Ibrutinib Dose Research Articles

Real-world outcomes following ibrutinib dose reduction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

This study used real-world data from three separate United States (US) databases to evaluate dosing patterns and time to next treatment (TTNT) following the first-incident adverse event (AE) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treated with first-line ibrutinib with and without dose reduction (DR). Median TTNT or death in patients with and without a DR following an AE in each database was as follows: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM): 59.5 and 30.6months; ConcertAI: 27.1 and 18.0months; and Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS): 49.8 and 22.0months, respectively. Median TTNT or death in patients with cardiac AEs, with and without a DR, was: Optum CDM: 44.4 and 22.9months; ConcertAI: 29.9 and 18.3months; and Medicare FFS: 49.6 and 14.0months, respectively. Ibrutinib DR was associated with fewer outpatient visits and lower CLL/SLL-related medical costs. These findings suggest that utilizing ibrutinib DR may effectively manage tolerability without compromising clinical efficacy.

Phase IB part of LOC-R01, a LOC network non-comparative randomized phase IB/II study testing R-MPV in combination with escalating doses of lenalidomide or ibrutinib for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients

BackgroundResults of conventional induction chemotherapies in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) need to be improved. Ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, and lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, have shown promising results at relapse, supporting to further assess their individual use in combination with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were randomized to receive four 28-day cycles of ibrutinib or lenalidomide in combination with R-MPV (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and prednisone) in a 3 + 3 design. Responders then received a consolidation with R-Cytarabine and an intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The objective of the phase IB study was to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring during the first induction cycle.ResultsTwenty-six patients (median age 52) were randomized. Four DLTs were observed: one grade 5 aspergillosis and pneumocystosis, one grade 4 catheter-related infection and two grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels. RP2D of ibrutinib and lenalidomide were 560 mg daily (D3-14 and D17-28) and 15 mg daily (D1-21) respectively, in combination with R-MPV. In both arms, the most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic cytolysis, neutropenia and infections. One grade 4 Lyell’s syndrome was reported at cycle 2 in the lenalidomide arm. After 4 induction cycles, the overall response rates were 76.9% and 83.3% in the lenalidomide and ibrutinib arm, respectively.ConclusionTargeted induction therapies combining lenalidomide or ibrutinib with R-MPV are feasible for first-line PCNSL. The safety profile is consistent with the known safety profiles of R-MPV and both targeted therapies. The phase II part of the study is ongoing.Trial registrationNCT04446962.

Formulation and in-vitro anticancer activity of nilotinib immediate release and ibrutinib sustained release pellets

Background: Blood cancer is a significant contributor to mortality rates worldwide, and its prevalence is projected to rise on a global scale. This trend places considerable strain on healthcare systems and necessitates the expedited development of innovative treatments by pharmaceutical firms to remain competitive. Conventional pellets produce rapid plasma drug levels, but they might cause side effects, decrease effectiveness, and lead to poor therapeutic management. Ibrutinib and Nilotinib are employed to treat leukemia patients. Methodology: The current research aims to formulate, characterize, and anticancer effect of Nilotinib immediate release (NIR) and Ibrutinib sustained release (ISR) seal sugar-coated pellets. Micrometric properties estimated the characterization of the drug pellets, and surface morphology was estimated using scanning electron microscopy. Drug excipient compatibility studies, stability studies, and in-vitro drug release were accessed. Result & Discussion: The results of pellet formulations FNI-1 to FNI-5 showed that FNI-5 formulations showed 100±6.0 µm size and possessed excellent mechanical strength for giving pellets a good self-life; also, due to the higher drug content up to 99%, FNI-5 was the best suited for pellet formulation and because NIR showed 99.18 ± 2.12 drug release at 2h and ISR 99.03±3.74% up to 12h so that anticancer concentration maintained for prolonged period. The standard dose for cytotoxicity against the THP-1 cell line of Nilotinib was found to be 200 mg, and the maintenance oral dose of Ibrutinib was 140mg, with four times the intake of the drug up to 560 mg. In an in vitro study in FNI-5 (final formulation), the dose of Ibrutinib was reduced to 420 mg. Conclusion: A synergistic effect of Ibrutinib and nilotinib drugs was observed in the inhibition of cancer cell growth, with an IC50 value of 4.585 µg/mL

Personalized dose selection for the first Waldenström macroglobulinemia patient on the PRECISE CURATE.AI trial

The digital revolution in healthcare, amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and artificial intelligence (AI) advances, has led to a surge in the development of digital technologies. However, integrating digital health solutions, especially AI-based ones, in rare diseases like Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) remains challenging due to limited data, among other factors. CURATE.AI, a clinical decision support system, offers an alternative to big data approaches by calibrating individual treatment profiles based on that individual’s data alone. We present a case study from the PRECISE CURATE.AI trial with a WM patient, where, over two years, CURATE.AI provided dynamic Ibrutinib dose recommendations to clinicians (users) aimed at achieving optimal IgM levels. An 80-year-old male with newly diagnosed WM requiring treatment due to anemia was recruited to the trial for CURATE.AI-based dosing of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor Ibrutinib. The primary and secondary outcome measures were focused on scientific and logistical feasibility. Preliminary results underscore the platform’s potential in enhancing user and patient engagement, in addition to clinical efficacy. Based on a two-year-long patient enrollment into the CURATE.AI-augmented treatment, this study showcases how AI-enabled tools can support the management of rare diseases, emphasizing the integration of AI to enhance personalized therapy.

