Dose-dense Research Articles

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low early breast cancer: An exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial.

532 Background: Dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy represents the standard treatment for patients with node-positive early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer, but its role in HER2-low disease is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated efficacy of DD chemotherapy among patients affected by HER2-negative breast cancer according to HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score (low vs. zero). Methods: Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either DD or standard schedule anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. HER2 status was assessed locally. Tumours with HER2 score 0 were classified as HER2-zero, while those with a HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification were defined as HER2-low. Some tumours were classified as HER2-negative with unknown IHC score. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with HER2-zero vs HER2-low tumours. Results: Among 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 1243 subjects were eligible for this analysis. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 44-59) and 604 patients (48.6%) were pre-menopausal. Hormone receptor status was positive in 87.9% of cancers. 475 tumours were classified as HER2-zero (38.2%), 446 (35.9%) were defined HER2-low and 322 (25.9%) were HER2-negative with unknown IHC score. No significant differences were found in terms of baseline characteristics between these three subgroups. At a median follow-up of 14.9 years (IQR 8.4-16.2), no significant interaction was observed between treatment effect and HER2 status in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) (p for interaction=0.46) nor in overall survival (OS) (p for interaction=0.43). Comparing patients with HER2-zero breast cancer with those affected by HER2-low tumours, no significant differences in iDFS were observed (15yr iDFS were 61% vs. 54%, respectively, p=0.25), nor OS differences (15yr OS were 75% vs. 72%, respectively, p=0.19). When investigating DD schedule efficacy among patients with HER2-zero tumours, hazard ratio (HR) for iDFS was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.87) and HR for OS was 0.57 (95%CI 0.38-0.88). Similarly, within patients affected by HER2-low breast cancer, HR was 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.11) for iDFS and 0.83 (95%CI 0.57-1.22) for OS. These results were consistent with the findings of efficacy of DD chemotherapy in the overall population included in this analysis (HR for iDFS 0.73 [95%CI 0.61-0.89]; HR for OS 0.69 [95%CI 0.54-0.88]). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis of a large phase III adjuvant trial, HER2 status (i.e. HER2-zero vs HER2low) did not show prognostic value. In patients with high-risk early breast cancer, the benefit of DD chemotherapy was observed irrespective of HER2 status. Clinical trial information: NCT00433420 .

Phase II trial of weekly or bi-weekly tocilizumab with ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma: Clinical outcomes and biomarker analysis.

9553 Background: Combination immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved outcomes in a plethora of cancer subtypes. However, up to 60% of patients (pts) receiving ipilimumab (ipi) plus nivolumab (nivo) experience grade 3/4 (G 3/4) immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often leading to treatment discontinuation. We evaluated two therapeutic strategies targeting interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) to reduce irAEs while enhancing ICls efficacy. Methods: Phase Il trial (NCT04940299) investigating safety/efficacy of frontline tocilizumab (toci; IL-6R inhibitor) combined with ipi 3mg/kg + nivo 1mg/kg Q3 weeks (wks) for 12 wks in advanced melanoma. Initially, toci was given as 162 mg subcutaneously (SQ) bi-weekly for 6 doses (regular dosing regimen; RD). Then, we escalated to a dose dense (DD) regimen (162 mg SQ weekly for 6 wks then bi-weekly for 6 wks; 9 doses total). Primary objective was rate of G 3/4 irAEs. Secondary objectives were objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST 1.1. Exploratory objectives involved immune analysis (gene expression, CyTOF, cytokine analysis) on longitudinal blood and tissue samples to identify drivers of auto- vs antitumor immunity. Results: As of Feb 2024, 35 pts were enrolled (25 pts to RD regimen; 10 pts to DD regimen). In RD group, median follow-up is 18 months (6 - 25 months). By 12 wks, 44% of pts developed G 3/4 irAEs including colitis (20%), hepatitis (16%), pancreatitis (12%), type I diabetes and serum sickness (4% each) and 20% of pts required hospitalization due to irAEs. Median time to G 3/4 irAEs onset was 7.4 wks. 16% of pts discontinued ICIs due to irAEs. ORR was 56% at 12 wks including 40% in pts with high LDH and DCR was 80%. Gene expression analysis showed a trend towards higher expression of IL-17 pathway genes in pts who developed G 3/4 irAEs, suggesting IL-6/Th17 pathway was not sufficiently inhibited. Thus, we enrolled 10 pts into the DD regimen aiming to achieve better inhibition of the IL-6/Th17 pathway. In DD group, median follow-up is 7 months (3 - 13 months). By 12 wks, 40% of pts developed G 3/4 irAEs, including colitis (10%), hepatitis (20%), and uveitis (10%) and 30% of pts required hospitalization due to irAEs. Median time to G 3/4 irAEs onset was 4.9 wks. 30% of pts discontinued ICIs due to irAEs. ORR was 70% at 12 wks including 75% in pts with high LDH and DCR was 80%. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate toci in combination with high dose ipi3/nivo1. Although our cohort is small, preliminary data suggests IL-6R blockade using the DD regimen could decrease the rate of G 3/4 irAEs while maintaining antitumor responses of ipi3/nivo1. A randomized phase ll trial investigating this strategy is underway. Ongoing immune analysis comparing treatment regimens aims to identify distinct pathways involved in auto- vs antitumor immunity and IL-6/Th17 independent pathways of toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04940299 .

