Dorsal Root Potentials Research Articles

Suprapontine Structures Modulate Brainstem and Spinal Networks

Several spinal motor output and essential rhythmic behaviors are controlled by supraspinal structures, although their contribution to neuronal networks for respiration and locomotion at birth still requires better characterization. As preparations of isolated brainstem and spinal networks only focus on local circuitry, we introduced the in vitro central nervous system (CNS) from neonatal rodents to simultaneously record a stable respiratory rhythm from both cervical and lumbar ventral roots (VRs).Electrical pulses supplied to multiple sites of brainstem evoked distinct VR responses with staggered onset in the rostro-caudal direction. Stimulation of ventrolateral medulla (VLM) resulted in higher events from homolateral VRs. Stimulating a lumbar dorsal root (DR) elicited responses even from cervical VRs, albeit small and delayed, confirming functional ascending pathways. Oximetric assessments detected optimal oxygen levels on brainstem and cortical surfaces, and histological analysis of internal brain structures indicated preserved neuron viability without astrogliosis. Serial ablations showed precollicular decerebration reducing respiratory burst duration and frequency and diminishing the area of lumbar DR and VR potentials elicited by DR stimulation, while pontobulbar transection increased the frequency and duration of respiratory bursts. Keeping legs attached allows for expressing a respiratory rhythm during hindlimb stimulation. Trains of pulses evoked episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) when delivered to VLM or to a DR, the latter with a slightly better FL than in isolated cords.In summary, suprapontine centers regulate spontaneous respiratory rhythms, as well as electrically evoked reflexes and spinal network activity. The current approach contributes to clarifying modulatory brain influences on the brainstem and spinal microcircuits during development.Graphical Novel preparation of the entire isolated CNS from newborn rats unveils suprapontine modulation on brainstem and spinal networks. Preparation views (A) with and without legs attached (B). Successful fictive respiration occurs with fast dissection from P0-P2 rats (C). Decerebration speeds up respiratory rhythm (D) and reduces spinal reflexes derived from both ventral and dorsal lumbar roots (E).

Central sensitization of dorsal root potentials and dorsal root reflexes: An in vitro study in the mouse spinal cord.

Axo-axonic contacts onto central terminals of primary afferents modulate sensory inputs to the spinal cord. These contacts produce primary afferent depolarization (PAD), which serves as a mechanism for presynaptic inhibition, and also produce dorsal root reflexes (DRRs), which may regulate the excitability of peripheral terminals and second order neurons. We aimed to identify changes in these responses as a consequence of peripheral inflammation. In vitro spinal cord recordings of spontaneous activities in dorsal and ventral roots were performed in control mice and following paw inflammation. We also used pharmacological assays to define the neurotransmitter systems implicated in such responses. Paw inflammation increased the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous dorsal root depolarizations, the occurrence of DRRs and the amplitude of ventral roots depolarizations. PAD was classified in two different patterns based on their relation to ventral activity: time-locked and independent events. Both patterns increased in amplitude after paw inflammation, and independent events also increased in frequency. The circuits that were responsible for this activity implicated both glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission. Adrenergic modulation differentially affected both types of PAD, and this modulation changed after paw inflammation. Our findings suggest the existence of independent spinal circuits at the origin of PAD and DRRs. Inflammation modulates these circuits differentially, unveiling varied mechanisms of spinal sensitization. This in vitro approach provides an isolated model for the study of the mechanisms of central sensitization and for the performance of pharmacological assays with the purpose of identifying and testing novel antinociceptive targets. Spinal circuits modulate activity of primary afferents acting on central terminals. Under in vitro conditions, dorsal roots show spontaneous activity in the form of depolarizations and action potentials. Our findings are consistent with the existence of several independent generator circuits. Experimental paw inflammation reduced mechanical withdrawal threshold and significantly increased the spontaneous activity of dorsal roots, which may be secondary to an enhanced output of spinal generators. This can be considered as a novel sign of central sensitization.

Nicotinic receptor modulation of primary afferent excitability with selective regulation of Aδ-mediated spinal actions.