Impact of ibrutinib dose adjustment on TTNT in first-line CLL/SLL: a real-world analysis using target trial emulation

AbstractIbrutinib, a once-daily Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard-of-care first-line (1L) treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Dosing flexibility (adjustment to daily dose of <420 mg/d) with ibrutinib can help prevent recurrence or worsening of adverse events while maintaining long-term efficacy. This study compared time to next treatment among patients with CLL/SLL in the United States initiating 1L single-agent ibrutinib at 420 mg/d (index date) and staying on this dose vs patients with dose adjustment (DA) within 3 to 12 months. Two databases were used: Komodo claims (a majority from community practices) and Acentrus electronic medical records (from academic and nonteaching hospital systems). To account for immortal time bias (patients with DA survived on 1L therapy until DA) and overlap between follow-up time and definition of treatment strategies, a target trial emulation approach was used, in which patients were cloned at index date and contributed follow-up to both treatment strategy arms until deviation from the strategy. Among 3343 patients in Komodo (mean age: 67.5 years; 37.6% female) and 1171 patients in Acentrus (mean age: 70.4 years; 34.6% female) who initiated 1L single-agent ibrutinib 420 mg/d, 18.0% and 19.6%, respectively, had a DA. DA was not associated with an increased risk of having a next treatment in both databases (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: Komodo: 0.95 [0.80-1.14], Acentrus: 1.14 [0.80-1.62]). These findings suggest that a flexible dosing approach with ibrutinib may be effective in allowing patients to achieve optimal outcomes while remaining on long-term continuous 1L treatment.

Repurposing ibrutinib for chemo-immunotherapy in a phase 1b study of ibrutinib with indoximod plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and etoposide for patients with childhood brain cancer.

TPS2703 Background: In children, brain cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death. The indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a metabolic checkpoint, expressed by host myeloid and dendritic cells, that suppresses anti-tumor immune responses following chemotherapy. We recently published results of a first-in-children phase 1 trial (NCT02502708) that showed the oral IDO-pathway inhibitor indoximod was well tolerated and provided meaningful clinical benefit for many patients with progressive childhood brain tumors, when given in combination with oral chemotherapy regimens (1). Using preclinical models, we have also reported the importance of the Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) pathway as a key upstream driver of IDO during chemotherapy (2). Thus, we hypothesize that adding the BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib to the previously studied regimen of investigational indoximod IDO-inhibitor plus oral metronomic cyclophosphamide and etoposide will synergistically enhance anti-tumor immune responses, leading to improvement in Objective Response Rate (ORR) with manageable overlapping toxicity. Methods: The current study (NCT05106296) is an Investigator-Sponsored, open label, single-arm phase 1b trial comprised of a Dose-escalation Cohort (n=18) using a 3+3 dose escalation design to establish safety and dosing of ibrutinib in the combined regimen; followed by an Expansion Cohort (n=19) at the MTD to evaluate efficacy. Patients are treated with the all-oral 4-drug chemo-immunotherapy regimen in 28-day cycles using: (i) ibrutinib [Study Dose once daily on days 1-21]; (ii) indoximod [38.4 mg/kg/day divided twice daily throughout the cycle]; (iii) cyclophosphamide [2.5 mg/kg/dose, maximum dose 100 mg, once daily on days 1-21]; and (iv) etoposide [50 mg/m2/dose once daily on days 1-21]. Eligible patients are age 12 to 25 years with relapsed or refractory brain cancer, MRI evidence of current active disease not recently treated with radiation/proton therapy, ECOG performance score 0-2, and meet standard organ function requirements. Patients with systemic infection, autoimmune disease, recent live-virus vaccination, comorbid conditions that may overlap with expected regimen toxicities, or chronic treatment with anticoagulants or strong CYP3A inhibitors are excluded. Primary Objectives are to: (i) determine the pediatric recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib for the combined regimen (Dose-escalation Cohort), and (ii) evaluate preliminary evidence of efficacy for the combined regimen in terms of ORR (Expansion Cohort). Exploratory analyses use single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing (scRNAseq/TCRseq) of cryopreserved serial peripheral blood samples to monitor for treatment-expanded TCR clonotypes and study their phenotype. 1. Neuro-Oncology 26:348-361, 2024. 2. Immunity54:2354-2371, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05106296 .

