Dose Arm Research Articles

Effect of masupirdine (SUVN-502) on cognition in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, phase 2, proof-of-concept study.

IntroductionThis study explored the efficacy and safety of a serotonin‐6 receptor antagonist, masupirdine, as adjunct treatment in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) concomitantly treated with donepezil and memantine.MethodsThe effects of masupirdine were evaluated in patients with moderate AD dementia on background treatment with donepezil and memantine. Five hundred thirty‐seven patients were expected to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, using permuted blocked randomization. After a 2‐ to 4‐week screening period, the study consisted of a 26‐week double‐blind treatment period, and a 4‐week washout period. The primary efficacy measure was the 11‐item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog 11). Secondary efficacy measures were Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes, Mini‐Mental State Examination, 23‐item Alzheimer's Disease Co‐operative Study Activities of Daily Living, and 12‐item Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). A total of 564 patients were randomized to receive either daily masupirdine 50 mg (190 patients), masupirdine 100 mg (185 patients), or placebo (189 patients). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02580305).ResultsThe MMRM results showed statistically non‐significant treatment differences in change from baseline in ADAS‐Cog 11 scores at week 26, comparing each masupirdine dose arm to the placebo arm. No significant treatment effects were observed in the secondary evaluations.DiscussionMasupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated. Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed.Highlights Masupirdine was evaluated in moderate Alzheimer's disease patients.First trial in class with background treatment of donepezil and memantine.Masupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated.Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed.

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.

TEMPO: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Arm Study Comparing 2 Intermittent Dosing Schedules of Duvelisib in Subjects with Indolent Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

TEMPO: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Arm Study Comparing 2 Intermittent Dosing Schedules of Duvelisib in Subjects with Indolent Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Post Hoc Analysis of Responses to Ponatinib in Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) By Baseline BCR-ABL1 Level and Baseline Mutation Status in the Optic Trial

Post Hoc Analysis of Responses to Ponatinib in Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) By Baseline BCR-ABL1 Level and Baseline Mutation Status in the Optic Trial

Innovative Adaptive Study Design in Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia: Bayesian Design with Concurrent Randomization and Borrowing from Historical Data

BackgroundClinical development of new therapies in transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia has several challenges. Patient enrollment in rare diseases requires multi-center multi-country studies, and the lack of reliable surrogate endpoint for dose selection requires powering for clinical endpoints usually used in Phase 3 trials. An acceptable endpoint from a regulatory perspective which is based on responders analysis, such as proportion of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction in Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion burden and a reduction of ≥2 units, requires 12 weeks screening period to establish baseline transfusion burden for reliable comparison. Importantly, higher randomization ratio of treatment:placebo can improve patients' motivation to enroll into a trial, but it is less statistically efficient and requires higher sample size.We designed a Phase-2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multi-center study with Vamifeport (NCT04938635) to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of a new therapy in adults with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia. The proposed design follows the Bayesian framework with borrowing from published historical control data. The historical control data is used to construct an informative prior for the control arm to reduce the burden of patients randomized to a control arm and improve the trial's efficiency in performing dose selection.Study Design and MethodsAdults (18 to 65 y.o.) with documented diagnosis of β-thalassemia or hemoglobin E / β-thalassemia will be randomized to three doses of the investigational drug or placebo plus best supportive care. RBC transfusion dependence is defined as at least 6 RBC Units in the 24 weeks prior to randomization and no transfusion-free period for ≥35 days during that period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients experiencing ≥33% reduction of RBC units from baseline and a reduction of ≥2 units assessed from week 13 to week 24. The key secondary endpoints include proportion of patients experiencing ≥33% reduction from week 37 to week 48; proportion of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction over any consecutive 12-week interval from week 1 to week 48 and the mean change from baseline in RBC transfusions (units) from week 13 to week 24. The primary and key-secondary analysis will be conducted in a hierarchical fashion to account for multiplicity.We proposed a Bayesian design with the use of noninformative, or weakly informative, priors for the active dose arms while using a robustified informative prior for the control arm. Historical control data will be “borrowed” in an informative prior for the control arm rate from the Phase 3 trial - BELIEVE. The robustification is required in order to control the level of borrowing depending on the level of prior-data conflict.Prior-data conflict can arise from multiple sources like population heterogeneity between the historical and current study. Therefore, the selection of historical data (BELIEVE trial) addresses similarity in inclusion / exclusion criteria, standard of care etc. The robustification of the informative prior does not take into account prior-data conflict in terms of population or study characteristics but directly focuses on the informative prior of the parameter of interest and the corresponding likelihood of the current data. For example, in the BELIEVE study, out of 112 patients randomized to the control arm, 5 patients (4.5%) had a ≥33% reduction in transfusion burden over 24 weeks. A prior-data conflict may arise if the Phase-2b trial of interest here, suggests that the proportion is substantially different that 4.5% and this can inflate the frequentist Type-I or Type-II error rates examined via simulations.We evaluated Type-I error rates of the proposed design with 5000 Monte-Carlo runs for each scenario of the response rates. Using informative prior with no prior-data conflict the type-I error with no robustification is ≈ 2.4%. As the prior-data conflict increases, without robustification, the type-I error cannot be controlled. However, with a robustification weight of 0.5 the type-I errors can be controlled in line with regulatory requirements.DiscussionA proposed Bayesian design with robustified informative prior for the control arm helps reduce patients' burden of randomization to control arm and reduce overall sample size for a rare disease trial when recruitment and trial duration are challenging. DisclosuresMuehlemann: Vifor Pharma AG: Consultancy. Mukherjee: Vifor Pharma AG: Consultancy. Taher: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vifor Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gudmundsdottir: Vifor Pharma AG: Current Employment. Morin: Vifor Pharma AG: Current Employment. Richard: Vifor Pharma AG: Current Employment.