Somatosensory input strength can be modulated by primary afferent depolarization (PAD) generated predominantly via presynaptic GABAA receptors on afferent terminals. We investigated whether ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) also provide modulatory actions, focusing on myelinated afferent excitability in in vitro murine spinal cord nerve-attached models. Primary afferent stimulation-evoked synaptic transmission was recorded in the deep dorsal horn as extracellular field potentials (EFPs), whereas concurrently recorded dorsal root potentials (DRPs) were used as an indirect measure of PAD. Changes in afferent membrane excitability were simultaneously measured as direct current (DC)-shifts in membrane polarization recorded in dorsal roots or peripheral nerves. The broad nAChR antagonist d-tubocurarine (d-TC) selectively and strongly depressed Aδ-evoked synaptic EFPs (36% of control) coincident with similarly depressed A-fiber DRP (43% of control), whereas afferent electrical excitability remained unchanged. In comparison, acetylcholine (ACh) and the nAChR agonists, epibatidine and nicotine, reduced afferent excitability by generating coincident depolarizing DC-shifts in peripheral axons and intraspinally. Progressive depolarization corresponded temporally with the emergence of spontaneous axonal spiking and reductions in the DRP and all afferent-evoked synaptic actions (31%-37% of control). Loss of evoked response was long-lasting, independent of DC repolarization, and likely due to mechanisms initiated by spontaneous C-fiber activity. DC-shifts were blocked with d-TC but not GABAA receptor blockers and retained after tetrodotoxin block of voltage-gated Na+ channels. Notably, actions tested were comparable between three mouse strains, in rat, and when performed in different labs. Thus, nAChRs can regulate afferent excitability via two distinct mechanisms: by central Aδ-afferent actions, and by transient extrasynaptic axonal activation of high-threshold primary afferents.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Primary afferents express many nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR) subtypes but whether activation is linked to presynaptic inhibition, facilitation, or more complex and selective activity modulation is unknown. Recordings of afferent-evoked responses in the lumbar spinal cord identified two nAChR-mediated modulatory actions: 1) selective control of Aδ afferent transmission and 2) robust changes in axonal excitability initiated via extrasynaptic shifts in DC polarization. This work broadens the diversity of presynaptic modulation of primary afferents by nAChRs.

Direct evidence for decreased presynaptic inhibition evoked by PBSt group I muscle afferents after chronic SCI and recovery with step-training in rats.

Presynaptic inhibition is modulated by supraspinal centres and primary afferents in order to filter sensory information, adjust spinal reflex excitability, and ensure smooth movement. After spinal cord injury (SCI), the supraspinal control of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) interneurons is disengaged, suggesting an increased role for sensory afferents. While increased H-reflex excitability in spastic individuals indicates a possible decrease in presynaptic inhibition, it remains unclear whether a decrease in sensory-evoked PAD contributes to this effect. We investigated whether the PAD evoked by hindlimb afferents contributes to the change in presynaptic inhibition of the H-reflex in a decerebrated rat preparation. We found that chronic SCI decreases presynaptic inhibition of the plantar H-reflex through a reduction in PAD evoked by posterior biceps-semitendinosus (PBSt) muscle group I afferents. We further found that step-training restored presynaptic inhibition of the plantar H-reflex evoked by PBSt, suggesting the presence of activity-dependent plasticity of PAD pathways activated by flexor muscle group I afferents. Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in the disruption of supraspinal control of spinal networks and an increase in the relative influence of afferent feedback to sublesional neural networks, both of which contribute to enhancing spinal reflex excitability. Hyperreflexia occurs in ∼75% of individuals with a chronic SCI and critically hinders functional recovery and quality of life. It is suggested that it results from an increase in motoneuronal excitability and a decrease in presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibitory mechanisms. In contrast, locomotor training decreases hyperreflexia by restoring presynaptic inhibition. Primary afferent depolarization (PAD) is a powerful presynaptic inhibitory mechanism that selectively gates primary afferent transmission to spinal neurons to adjust reflex excitability and ensure smooth movement. However, the effect of chronic SCI and step-training on the reorganization of presynaptic inhibition evoked by hindlimb afferents, and the contribution of PAD has never been demonstrated. The objective of this study is to directly measure changes in presynaptic inhibition through dorsal root potentials (DRPs) and its association with plantar H-reflex inhibition. We provide direct evidence that H-reflex hyperexcitability is associated with a decrease in transmission of PAD pathways activated by posterior biceps-semitendinosus (PBSt) afferents after chronic SCI. More precisely, we illustrate that the pattern of inhibition evoked by PBSt group I muscle afferents onto both L4-DRPs and plantar H-reflexes evoked by the distal tibial nerve is impaired after chronic SCI. These changes are not observed in step-trained animals, suggesting a role for activity-dependent plasticity to regulate PAD pathways activated by flexor muscle group I afferents.