Abstract PO1-04-03: Phase I/II Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib is a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase that has demonstrated potent inhibition of ErbB/HER family receptor tyrosine kinases in preclinical models. Ibrutinib also displays immunomodulatory effects, shifting the profile of the immune response from Th2-type to Th1-type cytokines (Dubovsky et al. 2013), resulting in enhanced antitumor immunity. As there is a need for novel HER2-targeted therapies following progression on established anti-HER2–directed therapies, and as combining multiple HER2-directed agents is more effective than single-agent therapy (Blackwell et al. 2012), this study explored the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT03379428). Trial design: Phase I was a dose-escalation study to define the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib plus trastuzumab. The primary objective of Phase II was to define the clinical benefit rate (CBR = complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD] ≥ 6 months) of ibrutinib plus trastuzumab; secondary objectives were to determine objective response rate (ORR = CR + PR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety/tolerability. Pts had HER2-positive MBC with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, disease progression on or within 6 months of completing ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) therapy, and ≤4 (Phase I) or ≤5 (Phase II) prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC, with no limit on prior endocrine therapies. Results: 26 pts were treated in Phases I and II: median age, 65.1 y; 15.4% Asian, 15.4% Black, 46.2% Caucasian, 19.2% Hispanic, and 3.8% Other; 46.2% with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0, 42.3% with PS of 1, and 7.7% with PS of 2. Median prior lines of therapy for MBC was 2 (range: 0, 6); median prior lines of therapy in any setting was 4 (range: 1, 9). In any setting, 88.5% of pts had prior treatment (Tx) with trastuzumab, 80.8% had prior Tx with pertuzumab, and 100% had prior Tx with T-DM1. 0% of pts had brain, 38.5% had bone, 23.1% had liver, and 42.3% had lung metastases. All pts were HER2+ by local pathology, 61.5% positive by IHC and 42.3% by FISH; 12 pts had ER+ and/or PR+ and 14 pts had ER-/PR- cancers. The starting dose of ibrutinib for Phase I was 560 mg. Of the 3 pts enrolled at this dose level, all experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), with 2 of the pts experiencing serious AEs (grade 4 alanine aminotransferase [ALT] increased and grade 5 respiratory failure). As such, 420 mg of ibrutinib was selected as the RP2D. At the time of data extraction, across Phase I/II, 16 pts (61.5%) experienced a Tx-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common (≥5%) TRAEs of any grade were bruising and rash (each 19.2%); fatigue and thrombocytopenia (each 15.4%); anemia, diarrhea, and edema (each 11.5%); and ALT increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blurred vision, ecchymoses, mucositis, nausea, pruritus, and vomiting (each 7.7%). A total of 5 pts (19.2%) experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs; no grade 5 TRAEs were reported. 26 pts were treated with ibrutinib and trastuzumab, and 26 pts were in the evaluable population. 1 pt had CR for an ORR of 3.8% (95% CIs: 0.1, 19.6); 9 pts had SD, and 4 pts had SD for ≥6 months for a CBR of 19.2% (95% CIs: 6.6, 39.4). Median OS was 27.1 months (range: 0.30, 27.1), and median PFS was 2.0 months (range: 0.03, 27.1). The PFS rate at 12 months was 34.6% (95% CIs: 15.6, 54.6). Conclusion: Ibrutinib plus trastuzumab had a manageable safety profile; however, the CBR did not reach the protocol-specified goal of 28%, and these results do not support further clinical investigation. An in-depth evaluation of the immune effects of ibrutinib in these pts is ongoing. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Andrea Glidden, Tracy Locke, Amy Scales. Phase I/II Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-04-03.

Ibrutinib disrupts blood-tumor barrier integrity and prolongs survival in rodent glioma model

In malignant glioma, cytotoxic drugs are often inhibited from accessing the tumor site due to the blood-tumor barrier (BTB). Ibrutinib, FDA-approved lymphoma agent, inhibits Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and has previously been shown to independently impair aortic endothelial adhesion and increase rodent glioma model survival in combination with cytotoxic therapy. Yet additional research is required to understand ibrutinib’s effect on BTB function. In this study, we detail baseline BTK expression in glioma cells and its surrounding vasculature, then measure endothelial junctional expression/function changes with varied ibrutinib doses in vitro. Rat glioma cells and rodent glioma models were treated with ibrutinib alone (1–10 µM and 25 mg/kg) and in combination with doxil (10–100 µM and 3 mg/kg) to assess additive effects on viability, drug concentrations, tumor volume, endothelial junctional expression and survival. We found that ibrutinib, in a dose-dependent manner, decreased brain endothelial cell–cell adhesion over 24 h, without affecting endothelial cell viability (p < 0.005). Expression of tight junction gene and protein expression was decreased maximally 4 h after administration, along with inhibition of efflux transporter, ABCB1, activity. We demonstrated an additive effect of ibrutinib with doxil on rat glioma cells, as seen by a significant reduction in cell viability (p < 0.001) and increased CNS doxil concentration in the brain (56 ng/mL doxil alone vs. 74.6 ng/mL combination, p < 0.05). Finally, Ibrutinib, combined with doxil, prolonged median survival in rodent glioma models (27 vs. 16 days, p < 0.0001) with brain imaging showing a − 53% versus − 75% volume change with doxil alone versus combination therapy (p < 0.05). These findings indicate ibrutinib’s ability to increase brain endothelial permeability via junctional disruption and efflux inhibition, to increase BTB drug entry and prolong rodent glioma model survival. Our results motivate the need to identify other BTB modifiers, all with the intent of improving survival and reducing systemic toxicities.

Ibrutinib in Combination with Revlimid/Dexamethasone (Rd) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (AFT-15)

