Dose Escalation Research Articles

Combinational zimberelimab plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy for alpha-fetoprotein elevated, advanced gastric cancer patients (AFPGC): a phase 1 dose-escalation study

BackgroundAlpha-fetoprotein elevated gastric cancer (AFPGC) got growing interests for its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. Here, a phase 1 dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of zimberelimab (GLS-010, anti-PD-1) plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy (XELOX) as the first-line treatment for AFPGC.MethodsHistologically confirmed HER2-negative, advanced GC patients with elevated serum AFP level (≥ 20 ng/ml) were screened. Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients were administered varying doses of lenvatinib (12, 16, 20 mg) with GLS-010 and XELOX. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate.ResultsNine patients were enrolled with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were fatigue (55.6%), hand-foot syndrome (55.6%) and rash (55.6%), and no grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. All patients exhibited disease control with ORR reaching 33.3%. The median PFS and OS reached 7.67 months (95% CI 4.07–11.27) and 13.17 months (95% CI 2.78–23.56), respectively. Serum AFP level was found correlated with therapeutic responses. Further 16s rRNA sequencing analysis demonstrated altered gut microbiota with elevated abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium-GAM79 and Roseburia hominis A2-183.ConclusionsGLS-010 plus lenvatinib and XELOX demonstrated a manageable safety profile with promising efficacy for AFPGC. With RP2D of lenvatinib determined as 16 mg, further expansion cohort is now ongoing. Translational investigation suggested that serum AFP can be indictive for therapeutic responses and certain microbiota species indicating favorable responses to immunotherapy was elevated after the combinational treatment.

A phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation study of TAK-280, an investigational B7-H3 x CD3ε conditional bispecific redirected activation (COBRA) T-cell engager, in adult patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumors.

TPS2684 Background: TAK-280 is a novel COBRA T-cell engager that targets the B7 homolog 3 protein (B7-H3), an antigen highly expressed in a range of solid tumors including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non–small cell lung cancer. In its prodrug form, TAK-280 binds to B7-H3, but not to CD3ε. Once in the protease-rich tumor microenvironment, TAK-280 undergoes protease-mediated activation through formation of CD3ε-binding active dimers, which stimulate CD3 T-cell activation and cytotoxic antitumor response against co-engaged B7-H3–expressing cells. In preclinical studies, TAK-280 demonstrated cleavage-dependent conditionality, engagement of tumor target antigen, and induction of T-cell mediated tumor killing. TAK-280 has the potential to target solid tumors that are not amenable to treatment with conventional first- or second-generation T-cell engagers, while limiting toxicity to normal tissues. Methods: This phase 1/2 study is enrolling adult patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumors described in the literature to have enhanced B7-H3 expression, who are ineligible or intolerant to standard therapies. Other eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Key exclusion criteria include history of autoimmune disease, major surgery ≤8 weeks before first dose of TAK-280, and history of clinically significant cardiac or gastrointestinal disorders. During phase 1 dose escalation, TAK-280 is administered as an intravenous infusion, once weekly, in 28-day cycles at a pre-defined dose level range. Patients who do not experience dose-limiting or other unacceptable toxicities may receive up to 14 treatment cycles depending on response; patients are treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from study. The dose-escalation phase will determine two recommended doses for expansion to be assessed during the cohort-expansion phase. The primary endpoint is incidence of dose-limiting or other toxicities during dose escalation; secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic parameters, response assessment per RECIST v1.1, overall response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, and prostate-specific antigen response in patients with mCRPC. Cytokine release syndrome is closely managed and reported per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus grading. Approximately 182 patients are planned to be enrolled (42 in dose escalation and 100–142 in cohort-expansion); as of the data cutoff date of Jan 10, 2024, 18 patients have received the study drug. Clinical trial information: NCT05220098 .

A phase I study of irinotecan combined with BAY1895344 (ATR inhibitor) in advanced solid tumors: Results of ETCTN 10402 dose escalation.

3077 Background: ATR protein kinase is activated by replication stress and recruited to stalled forks or single strand DNA defects in various cancers. The topoisomerase-I (Top1) inhibitor irinotecan induces DNA damage. The ATR inhibitor BAY1895344 (elimusertib) has demonstrated cytotoxic potential in SCLC and GI cancer xenografts when combined with Top1 inhibitors . Methods: This phase Ia trial assessed elimusertib in combination with irinotecan in adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumors for whom irinotecan can be considered standard care. Patients with previous irinotecan exposure were excluded. Two dosing schedules were used: 1) Biweekly - irinotecan IV (starting at 150 mg/m2) D1 + elimusertib (starting dose 20 mg PO BID) D1,D2 (cycle=14 days); 2) Weekly - irinotecan (starting at 50 mg/m2) IV on D1,8,15 with elimusertib (starting at 20 mg PO daily) on D2,D3,D9,D10 and D16,D17 (cycle=21 days). Dose escalation utilized a 3+3 design. Primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability and estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and assessing anti-tumor activity. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled in dose escalation (N=9 [Biweekly] and N=12 [Weekly], median age 58 and 2 lines of prior therapy. For the Biweekly cohort: 3/3 patients enrolled at dose level (DL) 1 experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); 6 patients received DL-1 without any DLTs. The weekly regimen escalation comprised of 12 patients: 6 enrolled in DL1 with 2/6 having hematologic DLT and 5/6 unable to complete ≥75% of cycle 1 dosing; 6 enrolled in DL-1 with no DLTs observed. Notable grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events and summary best response are summarized (Table 1). The majority of evaluable patients in both schedules had initial disease control (56% [biweekly] and 67% [weekly]). One confirmed partial response was seen in the biweekly RP2D. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 mo [biweekly] and 2.5 mo [weekly]. PK results will be presented at time of meeting. Conclusions: Both RP2D and MTD of elimusertib in combination with irinotecan were reached for both dosing schedules: irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV D1 + elimusertib 10 mg BID PO D1,D2 (biweekly) and irinotecan 25 mg/m2 IV on D1 + elimusertib (20 mg PO daily) on D2,D3 (weekly). Dose escalation was notably limited by myelotoxicity. Due to sponsor decision, the study was halted prior to planned expansion but the concept of ATR + topo I combination remains scientifically relevant. Clinical trial information: NCT04514497 . [Table: see text]

Safety and preliminary efficacy results of IBI389, an anti-CLDN18.2/CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with solid tumors and gastric or gastro-esophageal tumors: A phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study.

