Dopamine D2 Antagonist Research Articles

Differential regulation of the nocturnal and diurnal prolactin surges in pregnant rats revealed by dopamine receptor antagonism.

We have explored temporal changes in the magnitude of dopamine (DA) interaction (DA tone) at the anterior pituitary lactotrophs related to both the nocturnal and diurnal prolactin (PRL) surges on day 8 of pregnancy, by utilizing a competitive DA D2 antagonist, domperidone (DOM). After withdrawal of blood from pregnant rats on day 7 in order to demonstrate the presence of a PRL surge, experimental rats received DOM (100 micrograms/kg i.v. or i.a.) at various times on day 8. Blood samples were taken immediately before and following injection of DOM at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min. The peak PRL response to DOM occurred 15 min after injection. Comparisons were made between circulating PRL levels immediately prior to and at several times following DOM administration for the various times of the day, and represented as incremental increases in PRL following DOM. During times on day 8 when PRL levels were normally low (24:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h), pregnant rats exhibited a substantial PRL response to DOM. However, during the nocturnal PRL surge (02:00, 04:00 h) the peak PRL response to DOM was significantly lower. In sharp contrast, the PRL response to DOM administered during the diurnal PRL surge (18:00 h) was significantly higher than all other times of the day tested. In a dose-response study in which 10, 100 and 1,000 micrograms/kg DOM was administered at the two critical times when the response to DOM differed greatly, 02:00 and 18:00 h, there was a significantly reduced PRL response to DOM at 02:00 h compared to 18:00 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Positron-emitting N-[18F]fluoroalkyl and [18F]fluoropyrrolidinyl analogues of eticlopride as potential in vivo radioligands for dopamine D2 receptors.

N-Fluoroalkyl and 4-fluoropyrrolidinyl eticlopride analogues with high affinity toward central nervous system dopamine D2 receptors in vitro were labelled with positron emitting fluorine-18 (t1/2 = 110 min), and their in vivo biodistribution was investigated in rats. N-[18F]Fluoro-ethyl and -propyl eticlopride derivatives showed poor in vivo selectivity in the rat brain. On the other hand, 4-[18F]fluoropyrrolidinyl eticlopride exhibited almost constant and relatively high striatal concentration. The striatal/cerebellar radioactivity ratio, which corresponds to the ratio of a brain D2 receptor-rich to poor region, gradually increased to 5.2-6.4, 90 min after the injection. The striatal accumulation was selectively inhibited by pre-injection of haloperidol, a dopamine D2 antagonist, without affecting accumulation in other tissues. Thus, the selective striatal accumulation of 4-[18F]fluoropyrrolidinyl eticlopride in striatal tissue appears to be due to the specific binding to dopamine D2 receptors.

Effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine

The objective of the present study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine could be blocked by either D1 or D2 selective dopamine antagonists. In three experiments, male rats received 10-21 daily injections of a selective D1 (SCH 23390; 0 or 0.5 mg/kg IP) or D2 (sulpiride; 0, 30, or 100 mg/kg IP) antagonist followed by an apomorphine (0 or 1.0 mg/kg SC) injection. In two experiments, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas after the daily injections. In all experiments, the rats were tested for sensitization to apomorphine following the training phase. The results indicated that apomorphine produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with each injection, and this apomorphine-induced increase in activity was completely blocked by both sulpiride and SCH 23390 treatments. However, although both sulpiride and SCH 23390 blocked apomorphine-induced activity, only SCH 23390 injections prevented the development of sensitization to apomorphine. That is, rats pretreated with sulpiride and apomorphine displayed significant sensitization when subsequently tested with a challenge dose of apomorphine alone. These findings suggest that the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is related specifically to the stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors.