Introduction: Preclinical studies have suggested synergism between lenalidomide (LEN) and ibrutinib (IBR) in multiple myeloma (MM). Both downregulate IRF4, a master transcriptional factor that regulates myeloma cell survival. Single agent oral IBR combined with dexamethasone proved well tolerated and active in advanced, steroid refractory relapsed MM as part of a large Phase1/2 study in 60 patients, with durable stabilization and minimal response seen in most evaluable patients (Richardson PG et al, BJH 2018). LEN is considered a standard of care in newly diagnosed MM, as maintenance and in relapsed disease, and a backbone of oral therapy in the MM treatment paradigm (Laubach JP et al, Leukemia 2016). Methods: We therefore conducted a 3+3 phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IBR in combination with LEN + dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM who had at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Three dose levels (DL) were planned. Cycle length was 28 days. IBR was administered orally daily at 560mg on DL1-2 and 840mg on DL3, LEN orally days 1-21 at 15mg on DL1 and 25mg on DL2-3, and DEX orally days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at 40 mg if age &amp;lt; 75 or 20 mg if ≥75 for DL1-3. Patients with GFR ≥ 30 and &amp;lt; 60 were treated according to manufacturer's instructions with lenalidomide dosed at 10mg/d. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade 4 thrombocytopenia; grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days or febrile neutropenia; grade 4 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea; grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or platelet transfusion; grade 3-4 hyperglycemia or thrombotic/embolic event, treatment delays ≥ 21 days for toxicity; and treatment related death. Due to changes in standard of care during the study, eligibility was modified to allow the enrollment of patients with RRMM who had at least 1 prior line of therapy. Response was assessed using IMWG/Uniform Criteria. Results: Fourteen patients (DL1-6 pts; DL2-3 pts; DL3-5 pts) registered to the study from March 2019 to May 2023, prior to its closure due to slow accrual. One patient on DL3 cancelled participation prior to start of treatment due to disease progression (PD). The remaining 13 patients are included in summary of toxicities and response but 2 patients on DL3 are excluded from determination of MTD due to discontinuing cycle 1 treatment due to COVID and receiving 280 mg/day of IBR instead of assigned 840 mg/day dose during cycle 1, respectfully. Twelve patients were evaluable for response. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range: 2-9), reflecting a heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory population. One of the 6 patient on DL1 developed a DLT, grade 3 non-viral hepatitis. None of the 3 patients on DL2 or the 2 patients on DL3 had a DLT. One patient on DL1 remains on treatment with stable disease for 42+ cycles. The median number of cycles administered was 3 (range: 1-42+). Severe toxicities reported included grade 3 lymphocytopenia (3), anemia (2), alanine aminotransferase increase (1), aspartate aminotransferase increase (1), blood bilirubin increase (1), hypocalcemia (1), hypokalemia (1) hypophosphatemia (1), febrile neutropenia (1), chronic kidney disease (1), non-viral hepatitis (1), soft tissue infection (1), and fatigue (1); grade 4 lymphocytopenia (1), and grade 5 sepsis (1). End of treatment reasons included: PD (7), toxicity (2), death [soft tissue infection that turned into sepsis considered to be likely related to DEX] (1), and concomitant conditions (2). Stable disease (SD) or better was achieved in 10 of 12 evaluable patients (83%), including one patient who achieved disease control for over 3.5 years. One patient (8%) on DL3 had a complete response (CR) but stopped treatment after 2 cycles due to reversible toxicity and comorbid conditions, based upon physician advice and patient choice. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide with Ibrutinib as an all-oral approach in RR MM proved feasible and generally tolerable, with the majority of discontinuation seen in this Phase I study due to disease progression. No COVID related - mortality was seen. SD or better was achieved in 83% of patients, including one CR. Potential future directions include combination approaches with next generation IMids such as pomalidomide, as well as other orally bioavailable novel agents with potent immune activating properties, such as CelMoDs. Support: AFT; Pharmacyclics; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03702725

Tolerability and Outcomes of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Patients with Severe Renal Dysfunction

Introduction: There is limited data on the outcomes and tolerability of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in patients with severe renal dysfunction, particularly older adults. The most commonly prescribed BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, is believed to be safe for mild to moderate renal dysfunction. However, severe renal failure has been excluded from prospective studies, and there is no guidance on dosing under the FDA label. Furthermore, ibrutinib itself can cause kidney injury and worsen existing renal dysfunction. This national Veterans Affairs (VA) analysis aims to review the safety and tolerability of BTK inhibitors in severe renal impairment. Methods: An electronic query of the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and retrospective chart review were performed to identify patients with CLL treated with a BTK inhibitor between 2013-2022 and who had severe chronic kidney disease defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &amp;lt; 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 overlapping with their treatment period. Isolated acute kidney injuries lasting &amp;lt; 1 month were excluded. Fisher's exact test was utilized to evaluate categorical variables, logistic regression for binary outcomes, and log-rank and Cox regression for time-to-event analyses. Results: A total of 115 patients across 68 VA medical centers received 124 lines of BTK inhibitors with an eGFR &amp;lt; 30 (Table 1). The median duration of follow-up from the start of therapy was 26 months (range, 0.5 - 94). The median age was 74, and 98% were male, reflecting the U.S. veteran population. 64% had an eGFR &amp;lt; 30 at the start of therapy, with 18% requiring dialysis, while the remaining 36% experienced progressive renal dysfunction during treatment. The oral BTK agents prescribed were ibrutinib ( n = 103), acalabrutinib ( n = 18), and zanubrutinib ( n = 3). Most BTK inhibitors (n = 94 of 124 lines, 76%) were initiated at the FDA-label dose. 46 (37%) later required dose reduction, primarily due to drug toxicity ( n = 37). The most common reasons for dose reduction were cytopenia ( n = 10), failure to thrive ( n = 6), bleeding ( n = 5), and worsening renal function ( n = 5). Discontinuation of therapy for toxicity occurred in 50% (ibrutinib), 39% (acalabrutinib), and 33% (zanubrutinib). The most common reasons for discontinuation were infection ( n = 15), bleeding ( n = 10), arrhythmia ( n = 9), and disease progression ( n = 9). Among patients who received ibrutinib ( n = 103), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 45 and 49 months, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression, covariates associated with shorter PFS included the baseline severity of renal failure (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.21 - 2.88), cirrhosis (HR 6.36, 95% CI 1.45 - 19.76), and heart failure (HR 4.20, 95% CI 1.82 - 9.47). Younger age, dialysis, and absence of atrial fibrillation at the start of therapy were protective in univariate but not multivariate models. Heart failure and cirrhosis retained their prognostic impact on OS in multivariate modeling. Factors including race, rural residence, obesity, IGHV status, and TP53 deletion were not significantly associated with survival in this cohort. The median duration of therapy of ibrutinib was 33 months. Ibrutinib dose reductions at initiation or during treatment were associated with a longer duration of therapy (Figure 1). Of note, dose reductions did not significantly reduce the response rate to ibrutinib or worsen survival. Interestingly, 11 patients had CLL-related kidney dysfunction. However, kidney function did not improve after treatment with a BTK inhibitor in any of the 115 patients. Progression of renal impairment was observed in 51 patients (50%) on ibrutinib, 8 (44%) on acalabrutinib, and none on zanubrutinib. The etiology of worsening renal function was uncertain for the majority of patients. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of BTK inhibitors in patients with CLL and severe renal dysfunction have not been well-described. In our real-world data analysis, these agents appear to be a reasonable therapeutic option in severe renal impairment, including in older adults and those on dialysis. Lab monitoring is needed, given the risk of worsening renal function. Dose modifications may help improve tolerability without reducing efficacy. Unfortunately, severe renal dysfunction is unlikely to improve with CLL treatment, even in CLL-related kidney failure.