The activation of D2 and D3 receptor subtypes inhibits pathways mediating primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in the mouse spinal cord

Somatosensory information can be modulated at the spinal cord level by primary afferent depolarization (PAD), known to produce presynaptic inhibition (PSI) by decreasing neurotransmitter release through the activation of presynaptic ionotropic receptors. Descending monoaminergic systems also modulate somatosensory processing. We investigated the role of D1-like and D2-like receptors on pathways mediating PAD in the hemisected spinal cord of neonatal mice. We recorded low-threshold evoked dorsal root potentials (DRPs) and population monosynaptic responses as extracellular field potentials (EFPs). We used a paired-pulse conditioning-test protocol to assess homosynaptic and heterosynaptic depression of evoked EFPs to discriminate between dopaminergic effects on afferent synaptic efficacy and/or on pathways mediating PAD, respectively. DA (10 μM) depressed low-threshold evoked DRPs by 43 %, with no effect on EFPs. These depressant effects on DRPs were mimicked by the D2-like receptor agonist quinpirole (35 %). Moreover, by using selective antagonists at D2-like receptors (encompassing the D2, D3, and D4 subtypes), we found that the D2 and D3 receptor subtypes participate in the quinpirole depressant inhibitory effects of pathways mediating PAD.

Activation of α-adrenoceptors depresses synaptic transmission of myelinated afferents and inhibits pathways mediating primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in the in vitro mouse spinal cord.

Somatosensory afferent transmission strength is controlled by several presynaptic mechanisms that reduce transmitter release at the spinal cord level. We focused this investigation on the role of α-adrenoceptors in modulating sensory transmission in low-threshold myelinated afferents and in pathways mediating primary afferent depolarization (PAD) of neonatal mouse spinal cord. We hypothesized that the activation of α-adrenoceptors depresses low threshold-evoked synaptic transmission and inhibits pathways mediating PAD. Extracellular field potentials (EFPs) recorded in the deep dorsal horn assessed adrenergic modulation of population monosynaptic transmission, while dorsal root potentials (DRPs) recorded at root entry zone assessed adrenergic modulation of PAD. We found that noradrenaline (NA) and the α1-adrenoceptor agonists phenylephrine and cirazoline depressed synaptic transmission (by 15, 14 and 22%, respectively). DRPs were also depressed by NA, phenylephrine and cirazoline (by 62, 30, and 64%, respectively), and by the α2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, although to a lower extent (20%). We conclude that NA depresses monosynaptic transmission of myelinated afferents onto deep dorsal horn neurons via α1-adrenoceptors and inhibits interneuronal pathways mediating PAD through the activation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors. The functional significance of these modulatory actions in shaping cutaneous and muscle sensory information during motor behaviors requires further study.