Role of genotype and dopamine receptors in behaviour of inbred mice in a forced swimming test

The role of genotype in the effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine agonists and antagonists on behavioural despair (Porsolt's test) was studied. Mice of nine inbred strains showed significant interstrain differences in duration of immobility. The influence of dopaminergic drugs was assessed in six strains characterized by different levels of swimming activity. SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg), an agonist at D1 dopamine receptors, increased swimming activity, while the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) reduced it, the effects being genotype dependent. The involvement of D2 dopamine receptors in the regulation of mouse behaviour in the forced swimming test was not so evident; the D2 agonist bromocriptine (10 mg/kg) produced no significant effect. The D2 agonist quinpirole (2.5 mg/kg) increased immobility in the majority of the mouse strains studied, while in CBA mice it resulted in a marked reduction of immobility. The D2 antagonist sulpiride (20 mg/kg) decreased immobility and increased active swimming only in two strains. The present results suggest a different role for D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the regulation of swimming in the mouse.

Behavioural profile of partial D2 dopamine receptor agonists

The effects of partial D2 dopamine (DA) receptor agonists on the behavioural activation produced by 1.5 and 8.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine were compared with the changes produced by the classical DA antagonist haloperidol. Alterations in behaviour were assessed in standard activity monitoring cages by direct observation of the rats using a rapid time sampling procedure. Haloperidol blocked d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg)-induced increases in photocell counts, ambulation, rearing and sniffing up, and after the highest dose of the DA antagonist the animals were mainly inactive. The partial D2 DA agonist SDZ 208-911 was equipotent to haloperidol in blocking the increase in photocell counts and rearing produced by d-amphetamine. However, even high doses of the drug did not reduce the incidence of sniffing or induce inactivity, but qualitative changes in the form of sniffing did occur. Although considerably less potent, preclamol exerted similar effects to SDZ 208-911. The profiles of SDZ 208-912 and terguride were intermediary to those of SDZ 208-911 and haloperidol. All compounds blocked the repetitive sniffing down produced by 8.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine. After a low dose of haloperidol, these stereotyped behaviours were replaced by a behavioural syndrome similar to that observed with low dose d-amphetamine, but inactivity was observed following a further small increase in antagonist dose. The blockade of stereotypy by SDZ 208-911, preclamol and terguride was accompanied only by the low dose d-amphetamine behavioural syndrome; no inhibition of sniffing or induction of inactivity occurred. SDZ 208-912 exhibited a profile with features very similar to that noted with haloperidol. These findings suggest that partial D2 agonists exert similar, but not identical, behavioural effects to classical DA antagonists when dopaminergic function in increased by d-amphetamine. The differences in behavioural profile are discussed in relation to variations in the intrinsic efficacy of the dopaminergic compounds and to differences in the response capability of D2 receptor populations underlying the different behaviours produced by d-amphetamine.

Molecular cloning and characterization of a high affinity dopamine receptor (D1 beta) and its pseudogene.

We have cloned a novel human intronless gene encoding a G-protein-coupled receptor of the dopamine receptor family. Expression of this receptor in Cos-7 cells led to the high affinity binding of a number of dopamine D1 antagonists, with a binding profile similar to that of the previously described dopamine D1 receptor. In contrast, the agonist binding profile of this new receptor did not exactly match any previously defined dopamine D1 receptor and was notable for its unusually high affinity for dopamine. This new receptor caused a 13-fold increase in adenylylcyclase activity in transfected Cos-7 cells, following addition of dopamine. Messenger RNA encoding this new receptor appears to be widely distributed in the human brain, including cortical regions, choroid plexus, hippocampus, and brain stem. This new receptor appears to be identical to the recently described dopamine D5 receptor. A second closely related gene, GL39, was isolated and shown to represent a pseudogene, the first to be described in the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. This pseudogene exhibits 94% nucleotide sequence homology to the GL30 sequence and may have arisen from a gene duplication event followed by a mutation approximately 8 million years ago, prior to the emergence of man. This recently evolved pseudogene is transcribed in the human brain with a tissue distribution similar to that for its closely related functional gene.