Intranasal Carbetocin Reduces Hyperphagia and Anxiety and Distress Behaviors in Prader-Willi Syndrome: Results From the CARE-PWS Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex genetic disorder associated with multiple neuroendocrine abnormalities, including significantly decreased hypothalamic oxytocin levels, resulting in symptoms of severe hyperphagia (an unrelenting false sense of starvation) and multiple severe neuropsychiatric and behavioral issues. CARE-PWS, a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, has evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intranasal carbetocin, a selective oxytocin receptor agonist, in participants with PWS. Eligible participants aged 7 through 18 with genetically confirmed PWS were randomized in equal proportions to three treatment arms for the 8-week placebo-controlled period of the study: carbetocin 9.6 mg, carbetocin 3.2 mg, or a matching placebo, administered by nasal spray three times a day with meals. The primary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) or Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) scores for the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm vs placebo, and the first secondary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in HQ-CT or CY-BOCS scores for the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm vs placebo. Additional secondary endpoints included changes from baseline to week 8 in PWS Anxiety and Distress Questionnaire (PADQ) scores, and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scores evaluating the overall change in severity of PWS symptoms at week 8. Due to COVID-19, enrollment was closed early with 119 evaluable participants for the primary analysis. In the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm, trends toward numerically greater improvements in HQ-CT and CGI-C scores relative to placebo were observed but did not reach statistical significance; however, the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm demonstrated a significant improvement in HQ-CT scores (LS mean improvement vs placebo -3.14 points, p=0.016). In the 3.2 mg arm, additional consistent evidence of improvements versus placebo was seen in multiple secondary endpoints, including CGI-C (p=0.027) and PADQ (p=0.027). Numeric trends toward improvement in CY-BOCS scores were observed in each dose arm, but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo. During the subsequent long-term follow-up period of the study, both carbetocin arms have experienced continued numeric improvements from baseline across multiple endpoints. Intranasal carbetocin was generally well-tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse event was flushing, which was generally mild and transient. In conclusion, results of the CARE-PWS study support that intranasal carbetocin appears to be safe and well tolerated, and reduces hyperphagia and anxiety and distress behaviors in PWS.