2519 Background: CLDN18.2 expression has been observed in various solid tumors especially in gastric cancer, indicating its potential as a novel target for anti-tumor therapy. IBI389 is an anti-CLDN18.2/CD3 bispecific antibody that induces immune synapse formations by linking CD3 molecules in T-cell receptor complexes and CLDN18.2 antigens on the membrane of tumor cells. Herein, we report preliminary results from a phase I study to evaluate safety and efficacy of IBI389 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced solid tumors who failed or were intolerant to standard treatments were enrolled. The dose escalation of IBI389 monotherapy used intra-patient dose escalation with accelerated titration and the classic 3+3 design (0.003 µg/kg to 600 µg/kg). Selected dose levels were expanded in pts with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJ C) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The primary objective was safety. Secondary objective was efficacy assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1 including objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: As of January 9, 2024, a total of 114 pts were enrolled (males: 67.5%, median age: 60.0 years, G/GEJ C: 32.5%, PDAC: 57.9%, stage IV: 81.6%). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed during dose escalation. The MTD was not reached. In all pts, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 112 (98.2%) pts including 76 (66.7%) pts with grade ≥3 TEAEs. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 111 (97.4%) pts including 63 (55.3%) pts with grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥ 4%) were gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (21.9%), lymphocyte count decreased (13.2%) and nausea (4.4%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) related adverse events occurred in 65 (57.0%) pts including 1 (0.9%) pts with grade 3 CRS and no grade 4 or 5 CRS. TEAEs leading to dose interruption and treatment discontinuation occurred in 44 (38.6%) and 8 (7.0%) pts. Preliminary efficacy of IBI389 was observed in pts with CLDN18.2 expression ≥10% (immunohistochemistry 2+/3+). In G/GEJ C pts with previous treatments ≥2 lines receiving IBI389 at various dose levels ranging from 10µg/kg to 600 µg/kg (n=26), 8 pts had partial response (PR) and 11 pts had stable disease (SD). The ORR was 30.8% (95%CI: 14.3-51.8) and DCR was 73.1% (95%CI: 52.2-88.4). Conclusions: IBI389 showed manageable safety profiles in pts with advanced solid tumors and preliminary efficacy in CLDN18.2-positive pts with G/GEJ C. Clinical trial information: NCT05164458 .

DUET-01: A first-in-human, phase 1/2 study of BOXR1030 in patients with advanced glypican-3-positive solid tumors.

TPS2681 Background: Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a membrane-bound heparin sulfate proteoglycan involved in cell proliferation that is overexpressed in several tumor types. BOXR1030 is an autologous T-cell therapy that co-expresses a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) targeting GPC3 on tumor cells and glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 2 (GOT2), a mitochondrial enzyme that plays an important role in maintaining mitochondrial function and improving T-cell functionality in the solid tumor microenvironment. In non-clinical studies, BOXR1030 showed GPC3-specific cytotoxicity, proliferation and cytokine release only in the presence of GPC3+ cells. Methods: DUET-01 (NCT05120271) is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion clinical trial to determine a safe dose of BOXR1030 in patients with advanced GPC3-positive solid tumors. Dose escalation will be guided by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) within 28 days of dosing. The Bayesian logistic regression model will be used on the accumulated DLT data to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The Dose Escalation Committee will select the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) to be used in the expansion phase cohort(s) (10-20 subjects each) based on data accumulated in the dose escalation cohorts. Eligible subjects will undergo leukapheresis to obtain T cells for BOXR1030 manufacturing and will receive 3 days of lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide within 5 days prior to BOXR1030 administration. The starting dose is 0.3 × 106 BOXR1030 T cells/kg body weight. Antitumor activity will be assessed every 6 weeks after cell infusion per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and RECIST for immune-based therapeutics (iRECIST). Six months after BOXR1030 administration, subjects will enter long-term follow-up for up to 15 years. Long-term follow-up assessments will focus on long-term safety and disease status. Main inclusion criteria are histologically confirmed advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, or Merkel cell carcinoma; GPC3 overexpression by immunohistochemistry assay confirmed centrally on tumor specimen taken within 6 months prior to signing consent and after the initiation of the subject’s most recent systemic anticancer therapy; body weight of ≥ 50 kg (≥ 65 kg for dose level 1); and life expectancy > 16 weeks. The primary endpoints are the incidence of DLTs; determination of the MTD and RP2D; the type, frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events; clinically significant abnormal safety laboratory findings and vital signs. Key secondary endpoints include efficacy parameters such as objective response rate, BOXR1030 T-cell expansion and persistence, and levels of inflammatory markers and cytokines. The first patient was treated with BOXR1030 in December 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05120271 .

A phase I study of ATR inhibitor BAY1895344 (elimusertib) plus topotecan (ETCTN 10402): Results of dose escalation.

