Imaging Dose Research Articles

Prognosis Forecast of Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Deep Learning Multi-Modal Information Fusion.

Radiation therapy is the primary treatment for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, it may induce necrosis of the nasopharynx, leading to severe complications such as bleeding and headache. Therefore, forecasting necrosis of the nasopharynx and initiating timely clinical intervention has important implications for reducing complications caused by re-irradiation. This research informs clinical decision-making by making predictions on re-irradiation of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma using deep learning multi-modal information fusion between multi-sequence nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and plan dose. Specifically, we assume that the hidden variables of model data can be divided into two categories: task-consistency and task-inconsistency. The task-consistency variables are characteristic variables contributing to target tasks, while the task-inconsistency variables are not apparently helpful. These modal characteristics are adaptively fused when the relevant tasks are expressed through the construction of supervised classification loss and self-supervised reconstruction loss. The cooperation of supervised classification loss and self-supervised reconstruction loss simultaneously reserves the information of characteristic space and controls potential interference simultaneously. Finally, multi-modal fusion effectively fuses information through an adaptive linking module. We evaluated this method on a multi-center dataset. and found the prediction based on multi-modal features fusion outperformed predictions based on single-modal, partial modal fusion or traditional machine learning methods.

Threshold in breast compression reduction for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

IntroductionBreast compression is essential in mammography to improve image quality and reduce radiation dose. However, it can cause discomfort or even pain in women which could discourage them from attending future mammography examinations. Therefore, this study aims to explore the maximum reduction in breast compression in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) that is achievable without impacting on image quality and dose. MethodsTen compression force (CF) levels (20N–110N, with 10N intervals) were assessed on Siemens MAMMOMAT Inspiration with Nuclear Associates 18–228 phantom. Imaging was carried out in craniocaudal projection using Automatic Exposure Control at 28 kVp with a Tungsten/Rhodium anode/filter combination, and at 50° sweep angle for DBT. Using ImageJ software, image quality of the acquired mammograms and central tomosynthesis slices were examined based on mass conspicuity (MC) and microcalcification conspicuity (MicroC). Entrance skin dose (ESD) and mean glandular dose (MGD) were recorded from Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine image header. Linear regression was performed to examine the relationship between CF with ESD, MGD, MC and MicroC. Differences in image quality and radiation dose were assessed with one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis H test. ResultsSignificant correlations were noted between CF with ESD and MicroC for FFDM and DBT, with DBT also demonstrating associations with MGD and MC. No significant differences were observed for ESD, MGD, MC and MicroC when CF was reduced to 40N and 80N in FFDM and DBT respectively. ConclusionThis study demonstrated that CF can be reduced as low as 40N and 80N in FFDM and DBT respectively, without significant impact on image quality and radiation dose. Implications for practiceReduced mammographic compression may reduce discomfort or pain in women, which may improve attendance rate in breast screening programmes. Findings from this study will provide reference for future work examining breast compression in mammography.

The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography CT Extremity Arthrography in the Preoperative Assessment of Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disease and the leading cause of pain, disability, and quality of life deterioration. Our study sought to evaluate the image quality and dose of cone-beam computed tomography arthrography (CBCT-A) and compare them to digital radiography (DR) for OA diagnoses. Overall, 32 cases of CBCT-A and DR with OA met the inclusion criteria and were prospectively analyzed. The Kellgren and Lawrence classification (KLC) stage, sclerosis, osteophytes, erosions, and mean joint width (MJW) were compared between CBCT-A and DR. Image quality was excellent in all CBCT-A cases, with excellent inter-observer agreement. OA under-classification was noticed with DR for MJW (p = 0.02), osteophyte detection (<0.0001), and KLC (p < 0.0001). The Hounsfield Unit (HU) values obtained for the cone-beam computed tomography CBCT did not correspond to the values for multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), with a greater mean deviation obtained with the MDCT HU for Modeled Based Iterative Reconstruction 1st (MBIR1) than for the 2nd generation (MBIR2). CBCT-A has been found to be more reliable for OA diagnosis than DR as revealed by our results using a three-point rating scale for the qualitative image analysis, with higher quality and an acceptable dose. Moreover, the use of this imaging technique permits the preoperative assessment of extremities in an OA diagnosis, with the upright position and bone microarchitecture analysis being two other advantages of CBCT-A.

Radiation-induced acoustic signal denoising using a supervised deep learning framework for imaging and therapy monitoring.