Afferent Input Induced by Rhythmic Limb Movement Modulates Spinal Neuronal Circuits in an Innovative Robotic In Vitro Preparation

Locomotor patterns are mainly modulated by afferent feedback, but its actual contribution to spinal network activity during continuous passive limb training is still unexplored. To unveil this issue, we devised a robotic in vitro setup (Bipedal Induced Kinetic Exercise, BIKE) to induce passive pedaling, while simultaneously recording low-noise ventral and dorsal root (VR and DR) potentials in isolated neonatal rat spinal cords with hindlimbs attached. As a result, BIKE evoked rhythmic afferent volleys from DRs, reminiscent of pedaling speed. During BIKE, spontaneous VR activity remained unchanged, while a DR rhythmic component paired the pedaling pace. Moreover, BIKE onset rarely elicited brief episodes of fictive locomotion (FL) and, when trains of electrical pulses were simultaneously applied to a DR, it increased the amplitude, but not the number, of FL cycles. When BIKE was switched off after a 30-min training, the number of electrically induced FL oscillations was transitorily facilitated, without affecting VR reflexes or DR potentials. However, 90 min of BIKE no longer facilitated FL, but strongly depressed area of VR reflexes and stably increased antidromic DR discharges. Patch clamp recordings from single motoneurons after 90-min sessions indicated an increased frequency of both fast- and slow-decaying synaptic input to motoneurons. In conclusion, hindlimb rhythmic and alternated pedaling for different durations affects distinct dorsal and ventral spinal networks by modulating excitatory and inhibitory input to motoneurons. These results suggest defining new parameters for effective neurorehabilitation that better exploits spinal circuit activity.

Mast Cells and Nerve Signal Conduction in Acupuncture.

Nerve and mast cells are densely distributed around acupoints in connective tissue. To explore the internal relations between them in acupuncture effect, we examined dorsal root potential (DRP) response to acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) under sodium cromoglicate (DSCG, a mast cell stabilizer) intervention in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. We used single unit nerve recording techniques to collect nerve signals from DRP afferent nerves for a 45-minute period that includes 4 stages, that is, base, drug absorption, acupuncture, and recovery stages. We analyzed the recorded signals from time-domain and frequency-domain perspectives. The results showed that once acupuncture needle was inserted, twisting needle excited more nerves discharges than those at base discharges in ACU (from 35.1 ± 7.2 to 47 ± 9.2 Hz, P = 0.004), and there existed the same trend in Saline + ACU group (from 23.8 ± 2.6 to 29.8 ± 4.2 Hz, P = 0.059). There was no change of nerve discharges under twisting needle with injection of DSCG (from 34.8 ± 5.3 to 34.7 ± 4.4 Hz, P = 0.480). We conclude that acupuncture manipulation promotes neural signal production and DSCG could partly inhibit nerve discharges.

Pre-Synaptic Inhibition of Afferent Feedback in the Macaque Spinal Cord Does Not Modulate with Cycles of Peripheral Oscillations Around 10 Hz.

Spinal interneurons are partially phase-locked to physiological tremor around 10 Hz. The phase of spinal interneuron activity is approximately opposite to descending drive to motoneurons, leading to partial phase cancellation and tremor reduction. Pre-synaptic inhibition of afferent feedback modulates during voluntary movements, but it is not known whether it tracks more rapid fluctuations in motor output such as during tremor. In this study, dorsal root potentials (DRPs) were recorded from the C8 and T1 roots in two macaque monkeys following intra-spinal micro-stimulation (random inter-stimulus interval 1.5–2.5 s, 30–100 μA), whilst the animals performed an index finger flexion task which elicited peripheral oscillations around 10 Hz. Forty one responses were identified with latency < 5 ms; these were narrow (mean width 0.59 ms), and likely resulted from antidromic activation of afferents following stimulation near terminals. Significant modulation during task performance occurred in 16/41 responses, reflecting terminal excitability changes generated by pre-synaptic inhibition (Wall's excitability test). Stimuli falling during large-amplitude 8–12 Hz oscillations in finger acceleration were extracted, and sub-averages of DRPs constructed for stimuli delivered at different oscillation phases. Although some apparent phase-dependent modulation was seen, this was not above the level expected by chance. We conclude that, although terminal excitability reflecting pre-synaptic inhibition of afferents modulates over the timescale of a voluntary movement, it does not follow more rapid changes in motor output. This suggests that pre-synaptic inhibition is not part of the spinal systems for tremor reduction described previously, and that it plays a role in overall—but not moment-by-moment—regulation of feedback gain.