Demystifying Cardiac Dose in RTOG-0617

The RTOG-0617 trial presented worse overall survival for patients with lung cancer treated in the high-dose 74 Gy arm compared to those treated with 60Gy. In multi-variable models, whole heart volumetric dose parameters (volume of heart receiving at least 5Gy and 30Gy), and the high-dose treatment arm was found to be associated with survival, rescinding dose escalation. In this abstract, we repeat this survival analysis, but consider cardiac sub-regions to find an explanation for the counterintuitive survival difference observed between the treatment arms.Voxel-wise analysis was performed on dose distributions spatially normalized onto a template patient anatomy. Permutation testing assessed significance, identifying anatomical regions where dose was associated with overall survival. Dose to the identified cardiac sub-region was included in multi-variable modelling. Clinical and dosimetric variables were bootstrapped 500 times into an elastic-net variable selection model to identify variables associated with survival. Variable importance was assessed by (1) magnitude of model coefficients and (2) frequency of selection. Next, multi-variable Cox regression survival models were created to assess significance of dose to the identified cardiac region compared to v5 and v30 parameters used previously.A total of 488 patients, with accurate dose mapping, were included in the voxel-wise analysis. A significance region (P < 0.001) was identified in the base of the heart, centered over the origin of the left coronary artery and atrioventricular node, with median dose 9.5 Gy (high dose arm 10.2 Gy, low dose arm 9.1 Gy). Bootstrapping of clinical variables identified mean lung dose (selected 99%), treatment arm (65%), log tumor volume (66%) and heart region dose (62%) as most important factors associated with survival (v5 and v30 selected < 10%). Multi-variable models included mean lung dose, log tumor volume, age, gender, treatment arm, performance status, smoking history, PET staging and histology and either heart v5, v30 or the identified heart region dose. Heart v5 and v30 were not found to be associated with survival, with treatment arm (P < 0.05) and log tumor volume (P < 0.02) being significant. However, heart region dose was significant (P = 0.02), along with log tumor volume (P = 0.03). Other parameters, including treatment arm were not significant.These results show that dose to cardiac sub-regions is more strongly association with overall survival than whole heart dose parameters. Variable selection showed the importance to include mean lung dose, suggesting an interplay between lung and cardiac dose. The treatment arm effect observed in RTOG-0617 lost its significant once the identified base of heart region dose was included into the model. Our results suggest that the worse survival of the high dose arm in RTOG617 could be explained by the dose delivered to the base of the heart.

Two-year results of a randomised trial comparing 4- versus 12-weekly bone-targeted agent use in patients with bone metastases from breast or castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundWe present the 2-year results of a randomised trial comparing 4- versus 12-weekly bone-targeting agents (BTAs) in patients with bone metastases from breast or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Patients and MethodsPatients with bone metastases from breast or CRPC, who were going to start or were already receiving BTAs, were randomised to 4- or 12-weekly BTA treatment for 2 years. The endpoints were: symptomatic skeletal events (SSE) rates, time to SSEs, toxicity and cost-effectiveness. ResultsOf 263 patients (160 breast cancer, 103 CRPC), 133 (50.6%) and 130 (49.4%) were randomised to the 4- and 12-weekly groups, respectively. BTAs included denosumab (56.3%), zoledronate (24.0%) and pamidronate (19.8%). After 2 years, the cumulative incidence rate (95% CI) of SSEs was 32.7% (24.6% to 41.1%) and 28.1% (20.3% to 36.4%) for the 4- and 12-weekly intervention groups respectively. The hazard ratio for time to first SSE was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.47). However, in a post hoc analysis, those patients who had an on-study SSE, there was a small non-statistical increased risk of subsequent SSEs among patients on the 12-weekly dosing arm (HR = 1.14; 95% CI – 0.90–1.44). BTA-related toxicity rates were similar between study arms. A cost-utility analysis showed that 12-weekly BTA is cost-effective from a public payer’s perspective. ConclusionThese results in addition to those previously reported for de-escalating zoledronate, would support that de-escalation of commonly used BTAs is a reasonable and economically valid treatment option. While not statistically significant, the increase in subsequent SSEs in the 12-weekly arm requires further exploration.

Rationale of a lower dexamethasone dose in prenatal congenital adrenal hyperplasia therapy based on pharmacokinetic modelling.

Prenatal dexamethasone therapy is used in female foetuses with congenital adrenal hyperplasia to suppress androgen excess and prevent virilisation of the external genitalia. The traditional dexamethasone dose of 20 µg/kg/day has been used since decades without examination in clinical trials and is thus still considered experimental. As the traditional dexamethasone dose potentially causes adverse effects in treated mothers and foetuses, we aimed to provide a rationale of a reduced dexamethasone dose in prenatal congenital adrenal hyperplasia therapy based on a pharmacokinetics-based modelling and simulation framework. Based on a published dexamethasone dataset, a nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed describing maternal dexamethasone pharmacokinetics. In stochastic simulations (n = 1000), a typical pregnant population (n = 124) was split into two dosing arms receiving either the traditional 20 µg/kg/day dexamethasone dose or reduced doses between 5 and 10 µg/kg/day. Target maternal dexamethasone concentrations, identified from the literature, served as a threshold to be exceeded by 90% of mothers at a steady state to ensure foetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. A two-compartment dexamethasone pharmacokinetic model was developed and subsequently evaluated to be fit for purpose. The simulations, including a sensitivity analysis regarding the assumed foetal:maternal dexamethasone concentration ratio, resulted in 7.5 µg/kg/day to be the minimum effective dose and thus our suggested dose. We conclude that the traditional dexamethasone dose is three-fold higher than needed, possibly causing harm in treated foetuses and mothers. The clinical relevance and appropriateness of our recommended dose should be tested in a prospective clinical trial.