3076 Background: Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase is activated by replication stress and recruited to stalled forks or single strand DNA abnormalities in various cancers. The topoisomerase-I (Top1) inhibitor topotecan induces DNA damage. The ATR inhibitor BAY 1895344 (elimusertib) has demonstrated cytotoxic potential in small cell lung cancer and gastrointestinal cancer xenografts when combined with Top1 inhibitors . Methods: This is phase Ia study of elimusertib combined with topotecan in adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumors for whom topotecan can be considered as part of standard care. Patients with previous topotecan exposure were excluded. The study combination was assessed starting at Topotecan 1 mg/m2 IV (D1-D5) plus elimusertib 20 mg BID (D2, D5) (Cycle=21 days). Dose escalation utilized a 3+3 design. Primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability and estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination. Secondary objectives included estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and assessing anti-tumor activity of the combinations. Results: Eight patients were treated in dose escalation. Participants were a median of 63 years old and had received 2 median lines of previous therapy. The initial two patients enrolled into dose level (DL) 1 had dose-limiting toxicities with one of patient experiencing respiratory failure and cardiac arrest in setting of pancytopenia related to study drug. Six patients were subsequently enrolled in and received DL-1 (elimusertib decreased from 20 mg BID to 20 mg Daily) and no DLTs were observed. Notable grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events and summary best response are summarized in Table. Disease control rate was 43% among evaluation patient including one unconfirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival in the RP2D cohort was 3.45 months. PK studies are in process and results will be presented at time of meeting. Conclusions: RP2D and MTD was established for elimusertib in combination with Topotecan: Topotecan 1 mg/m2 IV [D1-D5] plus elimusertib 20 mg Daily [D2, D5] every 3 weeks. Dose escalation was notably limited by myelotoxicity. Due to sponsor decision, the study was halted prior to planned expansions cohorts but the concept of ATR + topo I inhibition remains relevant. Clinical trial information: NCT04514497 . [Table: see text]

Phase 1 dose escalation and cohort expansion study evaluating safety, PK, PD and clinical activity of STC-15, a METTL-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced malignancies.

2586 Background: RNA modifications are involved in cancer initiation and progression. The most abundant modification of mRNA is m6A generated by METTL3. Inhibition of METTL3 causes double-stranded RNA formation and activation of cellular T1 IFN response. IFN signaling induces IFN-stimulated gene families i.e. IFIT and OAS, characteristic of an anti-viral response, and secretion of cytokines and chemokines. STC-15, a first in class small molecule inhibitor of METTL3 developed by Storm Therapeutics, demonstrated in pre-clinical models, activation of IFN signaling and remodeling of the TME towards pro-inflammatory state. We report the dose escalation results from a FIH trial in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: This is a multi-center, open-label, dose escalation study. STC-15 oral capsules are administered daily or t.i.w. in 21-d treatment cycles. Dose escalation follows 3+3 modified Fibonacci regimen. Primary objectives are safety and PK. Secondary objectives are preliminary evidence of anticancer activity and RP2D. Exploratory objectives are PD (i.e. target engagement and immune activation biomarkers) and correlation of primary pharmacology with observed clinical efficacy. Results: As of 02/01/2024, 31 patients enrolled across 4 dose levels and 5 cohorts: 60mg QD (6 pats), 60mg t.i.w. (3 pats), 100mg t.i.w. (14 pats), 160 mg t.i.w. (5 pats) and 200mg t.i.w. (3 pats). PK profile supports t.i.w. dosing. A total of 169 AEs were observed with 45 AEs attributed to STC-15 treatment. AEs were manageable, mostly hematology (thrombocytopenia 31%; 4% Grade 3), skin (pruritis, rash 14% G1/2) and GI (N/V and diarrhea 14% G1/2). 12 SAEs occurred; 1 pt (60mg QD) had DLT with G3 pneumonitis. Of 14 patients with at least 1 on-treatment scan, DCR is 78% with 2 confirmed PR ongoing in angiosarcoma (60mg, 32 weeks) and IO-refractory NSCLC (100mg, 33 weeks) and 9 SD. An average of 63% reduction in m6A on mRNA in peripheral blood within the first 24h post dosing was observed in 60mg cohorts, confirming target engagement. Whole blood Nanostring and pathway analysis of gene expression confirms upregulation of innate immune pathways (i.e. T1,2 IFN activation and anti-viral responses) as early as 8h after first dose and throughout the treatment cycle. Updated PK/PD and clinical data will be presented. Conclusions: Treatment with STC-15 is well tolerated across pharmacologically active dose range with encouraging signs of clinical activity. Early biomarker data provide proof of mechanism in target engagement, strong activation of innate immune responses and correlation of pharmacological activity with clinical response. The study is ongoing and expansion cohorts are underway to further evaluate PK/PD, safety and clinical efficacy at optimized pharmacologically active doses. Clinical trial information: NCT05584111 .

A phase 1a/b, multi-regional, first-in-human study of CS5001, a novel anti-ROR1 ADC, in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas.

3023 Background: Receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) is an embryonic tyrosine kinase-like molecule implicated in multiple pathways promoting oncogenic signaling. ROR1 is overexpressed in a broad spectrum of solid tumors and hematological malignancies while notably absent in normal tissues. CS5001 is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a human anti–ROR1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody which is site-specifically conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer prodrug through a proprietary lysosomal cleavable β-glucuronide linker. Here, we report preliminary phase 1a results of CS5001 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Methods: This is a global, first-in-human, phase 1a/b study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity of CS5001 in pts with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. CS5001 was administered intravenously Q3W with a 42-day-DLT period. In phase 1a (dose escalation), pts who had progressed on or been intolerant to standard therapies were enrolled without baseline ROR1 expression testing; accelerated titration followed by Bayesian Optimal Interval design was employed; in parallel with dose escalation, additional pts were enrolled to selected dose levels deemed safe to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Results: As of 15 Jan 2024, 49 pts with lymphomas (n=17) and solid tumors (n=32) were treated across 8 dose levels (7 to 125 μg/kg). Median age was 57 years. Most (n=40, 81.6%) pts had received ≥3 lines of prior anti-tumor treatment. No DLT was observed and MTD was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 29 pts (59.2%); the most common TRAE was fatigue (n=8, 16.3%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 7 pts (14.3%), with fatigue, gamma-glutamyltransferase increased and pneumonia being the most common (occurring in 2 pts [4.1%] each). No grade 4-5 TRAEs were reported. Drug exposure of CS5001 was proportional to dose in general, with an apparent half-life of about 5 days. The PK profile of CS5001 was similar to that of total antibody, indicating good stability of the ADC in the circulation. Among the 34 pts with post baseline tumor assessment (13 lymphomas and 21 solid tumors), objective responses were observed in pts at dose level 5 or above (n=23), including 2 complete responses (1 Hodgkin lymphoma [HL] and 1 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) and 3 partial responses (2 HL and 1 pancreatic cancer). Stable diseases were observed in 3 pts (2 colorectal cancer and 1 renal cancer). Dose escalation is still ongoing, and more data will be available at the conference presentation. Conclusions: CS5001 was well tolerated with no DLT identified, PK characteristics were as expected, and encouraging antitumor activities were observed in various advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Current data support continued evaluations for the recommended phase 2 dose and subsequent phase 1b dose expansion. Clinical trial information: NCT05279300 .