Extrasynaptic α6 subunit-containing GABAA receptors modulate excitability in turtle spinal motoneurons.

Motoneurons are furnished with a vast repertoire of ionotropic and metabotropic receptors as well as ion channels responsible for maintaining the resting membrane potential and involved in the regulation of the mechanisms underlying its membrane excitability and firing properties. Among them, the GABAA receptors, which respond to GABA binding by allowing the flow of Cl− ions across the membrane, mediate two distinct forms of inhibition in the mature nervous system, phasic and tonic, upon activation of synaptic or extrasynaptic receptors, respectively. In a previous work we showed that furosemide facilitates the monosynaptic reflex without affecting the dorsal root potential. Our data also revealed a tonic inhibition mediated by GABAA receptors activated in motoneurons by ambient GABA. These data suggested that the high affinity GABAA extrasynaptic receptors may have an important role in motor control, though the molecular nature of these receptors was not determined. By combining electrophysiological, immunofluorescence and molecular biology techniques with pharmacological tools here we show that GABAA receptors containing the α6 subunit are expressed in adult turtle spinal motoneurons and can function as extrasynaptic receptors responsible for tonic inhibition. These results expand our understanding of the role of GABAA receptors in motoneuron tonic inhibition.

Measuring spinal presynaptic inhibition in mice by dorsal root potential recording in vivo.

Presynaptic inhibition is one of the most powerful inhibitory mechanisms in the spinal cord. The underlying physiological mechanism is a depolarization of primary afferent fibers mediated by GABAergic axo-axonal synapses (primary afferent depolarization). The strength of primary afferent depolarization can be measured by recording of volume-conducted potentials at the dorsal root (dorsal root potentials, DRP). Pathological changes of presynaptic inhibition are crucial in the abnormal central processing of certain pain conditions and in some disorders of motor hyperexcitability. Here, we describe a method of recording DRP in vivo in mice. The preparation of spinal cord dorsal roots in the anesthetized animal and the recording procedure using suction electrodes are explained. This method allows measuring GABAergic DRP and thereby estimating spinal presynaptic inhibition in the living mouse. In combination with transgenic mouse models, DRP recording may serve as a powerful tool to investigate disease-associated spinal pathophysiology. In vivo recording has several advantages compared to ex vivo isolated spinal cord preparations, e.g. the possibility of simultaneous recording or manipulation of supraspinal networks and induction of DRP by stimulation of peripheral nerves.

Serotonin, Dopamine and Noradrenaline Adjust Actions of Myelinated Afferents via Modulation of Presynaptic Inhibition in the Mouse Spinal Cord

Gain control of primary afferent neurotransmission at their intraspinal terminals occurs by several mechanisms including primary afferent depolarization (PAD). PAD produces presynaptic inhibition via a reduction in transmitter release. While it is known that descending monoaminergic pathways complexly regulate sensory processing, the extent these actions include modulation of afferent-evoked PAD remains uncertain. We investigated the effects of serotonin (5HT), dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) on afferent transmission and PAD. Responses were evoked by stimulation of myelinated hindlimb cutaneous and muscle afferents in the isolated neonatal mouse spinal cord. Monosynaptic responses were examined in the deep dorsal horn either as population excitatory synaptic responses (recorded as extracellular field potentials; EFPs) or intracellular excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). The magnitude of PAD generated intraspinally was estimated from electrotonically back-propagating dorsal root potentials (DRPs) recorded on lumbar dorsal roots. 5HT depressed the DRP by 76%. Monosynaptic actions were similarly depressed by 5HT (EFPs 54%; EPSCs 75%) but with a slower time course. This suggests that depression of monosynaptic EFPs and DRPs occurs by independent mechanisms. DA and NA had similar depressant actions on DRPs but weaker effects on EFPs. IC50 values for DRP depression were 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 µM for 5HT, DA and NA, respectively. Depression of DRPs by monoamines was nearly-identical in both muscle and cutaneous afferent-evoked responses, supporting a global modulation of the multimodal afferents stimulated. 5HT, DA and NA produced no change in the compound antidromic potentials evoked by intraspinal microstimulation indicating that depression of the DRP is unrelated to direct changes in the excitability of intraspinal afferent fibers, but due to metabotropic receptor activation. In summary, both myelinated afferent-evoked DRPs and monosynaptic transmission in the dorsal horn are broadly reduced by descending monoamine transmitters. These actions likely integrate with modulatory actions elsewhere to reconfigure spinal circuits during motor behaviors.

