INTRODUCTION: Traumatic optic neuropathy is a devastating potential complication of closed head injury. The hallmark of an optic neuropathy, traumatic loss of visual function, which can manifest by subnormal visual acuity, visual field loss, or colour vision dysfunction. The presence of an afferent pupillary defect strongly suggests a prechiasmal location for the injury and is necessary to validate the diagnosis of traumatic optic neuropathy. Vision loss associated with traumatic optic neuropathy can be partial or complete and temporary or permanent. Approximately 1.5% to 5% of patients with closed head injuries have damage to visual pathways (4-6 / 100,000 general population / yr). These injuries can be divided into anterior and posterior lesions. Anterior lesions shows ophthalmoscopic abnormalities (eg. Central retinal artery occlusion) and usually associated with a variety of easily recognized injuries to the globe. Anterior lesions may include optic nerve avulsion, traumatic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, anterior optic nerve sheath hematoma. Posterior lesions are free of ophthalmoscopic findings, but disc edema and disc pallor do occur. Posterior traumatic optic neuropathy is characterised by visual loss that occur in the presence of an afferent pupillary defect but without evidence of injury to the eye or optic nerve. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse the clinical profile, response to mega dose steroid therapy and visual function outcome in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy presenting to the neuroophthalmology clinic at Regional Institute of Ophthalmology and Government Ophthalmic Hospital, Chennai. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational case study on the pattern of traumatic optic neuropathy and analysis of clinical profile, response to treatment and visual function outcome was conducted in the department of neuroophthalmology at RIO-GOH, Chennai. The study was conducted from June 2008 to November 2010. All eligible traumatic optic neuropathy patients according to inclusion criteria, presented to the neuroophthalmology clinic at RIO-GOH during June 2008 to may 2010 were included in the study. DISCUSSION Hippocrates might have been the first to identify the phenomenon of acute and delayed vision loss after injuries placed to and slightly above the brow. While there is little controversy on the macroscopic mechanism of trauma theory, multiple hypothesis have been proposed at microscopic level of damage to the optic nerve including contusion necrosis, nerve fibre tears and nerve infarction secondary to closed space edema, haemorrhage, thrombosis, vasospasm, impingement by bone spicules and shearing of dural vessels in the optic canal. In our study it is evident that traumatic optic neuropathy is devastating cause of permanent visual loss. Concussive force to head especially forehead transmits shock wave to optic canal. Visual loss is usually instantaneous. SUMMARY: Traumatic optic neuropathy is a rare but significant cause of post traumatic visual loss. The responsible blunt trauma to the frontal region may be minor or severe and accompanied by multiple adjacent fractures. Careful documentation of visual acuity, pupillary function, and red desaturation is essential to guide management. CT imaging should be performed to document such structural abnormalities as optic nerve avulsion, optic nerve sheath hematoma, orbital hematoma, or optic canal fracture with fragments. Based on the data from the International Optic Nerve Trauma Study, observation without intervention is a viable option. Patients and their families should be made aware of the information regarding mega dose corticosteroid therapy and participate in an informed decision. In particular, if visual acuity begins to deteriorate, then corticosteroid therapy should be considered. If a structural abnormality is present that may be contributing to optic nerve dysfunction (hematoma or fragment) or if the patient’s visual acuity deteriorates on corticosteroids, optic canal decompression should be offered. Management of this disorder remains very controversial; involvement of other appropriate subspecialists and careful discussions with the patient and family are essential to maximize visual outcome. FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIES: A better understanding of the cellular and biochemical mechanisms involving normal and traumatized axons, glia, and myelin sheaths may eventually leads to better intervention for traumatic optic neuropathy. Although corticosteroids are a type of neuroprotective agents, the recent expansion in basic scientific research regarding other neuroprotective agents may lead to a redirection in future therapy for this condition. CONCLUSION: In our study the clinical profile of 100 eligible patients who presented with loss of vision following trauma during June 2008 – May 2010 were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on exclusion and inclusion criteria 100 cases were taken up for the study.