Preliminary results of a phase 1, first-in-human, dose escalation study of the anti-CCR8 cytolytic antibody, CHS-114 (formerly SRF114) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2664 Background: Depletion of intratumoral regulatory T cells (itTregs) represents an attractive therapeutic strategy to enhance antitumor responses. The chemokine receptor CCR8 is preferentially expressed on itTregs compared to peripheral Tregs and other immune cell types, and CCR8 expressing itTregs are highly immune suppressive. Our preclinical studies have demonstrated that treatment of a PD-1 resistant mouse tumor model with an anti-CCR8 monoclonal antibody (mAb) depletes itTregs, reduces tumor growth, and enhances anti-PD-1 antitumor activity. CHS-114 an afucosylated mAb that binds CCR8, depletes itTregs, and enhances toripalimab- (tori; anti-PD-1 mAb) mediated T cell activation. Here, we present preliminary results of the first-in-human phase 1 study of CHS-114. Methods: This phase 1, multicenter, single agent and combination (combo) dose escalation study (NCT05635643) of CHS-114 is enrolling patients (pts) ≥18 years of age with advanced solid tumors who progressed during or after standard therapy. CHS-114 dose escalation guided by the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design will evaluate doses ranging from 5 to 1500 mg q3w. Five additional pts with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will be enrolled at each of 2 selected dose levels (DLs) with required biopsies. Combo dose escalation will evaluate 2 DLs of CHS-114 combined with tori 240 mg q3w in pts with HNSCC using a standard 3+3 design. Primary objectives are to determine the recommended dose(s) for expansion of CHS-114 and the safety and tolerability of CHS-114 + tori. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of CHS-114 alone and in combination with tori. Tumor and immune biomarkers are being evaluated as exploratory endpoints. Results: As of 15Dec2023, 15 pts received CHS-114 at doses ranging from 5 to 700 mg q3w. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33% of pts; all were CTCAE grade 1-2, with pyrexia (13%) being the most common. Preliminary PK analysis indicates that CHS-114 exposure increases with dose with an elimination half-life between 9-17 days across the dose range of 10-700 mg. Preliminary receptor occupancy analysis using an immune profiling assay in peripheral blood at 100, 300, and 700 mg DLs revealed minimal detection of CCR8+ Tregs and a modest concomitant decrease in overall Treg frequency at the end of cycle 1, consistent with strong receptor occupancy. Conclusions: CHS-114 has an acceptable safety profile to date in heavily pretreated pts at doses up to 700 mg. CHS-114 administration at 100 to 700 mg shows robust decreases in peripheral CCR8+ Tregs following the first dose (cycle 1). Dose escalation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05635643 .

A phase Ia/Ib, non-randomized, open-label, dose escalation and expansion trial of the B7-H6/CD3 T-cell engager BI 765049 with or without ezabenlimab in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors.

TPS2669 Background: Bispecific T-cell engagers represent a promising therapeutic approach for patients with solid tumors; however, these agents require an appropriate target antigen. B7-H6 is an encouraging target as it is expressed on multiple solid tumors but shows only limited expression on normal tissue (1). BI 765049 is a novel immunoglobulin G (IgG)-like T-cell engager designed to simultaneously bind B7-H6-expressing tumor cells and CD3 on T-cells resulting in the formation of a cytolytic synapse that triggers apoptosis of the tumor cells. Methods: NCT06091930 is a Phase I, non-randomized, open-label, multi-center, dose escalation and expansion trial that aims to assess the safety and tolerability of BI 765049 alone or in combination with programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor ezabenlimab, in patients with advanced or unresectable gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer. Patients must have progressed on, or be ineligible for, standard therapies. Key inclusion criteria include confirmed B7-H6 expression (central pathology review) except in CRC; ≥1 evaluable target lesion outside of the central nervous system (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1); and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1. Patients with prior B7-H6-targeted treatment are ineligible. The study is divided into four parts: dose escalation and expansion of BI 765049 monotherapy (Parts I and II, respectively), and in combination with ezabenlimab (Parts III and IV, respectively). BI 765049 dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Treatment will continue until progressive disease or discontinuation for other reasons, or for up to 36 months. The primary endpoint for Parts I and III is the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities; and for Parts II and IV it is objective response (OR; determined by the investigator; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints for Parts I and III are pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and OR (RECIST v1.1); and for Parts II and IV secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control, PK measurements, and OR (immunotherapy RECIST [iRECIST]). 1. Zhang W, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(23):5190–5201. Clinical trial information: NCT06091930 .

AFNT-211: A phase 1 study of autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells engineered to express a high avidity HLA-A*11:01-restricted, KRAS G12V-specific, transgenic TCR, a CD8α/β coreceptor, and a FAS41BB switch receptor in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