Radiation-induced acoustic (RA) imaging is a promising technique for visualizing the invisible radiation energy deposition in tissues, enabling new imaging modalities and real-time therapy monitoring. However, RA imaging signal often suffers from poor signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), thus requiring measuring hundreds or even thousands of frames for averaging to achieve satisfactory quality. This repetitive measurement increases ionizing radiation dose and degrades the temporal resolution of RA imaging, limiting its clinical utility. In this study, we developed a general deep inception convolutional neural network (GDI-CNN) to denoise RA signals to substantially reduce the number of frames needed for averaging. The network employs convolutions with multiple dilations in each inception block, allowing it to encode and decode signal features with varying temporal characteristics. This design generalizes GDI-CNN to denoise acoustic signals resulting from different radiation sources. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated using experimental data of x-ray-induced acoustic, protoacoustic, and electroacoustic signals both qualitatively and quantitatively. Results demonstrated the effectiveness of GDI-CNN: it achieved x-ray-induced acoustic image quality comparable to 750-frame-averaged results using only 10-frame-averaged measurements, reducing the imaging dose of x-ray-acoustic computed tomography (XACT) by 98.7%; it realized proton range accuracy parallel to 1500-frame-averaged results using only 20-frame-averaged measurements, improving the range verification frequency in proton therapy from 0.5 to 37.5 Hz; it reached electroacoustic image quality comparable to 750-frame-averaged results using only a single frame signal, increasing the electric field monitoring frequency from 1 fps to 1k fps. Compared to lowpass filter-based denoising, the proposed method demonstrated considerably lower mean-squared-errors, higher peak-SNR, and higher structural similarities with respect to the corresponding high-frame-averaged measurements. The proposed deep learning-based denoising framework is a generalized method for few-frame-averaged acoustic signal denoising, which significantly improves the RA imaging's clinical utilities for low-dose imaging and real-time therapy monitoring.

A new fluorescenttargeting tracer contrasts dual tracers in sentinel lymph node biopsy of breast cancer.

Purpose: To explore the clinical application value of indocyanine green (ICG)-rituximab in sentinel lymph node biopsy. Methods: This study included 156 patients with primary breast cancer: 50 patients were enrolled in dose-climbing test, and 106 patients were enrolled in verification test. This was to compare the consistency of ICG-rituximab and combined method in the detected lymph nodes. Results: According to the verification test, the imaging rate of ICG-rituximab was 97.3%. Compared with the combined method, the concordance rate of fluorescence method was 0.991 (28+78/107; p<0.001). Conclusion: ForICG-rituximab as a fluorescent targeting tracer, the optimal imaging dose of ICG 93.75μg/rituximab 375μg can significantly reduce the imaging of secondary lymph nodes. Compared with the combined method, it has a higher concordance rate.

Photon-Counting Detector CT With Denoising for Imaging of the Osseous Pelvis at Low Radiation Doses: A Phantom Study.

BACKGROUND. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may allow lower radiation doses than used for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, with preserved image quality. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT, reconstructed with and without a denoising tool, in terms of image quality of the osseous pelvis in a phantom, with attention to low radiation doses. METHODS. A pelvic phantom comprising human bones in acrylic material mimicking soft tissue underwent PCD CT and EID CT at various tube potentials and radiation doses ranging from 0.05 to 5.00 mGy. Additional denoised reconstructions were generated using a commercial tool. Noise was measured in the acrylic material. Two readers performed independent qualitative assessments that entailed determining the denoised EID CT reconstruction with the lowest acceptable dose and then comparing this reference reconstruction with PCD CT reconstructions without and with denoising, using subjective Likert scales. RESULTS. Noise was lower for PCD CT than for EID CT. For instance, at 0.05 mGy and 100 kV with tin filter, noise was 38.4 HU for PCD CT versus 48.8 HU for EID CT. Denoising further reduced noise; for example, for PCD CT at 100 kV with tin filter at 0.25 mGy, noise was 19.9 HU without denoising versus 9.7 HU with denoising. For both readers, lowest acceptable dose for EID CT was 0.10 mGy (total score, 11 of 15 for both readers). Both readers somewhat agreed that PCD CT without denoising at 0.10 mGy (reflecting reference reconstruction dose) was relatively better than the reference reconstruction in terms of osseous structures, artifacts, and image quality. Both readers also somewhat agreed that denoised PCD CT reconstructions at 0.10 mGy and 0.05 mGy (reflecting matched and lower doses, respectively, with respect to reference reconstruction dose) were relatively better than the reference reconstruction for the image quality measures. CONCLUSION. PCD CT showed better-quality images than EID CT when performed at the lowest acceptable radiation dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising yielded better-quality images at a dose lower than lowest acceptable dose for EID CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. PCD CT with denoising could facilitate lower radiation doses for pelvic imaging.

Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?

Noncoplanar plans (NCPs) are commonly used for proton treatment of bilateral head and neck (HN) malignancies. NCP requires additional verification setup imaging between beams to correct residual errors of robotic couch motion, which increases imaging dose and total treatment time. This study compared the quality and robustness of NCPs with those of coplanar plans (CPs). Under an IRB-approved study, CPs were created retrospectively for 10 bilateral HN patients previously treated with NCPs maintaining identical beam geometry of the original plan but excluding couch rotations. Plan robustness to the inter-fractional variation (IV) of both plans was evaluated through the Dose Volume Histograms (DVH) of weekly quality assurance CT (QACT) sets (39 total). In addition, delivery efficiency for both plans was compared using total treatment time (TTT) and beam-on time (BOT). No significant differences in plan quality were observed in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage (D95) or organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (p>0.4 for all CTVs and OARs). No significant advantage of NCPs in the robustness to IV was found over CP, either. Changes in D95 of QA plans showed a linear correlation (slope=1.006, R2 >0.99) between NCP and CP for three CTV data points (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) in each QA plan (117 data points for 39 QA plans). NCPs showed significantly higher beam delivery time than CPs for TTT (539±50vs. 897±142s; p<0.001); however, no significant differences were observed for BOT. NCPs are not more robust to IV than CPs when treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams. CPs showed plan quality and robustness similar to NCPs while reduced treatment time (∼6min). This suggests that CPs may be a more efficient planning technique for bilateral HN cancer proton therapy.

Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Cancers

When radiation therapy is medically necessary for pregnant patients, photon-based treatments (XRT) have traditionally been used, whereas proton radiation therapy (PRT) is avoided due to concerns about neutron dose. This retrospective study analyzes pregnant patients treated with XRT and models the equivalent dose that would have been delivered to the fetus with proton radiation compared with XRT. The purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive analysis of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PRT) for pregnant patients and to evaluate whether PBS-PRT should be the new standard of practice for treating pregnant patients with brain and head and neck cancers. PBS-PRT plans were made for seven pregnant patients who received XRT: four treated for brain tumors and three for head and neck tumors. Measurements were performed with the patient plans using an anthropomorphic phantom and Wendi-2 meter placed at the phantom's abdomen. Patient-specific measurements were used to determine the total fetal equivalent dose from PBS-PRT compared with XRT. Imaging dose was also evaluated with a Fluke 451 dose meter. The average measured fetal equivalent dose, accounting for photons and neutrons, for the brain plans was 0.4 mSv for PBS-PRT and 7 mSv for XRT. For the head and neck plans, it was 6 mSv and 90 mSv for PBS-PRT and XRT, respectively. The PBS-PRT plans were preferred by the physicians for both tumor coverage and normal-tissue sparing. Daily imaging added between 0.05 and 1.5 mSv to the total dose. This retrospective study showed that when treating brain or head and neck cancers in pregnant patients, fetal equivalent dose is reduced by approximately a factor of 10 with PBS-PRT compared with XRT without making any compromises in treatment planning objectives. These results support a change of practice to using PBS-PRT as the new standard for treating pregnant patients with brain or head and neck tumors compared with XRT.

A retrospective comparison of setup accuracy from CBCT and SGRT data in breast cancer patients

IntroductionBoth cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) are used for breast patient positioning verification before treatment delivery. SGRT may reduce treatment time and imaging dose by potentially reduce the number of CBCT needed. The aim of this study was to compare the displacements resulting in positioning from the Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) 3D and SGRT methods and to design a clinical workflow for SGRT implementation in breast radiotherapy to establish an imaging strategy based on the data obtained. MethodsFor this study 128 breast cancer patients treated with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions using 3D conformal radiotherapy with free breathing technique were enroled. A total of 366 CBCT images were evaluated for patient setup verification and compared with SGRT. Image registrations between planning CT images and CBCT images were performed in mutual agreement and in online mode by three health professionals. Student's paired t‐test was used to compare the absolute difference in vector shift, measured in mm, for each orthogonal axis (x, y, z) between SGRT and CBCT methods. The multidisciplinary team evaluated a review of the original clinical workflow for SGRT implementation and data about patients treated with the updated workflow were reported. ResultsComparison of the shifts obtained with IGRT and SGRT for each orthogonal axis (for the x-axes the average displacement was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, y = 1.1 ± 0.8 mm and z = 1.0 ± 0.7 mm) revealed no significant statistical differences (p > 0.05). Using the updated workflow the difference between SGRT and IGRT displacements was <3 mm in 91.4 % of patients with a reduction in total treatment time of approximately 20 %, due to the reduce frequency of the CBCT images acquisition and matching. ConclusionsThis study has shown that IGRT and SGRT agree in positioning patients with breast cancer within a millimetre tolerance. SGRT can be used for patient positioning, with the advantages of reducing radiation exposure and shorter overall treatment time.