The Potentials Recorded Around the Spinal Cord: Different Sides of the Same Dice

Introduction. Clinical Neurophysiology is strongly based on the interpretation of electric potential fields. Such interpretations may sometimes create different conceptual objects that over time end up as different sides of the same phenomenon. An instructive example is represented by the potential fields recorded around the spinal cord viewed from a historical perspective. Method. A brief historical account is given of the potentials recorded around the spinal cord. Results. Dorsal root reflex, dorsal root potential, cord dorsum potential and primary afferent depolarization are described. Conclusion. all these potentials are mainly different aspects of the same generator the segmental spinal cord activities secondary to the recordings by different leads.

The Potentials Recorded Around the Spinal Cord

Introduction. Clinical Neurophysiology is strongly based on the interpretation of electric potential fields. Such interpretations may sometimes create different conceptual objects that over time end up as different sides of the same phenomenon. An instructive example is represented by the potential fields recorded around the spinal cord viewed from a historical perspective. Method. A brief historical ac­count is given of the potentials recorded around the spinal cord. Re­sults. Dorsal root reflex, dorsal root potential, cord dorsum potential and primary afferent depolarization are described. Conclusion. all these potentials are mainly different aspects of the same generator - the segmental spinal cord activities - secondary to the recordings by different leads.

Independent Control of Presynaptic Inhibition by Reticulospinal and Sensory Inputs at Rest and during Rhythmic Activities in the Cat

To be functionally relevant during movement, the transmission from primary afferents must be efficiently controlled by presynaptic inhibition. Sensory feedback, central pattern generators, and supraspinal structures can all evoke presynaptic inhibition, but we do not understand how these inputs interact during movement. Here, we investigated the convergence of inputs from the reticular formation and sensory afferents on presynaptic inhibitory pathways and their modulation at rest and during two fictive motor tasks (locomotion and scratch) in decerebrate cats. The amplitude of primary afferent depolarization (PAD), an estimate of presynaptic inhibition, was recorded in individual afferents with intra-axonal recordings and in a mix of afferents in lumbar dorsal rootlets (dorsal root potential [DRP]) with bipolar electrodes. There was no spatial facilitation between inputs from reticulospinal and sensory afferents with DRPs or PADs, indicating an absence of convergence. However, spatial facilitation could be observed by combining two sensory inputs, indicating that convergence was possible. Task-dependent changes in the amplitude of responses were similar for reticulospinal and sensory inputs, increasing during fictive locomotion and decreasing during fictive scratch. During fictive locomotion, DRP and PAD amplitudes evoked by reticulospinal inputs were increased during the flexion phase, whereas sensory-evoked DRPs and PADs showed maximal amplitude in either flexion or extension phases. During fictive scratch, the amplitudes of DRPs and PADs evoked by both sources were maximal in flexion. The absence of spatial facilitation and different phase-dependent modulation patterns during fictive locomotion are consistent with independent presynaptic inhibitory pathways for reticulospinal and sensory inputs.

