Abstract Nonlethal age-estimation methods for Florida Bass Micropterus salmoides using fin rays and spines would enhance trophy-bass research, management, and conservation. Nonlethal removal of fin structures would also expand opportunities for collecting age-related information, specifically during small-population projects as well as tournaments and citizen-science programs, for which sacrificing fish is not an option. We assessed the bias of age estimates derived from Florida Bass anal-, pelvic-, dorsal-, and pectoral-fin rays and anal-, pelvic-, and dorsal-fin spines by comparing them to age estimates derived from otoliths (i.e., sagittae), which are the standard for ageing Florida Bass. We evaluated the precision of age estimates by calculating the absolute difference between replicate reads of each ageing structure for each reader. Linear-mixed effects model selection indicated that precision was most affected by age, structure, and the age*structure interaction, in which the effect of age varied by structure. Age estimates from otoliths were the most precise whereas pelvic spines were the least precise among all structures examined. Bias was similar across all fin structures, but the effect of age on bias varied by reader. Marginal increment analysis indicated that annulus formation was completed from November to March in Florida Bass dorsal spines, 5 months earlier than in Florida Bass otoliths. Our results suggest that nonlethally removed fin structures, especially dorsal spines, have potential for use in estimating age, growth rates, mortality, and age structure of bass populations, which could be particularly beneficial where bass can reach unusual trophy sizes.