Abstract PO1-03-02: Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules in patients with breast cancer: analysis from the randomized phase III GIM2 trial

Abstract Background: The long-term results of the Italian randomized phase III GIM2 study showed that, in women with node-positive breast cancer (BC), dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy significantly improved both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-interval (SI) chemotherapy. Obesity has been identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with BC, with a potential negative impact on the efficacy and toxicity of systemic therapies. Nevertheless, the specific influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules (DD or SI) remains a subject of debate. This analysis aimed to investigate this hypothesis in patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial. Methods: GIM2 was a randomized multicentric phase III trial that compared different chemotherapy schedule (DD vs SI) and regimen (FEC-P vs EC-P) in 2091 node-positive early breast cancer patients. BMI (kg/m2) was categorized as follows: < 18.5 (underweight), 18.5 to < 25 (lean), 25 to < 30 (overweight), and ≥ 30 (obese). The primary endpoint was to assess association between BMI and DFS and OS. Survival estimates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for relevant prognostic factors, were used. Results: A total of 1925 patients were included in the present analysis, of whom 31.6% (n=632) were overweight and 19.3% (n=386) obese. Median age was 52 years. Overweight-obesity condition was significantly associated with postmenopausal status, greater representation of T2-T4 tumors with N > 2 in both patients in the DD and SI arm. After a median follow-up of 15.0 years (IQR 8.4-16.3), compared to patients with normal BMI, those who were overweight or obese at diagnosis had a higher risk of experiencing a DFS event (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.11 95% CI 0.94-1.31 and HR 1.37 95%CI 1.14-1.65, respectively, p=0.003) and OS event (HR 1.11 95% CI 0.89-1.38 and HR 1.59 95%CI 1.26-2.01, respectively, p=0.0003). No significant interaction was found between BMI and treatment schedule in terms of DFS (p for interaction=0.56) nor OS (p for interaction=0.19). At the multivariate analysis, in the DD arm, adjusted HR (aHR) for DFS and for OS were 1.01 (95% CI 0.75- 1.35) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.72-1.52) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68- 1.15) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.54-1.10) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. In the SI arm, aHRs for DFS and OS were 1.24 (95% CI 0.94- 1.63) and 1.35 (95%CI 0.96- 1.90) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 1.04 (95%CI 0.82- 1.33) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.74-1.40) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. Similar results were observed when considering hormone receptor-positive and negative BC separately. Conclusion: In the GIM2 trial, BMI was prognostic but not predictive of different benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. In high-risk patients, DD schedule should be considered the preferred schedule irrespective of BMI. Citation Format: Francesca Poggio, Eva Blondeaux, Marco Tagliamento, Marta Perachino, Simone Nardin, Benedetta Conte, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Valeria Forestieri, Michelino De Laurentiis, Adriano Gravina, Giancarlo Bisagni, Anita Rimanti, Anna Turletti, Cecilia Nisticò, Angela Vaccaro, Francesco Cognetti, Alessandra Fabi, Simona Gasparro, Ornella Garrone, Ylenia Urracci, Maria Grazia Alicicco, Mauro Mansutti, Paola Poletti, Pierpaolo Correale, Claudia Bighin, Fabio Puglisi, Filippo Montemurro, Giuseppe Colantuoni, Luca Boni, Matteo Lambertini, Lucia Del Mastro. Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules in patients with breast cancer: analysis from the randomized phase III GIM2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-02.

Selection of breast cancer subtypes to improve benefits of intensive dose‑dense chemotherapy: A systematic meta‑analysis.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among women worldwide. A large number of patients experience recurrence and BC-associated mortality following adjuvant chemotherapy. The present study aimed to determine the most suitable pathological subtype of BC to benefit from intensive dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy. A total of four electronic databases were searched from inception up to March 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing DD chemotherapy with standard chemotherapy in patients with BC were included. Pairwise random effects and network meta-analyses were performed to summarize efficacy and safety outcomes. A total of 27 original studies including 27,580 patients with BC were included. In terms of efficacy, the present study evaluated overall survival, disease-free survival, event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, pathological complete response and objective remission rate. Significant differences were identified in overall, hormone receptor+ (HR+) and HR- subgroups. Furthermore, from the network analysis, the HR+ and Her2- subgroups had the highest ranking, and these findings suggested that HR+/Her2- patients with BC should adhere to a treatment strategy including intensive DD chemotherapy, which is also characterized by an acceptable safety profile. In conclusion, patients with HR+ and Her2- BC were revealed to be the most suitable pathological type and are most likely to benefit from intense DD chemotherapy. The present study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD2022420351567.