Force‐sensitive afferents recruited during stance encode sensory depression in the contralateral swinging limb during locomotion

Afferent feedback alters muscle activity during locomotion and must be tightly controlled. As primary afferent depolarization-induced presynaptic inhibition (PAD-PSI) regulates afferent signaling, we investigated hindlimb PAD-PSI during locomotion in an in vitro rat spinal cord-hindlimb preparation. We compared the relation of PAD-PSI, measured as dorsal root potentials (DRPs), to observed ipsilateral and contralateral limb endpoint forces. Afferents activated during stance-phase force strongly and proportionately influenced DRP magnitude in the swinging limb. Responses increased with locomotor frequency. Electrical stimulation of contralateral afferents also preferentially evoked DRPs in the opposite limb during swing (flexion). Nerve lesioning, in conjunction with kinematic results, support a prominent contribution from toe Golgi tendon organ afferents. Thus, force-dependent afferent feedback during stance binds interlimb sensorimotor state to a proportional PAD-PSI in the swinging limb, presumably to optimize interlimb coordination. These results complement known actions of ipsilateral afferents on PAD-PSI during locomotion.

Early postnatal development of GABAergic presynaptic inhibition of Ia proprioceptive afferent connections in mouse spinal cord

Sensory feedback is critical for normal locomotion and adaptation to external perturbations during movement. Feedback provided by group Ia afferents influences motor output both directly through monosynaptic connections and indirectly through spinal interneuronal circuits. For example, the circuit responsible for reciprocal inhibition, which acts to prevent co-contraction of antagonist flexor and extensor muscles, is driven by Ia afferent feedback. Additionally, circuits mediating presynaptic inhibition can limit Ia afferent synaptic transmission onto central neuronal targets in a task-specific manner. These circuits can also be activated by stimulation of proprioceptive afferents. Rodent locomotion rapidly matures during postnatal development; therefore, we assayed the functional status of reciprocal and presynaptic inhibitory circuits of mice at birth and compared responses with observations made after 1 wk of postnatal development. Using extracellular physiological techniques from isolated and hemisected spinal cord preparations, we demonstrate that Ia afferent-evoked reciprocal inhibition is as effective at blocking antagonist motor neuron activation at birth as at 1 wk postnatally. In contrast, at birth conditioning stimulation of muscle nerve afferents failed to evoke presynaptic inhibition sufficient to block functional transmission at synapses between Ia afferents and motor neurons, even though dorsal root potentials could be evoked by stimulating the neighboring dorsal root. Presynaptic inhibition at this synapse was readily observed, however, at the end of the first postnatal week. These results indicate Ia afferent feedback from the periphery to central spinal circuits is only weakly gated at birth, which may provide enhanced sensitivity to peripheral feedback during early postnatal experiences.

Monoaminergic Modulation of Spinal Viscero-Sympathetic Function in the Neonatal Mouse Thoracic Spinal Cord

Descending serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic systems project diffusely to sensory, motor and autonomic spinal cord regions. Using neonatal mice, this study examined monoaminergic modulation of visceral sensory input and sympathetic preganglionic output. Whole-cell recordings from sympathetic preganglionic neurons (SPNs) in spinal cord slice demonstrated that serotonin, noradrenaline, and dopamine modulated SPN excitability. Serotonin depolarized all, while noradrenaline and dopamine depolarized most SPNs. Serotonin and noradrenaline also increased SPN current-evoked firing frequency, while both increases and decreases were seen with dopamine. In an in vitro thoracolumbar spinal cord/sympathetic chain preparation, stimulation of splanchnic nerve visceral afferents evoked reflexes and subthreshold population synaptic potentials in thoracic ventral roots that were dose-dependently depressed by the monoamines. Visceral afferent stimulation also evoked bicuculline-sensitive dorsal root potentials thought to reflect presynaptic inhibition via primary afferent depolarization. These dorsal root potentials were likewise dose-dependently depressed by the monoamines. Concomitant monoaminergic depression of population afferent synaptic transmission recorded as dorsal horn field potentials was also seen. Collectively, serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine were shown to exert broad and comparable modulatory regulation of viscero-sympathetic function. The general facilitation of SPN efferent excitability with simultaneous depression of visceral afferent-evoked motor output suggests that descending monoaminergic systems reconfigure spinal cord autonomic function away from visceral sensory influence. Coincident monoaminergic reductions in dorsal horn responses support a multifaceted modulatory shift in the encoding of spinal visceral afferent activity. Similar monoamine-induced changes have been observed for somatic sensorimotor function, suggesting an integrative modulatory response on spinal autonomic and somatic function.