Comparative Effectiveness of Ibrutinib Flexible Dosing Treatment Strategies on Time to Next Treatment in a Largely Community-Based Claims Database: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Introduction: Outside of a clinical trial setting, ibrutinib is the most well-characterized of the covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in the first-line (1L) setting. However, the impact of ibrutinib dose adjustment on clinical outcomes remains to be defined. In this real-world effectiveness study, we compared time to next treatment (TTNT) as a proxy for disease progression for dose adjustment and standard dose treatment strategies in patients with CLL/SLL receiving 1L single-agent IBR. Methods: This study utilized the Komodo Health payer-complete dataset, derived from U.S. health insurance claims from &amp;gt;150 private insurers covering &amp;gt;160 million individuals from 2015-2023; 53% of these patients are from community centers. Adult patients with CLL/SLL were included if they initiated 1L single-agent IBR 420 mg/day between March 2016 - April 2023 (IBR initiation date = index date; 1L single-agent IBR was defined as no other CLL/SLL treatment in the 12-month baseline period or within 28 days after index). A target trial emulation (TTE) approach was utilized to compare TTNT, defined as the time between the index date to the initiation of a next line of therapy (LOT), for two treatment strategies: 1) Dose adjustment strategy, defined as a lead-in IBR treatment at 420mg/day for 3-12 months, followed by dose adjustment to &amp;lt;420mg/day until next LOT or IBR discontinuation; 2) Standard dose strategy, defined as a continuous IBR treatment at 420mg/day without any dose adjustment for &amp;gt;12 months until next LOT or IBR discontinuation. The TTE approach minimizes immortal time bias in a naïve observational analysis as patients in the dose adjustment cohort cannot initiate next LOT before dose adjustment occurs [Hernan et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2016]. To explicitly emulate a target trial, two clones were created for each patient, with one clone contributing person-time and event to each treatment strategy of interest, respectively. A clone was artificially censored when the actual treatment path deviated from the assigned treatment strategy. Selection bias due to artificial censoring was corrected using time-varying inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW), accounting for post-index time-varying clinical factors related to IBR dose adjustment or IBR discontinuation. TTNT hazard ratio (HR; robust 95% confidence interval [CI]) was estimated using an IPCW-weighted pooled logistic regression model. Alternative lead-in periods with IBR standard dosing (3-6 and 3-9 months) were also evaluated. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, defined as having a preexisting CV comorbidity or a high CHA 2DS 2-Vasc risk score. Results: 3,342 adults initiated 1L single-agent IBR at 420 mg/day. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 67.5 (10.6) years, 62% were male, and mean (SD) Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.0 (1.5). The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 19.6 (7.5, 35.0) months. During the study period, 463 patients (14%) initiated a subsequent LOT. The high CV risk subgroup consisted of 2,640 (79%) patients. In the overall study population, 608 (18%) patients experienced a dose adjustment after the index date. Of those, the dose adjustment occurred ≤3 months, ≤6 months, and ≤12 months post-index in 159 (26%), 300 (49%), and 440 (72%) patients, respectively, with dose used at the first reduction of 70 mg, 140 mg, or 280 mg in 4 (1%), 85 (14%), and 519 (85%) patients, respectively. The dose adjustment strategy (420 mg/day for 3-12 months followed by a reduced dose) was not associated with increased risk of initiating next LOT (adjusted HR [95% CI] 0.95 [0.80, 1.14]) compared to the continuous standard dose strategy; results for the alternative lead-in periods and the high CV risk subgroup were consistent with the primary scenario. Conclusions: In this real-world comparative effectiveness study with the majority of patients from community centers, dose adjustment of 1L single-agent IBR treatment for CLL/SLL is not associated with an increased risk of initiating next LOT when compared to continuous standard dose treatment. These findings suggest that a flexible dosing approach with IBR may be an effective option to maintain an optimal balance of clinical therapeutic efficacy and safety for patients with CLL/SLL in the 1L setting.