Measurement of endocrine activity (SET2,3) related to prognosis and prediction of benefit from dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) cancer: CALGB 9741 (Alliance).

505 Background: We investigated the clinical utility of SET2,3, a novel biomarker designed to measure to endocrine sensitivity. SET2,3 measures nonproliferative hormone receptor-related transcription (SETER/PR) adjusted for a baseline prognosis index derived from tumor size, nodes involved and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4). CALGB 9471 is a seminal phase III study that showed improved DFS and OS from 2-weekly dose-dense (DD) vs 3-weekly chemotherapy in ER-negative cancers. Risk of recurrence (ROR-PT) score (intrinsic subtype, proliferation score and tumor size) measured by Nanostring assay was reported to be prognostic in CALGB 9741, but did not predict benefit from DD chemotherapy. Methods: SET2,3 was performed using an aliquot of 200-300 ng RNA (residual from prior ROR-PT testing) from 682 ER+ tumor samples and tested using the QuantiGene Plex bead-based hybridization assay (ThermoFisher, Luminex). We report results for the primary and two secondary objectives of the NCI/CTEP-approved correlative science proposal CSC0154) to evaluate SET2,3 in CALGB 9741 for prognosis (primary endpoint: 95%CI for 5-year (yr) DFS > 75% for High SET2,3 using the predefined prognostic cutpoint 2.10), SET2,3 prognostic independence from ROR-PT, and prediction of outcome according to chemotherapy regimen. We used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for prognosis and comparison with ROR-PT results (using c-indices) and for prediction according to chemotherapy schedule using an interaction term (prespecified significance level for interaction: p < 0.10). Results: The study met its primary endpoint with a 5-yr DFS of 85.6% (95%CI 81.3-90.2) in the High-SET subset (244/613, 40%). High-SET vs Low-SET was significantly associated with favorable outcomes at 5 yr (DFS 85.6% vs 69%, p <.0001; OS 95.3% vs 84.6%, p <.0001) and 10 yr (DFS 77.7% vs 58.2%, p <.0001; OS 86.9% vs 65.9%, p <.0001). PAM50 ROR-PT and SET classification were available for 596 tumors. In multivariate models for DFS and OS, SET2,3 remained an independent prognostic variable for DFS (SET high vs low HR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.34 – 0.63, p < 0.0001; PAM50 ROR-PT high vs low HR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.91 – 1.64, p = 0.18) and for OS (SET high vs low HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25 – 0.53, p < 0.0001; PAM50 ROR-PT high vs low HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.91 – 1.75, p = 0.16). Similar observations were seen in models including SET and PAM50 ROR-PT as continuous variables. Lower SET2,3 values predicted improved outcomes from DD vs 3-weekly chemotherapy (interaction p=0.0998 for DFS, 0.042 for RFS and 0.027 for OS). This was unrelated to menopausal status and lower SET2,3 values favored DD concurrent treatments. Conclusions: SET2,3 index was strongly prognostic, independent of ROR-PT, and predicted survival benefit from DD chemotherapy in pre- and postmenopausal women with ER+ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00003088.

Abstract P5-18-13: Compression therapy and goshajinkigan for prevention of nab-paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with operable breast cancer