TPS8650 Background: Activating mutations in KRAS (including KRAS G12V) are well-described oncogenic drivers in solid tumors. Patients with KRAS driver mutations have a poor prognosis, and most KRAS-mutated cancers lack effective therapies. T cell receptor (TCR)-T cell therapies targeting mutant KRAS have demonstrated proof of concept in the clinic, but duration of response remains a challenge. AFNT-211 represents a novel strategy to address the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and improve response rate and duration in solid tumors. AFNT-211 autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are engineered to express a high avidity HLA-A*11:01-restricted, KRAS G12V-specific, transgenic TCR; the wildtype CD8α/β coreceptor; and a FAS-41BB switch receptor. The intended mechanism of action is recognition and elimination of KRAS G12V-mutated tumor cells by AFNT-211. AFNT-211 is designed to enhance anti-tumor activity via the following mechanisms of action as shown in preclinical models: (1) the CD8α/β coreceptor enables MHC-I– restricted TCR recognition of the KRAS G12V target by CD4+ T cells; (2) engaging CD4+ helper T cell responses drives enhanced CD8+ T cell cytotoxic activity and prevents T cell exhaustion; (3) the FAS-41BB chimeric switch receptor drives increased T cell activity, circumventing native FAS apoptotic signaling. Methods: This ongoing Phase 1, first-in-human, multicenter, open-label study of AFNT-211 (1) evaluates safety/tolerability, (2) determines the optimal biological dose (OBD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and (3) assesses preliminary antitumor activity. The study consists of 2 parts: dose escalation and dose expansion. Dose escalation is guided by the Bayesian optimal interval Phase 1/2 (BOIN12) design to determine the OBD. The BOIN12 design quantifies the desirability of a dose in terms of toxicity-efficacy tradeoff and adaptively allocates patients to the dose with the highest estimated desirability. The RP2D will be selected based on the BOIN12 design and the totality of benefit/risk assessment. Patients enrolling in dose expansion will be treated at the OBD/RP2D in indication-specific cohorts. This study is conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years who are HLA-A*11:01-positive with advanced/metastatic solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12V mutation, and intolerance of/progression on at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Patients undergo leukapheresis to collect T cells for the manufacturing of AFNT-211 and receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to AFNT-211 infusion. This is followed by a 28-day dose-limiting toxicity observation period (dose escalation only) and a post-treatment follow-up period for 24 months/ until disease progression. The study is open for recruitment in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT06105021 .

First-in-human study of HMPL-295, an ERK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose-escalation results of monotherapy.

e15112 Background: HMPL-295 (’295) is an extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) inhibitor with potent activity in non-clinical studies. This is a first-in-human, dose escalation study of ’295 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report the results of the mono dose escalation stage. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors who have failed standard therapy were enrolled to receive ’295 once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles or ’295 QD 2 weeks on/1 week off (2w on/1w off) in 21-day cycles. The mTPI-2 design was used for dose escalation, having explored from 5 to 75 mg QD in 6 cohorts, as well as 75 mg and 100 mg QD 2w on/1w off. The study aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and preliminary efficacy (best of response, BOR). Results: As of Dec 11, 2023, 47 pts with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (n=1, 1, 3, 6, 12, 5, 13, 6 in 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 75 mg QD cohorts, 75, 100 mg QD 2w on/1w off cohorts, respectively), with a median age of 58 years, 23 (48.9%) male pts. During the dose escalation from 5 to 75 mg QD cohort, 1 pt given 40 mg QD experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 dermatitis acneiform and 2 pts given 75 mg QD experienced DLTs of grade 3 rash and acute kidney injury (AKI). As for intermittent-administration cohorts, 2 pts given 100 mg QD 2w on/1w off experienced DLTs of grade 3 AKI and rash maculo-papular. After multiple-dose oral administration, ’295 plasma concentrations reach peak at 1.0-2.0 hours post dose and the exposure (Cmax and AUC) displayed dose dependent increase. The accumulation ratio (AUC) was 2.1–3.4 after repeat dosing, reaching steady-state around day 15. ’295 inhibited ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) phosphorylation which is a downstream signaling molecule regulated by ERK1/2 and stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). The BOR was partial response each in 1 pt with duodenal adenocarcinoma in 40 mg QD cohort,1 pt with endometrial cancer in 50 mg QD cohort and 1 pt with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 75 mg QD 2w on/1w off cohort. Stable disease with tumor shrinkage was also observed in 2 pts with NSCLC on 50 mg QD and 75 mg QD 2w on/1w off cohort respectively, and 1 pt with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in 100 mg QD 2w on/1w off cohort. 25 (53.2%) pts reported grade ≥3 TEAEs. The most common (≥10.0%) ≥ grade 3 TEAEs were rash (10.6%) and anemia (10.6%). Conclusions: Considering safety, tolerability, PK/PD and preliminary efficacy results, RP2D was determined to be 50 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT04908046 .

A phase 1 study of the BET inhibitor ZEN003694 in combination with the MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib in solid tumors with RAS pathway alterations and triple-negative breast cancer (NCI number 10449).

TPS3182 Background: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins serve as epigenetic readers and regulate transcription by binding acetylated lysines in histones. BET inhibitors target this epigenetic machinery modifying the expression of oncogenes and have the potential to overcome drug resistance in different settings. Resistance to mitogen-activated extracellular kinase (MEK) inhibition appears to rely upon changes in gene expression, a process that can be potentially inhibited via BET blockade. Preclinical data have demonstrated synergistic efficacy of dual MEK and BET inhibition in MAPK-altered solid tumors. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a disease frequently found to have gene amplifications in BRAF, NF1 mutations, and upstream regulators of the MAPK pathway and preclinical work has shown efficacy with dual inhibition of MEK and BET. Methods: This phase 1, open-label, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the BET inhibitor ZEN003694 in combination with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in solid tumors with RAS pathway alterations and TNBC. The study has two parts: dose escalation (part 1) which plans to recruit a maximum of 30 patients and dose expansion (part 2), which will comprise 12 patients. The primary objective of part 1 is to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), whereas the primary objective of dose expansion is to evaluate safety and toxicity. Secondary objectives include tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity. Additional analyses will explore epigenetic changes such as ChIPseq to determine levels of H3K27ac and ATACseq to determine treatment-induced changes in open chromatin regions. ZEN003694 is given orally daily, and binimetinib is administered orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation is being conducted using a standard 3+3 cohort design to determine the MTD. Part 1 requires evaluable or measurable disease, whereas Part 2 requires measurable disease as per RECIST v1.1. Patients must have an ECOG performance status of ≤2. Included tumors are TNBC (estrogen receptor ≤1%, progesterone receptor ≤1%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) 0–1+ or non-amplified) or any other solid tumor with actionable MAPK alterations (e.g. KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, or BRAF activating mutations, inactivating NF1 mutations, or BRAF fusions). Patients with any PI3K pathway activating genomic alterations are excluded. Prior therapy with BET, RAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitor is not permitted. This study is currently ongoing in dose escalation. Clinical trial information: NCI number 10449.