The anesthetic urethane blocks excitatory amino acid responses but not GABA responses in isolated frog spinal cords

The anesthetic urethane is commonly used in physiological experiments. We tested urethane's actions on GABA receptors on the primary afferents in the spinal cord, which are one of the few areas in the adult central nervous system (CNS) that are depolarized by GABA, and on ligand-gated excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptors located on motoneurons. Both receptor types are critically important during anesthetic immobilization. We used the isolated hemisected spinal cord of the frog in a sucrose gap chamber to record glutamate-, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-, kainate-, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-induced depolarizations of the dorsal root (DR) and ventral root (VR). DR potentials (DRPs) and VR potentials (VRPs) evoked by single supramaximal afferent stimuli were also studied. Urethane (10-80 mM) was applied for 10-30 min. Urethane depressed EAA responses on the motoneurons in a dose-dependent manner. At a clinical anesthetic concentration (10 mM), EAA-induced depolarizations were reduced by 8.1 ± 2.2 % (n = 7, P = 0.025), but increasing the concentration to 40 mM revealed a larger, 24.7 ± 3 % (n = 53, P = 0.0001) depressing effect of urethane on all EAA responses in the motoneurons. However, GABA and K(+) responses recorded in the DR were not altered by the presence of 10 or 40 mM urethane. Evoked DRPs and VRPs were reduced by urethane and spontaneous DR and VR potentials were suppressed by 10 or blocked by 40 mM urethane. Urethane appears to be selective for EAA-, sparing GABA responses at a clinical anesthetic concentration. Only a 10 % reduction of EAA activity seems to be necessary to induce anesthesia.

Requirement of neuronal connexin36 in pathways mediating presynaptic inhibition of primary afferents in functionally mature mouse spinal cord

Electrical synapses formed by gap junctions containing connexin36 (Cx36) promote synchronous activity of interneurones in many regions of mammalian brain; however, there is limited information on the role of electrical synapses in spinal neuronal networks. Here we show that Cx36 is widely distributed in the spinal cord and is involved in mechanisms that govern presynaptic inhibition of primary afferent terminals. Electrophysiological recordings were made in spinal cord preparations from 8- to 11-day-old wild-type and Cx36 knockout mice. Several features associated with presynaptic inhibition evoked by conditioning stimulation of low threshold hindlimb afferents were substantially compromised in Cx36 knockout mice. Dorsal root potentials (DRPs) evoked by low intensity stimulation of sensory afferents were reduced in amplitude by 79% and in duration by 67% in Cx36 knockouts. DRPs were similarly affected in wild-types by bath application of gap junction blockers. Consistent with presynaptic inhibition of group Ia muscle spindle afferent terminals on motoneurones described in adult cats, conditioning stimulation of an adjacent dorsal root evoked a long duration inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes recorded from the ventral root in wild-type mice, and this inhibition was antagonized by bicuculline. The same conditioning stimulation failed to inhibit monosynaptic reflexes in Cx36 knockout mice. Immunofluorescence labelling for Cx36 was found throughout the dorsal and ventral horns of the spinal cord of juvenile mice and persisted in mature animals. In deep dorsal horn laminae, where interneurones involved in presynaptic inhibition of large diameter muscle afferents are located, cells were extensively dye-coupled following intracellular neurobiotin injection. Coupled cells displayed Cx36-positive puncta along their processes. Our results indicate that gap junctions formed by Cx36 in spinal cord are required for maintenance of presynaptic inhibition, including the regulation of transmission from Ia muscle spindle afferents. In addition to a role in presynaptic inhibition in juvenile animals, the persistence of Cx36 expression among spinal neuronal populations in the adult mouse suggests that the contribution of electrical synapses to integrative processes in fully mature spinal cord may be as diverse as that found in other areas of the CNS.