An evaluation of an energy independent CT reconstruction algorithm for use in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Radiotherapy treatment planning relies upon density information provided by CT for accurate dose calculations. Hounsfield units (HUs) are converted to electron/physical density via an energy dependant calibration curve. Multiple curves are required to make full use of the available accelerating potentials (kVp). The curves are bi-linear with a discontinuity occurring at soft-tissue densities. The commercial algorithm, DirectDensityTM (Siemens Healthcare GmbH), constructs a single calibration curve covering all available kVp. This enables the optimisation of the CT image quality, e.g. in terms of contrast, or the reduction of the imaging dose, whilst rendering the radiotherapy treatment dose calculation robust to the energy used to acquire the CT image. We report our investigations on the clinical utilisation of the DirectDensityTM algorithm for radiotherapy treatments, by using all accelerating potentials, i.e. from 70 kVp up to 140 kVp, available at our CT treatment simulator, in contrast to previous studies that were limited to accelerating potentials spanning a subset of the available kVp. The DirectDensityTM (DD) reconstruction algorithm available on a SOMATOM go.Open Pro CT scanner (Siemens Healthineers) was evaluated using the RayStation v. 9 treatment planning system (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) and a CIRS Model 002LFC IMRT Thorax Phantom (SunNuclear, Melbourne, FL), which was imaged at all available kVp with clinical protocols corresponding to various anatomical sites. The DD images were compared to those with the standard reconstruction algorithm acquired only at 120 kVp, as per our routine clinical practice. The effect of increasing kVp on HU is investigated for relevant tissue substitutes. In addition, a dosimetric comparison is performed for a VMAT plan technique with 6 MV X-rays using retrospective patient CT data sets representing four anatomical sites (pelvis, thorax, brain and "head and neck") with five patients for each site. The original dose distributions were calculated on images acquired at 120 kVp using the standard clinical iterative reconstruction (Qr40) and compared with dose distributions recalculated on images reconstructed with the new DD (Sm40) algorithm. The maximum difference for radiotherapy doses calculated using images of the phantom reconstructed with Qr40 (120 kVp) or DD (all available kVp) was 0.73%. The patient plans on the anatomically representative sites studied here showed a mean PTV dose difference of -0.2% (s.d. 0.7) for D99%, -0.4% (s.d. 0.4%) for D50% and -0.3% (s.d. 0.4%) for D2%. Incidentally, we found a previously unreported decrease in HU, mostly notable for bone type inserts (~34 HU (cortical bone)), at 110 kVp for the DD reconstructed images. The effect was not noted for the standard Qr40 reconstructions. DD has a minimal dosimetric impact in the dose calculations for radiotherapy treatments and could be implemented with existing clinical workflows. Attention should be paid to the HU values for images acquired at 110 kVp (DD algorithm), which warrants further investigation. This is the first paper where DD was evaluated at all available kVp, leading to the incidental discovery of abnormal HU values at 110 kVp for this algorithm.

Imdose Phantom Development For Quality Assurance And Control In Computed Tomography Imaging Study Of Image Quality And Dosage Assessment

C.T. has made a great contribution to detecting and diagnosing patients' diseases. C.T., before being applied to patients, must pass quality assurance and control with phantom. However, the availability of phantoms is still minimal because of their high price. His study aims to create and evaluate cylindrical phantoms for quality assurance and control procedures based on image quality and dose parameters. The research method involves creating an image-quality phantom design that references the CatPhan phantom using Sketchup. The results show that the phantom image provides results from the standard phantom; the SNR, CNR, MTF, noise, and MTF values of the ImDose phantom are still within the standard phantom criteria. Based on statistical tests, the image quality of SNR, CNR, MTF, NPS, and noise is not statistically significantly different from the standard phantom (p &gt; 0.05). The uniformity value still needs to be improved because it has a significant difference from the standard phantom with an ap value &lt;0.05. Increasing the voltage and current gave results proportional to improving image quality and dose. ImDose phantoms for quality assurance and C.T. control have been successfully developed.

The implementation of an image-guided system at a proton therapy center facility.

Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) proton therapy has similar requirements on patient alignment to within 1mm and 1-degree accuracy as photon radiosurgery. This study describes general workflow, acceptance, and commissioning test procedures and their respective results for an independent robotic arm used for Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) for a Proton Therapy System. The system is equipped with kV-imaging techniques capable of orthogonal and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging modalities mounted on an independent robotic arm gantry attached to the ceiling. The imaging system is capable of 360-degree rotation around patients to produce CBCT and kilovoltage orthogonal images. The imaging hardware is controlled by Ehmet Health XIS software, and MIM Software handles the image fusion and registration to an acceptable accuracy of ≤1-mm shifts for patients' alignment. The system was tested according to the requirements outlined in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG) 142 and TG 179. The system tests included (1) safety, functionality, and connectivity, (2) mechanical testing, (3) image quality, (4) image registration, and (5) imaging dose. Additional tests included imaging gantry isocentricity with a laser tracker and collision-avoiding system checks. The orthogonal and volumetric imaging are comparable in quality to other commercially available On-Board Imagers (OBI) systems. The resulting spatial resolution values were 1.8-, 0.8-, and 0.5-Line Pairs per Millimeter (lp/mm) for orthogonal, full-fan CBCT, and half-fan CBCT, respectively. The image registration is accurate to within 1mm and 1 degree. The data shows consistent imaging-guided system performance with standard deviations in x, y, and z of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.7mm, respectively. The system provides excellent image quality and performance, which can be used for IGRT. The proven accuracy of the x-ray imaging and positioning system at McLaren Proton Therapy Center (MPTC) is 1mm, making it suitable for proton therapy.

Dose reduction in sequence scanning 4D CT imaging through respiratory signal-guided tube current modulation: A feasibility study.

Respiratory signal-guided 4D CT sequence scanning such as the recently introduced Intelligent 4D CT (i4DCT) approach reduces image artifacts compared to conventional 4D CT, especially for irregular breathing. i4DCT selects beam-on periods during scanning such that data sufficiency conditions are fulfilled for each couch position. However, covering entire breathing cycles during beam-on periods leads to redundant projection data and unnecessary dose to the patient during long exhalation phases. We propose and evaluate the feasibility of respiratory signal-guided dose modulation (i.e., temporary reduction of the CT tube current) to reduce the i4DCT imaging dose while maintaining high projection data coverage for image reconstruction. The study is designed as an in-silico feasibility study. Dose down- and up-regulation criteria were defined based on the patients' breathing signals and their representative breathing cycle learned before and during scanning. The evaluation (including an analysis of the impact of the dose modulation criteria parameters) was based on 510 clinical 4D CT breathing curves. Dose reduction was determined as the fraction of the downregulated dose delivery time to the overall beam-on time. Furthermore, under the assumption of a 10-phase 4D CT and amplitude-based reconstruction, beam-on periods were considered negatively affected by dose modulation if the downregulation period covered an entire phase-specific amplitude range for a specific breathing phase (i.e., no appropriate reconstruction of the phase image possible for this specific beam-on period). Corresponding phase-specific amplitude bins are subsequently denoted as compromised bins. Dose modulation resulted in a median dose reduction of 10.4% (lower quartile: 7.4%, upper quartile: 13.8%, maximum: 28.6%; all values corresponding to a default parameterization of the dose modulation criteria). Compromised bins were observed in 1.0% of the beam-on periods (72 / 7370 periods) and affected 10.6% of the curves (54/510 curves). The extent of possible dose modulation depends strongly on the individual breathing patterns and is weakly correlated with the median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.22, p<0.001). Moreover, the fraction of beam-on periods with compromised bins is weakly anti-correlated with the patient's median breathing cycle length (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.24; p<0.001). Among the curves with the 17% longest average breathing cycles, no negatively affected beam-on periods were observed. Respiratory signal-guided dose modulation for i4DCT imaging is feasible and promises to significantly reduce the imaging dose with little impact on projection data coverage. However, the impact on image quality remains to be investigated in a follow-up study.