Abstract Purpose: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is one of the most common toxicities of taxane. Grade2-4 PN occurs in 27-35% of patients treated with taxane and 50-80% of them have persistent symptoms after chemotherapy. PN may result in dose reduction or treatment discontinuation and negatively affect quality of life (QOL). However, there are no established methods for preventing chemotherapy-induced PN. Therefore, we conducted the phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of compression therapy with elastic stockings and oral goshajinkigan (GJG), a traditional Japanese herbal medicine, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced PN in breast cancer patients who treated with dose-dense (DD) nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) followed by epirubicin and cycrlophosphamide (EC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Patients with clinical stage I-III human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer were included in the study. Nab-PTX (260mg/m2) followed by epirubicin (90mg/m2) plus cycrlophosphamide (600mg/m2) administered every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim support. Patients wore elastic stockings (ALCARE, Tokyo, Japan) for 24 h from the beginning of each treatment. Oral GJG (7.5g/day) was initiated on day 1 of first cycle of nab-PTX and continued to last cycle of EC. The primary endpoint was the rates of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were clinical response rate, breast conservation rate, safety, and health-related QOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity (FACT-NTX). An 11-item FACT-NTX component of FACT-Taxane scale assessed chemotherapy-induced PN at baseline, after each cycle of nab-paclitaxel and EC, and 2 months after last cycle of EC. Lower score indicates worse PN and a 10% or greater decrease in FACT-NTX score was defined as a clinically meaningful worsening of PN. Results: From February 2017 to August 2019, 58 patients were enrolled and 55 of these patients were included in the analysis. Overall, pCR was observed in 13 (23.6%) patients. In patients with triple-negative disease, 10 (38.5%) of 26 achieved pCR, whereas it was observed in 3 (10.3%) of 29 patients with luminal disease. Objective response (complete response or partial response) was achieved in 46 (83.6%) patients, overall. Of 36 patients originally deemed to require mastectomy, conversion to breast-conserving surgery after NAC was achieved by 11 (20.0%) patients. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were myalgia (16.4%), fatigue (14.5%) and transaminase elevation (9.1%). Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy and motor neuropathy occurred in 4 (7.3%) and 3 (5.5%) patients, respectively. No patient experienced grade 4 PN. The dose of nab-PTX had to be reduced in 8 (14.5%) patients, two (3.6%) of whom were due to PN. The EC dose was reduced in 10 (18.2%) patients, this occurred more frequently for non-hematological adverse events (14.5%). The average relative dose intensity of nab-PTX and EC part was 97.4% and 96.3%, respectively. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 8 (14.5%) patients, but there was no discontinuation due to PN. After last cycle of nab-PTX, the average decrease in FACT-NTX scores was 19.9% from baseline, however, it improved to 8.6% decrease at 2 months after last cycle of EC. Conclusions: Compression therapy with elastic stockings and GJG were effective to prevent PN associated with DD nab-PTX regimen. Preventive approach for PN may improve dose intensity of taxane and long-term QOL of breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Akiko Matsumoto, Yuka Maeda, Ayana Sato, Miki Yamada, Tatsuhiko Ikeda, Hiromitsu Jinno. Compression therapy and goshajinkigan for prevention of nab-paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with operable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-13.

Prospective Study Testing a Simplified Paclitaxel Premedication Regimen in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

BackgroundIn early trials, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel were common, thus prompting the administration of antihistamines and corticosteroids before every paclitaxel dose. We tested the safety of omitting corticosteroids after cycle 2 during the paclitaxel portion of the dose‐dense (DD) doxorubicin‐cyclophosphamide (AC)–paclitaxel regimen.Patients, Materials, and MethodsIn this prospective, single‐arm study, patients who completed four cycles of DD‐AC for stage I–III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles. Patients received a standard premedication protocol containing dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and a histamine H2 blocker prior to the first two paclitaxel cycles. Dexamethasone was omitted in cycles three and four if there were no HSRs in previous cycles. We estimated the rate of grade 3–4 HSRs.ResultsAmong 127 patients enrolled, 125 received more than one dose of protocol therapy and are included in the analysis. Fourteen (11.2%; 90% confidence interval, 6.9%–20.0%) patients had any‐grade HSRs, for a total of 22 (4.5%; 3.1%–6.4%) HSRs over 486 paclitaxel cycles. Any‐grade HSRs occurred in 1.6% (0.3%–5.0%), 6.5% (3.3%–11.3%), 7.4% (3.9%–12.5%), and 2.6% (0.7%–6.6%) of patients after paclitaxel cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Dexamethasone use was decreased by 92.8% in cycles 3 and 4. Only one patient experienced grade 3 HSR in cycles 3 or 4, for a rate of grade 3/4 HSR 0.4% (0.02%–2.0%) (1/237 paclitaxel infusions). That patient had grade 2 HSR during cycle 2, and the subsequent grade 3 event occurred despite usual dexamethasone premedication. A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients not known to have received dexamethasone in cycles 3 and 4 found that any‐grade HSRs occurred in 2.7% (3/111; 0.7%–6.8%) and 0.9% (1/109; 0.05%–4.3%) of patients in cycle 3 and 4, respectively.ConclusionCorticosteroid premedication can be safely omitted in cycles 3 and 4 of dose‐dense paclitaxel if HSRs are not observed during cycles 1 and 2.Implications for PracticeBecause of the potential for hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel, corticosteroids are routinely prescribed prior to each dose, on an indefinite basis. This prospective study, including 125 patients treated with 486 paclitaxel cycles, demonstrates that corticosteroids can be safely omitted in future cycles if HSRs did not occur during cycles 1 and 2 of paclitaxel and that this strategy reduces the use of corticosteroids in cycles 3 and 4 by 92.8% relative to current standard of care.

818P Veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in frontline high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC): Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel weekly and every 3 weeks in the VELIA study

The phase III randomised VELIA study (NCT02470585) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) and veliparib (VEL) induction therapy followed by VEL maintenance vs CP alone (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.28–0.68; Coleman et al., N Engl J Med 2019). Investigators chose between IV P 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W), or 80 mg/m2 dose-dense (DD) weekly. This exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety by P regimen.

