You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction: Urethral Reconstruction (including Stricture) II1 Apr 2015PD14-09 MOST EFFECTIVE METHOD OF USING BUCCAL GRAFT IN STAGED URETHROPLASTY FOR HYPOSPADIAS CRIPPLE. Pankaj Joshi, Craig Hunter, Walid Shahrour, Sandesh Surana, Vikram shah Batra, and Sanjay Kulkarni Pankaj JoshiPankaj Joshi More articles by this author , Craig HunterCraig Hunter More articles by this author , Walid ShahrourWalid Shahrour More articles by this author , Sandesh SuranaSandesh Surana More articles by this author , Vikram shah BatraVikram shah Batra More articles by this author , and Sanjay KulkarniSanjay Kulkarni More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1338AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES A two-stage urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft (BMG) is indicated for patients with history of failed hypospadias repair. Some patients have no urethral plate, severe spongiofibrosis, or complete breakdown of the urethra from failed prior interventions; they are termed hypospadias cripple. Prior to 2010, we were performing staged urethroplasty as described by Bracka, with BMG placement on the first stage. The graft was re-evaluated six months later and stage 2 tubularization was generally performed. We were not satisfied with additional staging procedures that resulted from graft contracture, scarring, and fistula formation, so we began to consider more effective methods. After 2010, we began performing a Johanson staged urethroplasty on the first stage. The second stage was a single procedure with dorsal inlay of buccal mucosa and tubularization. Our objective is to compare the success of each procedure. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts from 2007 to 2013 for those who underwent staged repair for multiple failed hypospadias. In group I, from 2007 to 2010, the graft was placed on the first stage. In group II, from 2010 to 2013, the graft was placed during the second stage at time of tubularization. RESULTS Mean age of group I was 19 years (range 8-21) and of group II age 23 years (range 8-34) years. After a mean follow up of 45 months, 10 patients from group I were reviewed. After a mean follow up of 14 months, 8 patients from group II were reviewed. For Group I: 2(20%) had contraction of buccal graft requiring additional graft placement, 2(20%) patients had fistula,1(10%) patient had a urinary tract infection, 1(10%) had dehiscence, and 1(10%) had urethral stricture. Of those in group II, 1(13%) had wound infection and 1(13%) patient had fistula. Our overall complication rate was 6/10 (60%) in group I and 2/8 (25%) in group II. CONCLUSIONS Hypospadias cripple patients can be managed with staged urethroplasty with placement of BMG graft to aid a failing urethral plate. Placing the BMG during the second stage is superior to the conventional technique of BMG placement during first stage. This modification decreases patient morbidity, improves success, and results in a small, but significant paradigm shift in the management of failed hypospadias. Larger multinstitutional studies may help substantiate our experience. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e322 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Pankaj Joshi More articles by this author Craig Hunter More articles by this author Walid Shahrour More articles by this author Sandesh Surana More articles by this author Vikram shah Batra More articles by this author Sanjay Kulkarni More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...