Setup accuracy and margins for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head, thorax, abdomen, and pelvic target volumes

The goal of the study was to evaluate the inter- and intrafractional patient setup accuracy of target volumes located in the head, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions when using SGRT, by comparing it with that of laser alignment using patient skin marks, and to calculate the corresponding setup margins. A total of 2303 radiotherapy fractions of 183 patients were analyzed. All patients received daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography scans (kV-CBCT) for online verification. From November 2019 until September 2020, patient setup was performed using laser alignment with patient skin marks, and since October 2020, using SGRT. The setup accuracy was measured by the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) corrections based on the kV-CBCT. The corresponding setup margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the impact of multiple factors on the setup accuracy. The inter-fractional patient setup accuracy was significantly better using SGRT compared to laser alignment with skin marks. The mean three-dimensional vector of the translational setup deviation of tumors located in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis using SGRT was 3.6 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 mm to 3.9 mm) and 4.5 mm using laser alignment with skin marks (95% CI 3.9 mm to 5.2 mm; p = 0.001). Calculation of setup margins for the combined inter- and intra-fractional setup error revealed similar setup margins using SGRT and kV-CBCT once a week compared to laser alignment with skin marks and kV-CBCT every other day. Furthermore, comparable setup margins were found for open-face thermoplastic masks with AlignRT compared to closed-face thermoplastic masks with laser alignment and mask marks. SGRT opens the possibility to reduce the number of CBCTs while maintaining sufficient setup accuracy. The advantage is a reduction of imaging dose and overall treatment time. Open-face thermoplastic masks may be used instead of closed-face thermoplastic masks to increase the patient's comfort.

Factors Associated with Stereotactic Radiation Plan Revision in Prospective Peer Review.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SR) is highly effective but has risks for serious toxicity. We sought to identify risk factors for SR plans requiring revision in a comprehensive, prospective peer review program conducted across a network of affiliated radiation centers. We hypothesized that increased physician experience and SR case volume would be associated with lower rates of SR plan revision. Weekly peer review rounds were conducted to review SR cases for image fusion, contours, plan, and dose constraints, all prior to start of radiation. Cases recommended for revision were recorded and tracked prospectively. Factors potentially associated with case revision including body site, SR type, physician experience, and physician case load were assessed for significance using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. From March 2019 to January 2023, 1,015 SR cases were prospectively reviewed, including 312 brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 190 multi-fraction brain SRS (fSRS), and 513 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Revision was recommended in 177 cases (17%). The yearly revision rate was 21% in 2019, 16% in 2020, 17% in 2021, and 18% in 2022. There were 13 individual treating physicians with a median of 5 years' experience (range: 2-18 years), measured at the time of each SR case review. Physicians were categorized as junior (< = 2 years of experience), mid-career (3-9 years), or senior (> = 10 years). The physician's SR case volume in the preceding 3 months (median 25 cases) was dichotomized as low volume (< = 25) or high volume (>25). Logistic regression results are shown in Table 1. Statistical significance was determined by p <0.05. SR plans utilizing SRS (as opposed to SBRT) and treated by physicians with high case volume had lower revision rates. Junior attendings had higher revision rates. These data imply a high value to peer review for junior attendings and for those with low SR case volume. Adequate case volume may be a critical factor for safe delivery of SR, analogous to surgical literature. Annual revision rates in the program remained stable over time, demonstrating the ongoing importance of an effective peer review program for SR.

Development of a Filtimator for Pediatric Image-Guided Radiation Therapy with Low Imaging Dose

We propose to use the filtimator (a filter and a collimator) for CBCT-based image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) optimized for pediatric patients to minimize the imaging dose but not to sacrifice the imaging quality required for bony-based image fusion. The filtimator was made of Tin (0.6 - 1 mm) and Cu sheets (0.6 to 1.2mm) for filter and collimation with adjustable collimation with 4 to 6 cm fields at the isocenter. The thickness of the filter in the central and the peripheral regions were determined using vendor-provided image registration software and to ensure that the rigid image registration results from the CBCT were with and without the filtimator. The image quality of the filtered CBCT was compared with the regular CBCTs. Image registration accuracy was investigated by creating a < 2° shift in pitch, roll, and rotation and < 3 cm shifts in the lateral, vertical, and longitudinal directions, using commercial head and house-made phantoms. The imaging dose reduction factor of the filtimator was measured using a CT dose index phantom. The contrast-to-noise ratio substantially improved in the opening region of the filter, which provided better visualization of normal anatomy and target volumes. The slim filter reduced the imaging dose by > 98% in the filtered region, and the visualization of bony structures was well preserved, allowing for accurate rigid image registration with the filter. The imaging registration difference was < 0.2° shift in pitch, roll, and rotation and < 0.5 mm shift in the lateral, vertical, and longitudinal directions compared to the regular CBCT. The proposed dose reduction with the filtimator was demonstrated to be efficient and effective in considerably reducing the patient imaging dose while yielding accurate registration results. This novel technique can become a valuable tool for generating 3- and 4-dimensional images with a much-reduced dose to improve the precision of target localization in radiation therapy.