CTNI-21. PHASE I STUDY OF BTK INHIBITOR IBRUTINIB WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE AND RADIATION IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA (EQUILIBRIUM): FINAL TRIAL REPORT

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma carries dismal prognosis for which novel therapeutics are urgently needed. Ibrutinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of BTK, has been shown in preclinical models to inhibit cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. We sought to investigate safety and tolerability of ibrutinib for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). METHODS EQUILIBRIUM was a prospective, phase I trial conducted in nGBM patients with KPS ≥ 70% and normal organ function. Patients received standard of care chemoradiation plus ibrutinib in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (level 1: 420 mg daily, level 2: 560 mg daily, level -1: 280 mg daily). Primary study objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ibrutinib in combination with radiotherapy (RT) of 60Gy over 6 weeks with/without 75 mg/m2 of temozolomide (TMZ) in MGMT methylated and unmethylated cohorts respectively. Secondary objective was to determine safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival. RESULTS 26 patients were enrolled, with 12 (46%) females. Median age was 61.5 years (range 76-22). 15 (58%) patients were MGMT methylated and 11 (42%) were unmethylated. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at all dose levels of ibrutinib+RT arm. MTD of ibrutinib was noted to be 420 mg daily with RT+TMZ in methylated arm. In Ibrutinib+RT+TMZ arm, median cycles of TMZ were 4 (range 0-6) and of ibrutinib were 3 (range 0-26). Median OS for MGMT methylated arm was 26.0 (22.0-NA) months and for MGMT unmethylated cohort was 14.0 (8.54-NA) months. Median OS for EGFR-amplified was 29.5 (21.9-NA) months and for EGFR-non-amplified was 21.8 (16.6-NA) months. 2-year OS for MGMT methylated arm was 56% (34-95%) and for MGMT unmethylated arm was 2% (6-70%). CONCLUSIONS 420 mg of Ibrutinib daily is safe and feasible with TMZ and RT for nGBM. Ibrutinib appears promising compared to historical outcomes in MGMT methylated patients. EGFR-amplified patients potentially derive significant benefit. Trial information: NCT03535350.

Ibrutinib combination therapy for advanced gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours: results from a phase 1b/2 study

BackgroundIbrutinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is approved for the treatment of various B-cell malignancies and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Based on encouraging preclinical data, safety and efficacy of ibrutinib combined with companion drugs for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gastric/gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma (GC), and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) were evaluated.MethodsIbrutinib 560 mg or 840 mg once daily was administered with standard doses of everolimus for RCC, docetaxel for GC, and cetuximab for CRC. Endpoints included determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib in phase 1b and efficacy (overall response rate [ORR] for GC and CRC; progression-free survival [PFS] for CRC) in phase 2.ResultsA total of 39 (RCC), 46 (GC), and 50 (RCC) patients were enrolled and received the RP2D. Safety profiles were consistent with the individual agents used in the study. Confirmed ORRs were 3% (RCC), 21% (GC), and 19% (CRC). Median (90% CI) PFS was 5.6 (3.9–7.5) months in RCC, 4.0 (2.7–4.2) months in GC, and 5.4 (4.1–5.8) months in CRC.ConclusionsClinically meaningful increases in efficacy were not observed compared to historical controls; however, the data may warrant further evaluation of ibrutinib combinations in other solid tumours.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02599324.

Impact of Ibrutinib Dose Reduction on Duration of Therapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Background : Ibrutinib (Ibr) has demonstrated a significant progression-free survival and overall survival benefit compared to chemotherapy in multiple phase 3 studies in patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients with CLL/SLL who continue treatment with single-agent Ibr experience better survival outcomes than those who discontinue treatment within the first 2 years. Adverse events (AEs) may be managed, and treatment outcomes are optimized through Ibr dose reduction (DR). Recent real-world data have shown that patients with a DR after an AE had longer time to next treatment (TTNT) than those without a DR and that this trend was consistent among patients with cardiac and noncardiac AEs (Shadman et al, EHA 2023). Here we continue to evaluate the impact of DR on real-world outcomes using data from electronic medical records (EMRs). Aims: This study estimates the real-world impact of DR following an AE among patients with CLL/SLL. Methods : Previously untreated adults diagnosed with CLL/SLL on or after February 12, 2013), who were treated with 420 mg single-agent Ibr on or after Feb 12, 2014 (Ibr approval date) were analyzed using EMRs from the ConcertAI database (February 12, 2013−May 1, 2022). Patients were included if they had a cardiac or noncardiac AE after single-agent Ibr initiation at 420 mg per day without any DRs/escalations prior to first AE occurrence (index date). Patients were excluded if they received an antineoplastic agent ≤6 months prior to starting first-line (1L) Ibr, an antineoplastic agent or combination therapy within 28 days of Ibr use, second-line therapy within 30 days of index, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, CYP3A inhibitor during 1L Ibr or before start of the second-line, an experimental therapy in clinical trials, or were diagnosed with other malignancies for which Ibr is indicated within 6 months prior to Ibr initiation. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and TTNT were described following AE occurrence among patients with and without DRs. A DR was defined as a dose lower than 420 mg per day on or after the date of first AE post-Ibr initiation, per pharmacy records. Cardiac AEs included atrial fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. Noncardiac AEs included febrile neutropenia, anemia, neutropenia, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, rash, and pneumonia. TTNT sensitivity analyses requiring next-line treatment to occur ≥180 days after 1L initiation or considering a switch to another BTKi or death as censoring events were also conducted. Results : Overall, 522 patients were included in the analysis; 420 patients (80%) without a DR and 102 patients (20%) with a DR. Patients with a DR were slightly older than those without (median age: 74.5 vs 70 years); a lower proportion of women had a DR compared with men (43% vs 57%). Among patients with and without a DR, the median time to the first incident AE was 42 days and 65 days, respectively. Among patients with a DR, 68 (67%) were able to resume the full 420 mg per day Ibr dose after DR. Mean time between Ibr initiation and end of 1L Ibr treatment was significantly longer in patients with a DR compared with those without (553 days vs 464 days; P = 0.012). Fewer patients with DR had a next treatment (47%) than those without a DR (55%). Median TTNT was significantly longer in patients with DR (27 months, 95% CI: 21, 44) compared with those without (18 months, 95% CI: 15, 20) ( P = 0.007) (Figure). TTNT results were similar in each sensitivity analysis. Summary/Conclusion : Among patients with CLL/SLL treated with 1L Ibr, those with doses reduced after experiencing an AE remained on 1L Ibr longer compared with those who did not have the dose reduced. Ibr dose adjustments may support patients with CLL/SLL remaining on 1L Ibr longer.

Ibrutinib Dose Adjustment Does Not Impact Time to Next Treatment in First-Line Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Analysis of Electronic Medical Records from Academic and Non-Teaching Hospitals Using Target Trial Emulation

Introduction: Ibrutinib, a once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), is recommended as first-line (1L) treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Dosing flexibility with ibrutinib allows patients to adjust their daily dose to help prevent recurrence or worsening of adverse events, while maintaining efficacy by allowing patients to stay on treatment and benefit from long-term treatment outcomes. The current study aimed to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in CLL patients initiating 1L single-agent ibrutinib at 420mg/day and staying on this dose versus those having a dose adjustment (DA) within 3-12 months. Methods: Specialty pharmacy electronic medical records from the Acentrus database, comprised primarily of academic and non-teaching hospital systems in the United States (1/1/2016-4/30/2022), were used to identify adults with CLL who initiated 1L single-agent ibrutinib at a starting dose of 420mg/day (index date) (N = 1,171). A washout period of ≥12 months pre-index (also used to evaluate baseline characteristics) was required to confirm use as 1L therapy. The following treatment strategies were compared: treatment for 3 months post-index at 420mg/day followed by DA to a dose below 420mg/day between 3-12 months post-index versus sustained treatment for ≥12 months post-index at 420mg/day. The first 3 months were required to be at 420mg/day for both strategies, as most DAs occur after this period. TTNT was defined as the time from the index date to the initiation of a next treatment. Administrative censoring included treatment discontinuation (based on treatment gap of ≥365 days), death, participation in a clinical trial, end of data availability, within-class BTKi switch (i.e., switching to another covalent BTKi), anti-CD20 antibody (i.e., obinutuzumab or rituximab), or venetoclax add-on within 180 days post-index. To account for immortal time bias (i.e., patients with DA are required to survive on 1L therapy until DA), as well as overlap between follow-up time and definition of treatment strategies, a target trial emulation approach was used, where all patients were cloned at index date and contributed follow-up to both treatment strategy arms. Hazard ratios (HRs) were approximated from odds ratios obtained from multivariate pooled logistic regression models comparing TTNT between the two treatment strategies. Sensitivity analyses using different time periods to capture DA (3-6, 3-9, and 3-18 months) were also conducted. Results were replicated in the subgroup of patients at high risk for a cardiovascular (CV) event (based on pre-existing CV conditions or a high CV risk score). Results: Among the 1,171 patients who initiated 1L single-agent ibrutinib at a starting dose of 420mg/day, the mean age was 70.4 years, with 34.6% being female. The mean Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.0, and 61.8% were classified as high risk for a CV event. The mean (median) follow-up was 29.8 (30.9) months. Overall, 229 (19.6%) patients had a DA at any time (178 [77.7%] adjusted their dose to 280mg/day), with a mean (median) time to DA of 9.0 (5.5) months. Of these patients, 111 (48.5%) had a DA between 3-12 months post-index date (3-6 months: 66 [28.8%] patients, 3-9 months: 87 [38.0%] patients, 3-18 months: 126 [55.0%] patients). A total of 90 (7.7%) patients initiated a next treatment, out of which 59 (65.6%) patients initiated a venetoclax-based regimen (beyond the first 180 days) as their subsequent therapy. After adjustment in a pooled logistic regression model, DA was not associated with an increased risk of having a next treatment (HR: 1.14, p-value: 0.469) ( Figure 1). In sensitivity analyses evaluating DA over periods of 3-6, 3-9, and 3-18 months, results remained non-significant, with HRs ranging from 1.13 to 1.30 (all p-values &amp;gt;0.05) ( Figure 2). Results were also consistent in the subgroup with high risk for a CV event. Conclusions: This large real-world analysis of CLL patients from academic and non-teaching hospital systems showed that undergoing DA of 1L ibrutinib yielded similar clinical outcomes compared to having no DA, with similar findings for the high CV risk subgroup. These findings, along with those from clinical trials and real-world community oncology practices, suggest that a flexible dosing approach with ibrutinib may be an effective approach in allowing patients to achieve optimal outcomes while remaining on long-term continuous 1L treatment.