Examination of Dosing of Antipsychotic Drugs for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Stable Schizophrenia

The doses of antipsychotic drugs needed for relapse prevention in schizophrenia is a debated issue. To examine dose-response findings in a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Studies were identified through the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (March 9, 2020), PubMed (January 1, 2021), and previous reviews. First authors and/or pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information. Two reviewers independently selected randomized clinical trials that compared fixed doses of a second-generation antipsychotic, haloperidol, or fluphenazine for relapse prevention in patients with stable schizophrenia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters in duplicate were extracted and frequentist dose-response random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Study-defined relapse (primary outcome), rehospitalization, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score reduction from baseline, all-cause discontinuation, and dropouts due to adverse events. Evidence from 72 dose arms from 26 studies with 4776 participants was analyzed. The efficacy-related dose-response curves had a hyperbolic shape meaning that the probability to relapse decreased rapidly with doses of up to 5-mg/d risperidone equivalent (relative relapse risk, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.57; standardized mean difference for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score reduction, -0.55; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.41), but flattened thereafter. In contrast, dropouts due to adverse events continued to increase beyond this dose (relative risk at 5 mg/d, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.87-2.55; relative risk at 15 mg/d, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.62). In a subgroup analysis of patients in remission, a plateau was reached earlier, at approximately 2.5-mg/d risperidone equivalent. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that doses higher than approximately 5-mg/d risperidone equivalent may provide limited additional benefit for relapse prevention but more adverse events. For patients in remission or who are receiving high-potency first-generation antipsychotics, doses as low as 2.5-mg/d risperidone equivalent may be sufficient. However, caution is needed at this low dose end when further decreases of dose may be accompanied by a disproportionally higher relapse risk. Moreover, the observations are averages, and factors such as slow or rapid metabolism, age, illness stage, comorbidities, and drug-drug interactions suggest that individual patients will often need higher or lower doses.

Dietary omega-3 fatty acid intake impacts peripheral blood DNA methylation -anti-inflammatory effects and individual variability in a pilot study

Omega-3 or n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are widely studied for health benefits that may relate to anti-inflammatory activity. However, mechanisms mediating an anti-inflammatory response to n-3 PUFA intake are not fully understood. Of interest is the emerging role of fatty acids to impact DNA methylation (DNAm) and thereby modulate mediating inflammatory processes. In this pilot study, we investigated the impact of n-3 PUFA intake on DNAm in inflammation-related signaling pathways in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of women at high risk of breast cancer.PBMCs of women at high risk of breast cancer (n=10) were obtained at baseline and after 6 months of n-3 PUFA (5 g/d EPA+DHA dose arm) intake in a previously reported dose finding trial. DNA methylation of PBMCs was assayed by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to obtain genome-wide methylation profiles at the single nucleotide level. We examined the impact of n-3 PUFA on genome-wide DNAm and focused upon a set of candidate genes associated with inflammation signaling pathways and breast cancer.We identified 24,842 differentially methylated CpGs (DMCs) in gene promoters of 5507 genes showing significant enrichment for hypermethylation in both the candidate gene and genome-wide analyses. Pathway analysis identified significantly hypermethylated signaling networks after n-3 PUFA treatment, such as the Toll-like Receptor inflammatory pathway. The DNAm pattern in individuals and the response to n-3 PUFA intake are heterogeneous. PBMC DNAm profiling suggests a mechanism whereby n-3 PUFAs may impact inflammatory cascades associated with disease processes including carcinogenesis.