Feasibility of Using Pseudo-CT for Dosimetry, Radiomics, and Efficacy Assessment in IMRT/VMAT of Brain Tumors: A Multi-Omics Analysis

Pseudo-CT generated by convolutional neural networks (CNN) and planning MRI has facilitated the promotion of MRI-Only. The technology not only reduces the time and money spent on CT scans, but also eliminates the cumbersome CT-MR registration. The feasibility in Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy has been analyzed in previous studies by our team. However, when the prescribed requirements are not met, IMRT/VMAT are still selected. The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of pseudo-CT in IMRT/VMAT for brain cancer via the following 5 aspects: (1) image difference, (2) dose accuracy, (3) radiomics feature, (4) efficacy assessment, and (5) correlation analysis. Brain tumor patients who had received radiotherapy at our institution and had planning MRI and CT were included in the study. Redesign of IMRT and VMAT radiotherapy plans according to 3 × 15Gy for each patient. Hounsfield unit (HU) values for PTV and OARs were used to assess image differences. And dose accuracy analysis contained a 2D dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics (Dmax, Dmean, D2%, D50%, D98%, HI, CI) and 3D gamma metrics (criteria: 1-3%/2mm, 1%/1mm, 10% threshold). Then 107 original image features of PTV and OARs were extracted for radiometry analysis. And tumor control probability (TCP) of PTV (Poisson model) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of OARs (Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model) were used for the variance analysis of efficacy assessment. Wilcox-test was used for significance of differences test (0.05), and spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the key features of the dose bias. A total of 42 patients were included, with 42 planning CTs and pseudo-CTs (mDixon-T1), and 38 pseudo-CTs (mDixon-T1-CE). The median volume of PTV was 4.1 cc (range 0.5-27.3), with no significant differences in HU, DVH, 3D gamma, and NTCP/TCP metrics. The median local gamma passing rates (1%/1mm) between planning CTs and pseudo-CTs (mDixon-T1) were 93.1% (range 65.5%-99.7%, IMRT) and 93.3% (range 63.9%-99.6%, VMAT). And more than 85% original radiomics features have significant difference. Further, the feature HU-Min was found to be more correlated with dose metrics in the correlation analysis. We speculate that it may be caused by the smoothing of the low frequency signal before outputting image. And since Shape_MeshVolume, Shape_VoxelVolume and PTV volume difference are highly correlated with dose deviation, it indicates that dose deviation affected by CT-MR registration. This study has the potential to provide guidance for the clinical application of pseudo-CT in the MRI-Only workflow with IMRT/VMAT for brain tumors. These quantitative results strongly indicate pseudo-CT can be used as a substitute for the initial CT in IMRT/VMAT for small brain lesions (size <5 cm, numbers <5), but not for radiomics analysis. Additionally, the impact of inter-image differences on dose accuracy is less significant compared to the deviation caused by image registration.

Accuracy of Electron Density and Planning Dosimetry in a Novel High-Quality CBCT Imaging System

A high-quality Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging system has been FDA approved for imaging guidance and dose calculation in radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the relative electron density in CBCT images acquired in this CBCT imaging system in a phantom study and its dosimetric impact on treatment planning in a patient study. Astoichiometric CT calibration was performed with a CIRS phantom (SunNuclear, Model 062M) to generate the HU-electron density curve for two tube voltages, 125kVp and 140 kVp, respectively. The phantom has a longitudinal length of 26.5 cm and is equipped with interchangeable inserts of various compositions, supplied by the vendor. Measurements were taken with solid water plates added to both ends of the phantom to allow adequate scattering and repeated for various clinical protocols with different combinations of tube voltages and exposures. The accuracy of the relative electron density of the CBCT imaging system was verified by comparing the calculated electron density from the Hounsfield Units (HU) measurements obtained from a Gammex phantom to the relative electron densities provided in vendor's specifications. To benchmark the relative electron density of the CBCT imaging system against a standard helical CT simulator, ten clinical plans that were created on CT simulation images were copied and recalculated on the CBCT images acquired immediately after the CT simulation, the latter of which was a standard procedure in current radiotherapy care for all patients who had given their consent to participate in the IRB-approved imaging study. The dose grids used in these calculations were 2.5mm x 2.5mm x 3mm. The Gamma passing rate was calculated using a standard 3mm/3% criterion with a 10% threshold. Ourresults showed the difference between the averaged CBCT calibration curves acquired at tube voltages of 125 kVP and 140 kVp was less than 2%. The mean discrepancy of the relative electron densities from vendor's specification was 0.0045 with a range between -0.02 and 0.04. Relative electron densities in all inserts were within 2% from the vendor's specifications except the cortical bone insert. Gamma passing rate was between 96.02% and 98.49% with mean value of 97.4% and a standard deviation of 0.95%. We consider this reflects the fact that the CT simulation and CBCT imaging were performed in separated rooms, which resulted in slight anatomical deformation that could negatively impact the Gamma passing rate. The CBCT imaging system provides sufficient accuracy of electron density for dose calculation, and the dose distribution calculated on the CBCT images is clinically equivalent to those calculated on helical CT images. The enhanced imaging quality of CBCT could further extend the role of imaging guidance to planning for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing the need for re-simulation and interruptions in the radiotherapy course.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients with Brain and Head and Neck Tumors