A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of HB0036 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e14504 Background: HB0036 is a bispecific IgG1 antibody targeting both human programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT). Here we report the initial results from the first-in human study ofHB0036 in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase I/II, multicenter, dose escalation and dose expansion study of HB0036 administered intravenously to adult pts with resistant/ refractory advanced or metastatic solid tumors who had failed standard therapies. Monotherapy of HB0036 will be conducted in 72 enrolled subjects. In the dose escalation phase (phase I), an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3 design was used to dose escalation by assessing the safety and tolerability of HB0036 monotherapy (dose range 0.04 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg), and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). HB0036 was administered Q3w on a 21-day treatment cycle and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in first treatment cycle. Tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were performed once every 6 weeks (2 cycles). HB0036 PK and PD analyses were performed. Results: At cutoff date of Jan 2, 2024, 19 pts (11 females and 8 males; ECOG 0/1, 3/16) with advanced refractory solid tumors have been enrolled in phase I (0.04 mg/kg [n = 1], 0.12 mg/kg [n = 1], 0.36 mg/kg [n = 1], 1 mg/kg [n = 3], 3 mg/kg [n = 3], 6 mg/kg [n = 3], 10 mg/kg [n = 4], 20 mg/kg [n = 3]). The median age was 59 (range 29-80) years. The pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 2 (range 1-4) prior lines of therapy. No DLT was observed. 13 (68.4%) pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with 1 pt (5.3%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. No grade 5 TRAE occurred. The incidence or severity of AE was not associated with the dose. The most common TRAEs (≥10%) were blood bilirubin increased, anemia, infusion-related reaction, AST elevated, ALT elevated, bilirubin conjugated increased, fever, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypothyroidism and pyrexia. No SAEs related to HB0036 have been reported. As of DEC 25,2023, in 13 pts who had undergone at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, the investigator-assessed best response included 9 SDs and 4 PDs. The DCR was 69% (9/14, 95% CI, 38.6%-90.9%). Durable clinical benefit (SD for > 36 weeks) was seen in 1 subject (3 mg/kg) with lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. HB0036 has presented safe and well-tolerated profile up to doses of 20 mg/kg. To date, 5 responders are still on treatment. The dose escalation is still in progress. Conclusions: HB0036 showed an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity in advanced solid tumors, which supports further studies to explore the safety and efficacy of HB0036 as a monotherapy and combination with other anti-tumor agents. Based on these data, phase II monotherapy and combination studies are in preparation. Clinical trial information: NCT05417321 .

A first-in-human, phase 1/2a study of GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Initial results from dose escalation.

2598 Background: GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) is a novel immunocytokine designed to direct IL-2v3 to immune cells and tumor cells. IL-2v3 of GI-102 abolished affinity to IL-2Rα minimizing the impact of IL-2 on Treg cells. Preferential targeting of immune cells and further inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 via CD80 synergize with potent activity of IL-2v3, resulting in robust proliferation and activation of CD8+ T and NK cells. Here we report preliminary safety and efficacy data of GI-102 from a phase 1/2a trial in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: NCT05824975 is an ongoing, dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion study to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity of GI-102. Each dose level allows to enroll additional 7 patients to fully inform the safety, PK and PD at that dose level. GI-102 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Disease was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 12 Jan 2024, 32 patients were treated in dose escalation: 8 at dose level 0.06 mg/kg, 10 at 0.12 mg/kg, 9 at 0.24 mg/kg and 5 at 0.45 mg/kg. Patients had received median of 3 [1-7] prior lines of therapy, including 25.0% (8/32) who had received ≥ 5 lines and 68.8% (22/32) had experienced immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed until the highest dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥ 10%) were pyrexia [43.8%] and chills [34.4%]. 5 patients [15.6%] had ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs and no patient reported TRAEs leading to discontinuation of GI-102. In 23 patients (7 cutaneous melanoma, 4 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 ovarian cancer and others) who had at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, objective responses were observed in 17.4% (4/23). In patients with metastatic melanoma who previously experienced ICB, overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 42.9% (3/7) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, including 3 confirmed partial responses (cPR). The median time to response (TTR) was 6 weeks and duration of response (DoR) was 6.0+, 2.4+ and 1.7+ month, respectively. In patients with metastatic ovarian cancer, ORR and DCR were 33.3% (1/3) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively, including 1 cPR [TTR of 6 weeks; DoR 1.9+ month]. Preliminary PK profile showed target-mediated drug disposition with a half-life of ~48 hours. 0.24 mg/kg of GI-102 resulted in a significant expansion of peripheral lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells (effector & memory) and NK cells, by 4.4 [2.1-9.6], 3.9 [2.0–5.7] and 20.4 [9.5–32.6]-fold change from baseline, respectively. There was no meaningful increase in Treg cells. Conclusions: GI-102 was well tolerated up to dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W with meaningful monotherapy activity, regardless of previous ICB experience, in patients who failed on standard of care. The dose-escalation is currently ongoing to identify RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT05824975 .

YL202/BNT326, a HER3-targeted ADC, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer: Preliminary results from a first-in-human phase I trial.