CONCERTO: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral laquinimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Background: Interventions targeting the adaptive immune response are needed in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: Evaluate laquinimod’s efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: CONCERTO was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-3 study. RRMS patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral laquinimod 0.6 or 1.2 mg or placebo for ⩽24 months (n = 727, n = 732, and n = 740, respectively). Primary endpoint was time to 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP). The laquinimod 1.2-mg dose arm was discontinued (1 January 2016) due to cardiovascular events at high doses. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: CONCERTO did not meet the primary endpoint of significant effect with laquinimod 0.6-mg versus placebo on 3-month CDP (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.67–1.31; p = 0.706). Secondary endpoint p values were nominal and non-inferential. Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated 40% reduction in percent brain volume change from baseline to Month 15 versus placebo (p < 0.0001). The other secondary endpoint, time to first relapse, and annualized relapse rate (an exploratory endpoint) were numerically lower (both, p = 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported with laquinimod 0.6 mg. Conclusion: Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated only nominally significant effects on clinical relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and was generally well tolerated. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01707992).

Alternative dosing of exemestane in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Design and methods of a randomized presurgical trial

IntroductionAromatase inhibitors are effective in lowering breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women, but adverse events represent a barrier to their acceptability and adherence as a preventive treatment. This study aims to assess whether lowering exemestane schedule may retain biological activity while improving tolerability in breast cancer patients. Methods/designWe are conducting a, pre-surgical, non-inferiority phase IIb study in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Participants are randomized to receive either exemestane 25 mg/day or 25 mg/three times-week or once a week for 4 to 6 weeks prior to surgery.The primary endpoint is the percentage change of serum estradiol concentration between baseline and surgery comparing the three arms. Sample size of 180 women was calculated assuming a 6% non-inferiority of the percent change of estradiol in the lower dose arms compared with the 80% decrease predicted in the full dose arm, with 80% power and using a one-sided 5% significance level and a two-sample t-test.Main secondary outcomes are: safety; change in Ki-67 in cancer and adjacent pre-cancer tissue, circulating sex hormones, adipokines, lipid profile, insulin and glucose changes, in correlation with drug and metabolites concentrations. Results and discussionThe present paper is focused on methodology and operational aspects of the study. A total of 180 participants have ben enrolled. The trial is still blinded, and the analyses are ongoing.Despite the short term duration, results may have relevant implications for clinical management of women at increased risk of developing a ER positive breast cancer.

Final report and long-term outcomes: Phase I trial of a HER2 intracellular plasmid-based vaccine in HER2+ advanced stage breast cancer.

2619 Background: Vaccination with the intracellular domain (ICD) of HER2 in pre-clinical models is both immunogenic and protective against the development of mammary tumors. This study (NCT00436254) was designed to examine the safety and optimal immunogenic dose of a DNA-based vaccine encoding the HER2 ICD in subjects with HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: Sixty-six patients with stage III or IV HER2 + breast cancer in remission or with stable bone only disease were enrolled into three vaccine arms: 1 (10mcg dose of plasmid), 2 (100mcg) and 3 (500mcg). Vaccines were administered i.d. monthly for three immunizations. Endpoints included safety and optimal dose. HER2 specific IFN-gamma immune responses were evaluated and DNA persistence at the vaccine site was assessed. Toxicity and clinical outcomes were followed for 10 years. Results: The majority of vaccine-related toxicity was grade 1 (89%) and grade 2 (11%) and was not significantly different between the three dose arms. All Arms developed HER2 ICD immunity after vaccination, however, patients in Arm 2 and Arm 3 had significantly better immune responses (of higher magnitude and at most time points) than patients in Arm 1 (p=0.003 and p&lt;0.001, respectively) after adjusting for baseline factors. At 60 weeks, the number of patients who maintained the greatest fold-difference in HER2 ICD immune responses from their baseline was highest in Arm 2 (73%) when compared to Arm 1 (47%) and Arm 3 (45%). Associations between ICD responses and plasmid DNA persistence at the vaccine site were estimated via linear regression models. HER ICD immunity after the end of immunizations, relative to baseline, was significantly lower in patients with DNA persistence at week 16 compared to those without persistence (p=0.02). Patients at the highest dose demonstrated the greatest incidence of plasmid persistence (92%) as compared to 33% in Arm 1 and 10% in Arm 2. The median time of follow-up was 118.6 months (Arm 1), 99.7 months (Arm 2), and 73.5 months (Arm 3). The median OS and PFS has not been reached in any Arm and did not differ with respect to treatment arm (Log-rank p-value 0.36 for OS, and 0.63 for PFS). However, we observed a separation of Kaplan-Meier curves for OS from about 40 months and curves for PFS from about 30 months, and the separation maintained until the end of the study for Arm 2 versus Arm 1 and Arm 3. One patient in Arm 2 developed lymphocytic colitis 2.2 years from enrollment deemed possibly related to vaccination. Conclusions: An intermediate dose (100mcg) of vaccine was immunogenic and associated with persistence of immunity at 60 weeks. A randomized phase II trial of the HER2 ICD plasmid-based vaccine in the neoadjuvant setting is in development. Clinical trial information: NCT00436254.