Effect of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer patients according to immunohistochemically defined luminal subtype: an exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial

BackgroundLuminal A-like and luminal B-like subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, but their role in predicting dose-dense (DD) efficacy in the high-risk setting is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated DD efficacy according to luminal-like subtypes. MethodsPatients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomised to receive either DD or standard-interval (SI) anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel. In our analysis, luminal A-like cohort was identified as having a Ki67 < 20% and a progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 20%; luminal B-like cohort as having a Ki67 ≥ 20% and/or a PgR < 20%. ResultsOut of 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 412 had luminal A-like and 638 luminal B-like breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, disease-free survival (DFS) was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.4–84.5) and 70.5% (66.5–74.2) in luminal A-like and luminal B-like cohorts; overall survival (OS) was 91.6% (88.2–94.1) and 85.1% (81.7–87.9), respectively. We found no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtype (interaction p = 0.603 and 0.535 for DFS and OS, respectively). When DD efficacy was investigated separately in each cohort, luminal-B like cohort appeared to benefit more from the DD schedule both in terms of DFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI 0.54–0.96]) and OS (unadjusted HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.40–0.94]), compared with the luminal A-like cohort (unadjusted HR for DFS 0.89 [95% CI 0.59–1.33]; unadjusted HR for OS 0.83 [95% CI 0.45–1.54]). ConclusionsNo significant interaction between luminal-like subtype and treatment was observed. Patients in the luminal B-like cohort seemed to benefit more from DD schedule.

Abstract P3-11-22: Efficacy of two kinds of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to support neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in primary breast cancer

Abstract Background and objective: Adjuvant chemotherapy is a critical part of systematic treatment of primary breast cancer. Chemotherapy induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common adverse event during adjuvant chemotherapy as well as a major factor limiting the implementation of the planned schedule of chemotherapy, causing the delay and drug reduction. Recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) effectively stimulates the proliferation of neutrophil progenitors, promotes differentiation of these cells into mature neutrophils, and promote the release of neutrophils from the marrow, thus reducing the probability of CIN and related complications. Dose-Dense (DD) chemotherapy has become a commonly recommended regimen for primary breast cancer because of improvement of disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). rhG-CSF should be administered prophylactically due to the high incidence of marrow suppression during dose-dense regimen. Little high-level clinical evidence to determine a unified rhG-CSF regimen. Single injection of long-acting pegfilgrastim and continuous multiple usage of short-acting filgrastim are two major ways to support dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on a single database, we retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of two different rhG-CSF in supporting the dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy (ddEC) in primary breast cancer, aiming to test the effectiveness of two different rhG-CSF as well as comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Methods: Data of patients who received dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy with support of rhG-CSF at Peking University Cancer Hospital Breast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center from Jul, 2015 to Jun, 2018 were retrospectively collected. All of these patients were planned to receive four cycles of ddEC (Epirubicin 100mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) with using one of the following rhG-CSF schedules in parallel: 1) filgrastim 200-300μg/d on day 4, 6, 8, 10; 2) pegfilgrastim 6mg on day 2. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated. Results: A total of 555 patients were enrolled and 2,176 cycles were completed in this study, 254 were treated with pegfilgrastim and 301 were treated with short-term filgrastim. 536 patients (96.6%, 95%CI: 95.1%-98.1%) completed all four cycles of treatment. Chemotherapy delay occurred in 42 patients (7.6%, 95%CI: 5.4%-9.8%) for 47 cycles (2.2%, 95%CI:11.6%-2.8%). 18 patients (3.2%, 95%CI:1.7% - 4.7%) had CIN-related chemotherapy delay. 532 patients achieved RDI≥85% (99.4%, 95%CI:98.7%-100%). FN occurred in 25 patients (4.5%, 95%CI:2.8% - 6.2%). In the subgroup of using pegfilgrastim, Chemotherapy delay occurred in 10 patients (3.9%, 95%CI:1.5%-6.3%), 243 patients achieved RDI≥85% (99.4%, 95%CI: 98.7%-100%), and FN occurred in 11 patients (4.3%, 95%CI: 1.8%-6.8%). In the subgroup of using short-term filgrastim, chemotherapy delay occurred in 15 patients (5.0%, 95%CI: 2.5%-7.5%), 289 patients achieved RDI≥85% (96%, 95CI: 93.8%-98.2%), and FN occurred in 14 patients (4.7%, 95%CI: 2.3%-7.1%). FN is more likely in patients using short-term filgrastim (6.3%vs2.8%, p=0.048), causing more chemotherapy delay (10.8%vs4.1%, p=0.003). Age, tumor size, status of axillary lymph nodes, pathological type and baseline of ANC were not correlated with non-febrile neutropenia in patients using short-term filgrastim. Conclusion: Two schedules of rhG-CSF are effective and safe in supporting four cycles of neoadjuvant ddEC. The effects of these two methods were similar in the completion rate of chemotherapy(RDI≥85%) and safety(incidence of FN). Citation Format: Jingyi Zhao, Yingjian He, Zhaoqing Fan, Jinfeng Li, Xinguang Wang, Yang Yang, Xue Chen, Tao Ouyang. Efficacy of two kinds of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to support neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-22.

A Prospective, Belgian Multi-center, Single-arm, Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Followed by Dose Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Stage II and III Triple Negative Breast Cancer

A Prospective, Belgian Multi-center, Single-arm, Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Followed by Dose Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Stage II and III Triple Negative Breast Cancer

A retrospective study comparing the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy and dose-dense chemotherapy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma

ObjectivesHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP) and dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy have been employed with varying success in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma. Despite the clinical benefits associated with these specific forms of chemotherapy administration, they have not been comparatively analyzed, vis-à-vis their efficacy. Study designAdvanced stage ovarian cancer patients who were treated with platinum/taxane chemotherapy via a DD regimen (n = 100), IP approach (n = 81) or a DD regimen in conjunction with HIPEC (n = 64) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical variables of interest were patient age, body mass index, surgery and pathology data, chemotherapy regimen, inclusion of maintenance therapy, and progression free/overall survival. ResultsProgression free survival (PFS) was significantly more pronounced in the HIPEC (34.9 months) and IP (34.0 months) patients, compared to the DD group (27.6 months) (P = 0.005). A cox-proportional hazards regression model indicated that there was a decreased risk of disease progression accorded to the patients who were treated with IP chemo or HIPEC and DD chemotherapy (HR, 0.43; 95 % CI: 0.21–0.88; P = 0.022) and the subjects who underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery (HR, 2.42; 95 % CI: 1.22–4.80; P = 0.011). Positive BRCA status (HR, 0.434; 95 % CI: 1.59–3.44; P = 0.001) and number of chemotherapy regimens (HR, 1.36; 95 % CI: 1.159–1.61; P = 0.001) were significantly correlated with improved OS although we did not discern a survival benefit associated with any of the chemotherapy treatments (P = 0.136). ConclusionWe observed PFS advantages conferred to the ovarian cancer patients treated with HIPEC and IP chemotherapy compared to DD chemotherapy. However, an overall survival advantage related to the chemotherapy regimens was not borne out, possibly due to the retrospective nature of the study or differing time periods wherein the specific patient cohorts underwent treatment.

186P - Efficacy of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) according to immunohistochemically (IHC) defined luminal subtypes: An exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial

BackgroundDD adjuvant CT improves disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC. Luminal A and luminal B subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; however, their role in predicting DD efficacy in clinically high-risk setting is uncertain. This exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial (Del Mastro et al, Lancet 2015) evaluated DD efficacy according to IHC defined luminal subtypes. MethodsIn the GIM2 trial, pts with node-positive early BC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of (fluorouracil) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (DD) or every 3 (standard interval [SI]) weeks followed by 4 cycles of DD or SI paclitaxel. Luminal A-like and luminal B-like BC were identified according to 13h St Gallen definition as having a Ki67<20% and a PgR>/=20% (luminal A-like), and a Ki67>/=20% and/or a PgR<20% (luminal B-like). Pts with HER2-positive BC were excluded. The efficacy of DD CT in terms of DFS and OS was compared between the two subtypes. ResultsOf 2,003 pts enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 401 had luminal A-like and 657 luminal B-like BC. After a median follow-up of 8 years, DFS was 81.1% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 76.6-84.7) and 70.6% (66.6-74.1) in luminal A-like and B-like BC, respectively; OS was 91.6% (88.1-94.1) and 85% (81.7-87.7), respectively. There was no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtypes (pinteraction=0.416 for DFS and pinteraction=0.313 for OS); however, the effect of DD CT appeared to be greater in luminal-B like BC (see table below).Table186PTable8 year DFS SI8 year DFS DDHR (95% CI)luminal A-like81.680.60.86 (0.56-1.30)luminal B-like66.874.70.74 (0.55-0.98)8 year OS SI8 year OS DDLuminal A-like92.990.60.88 (0.47-1.67)luminal B-like80.889.40.61 (0.40-0.93) ConclusionsThese long-term results confirm the prognostic value of IHC-defined luminal subtypes, with luminal B-like bearing a worse prognosis. In clinically high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC, luminal B-like subtype benefits more from DD CT both in terms of DFS and OS. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureM. Lambertini: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Theramex; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva. M. De Laurentiis: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene. S. De Placido: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. F. Montemurro: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Novartis; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, speaker honoraria, travel grant: Roche. L. Del Mastro: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Roche-Genentech; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Pegfilgrastim-induced fatigue and leukocytosis improved following dose reduction in a young patient with breast cancer: A case report.

Dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy is a treatment option for patients with high-risk premenopausal breast cancer. Pegfilgrastim may be administered as prophylaxis against the development of febrile neutropenia and enables the continuation of the DD schedule; however, it is associated with adverse effects, including bone and muscle pain and fatigue. We herein describe our experience with pegfilgrastim administration alongside DD chemotherapy in a patient with breast cancer. A 29-year-old female patient was diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer during lactation. The patient was diagnosed with cT2N1M0, stage IIB triple-negative breast cancer and underwent four cycles of DD chemotherapy with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (DTX) every 2 weeks preoperatively, with 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim administered subcutaneously on day 3 of each cycle. The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 2,700, 8,400, 11,100, 13,300 and 15,000/mm3 on day 1 of each cycle. The patient experienced fatigue after each pegfilgrastim injection and was considered to be a high responder to pegfilgrastim. Therefore, 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim on day 3 of the first DD-DTX cycle was recommended. On day 1 of the second cycle, the ANC was 13,090/mm3. The patient experienced less fatigue after the administration of 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim, but there was a significant decline in her performance status. As there is currently no evidence of pegfilgrastim dose reduction to below 1.8 mg, pegfilgrastim was omitted on day 3. On day 14, the patient developed viral enteritis, fever (38°C), and an ANC of 297/mm3. Therefore, the third cycle was postponed. After 1 week, the patient's ANC recovered to 2,480/mm3 and she was administered the third cycle with 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 3. Between January 2015 and March 2018, a total of 55 patients with breast cancer received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim at the Shiga General Hospital. No patients other than the one presented herein experienced leukocytosis during chemotherapy. Although this was a rare complication, a dose of 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim was effective in palliating the patient's symptoms and preventing DD chemotherapy discontinuation.

Tailored dose-dense chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: A secondary analysis of the phase III PANTHER trial.

553 Background: Dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes in early breast cancer (BC). However, there are no data to inform on the combination of DD chemotherapy with trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive disease. Methods: This is a protocol predefined secondary analysis of the randomized phase 3 PANTER trial. Women 65 years old or younger with node-positive or high-risk node negative BC were randomized 1:1 to either tailored according to hematologic nadirs and DD epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (4 cycles) followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (tDD EC/D) or standard 3-weekly 5-fluorouracil/E/C (3 cycles) and D (3 cycles); Patients with HER2-positive disease received 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. In addition, HER2-positive and an equal number of matched for age, treatment group and institution, HER2-negative patients that were enrolled in Swedish sites were enrolled in a predefined study of cardiac safety and underwent echocardiography or MUGA and electrocardiography at baseline and at four and six years of follow-up. The primary endpoint was BC relapse-free survival (BCRFS). Results: There were 342 HER2-positive patients; 335 received at least one dose of trastuzumab, while 29 patients discontinued trastuzumab prematurely. BCRFS was not statistically significantly in favor of tDD EC/D (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.37 – 1.27, P= 0.231). Cardiac outcomes after four and six years of follow-up did not differ significantly between HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients, nor between tDD and standard treatment. Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the only data on combining DD adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in BC. The combination decreased the risk for BC relapse by 32% compared to standard treatment, a statistically non-significant difference. Its efficacy and safety merit further evaluation as part of both escalation and de-escalation strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT00798070.

Two sequential dose-dense regimens of CGP, followed by MVAC in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): A single institution, explorative trial.

e16023 Background: Currently, cisplatin, gemcitabine, paclitaxel (CGP) and MVAC are the most active chemotherapy regimens in mUC. We tested the hypothesis that two sequential non-cross-resistant, dose-dense (DD) regimens may target different cancer cells, avoid drug resistance, and improve response rate. Methods: This is a single institution, explorative trial. The aim is to evaluate the incremental benefit of the two regimens in terms of complete response and long term survival. We treat all consecutive, chemo-naïve mUC patients with 4 cycles of CGP dose-dense every 14 days followed by 4 cycles of MVAC every 14 days. In all cycles we used Pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 3. Pts were evaluated with CT scan at the baseline, after 4 cycles, at the end of chemotherapy and then every 3 months for 2 years and 6 months thereafter. Results: From 2007 to 2018, 67 consecutive pts were included. Male were 82%; median age 66 years (33-83); Bajorin risk factors was 0 in 31%, 1 in 52%, 2 in 16%. The majority of pts were hospitalized for three days during chemotherapy and received hydration and supportive therapy. After the first 4 cycles of CGP, we observed 7% CR, 46% PR, 31% SD, and 12% PD. After the 4 sequential cycles of MVAC DD we observed a global 25% of CR, 33% PR, 10% SD, and 24% PD. Median TTP was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.3-10.1) and median OS was 18 months (95% CI, 10.8-26.1). 5 pts are still alive after more than 30 months and maintaining complete response. Main grade 3–4 toxicity included anemia 27%, asthenia 23%, neutropenia 19% (febrile 7%), thrombocytopenia 13%. Conclusions: The sequential use of these two DD regimens is active and leads to an increased number of complete response and possible longer survival. A randomized trial is needed to confirm our results.

