A Multicentric study on a dosimetric comparison of extended SSD technique, VMAT-Based and helical tomotherapy (HT) for total body irradiation (TBI)

Abstract

PurposeIn study, it was aimed to evaluate the dose volume histograms (DVH) of extended SSD technique, VMAT-based, and helical tomotherapy plans dosimetrically in a multi-institutional context to achieve higher plan quality and to harmonize total body irradiation plans. MethodsFour different clinical centers participated in the study. The CT images of ten patients were used in this study. During the first phase, ten patients enrolled for TBI were planned by multiple centers according to a common protocol. During the second phase, all centers shared their plans’ DVHs. Treatment plans were evaluated according to the critical organ dose limits. Statistical analysis was performed in the SPSS (version 22.0) program (p < 0.05). ResultsIn study, the results indicated that there was a statistically significant and considerable difference in the dose coverage of PTV, beam delivery time and MU, lens doses, and kidney doses between the four techniques (p < 0.001). The mean lung doses of the four centers were below 10 Gy. No significant difference in maximum liver doses between plans was obtained. ConclusionIn conclusion, although four treatment techniques were suitable for TBI treatment, more homogeneous dose distribution, and lower critical organ doses were obtained with the tomotherapy technique. However, treatment time, MU, and dose rate for lung were disadvantages of the tomotherapy technique. When it comes to deciding on the TBI treatment method, it need to be reviewed some important points. It is needed to sufficient data on long-term results to be able to standardize TBI techniques between centers.