Phase 3 comparison of high-dose once-daily (QD) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with standard twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC): CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538.

8505 Background: Although level 1 evidence is lacking, the majority of patients (pts) with LSCLC are treated with a high dose QD TRT regimen in clinical practice. CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 was designed to determine if administering high dose TRT would improve overall survival (OS), compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT, in LSCLC pts treated with chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Eligible pts had LSCLC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 and regional lymph node involvement excluding contralateral hilar or supraclavicular nodes. This phase 3 trial was conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, pts were randomized 1:1:1 to 45 Gy BID over 3 weeks, 70 Gy QD over 7 weeks, or 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB) over 5 weeks. For the second stage, the study planned discontinuation of one high dose arm based on interim toxicity analysis with patients then randomized 1:1 in the two remaining arms. TRT was given starting with either the 1st or 2nd (of 4 total) chemotherapy cycles. The primary endpoint was OS measured from date of randomization. Results: The trial opened 03/15/2008 and closed 12/01/2019 upon completing accrual, with the CB arm discontinued 3/11/2013 after interim analysis. This analysis includes 638 pts randomized to 45 Gy BID TRT (n = 313) or 70 Gy QD TRT (n = 325). Median age was 63 years (range 37-81), the majority of pts were Caucasian (86%), female (52%), and with ECOG PS 0-1 (95%). After median follow-up of 2.84 years (IQR:1.35 -5.61) for surviving pts, QD compared to BID did not result in a significant difference in OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.2, p = 0.9). Median, 2- and 4-year OS for QD were 30.5 months (95% CI: 24.4-39.6), 56% (95% CI: 0.51-0.62), and 39% (95% CI: 0.33-0.45), and for BID 28.7 months (95% CI: 26.2-35.5), 59% (95% CI: 0.53-0.65), and 35% (95% CI: 0.29-0.42). QD also did not result in a significant difference in PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18, p = 0.94). Most grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts. Rates of grade 3+ febrile neutropenia, dyspnea, esophageal pain and dysphagia for QD were 12.6%,7%, 11.6% and 11.3%, and for BID 13.6%, 4%, 11.2 % and 9.5%. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 3.7% and 1.7% of the QD and BID cohorts, respectively. Results will be updated at presentation. Conclusions: High dose QD TRT to 70 Gy did not significantly improve OS compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT. Nevertheless, favorable outcomes on the QD arm provide the most robust evidence available supporting high dose once-daily TRT as an acceptable option in LSCLC. Outcomes from this study, the largest conducted in LSCLC to date, will help guide TRT decisions for this patient population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Clinical trial information: NCT00632853.

Vitamin D3 Dose Requirement That Raises 25-Hydroxyvitamin D to Desirable Level in Overweight and Obese Elderly.

ContextGuidelines for the dosage of vitamin D supplementation vary widely globally. ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of 2 vitamin D doses, bracketed between the IOM recommended dietary allowance (RDA) and the upper tolerable limit, on vitamin D nutritional status in elderly individuals.MethodsThis post hoc analysis of data collected from a 12-month, double-blind, randomized control trial included 221 ambulatory participants (≥ 65 years) with a mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2 and a mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level of 20.4 ± 7.4 ng/mL, who were recruited from 3 outpatient centers in Lebanon. All participants received 1000 mg of elemental calcium daily from calcium citrate plus the daily equivalent of either 600 IU or 3750 IU of vitamin D3.ResultsMean 25(OH)D level at 12 months was 26.0 ng/mL with low dose and 36.0 ng/mL with high dose vitamin D3. The proportion of participants reaching a value ≥ 20 ng/mL was 86% in the low dose, and 99% in the high dose arms, with no gender differences. The increment of 25(OH)D per 100 IU/day was 1 ng/mL with the low dose, and 0.41 ng/mL with the high dose. Serum 25(OH)D levels at 1 year were highly variable in both treatment arms. Baseline 25(OH)D level and vitamin D dose—but not age, BMI, gender, or season—were significant predictors of serum 25(OH)D level post-intervention.ConclusionThe IOM Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of 600 IU/day does not bring 97.5% of ambulatory elderly individuals above the desirable threshold of 20 ng/mL. Country-specific RDAs are best derived taking into account the observed variability and predictors of achieved 25(OH)D levels.