Takeaim Lymphoma: An Open-Label, Dose Escalation and Expansion Trial of Emavusertib (CA-4948) in Combination with Ibrutinib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Background: Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel oral inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which is essential for toll-like receptor (TLR) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling in B cell proliferation. Additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4) is also present in emavusertib. IRAK4 forms a Myddosome complex with MYD88 adaptor protein and drives overactivation ofnuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), causing inflammation and tumor growth. Emavusertib has been reported to be well tolerated and active as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Nowakowski 2020). Preclinical studies demonstrated that tumor resistance and survival via IRAK4 activation could be delayed or reversed. Emavusertib crossed the blood-brain barrier in a murine PDX model of PCNS lymphoma, blocked the activated IRAK4 pathway, and induced tumor response and prolonged survival (von Roemeling 2022). In combination with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, emavusertib showed in vitro synergy and re-sensitization of resistant cell lines, overcoming BTK resistance (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). In vivo synergy in B-cell NHL was also demonstrated. Adaptive chemotherapy treatment resistance through IRAK4 upregulation and activation was also described in other disease models (Melgar 2019, Li 2019). This abstract presents preliminary efficacy and safety data of emavusertib + ibrutinib in R/R NHL patients. Aim:Assessment of safety and clinical activity of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label trial (NCT03328078) of emavusertib as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib. Part A1 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib as monotherapy; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 300 mg BID with continuous oral dosing (Nowakowski 2020). Part A2 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib at 420 and 560 mg QD (Joffe 2022). Part B - ongoing; an expansion cohort of PCNSL patients with resistance to prior BTK inhibitors for additional safety and efficacy related to exposure: emavusertib at 100 or 200 mg BID + ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-Day cycles. Results:As of 19 July 2023, 18 heavily pretreated NHL (including five PCNSL) patients received emavusertib at 100, 200, or 300 mg BID in combination with full ibrutinib doses per label. Median age was 63.5 years (range 50-92). Median number of prior lines of anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range 1-10). Eleven of 18 patients failed prior BTK inhibitors. Median treatment duration was 95.5 days (21-587 days), suggesting acceptable safety and tolerability. No DLTs were observed at the 200 mg BID dose level, and two reversible DLTs (stomatitis and syncope) were observed at the 300 mg BID dose level. The preliminary efficacy data of 16 evaluable patients in combination with ibrutinib showed 5 CRs (2 MCL, 3 PCNSL) and 1 PR (1 CLL). All 3 PCNSL patients with CR were previously treated with BTK inhibitors. Conclusion: The combination ofemavusertib plus ibrutinib (ema+ibr) is well tolerated with an acceptable long-term safety profile and promising efficacy, showing several objective responses in heavily pretreated and/or BTK inhibitor resistant patients. Emavusertib may have the potential to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance and the combination of ema+ibr has the potential to show increased anti-cancer activity compared to ibrutinib monotherapy.

Combined therapy with ibrutinib and bortezomib followed by ibrutinib maintenance in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and high-risk features: a phase 1/2 trial of the European MCL network (SAKK 36/13)

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have single-agent activity, non-overlapping toxicities, and regulatory approval in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Invitro, their combination provides synergistic cytotoxicity. In this investigator-initiated phase 1/2 trial, we established the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib, and assessed its efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this phase 1/2 study open in 15 sites in Switzerland, Germany and Italy, patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after ≤2 lines of chemotherapy and both ibrutinib-naïve and bortezomib-naïve received six cycles of ibrutinibb and bortezomib, followed by ibrutinib maintenance. For the phase 1 study, a standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib. The primary endpoint in phase 1 was the dose limiting toxicities in cycle 1. The phase 2 study was an open-label, single-arm trial with a Simon's two-stage min-max design, with a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) assessed by CT/MRI. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02356458. Between August 2015 and September 2016, nine patients were treated in the phase 1 study, and 49 patients were treated between November 2016 and March 2020 in the phase 2 of the trial. The ORR was 81.8% (90% CI 71.1, 89.8%, CR(u) 21.8%) which increased with continued ibrutinib (median 10.6 months) to 87.3%, (CR(u) 41.8%). 75.6% of patients had at least one high-risk feature (Ki-67>30%, blastoid or pleomorphic variant, p53 overexpression, TP53 mutations and/or deletions). In these patients, ibrutinib and bortezomib were also effective with an ORR of 74%, increasing to 82% during maintenance. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the median duration of response was 22.7, and the median PFS was 18.6 months. PFS reached 30.8 and 32.9 months for patients with a CR or Cru, respectively. The combination of ibrutinib and bortezomib shows durable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, also in the presence of high-risk features. SAKK (Hubacher Fund), Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, and Janssen.

Phase 1b dose-finding study of rituximab, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib (R2I) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that frequently becomes chemoresistant over time. The distinct mechanisms of ibrutinib and lenalidomide provided a judicious rationale to explore the combination with anti-CD20 immunotherapy. In this phase 1b study (NCT02446236), patients (n = 25) with relapsed/refractory MCL received rituximab with escalating doses of lenalidomide (days 1–21) and ibrutinib 560 mg (days 1–28) of 28-day cycles. The MTD for lenalidomide was 20 mg; most common grade ≥3 adverse events were skin rashes (32%) and neutropenic fever (24%). The best ORR was 88%, CR rate was 83%, and median duration of response (DOR) was 36.92 months (95% CI 33.77, 51.37). Responses were seen even in refractory patients or with high-risk features (e.g. blastoid variant, TP53 mutation, Ki-67 > 30%). R2I was safe and tolerable in patients with R/R MCL.

POSTER: CLL-403 Real-World Dosing Patterns and Time to Next Treatment for Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma With or Without Ibrutinib Dose Reduction Following an Adverse Event

POSTER: CLL-403 Real-World Dosing Patterns and Time to Next Treatment for Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma With or Without Ibrutinib Dose Reduction Following an Adverse Event

CLL-403 Real-World Dosing Patterns and Time to Next Treatment for Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma With or Without Ibrutinib Dose Reduction Following an Adverse Event

CLL-403 Real-World Dosing Patterns and Time to Next Treatment for Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma With or Without Ibrutinib Dose Reduction Following an Adverse Event