3034 Background: YL202/BNT326 is a novel ADC consisting of an anti-HER3 IgG1 monoclonal antibody linked to 8 molecules of YL0010014, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, via a tripeptide linker. We report preliminary safety and efficacy results from a phase I trial of YL202/BNT326. Methods: This multinational trial is recruiting patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an EGFR-activating mutation who were previously treated with 3rd generation TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy, and pts with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, HR-positive and HER2-negative (IHC 0,1+,2+/ISH-) breast cancer (BC) who were previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and at least one line of chemotherapy. YL202/BNT326 was given at 6 dose levels (DLs, Q3W, iv) in a BOIN dose escalation (D-ESC) scheme, followed by cohort backfill(BF) at selected doses. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] and adverse events [AEs]). Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics [PK] and efficacy per RECIST v1.1(ORR, DCR, BOR). Results: At data cutoff (4 Feb 2024), 52 pts were enrolled in D-ESC and BF (39 NSCLC, 13 BC). One DLT (grade 3 febrile neutropenia) occurred during D-ESC at the highest dose. Most common TRAEs (>20%, all grade / ≥ G3) were anemia (71%/20%), white blood cell count decreased (67%/31%), neutrophil count decreased (63%/29%), nausea (52%/0%), decreased appetite (42%/4%), lymphocyte count decreased (37%/23%), platelet count decreased (37%/10%), vomiting (37%/0%), dry mouth (25%/0%), fatigue (25%/0%), stomatitis (23%/2%), alopecia (21%/0%). Interstitial pneumonia occurred in 1 (2%) pt after COVID-19 infection. PK exposure was increased through dose escalation, with low systemic exposure of payload and no accumulation of YL202/BTN326 upon repeated administration. In 46 pts with at least 1 tumor assessment were evaluable for efficacy. Of the non-evaluable pts, 5 are on treatment pending first tumor assessment and 1 discontinued treatment prior to first assessment. In DL3 to DL5 dose range, ORR was 41.0% (95%CI, 25.6, 57.9), DCR was 94.9% (95%CI, 82.7, 99.4) across all tumor types; and the ORR in BC pts was 54.5% (95%CI, 23.4, 83.3), DCR was 100% (95%CI, 71.5, 100.0). Conclusions: YL202/BNT326 demonstrated encouraging efficacy in heavily pretreated locally advanced/ metastatic NSCLC and BC. The safety profile showed adequate safety and tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT05653752 . [Table: see text]

Evorpacept plus enfortumab vedotin in patients (Pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC): Phase 1a dose escalation results.

4575 Background: Maximizing antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in the tumor microenvironment requires both the inhibition of the myeloid CD47/SIRPα checkpoint and activation of the macrophage’s FcyR by an anti-cancer specific antibody (Lakhani et al. Lancet Oncol 2021). Evorpacept (EVO) is a CD47 inhibitor with an inactivated Fc effector domain that blocks the CD47-SIRPα interaction. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a nectin-4-directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) which engages the FcyR on the macrophage. We evaluated whether EVO plus EV would be safe, tolerable and active in pts with la/mUC. Methods: 20 pts with la/mUC who had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and progressed during or after treatment with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor were administered study drug in this phase 1 study (NCT05524545). Dose escalation (DE) cohorts were administered intravenous (IV) EVO 20 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg Q2W plus standard EV 1.25 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was first cycle dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Additional pts were enrolled in both dose levels as backfill cohorts to further characterize safety, PK, PD, and preliminary antitumor activity. Investigator response was based on RECIST v1.1, and data cut off was 18Jan(safety)/24Jan(efficacy) 2024. Results: Fourteen pts were administered EVO 20 mg/kg Q2W (DE n= 3; backfill n=11) and 6 pts EVO 30 mg/kg Q2W (DE n=6) plus standard EV. No DLTs were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was not reached. The maximum administered dose (MAD) of EVO was 30 mg/kg Q2W combined with EV. There were no treatment-related deaths on study. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in > 25% of subjects included fatigue, diarrhea, abnormal loss of weight, dysgeusia, decrease appetite, hyperglycemia, constipation, hypomagnesemia, lacrimation increased, nausea, peripheral sensory neuropathy, rash maculo-papular and urinary tract infection (UTI). There were 3 serious adverse events that were related to EVO plus EV (G3 UTI [1 pt]; G4 neutrophil count decreased and G3 UTI [1 pt]). Sixteen patients were response evaluable. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (1CR, 9PR). Accrual is ongoing and updated data will be provided at the time of presentation. Conclusions: This is the first study, to our knowledge, reporting data on the combination of a CD47 blocking agent in combination with an ADC in la/mUC. EVO plus EV is well tolerated at doses evaluated with no MTD reached and a MAD of 30 mg/kg Q2W. The combination shows early promising clinical activity compared to an ORR of 41% with EV alone in pts with la/mUC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1/L1 inhibitor (Powles et al. N Engl J Med 2021). Further investigation in this refractory population, including patients with prior EV exposure, is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05524545 .

First-in-human study of ABBV-706, a seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6)–targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

3001 Background: SEZ6 is a transmembrane protein expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), and central nervous system (CNS) tumors. These malignancies have a high unmet need for novel effective therapies. ABBV-706 is an ADC targeting SEZ6 conjugated to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload at a drug-to-antibody ratio of 6, and is highly efficacious in preclinical models of SCLC, NENs, and CNS tumors. Here, results from ABBV-706 monotherapy dose escalation (DE) are presented. Methods: Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, DE and dose-expansion study (NCT05599984) of ABBV-706 as monotherapy or in combination with budigalimab (a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor), carboplatin, or cisplatin. Primary objectives are to determine the safety, PK, preliminary efficacy, and recommended phase 2 dose of ABBV-706. Exploratory objectives are to assess SEZ6 expression retrospectively and its association with safety, PK, and efficacy. DE enrolled adults (≥18 yr) with relapsed/refractory SCLC, high-grade CNS tumors, and high-grade NENs, following the Bayesian optimal interval design. ABBV-706 was administered IV at 1.3–3.5 mg/kg doses Q3W in 21-d cycles. Results: As of data cutoff on Nov 15, 2023, 49 pts (SCLC: n=22 [45%]; CNS tumors: n=5 [10%]; NEN: n=22 [45%]) were enrolled and treated with ABBV-706 in DE and backfill cohorts. Median age was 64 yr (range 32–81) and median prior lines of therapy was 2.5 (range 1–6). 2 pts had a dose-limiting toxicity: 1 G4 leukopenia and neutropenia lasting >7 d at 3.0 mg/kg and 1 G4 thrombocytopenia at 3.5 mg/kg. TEAEs occurred in 45 (92%) pts, the most frequent being anemia (51%), fatigue (41%), neutropenia (31%), and leukopenia (31%). G≥3 TEAEs occurred in 28 (57%) pts and were mainly hematologic: neutropenia (29%), anemia (27%), and leukopenia (25%). No pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease was observed. Gastrointestinal TEAEs (all G1/2) were seen in 55% of pts, with the most common being nausea (27%) and vomiting (18%). There were no ABBV-706–related deaths. The maximum tolerated dose was 3 mg/kg IV Q3W. ABBV-706 ADC showed an approximate dose-proportional increase in exposure with an elimination half-life of approximately 7 d across doses. For 33 RECIST-evaluable pts, the confirmed (c) objective response rate was overall 21% (7 partial responses [PRs]); 40% (6/15) for SCLC and 6% (1/18) for NEN. The overall response (c and unconfirmed [u]) rate without confirmation was 45% (7 cPRs/8 uPRs); 73% (6 cPRs/5 uPRs) for SCLC, and 22% (1 cPR/3 uPRs) for NEN. 8 uPRs are pending confirmation and will be reported in the final presentation. The clinical benefit rate was 91% (7 PR, 23 stable disease). No activity was observed in 3/3 pts with high-grade gliomas. Conclusions: ABBV-706 demonstrated a manageable safety profile with promising efficacy in SCLC and NENs. Further evaluation of ABBV-706 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05599984 .

A phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study of CUE-101, given as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, in patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16+ head and neck squamous cell cancer (R/M HNSCC).

6004 Background: Immuno-STATs are modular T cell engagers engineered to selectively activate tumor-antigen specific CD8+ T cells via targeted delivery of cytokines. CUE-101, the first Immuno-STAT in clinical trials, is composed of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, HLA-A*0201, a peptide epitope derived from the HPV16 E7 protein and 4 molecules of attenuated human interleukin-2 (IL-2), to bind, expand, and activate HPV16-specific CD8+ T cells for the treatment of HPV16+ HNSCC. Methods: CUE-101-01 is an ongoing first-in-human study in HLA-A*0201 patients with HPV16+ R/M HNSCC. Escalating doses of CUE-101 monotherapy (0.06 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg) were evaluated in R/M HNSCC refractory to ≥ 1 platinum or checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) based therapy, alone or combined with pembrolizumab (1 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg + 200 mg pembrolizumab) in the first line treatment of PD-L1+ R/M HNSCCs. Enrollment at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was expanded. Therapy was administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Safety, PK/PD, and antitumor activity were assessed. Results: Enrollment in both monotherapy and combination cohorts is now completed (N=80 patients, 49 in monotherapy and 31 CUE-101 plus pembrolizumab). Following dose escalation, 4 mg/kg Q3W of CUE-101 was selected for RP2D for both monotherapy and pembrolizumab combination cohorts. At data cut-off, adverse events (AEs) have been manageable and 92% grade ≤2. The most frequent grade 3 AEs reported include lymphocyte count decreased (7.6%), anemia (6.3%), decreased appetite (5.1%) and infusion-related reactions (5.1%). In combination with pembrolizumab no unanticipated significant safety concerns have emerged. Exposure-dependent PD effects of CUE-101 are consistent with IL-2 pharmacology and indicate preferential expansion of CUE-101 on E7-specific T cells. Among the 19 evaluable patients treated with the RP2D of CUE-101 plus pembrolizumab, an ORR of 47% (1 CR, 8 PRs), a Disease Control Rate (ORR + durable SDs) of 74%, and mPFS of 5.8 months [95% CI 2.56; NA] were observed. A median OS has not been reached. Of the 9 patients with confirmed objective responses, all achieved >99% reduction in HPV16 cfDNA in plasma during their treatment course. Among the 19 evaluable monotherapy RP2D patients, 1 PR and 6 durable SD (SD ≥ 12 weeks) and mOS of 20.8 months [95% CI 11.0; NA] were observed. Conclusions: An ORR of 47% and a mPFS of 5.8 months were observed in R/M HNSCC patients treated with CUE-101 4 mg/kg + pembrolizumab as 1L therapy. A median OS of 20.8 was observed in patients treated with CUE-101 monotherapy as post-platinum/CPI therapy. CUE-101 continues to demonstrate safety, tolerability and meaningful clinical benefit in patients with HPV16+ R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03978689 .

A first-in-human trial of selective CDK7 inhibitor Q901, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Interim results of a phase I study (QRNT-009).

3078 Background: Q901 is a potent, covalently binding CDK7 inhibitor with excellent specificity for CDK7 against other protein kinases. Transcriptional regulation by CDK7 inhibition in cancer cells leads to DNA damage repair response inhibition and increased genomic instability. Q901 also regulates cell cycle checkpoints by inhibiting T-loop phosphorylation and transcriptionally downregulating CDK1, 2 and 4. In preclinical in vivo models, intravenous (iv) administration of Q901 once a week and once every three-week dosing regimen was well tolerated and showed significant antitumor activity. The safety profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy data for 18, 36 and 60 mg/m2 are presented. Methods: QRNT-009 (NCT05394103) is an ongoing Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Q901 is administered iv once weekly for four weeks, then once every two weeks thereafter in patients with advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), or pancreatic cancers. Results: As of data cutoff (12Jan2024), 17 patients received Q901 across 3 dose levels: 5 patients at 18 mg/m2, 4 patients at 36 mg/m2, and 8 patients at 60 mg/m2. The median prior lines of systemic therapy were 4 (range 2 - 17). Of 17 patients who received Q901 across all doses, there were no treatment related SAEs, treatment discontinuations, or dose reductions. Most common TRAEs ≥ 15% were nausea (29.4%), anemia (23.6%) and fatigue (23.5%). As of data cutoff, no DLTs were observed. All plasma PK analyses across dose levels showed dose dependent increase of AUC0-last and Cmax. No major metabolite was observed. POLR2A, which is a CDK7 target engagement marker showed biologically effective change starting from 18 mg/m2. 1 patient with pancreatic cancer who received 18 mg/m2 had a partial response with CA19-9 reduction from 4,632 to 219. 2 patients at 18 mg/m2 and 2 patients at 36 mg/m2 had stable disease. Additional safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Preliminary data from QRNT-009 study showed that selective CDK7 inhibitor Q901 is well tolerated. Preliminary antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic observations are encouraging. Dose escalation is ongoing to identify MTD or recommended dose for further studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05394103 .