Topline Results of the CARE-PWS Phase 3 Study: Intranasal Carbetocin Improves Hyperphagia and Anxiety and Distress Symptoms in Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS)

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex genetic disorder associated with multiple neuroendocrine abnormalities including significantly decreased hypothalamic oxytocin levels, resulting in symptoms of severe hyperphagia (an unrelenting false sense of starvation) and multiple severe neuropsychiatric and behavioral issues. CARE-PWS, a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, has evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intranasal carbetocin, a selective oxytocin receptor agonist, in participants with PWS.Eligible participants aged 7 through 18 with genetically confirmed PWS were randomized in equal proportions to three treatment arms for the 8-week placebo-controlled period of the study: carbetocin 9.6 mg, carbetocin 3.2 mg, or a matching placebo, administered by nasal spray three times a day with meals. The primary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) or Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) scores for the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm vs placebo, and the first secondary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in HQ-CT or CY-BOCS scores for the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm vs placebo. Additional secondary endpoints included changes from baseline to week 8 in PWS Anxiety and Distress Questionnaire (PADQ) scores, and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scores evaluating the overall change in severity of PWS symptoms at week 8.Due to COVID-19, enrollment was closed early with 119 evaluable participants for the primary analysis. In the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm, trends toward numerically greater improvements in HQ-CT and CGI-C scores relative to placebo were observed but did not reach statistical significance; however, the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm demonstrated a significant improvement in HQ-CT scores (LS mean improvement vs placebo -3.14 points, p=0.016). In the 3.2 mg arm, additional consistent evidence of improvements versus placebo was seen in multiple secondary endpoints, including CGI-C (p=0.027) and PADQ (p=0.027). Numeric trends toward improvement in CY-BOCS scores were observed in each dose arm, but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo. During the subsequent long-term follow-up period of the study, both carbetocin arms have experienced continued numeric improvements from baseline across multiple endpoints. Intranasal carbetocin was generally well-tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse event was flushing, which was generally mild and transient.In conclusion, results of the CARE-PWS study support that intranasal carbetocin appears to be safe and well tolerated, and reduces hyperphagia and anxiety and distress behaviors in PWS.

A Seamless Adaptive 2-in-1 Design Expanding a Phase 2 Trial for Treatment or Dose Selection Into a Phase 3 Trial

Seamless adaptive phase 2-3 designs provide possible pathways to expedite drug developments by allowing the expansion of an ongoing Phase 2 trial into a confirmatory Phase 3 trial. Here, we propose an adaptive 2-in-1 design which can expand an ongoing Phase 2 trial with multiple treatment or dose arms into a confirmatory Phase 3 trial with the selected arms based on intermediate endpoints from interim data for adaptive decision. The proposed adaptive design provides an efficient way to combine the treatment or dose selection stage and the confirmatory stage. We prove that the proposed design can preserve the familywise Type I error under a mild assumption that is expected to hold with practical considerations. Simulations are conducted to confirm the control of the familywise Type I error with an illustrated example design.

A randomized study of natalizumab dosing regimens for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Background: REFINE was an exploratory, dose- and frequency-blinded, prospective, randomized, dose-ranging study in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Objective: To examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of natalizumab administered via various regimens in RRMS patients. Methods: Clinically stable RRMS patients previously treated with 300 mg natalizumab intravenously for ⩾12 months were randomized to one of six natalizumab regimens over 60 weeks: 300 mg administered intravenously or subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg intravenously or subcutaneously every 12 weeks (Q12W), or 150 mg intravenously or subcutaneously Q12W. The primary endpoint was the mean cumulative number of combined unique active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions at week 60. Results: In total, 290 patients were enrolled. All Q12W dosing arms were associated with increased clinical and MRI disease activity and closed early; ⩾39.5% of patients in each Q12W arm met rescue criteria. In the 300 mg intravenous and subcutaneous Q4 W arms, the mean cumulative number of combined unique active MRI lesions was 0.23 and 0.02, respectively; annualized relapse rates were 0.07 and 0.08, respectively; and trough natalizumab serum levels and α4-integrin saturation were comparable. Conclusion: Natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous Q4W was comparable to 300 mg intravenous Q4W dosing with respect to efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety.

Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis

Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis