You have accessJournal of UrologyPediatrics: Imaging/Infections & Vesicoureteral Reflux1 Apr 2011565 ASSESMENT OF PEDIATRIC RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING URETEROSCOPY Paul Kokorowski, Jeanne Chow, Keith Strauss, Melanie Pennison, and Caleb Nelson Paul KokorowskiPaul Kokorowski Boston, MA More articles by this author , Jeanne ChowJeanne Chow Boston, MA More articles by this author , Keith StraussKeith Strauss Boston, MA More articles by this author , Melanie PennisonMelanie Pennison Boston, MA More articles by this author , and Caleb NelsonCaleb Nelson Boston, MA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1375AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Pediatric patients are more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults. The ′as low as reasonably achievable′ (ALARA) principle requires efforts to minimize exposure to the patient, but little is known about radiation exposure during urologic procedures in children, including ureteroscopy (URS) for urolithiasis. The aim of this study was to measure radiation exposure during pediatric URS and identify opportunities for quality improvement. METHODS We performed a prospective direct observation of URS procedures as part of a quality improvement initiative. Information regarding pre-operative patient characteristics, operative factors, fluoroscopy unit settings and radiation exposure were recorded. Primary outcomes were total fluoroscopy time (min) and patient skin entrance dose (SED, in mGy). Specific modifiable factors were identified from observations as targets for potential quality improvement. Univariate tests of association were used to identify specific patient and operative factors associated with primary outcomes. RESULTS Direct observation was performed on 48 consecutive ureteroscopic procedures at a single institution. 34 procedures were included in our analysis after excluding two procedures for arterio-venous malformations, one terminated procedure, and 11 non-pediatric patients (≥21 years of age). Median patient age was 16.5 years old (range 7.4 to 19.2). 21% (7/34) procedures resulted in failure to treat a stone due to spontaneous passage or difficult access. Median total fluoroscopy time was 2.85 min (range 0.4–6.7) and median SED was 42.7mGy (range 2.23–223.4).For reference purposes, SED for chest x-ray in a 15 year old is ∼0.16 mGy. There was considerable variability across multiple examined factors and thus no single factor was significantly associated with fluoroscopy time and only source to skin distance (SSD) was associated with skin entrance dose (p=0.02). However, several other modifiable factors including fluoroscopic image rate and field of view demonstrated opportunities for dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric patients receive considerable radiation exposure during ureteroscopic procedures. No specific modifiable factors were consistently predictive of total fluoroscopy time and only SSD was associated with skin entry dose. Large variations limited the power to detect differences. Multiple potential methods for potential radiation reduction were identified and future efforts will focus on implementing dose reduction strategies consistent with the ALARA principle. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e228 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Paul Kokorowski Boston, MA More articles by this author Jeanne Chow Boston, MA More articles by this author Keith Strauss Boston, MA More articles by this author Melanie Pennison Boston, MA More articles by this author Caleb Nelson Boston, MA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...