Doses Of Diflunisal Research Articles

Paracetamol and diflunisal for pain relief following third molar surgery in Hong Kong Chinese

In a double blind study in Hong Kong Chinese, 250 mg of diflunisal, 500 mg of paracetamol or placebo were given for post-operative pain relief following 77 third molar surgical procedures. The intensity of pain was recorded on a visual analogue scale. The first and second doses of paracetamol reduced pain significantly more than placebo, while this was true only for the second dose of diflunisal. There was no significant difference in pain reduction with the first and second dose of paracetamol, when compared with the first and the second dose of diflunisal. In this study in Hong Kong Chinese, neither the dose nor the interval between ingestion of the analgesic tablets in patients, who needed analgesics for postoperative pain, were significantly different to that reported before in non-Chinese, in contrast to the popular belief that Chinese patients have higher pain thresholds. However, a higher proportion of Chinese than that reported in non-Chinese did not need any analgesics for relief of postoperative pain.

A Method for the 12-Hour Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy in Outpatients with Postoperative Oral Surgery Pain: Three Studies of Diflunisal.

We have developed a method for measuring the efficacy of a single dose of an analgesic for 12 hours after administration to outpatients with postoperative oral surgery pain. Using a self-rating record, patients evaluate their pain and its relief for 12 hours after medication. We have used this method successfully in a series of three studies to compare diflunisal, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, with placebo and aspirin 650 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, propoxyphene napsylate 100 mg, or a combination of acetaminophen with either codeine 60 mg or propoxyphene 100 mg. Diflunisal evinced an unusually long duration of analgesic effect. In each study, all doses of diflunisal were significantly superior to placebo through the end of the 12-hour observation period, while the standards were superior for periods ranging from 2 to 7 hours. In terms of peak analgesia, diflunisal 1,000 mg was comparable to the acetaminophen-codeine combination and was significantly superior to all the other analgesic standards.

A 12‐Hour Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Diflunisal, Acetaminophen, an Acetaminophen‐Codeine Combination, and Placebo in Postoperative Pain

The analgesic efficacy of single 500 and 1,000 mg doses of diflunisal, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with acetaminophen 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen 600 mg with codeine 60 mg, and placebo in 132 inpatients with postoperative pain. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for up to 12 hours after medication. Diflunisal 500 and 1,000 mg were significantly superior to placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia, and a significant analgesic effect persisted for 8 hours. Acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination were significantly superior to placebo for most measures of analgesia, and their effects were significant for 4 and 5 hours respectively. Differences among the active medications were not statistically significant for measures of total or peak analgesia.

Diflunisal

The analgesic efficacy of single 500- and 1,000-mg doses of diflunisal (Dolobid), a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with that of acetaminophen, 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen, 600 mg, with codeine phosphate, 60 mg, and placebo in 159 oral surgery outpatients. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Both doses of diflunisal were significantly more effective than acetaminophen alone and produced peak analgesia comparable to that of the acetaminophen-codeine combination. Diflunisal proved to have an unusually long duration of analgesic action. Acetaminophen and the combination were significantly superior to placebo through hours 2 and 5, respectively; both doses of diflunisal were significantly superior through the end of the 12-hour observation period. None of the active treatments produced more side effects than the placebo. (<i>JAMA</i>1982;248:2139-2142)