90O - The role of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) before and after the introduction of trastuzumab (T): Exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial

90O - The role of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) before and after the introduction of trastuzumab (T): Exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial

Dose tailoring of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer based on hematologic toxicities: further results from the prospective PANTHER study with focus on obese patients

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for breast cancer improves relapse-free survival (BCRFS) and overall survival. Differences in terms of efficacy and toxicity could partly be explained by the significant interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics which cannot be captured by dosing according to body surface area. Consequently, tailored dosing was prospectively evaluated in the PANTHER trial. PANTHER is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial which compared tailored, dose-dense (DD) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (E/C) and tailored docetaxel (D) (tDD) with standard interval 5-fluorouracil/E/C and D. The primary end point was BCRFS and the primary efficacy analysis has been previously published. In this secondary analysis, we aimed to retrospectively explore the concept of dose tailoring. Our two hypotheses were that BCRFS would not vary depending on the cumulative administered epirubicin dose; and that dose tailoring would lead to appropriate dosing and improved outcomes for obese patients, who are known to have worse prognosis and increased toxicity after DD ACT. Patients treated with tDD had similar BCRFS regardless of the cumulative epirubicin dose (P = 0.495), while obese patients in this group [body mass index (BMI) ≥30] had improved BCRFS compared with nonobese ones (BMI <30) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02]. Moreover, tDD was associated with improved BCRFS compared with standard treatment only in obese patients (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90, P = 0.022) but not in nonobese ones (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.04, P = 0.089). The differences were not formally statistically significant (P for interaction 0.175). There were no differences in terms of toxicity across the epirubicin dose levels or the BMI groups. Dose tailoring is a feasible strategy that can potentially improve outcomes in obese patients without increasing toxicity and should be pursued in further clinical studies. NCT00798070.

O1-10-1 - Feasibility study of Dose-dense AC or EC followed by PTX for Japanese breast cancer patients

The feasibility study of Dose-Dense chemotherapy for operable Japanese breast cancer patients(SBP 09) Dose-dense(D-D) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer revealed significant survival benefit compared to the standard chemotherapy. In western countries, it has become a standard of care. Whereas in Japan, owing to the unapproval of G-CSF primary prophylactic administration, Dose-dense chemotherapy has not been defined for a long time in spite of its efficacy. Although in recent years, the number of reports regarding D-D therapy is slightly increasing in this country, prospective feasibility study is still uncommon. To verify of the feasibility of D-D chemotherapy, we conducted a multicenter phaseII study. We enrolled patients aged under 70years, with HER2 negative and operable node-positive primary breast cancer from 10centers. The primary end point was pCR rate, and the secondary end points were safety(FN rate, completion rate),overall response rate, toxicity profile and RDI. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with D-D AC or EC followed by PTX was administrated to eligible patients every 2weeks with Pegfilgrastim support. 50 patients were scheduled to be enrolled. 41/50 patients have been enrolled to this point. In analysis of 14/41 patients, median age was 48years(34-66), Histological subtypes were 57% Triple negative, 21% Luminal A Like, 21% LuminalB like. Clinical stageII and III were 64%, 36% respectively, and of them, StageIIIC was included at 21%. pCR rate showed 25% and, all were TN patients. Overall response rate was 100%, Grade3 or worse adverse events occurred in 33% of the patients (febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and so on). 20% of the patients were converted from q2w PTX to wPTX because of Grade3 adverse event. At the present, 80% accrual enrollment has been achieved. We plan to report the result of 50 patients full analysis.

Neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Large operable or locally advanced breast cancers (BCs) are usually treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) before surgery. However, there is no evidence to support an improvement in efficacy with dose-dense (DD) CT in this setting. We, therefore, carried out a meta-analysis to investigate whether DD-CT was more effective than the reference (every 3 weeks anthracyclines±taxanes) standard-dose CT as neoadjuvant treatment for BC. We searched Pubmed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, the Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized trials comparing conventional versus DD neoadjuvant CT for BC. Odds ratios (ORs) for pathologic complete responses (ypT0N0M0: pCR) and hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence [overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)] were estimated and pooled. A QUADAS-2 report for all studies included in the final analysis was tabulated for the risk of bias and applicability. A total of six randomized trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled rates of the pCR were 13.5 and 9.2% in the experimental and control arms. A significant increase in the pCR [OR=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.02, P=0.001] was noted with neoadjuvant DD-CT. However, the patients who received DD-CT did not have significantly better DFS and OS rates (DFS: HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1.01, P=0.06; OS: HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.78-1.02, P=0.08). Even with the limitation of a relatively short follow-up period, this meta-analysis shows that DD neoadjuvant CT, despite not leading to a significant increase in survival, increases by 46.7% the possibility of achieving a pCR in operable and locally advanced BC. This treatment should thus be considered one of the backbone treatments of choice when neoadjuvant therapy is planned.