk in WBRT.