When radiotherapy is medically necessary, x-ray based treatments (XRT) have traditionally been used to treat pregnant patients. Treatment planning and delivery techniques may be modified to minimize dose to the fetus but results in less optimal plans due to avoiding posterior beams or arcs. Monte Carlo calculations and published case studies suggest spot scanning proton therapy (PRT) reduces the equivalent dose to the fetus by a factor of 10 compared to XRT and does not require modified treatment planning techniques. However, due to concern for dose uncertainties and neutron scatter with PRT, few centers have adopted PRT over XRT for pregnant patients. The purpose of this work is to perform a retrospective study on the pregnant patients previously treated at our institution with XRT to measure the equivalent dose that would be delivered to the fetus with spot scanning PRT compared to XRT. PRT plans were made for seven pregnant patients, 4 brain tumors and 3 head and neck tumors, who had received XRT. Due to the finite range of protons, the fetal exposure is dominated by neutrons and not the primary beam. Thus, no beam arrangement modifications were required to minimize fetal dose for PRT plans. Fetal dose measurements were performed with the patient plans using a Rando phantom and Wendi-2 (Thermo Scientific) meter placed at the phantom's abdomen. The Wendi-2 measures ambient dose equivalent, which accounts for the biological effect of the neutron energies. Measurements were made at various distances from isocenter to the center of the detector. The total dose equivalent from PRT at several out of field distances was compared to that from XRT. Patient specific measurements were used to determine the total fetal dose from each modality, accounting for the changing position of the fetus each week of the mother's treatment. The imaging dose for standard of practice imaging, including verification CT scans and daily alignment imaging, was also evaluated using a similar setup with a Fluke 451 dose meter. The average measured fetal equivalent dose for the brain plans was 0.4 mSv for PRT and 7 mSv for XRT. For the head and neck plans, it was 6 mSv for PRT and 90 mSv for XRT. The dose from PRT was consistently at least a factor of 10 less than the XRT plans. In addition, the PRT plans were preferred by the physicians when considering tumor coverage and other normal tissue sparing. Daily imaging added between 0.05 and 1.5 mSv to the total dose in the PRT treatments. This retrospective study showed that when treating brain or head and neck tumors in pregnant patients, the equivalent dose a fetus would receive with PRT is approximately a factor of 10 less than XRT without making any compromises in treatment planning. These results support changing the standard of practice to utilizing spot scanning PRT as the preferred method for treating pregnant patients with brain or head and neck tumors when available instead of XRT. We have brought this process to clinic at our center.

A constructive non-local means algorithm for low-dose computed tomography denoising with morphological residual processing.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has attracted significant attention in the domain of medical imaging due to the inherent risks of normal-dose computed tomography (NDCT) based X-ray radiations to patients. However, reducing radiation dose in CT imaging produces noise and artifacts that degrade image quality and subsequently hinders medical disease diagnostic performance. In order to address these problems, this research article presents a competent low-dose computed tomography image denoising algorithm based on a constructive non-local means algorithm with morphological residual processing to achieve the task of removing noise from the LDCT images. We propose an innovative constructive non-local image filtering algorithm by means of applications in low-dose computed tomography technology. The nonlocal mean filter that was recently proposed was modified to construct our denoising algorithm. It constructs the discrete property of neighboring filtering to enable rapid vectorized and parallel implantation in contemporary shared memory computer platforms while simultaneously decreases computing complexity. Subsequently, the proposed method performs faster computation compared to a non-vectorized and serial implementation in terms of speed and scales linearly with image dimension. In addition, the morphological residual processing is employed for the purpose of edge-preserving image processing. It combines linear lowpass filtering with a nonlinear technique that enables the extraction of meaningful regions where edges could be preserved while removing residual artifacts from the images. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm preserves more textural and structural features while reducing noise, enhances edges and significantly improves image quality more effectively. The proposed research article obtains better results both qualitatively and quantitively when compared to other comparative algorithms on publicly accessible datasets.