Cannabinoid Receptor‐Regulated Cyclic AMP Accumulation in the Rat Striatum

The present study demonstrates that desacetyllevonantradol, a synthetic cannabinoid analog, reduces cyclic AMP levels in rat striatal slices stimulated with vasoactive intestinal peptide or SKF 38393, a D1-dopamine agonist. Desacetyllevonantradol and the D2 agonist LY 171555 both inhibited D1-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in the striatum. Spiperone, a specific D2-dopamine antagonist, fully reversed the inhibitory effect of LY 171555 but not that of desacetyllevonantradol, indicating that this cannabinoid response is not occurring through a D2-dopaminergic mechanism. Morphine also inhibited cyclic AMP accumulation in striatal slices stimulated with either SKF 38393 or vasoactive intestinal peptide. Naloxone, an opioid antagonist, fully reversed the effect of morphine but not that of desacetyllevonantradol, indicating that cannabinoid drugs are not acting via a mechanism involving opioid receptors. The response to maximally effective concentrations of desacetyllevonantradol was not additive to that of maximally effective concentrations of either morphine or LY 171555, suggesting that dopaminergic, opioid, and cannabinoid receptors may be present on the same populations of cells.

Effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists on cocaine self-administration in the rat

The effect of the selective D1 antagonist, SCH 23390, and the selective D2 antagonist, spiperone, was investigated in rats trained to self-administer intravenous cocaine on a fixed-ratio (FR) 5 schedule of reinforcement. Both SCH 23390 and spiperone pretreatment increased responding up to doses of 10.0 micrograms/kg, and decreased responding at higher doses. Since rate of responding maintained by a drug can be influenced by factors other than its reinforcing efficacy, behavior maintained by cocaine was also investigated under a progressive-ratio schedule. The breaking point obtained under this schedule is used as a measure of the efficacy of the reinforcer and this value is not exclusively determined by response rate. With the progressive-ratio schedule, both SCH 23390 and spiperone produced dose-dependent decreases in the highest ratio completed in rats self-administering cocaine. The results obtained using the FR 5 and progressive-ratio schedules suggest that both D1 and D2 receptors are involved in mediating the reinforcing effects of cocaine.

Effect of typical and atypical neuroleptics on the behavioural consequences of activation by muscimol of mesolimbic and nigro-striatal dopaminergic pathways in the rat

Direct injections of muscimol into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or substantia nigra zona reticulata (SNR) have been used to selectively stimulate the mesolimbic and nigro-striatal dopamine pathways respectively. Such injections induced locomotor activity, rearing, sniffing and in some animals an intermittent grooming response. These responses were rapid in onset, dose-related and relatively short lasting (less than 40 min). Selective increases in dopamine turnover were seen in the nucleus accumbens and in the striatum following VTA and SNR injections of muscimol (100 ng) respectively. Haloperidol inhibited the behavioural consequences of VTA and SNR injections of muscimol with similar potency (ED50S 0.01-0.03 mg/kg IP), and fluphenazine did likewise (ED50S 0.05-0.16 mg/kg IP). However, thioridazine (ED50S VTA: 1.45-2.04 mg/kg IP, SNR 8.50-9.20 mg/kg IP) and in particular clozapine (ED50S VTA: 0.24-0.58 mg/kg IP, SNR: 6.10-9.70 mg/kg IP) were more potent at inhibiting the locomotor activity and sniffing responses due to VTA rather than SNR administered muscimol. Since dopamine D2 antagonists are believed to exert their anti-psychotic effects via an action on mesolimbic dopaminergic systems, and their ability to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) is thought to be due to an action on nigro-striatal dopamine systems, these results suggest that the behavioural models described can be used to predict efficacy and side-effect liability of potential neuroleptic drugs.

Evaluation of a Possible Role for the Dopamine D1and D2Receptors in the Steroid-Dependent Suppression of Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in the Seasonally Anoestrous Ewe

Abstract This study was undertaken to determine whether dopaminergic suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion during seasonal anoestrus in the ewe is mediated via the dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptor. This was tested by 1) assessing the response to dopamine D(1) and D(2) antagonists during seasonal anoestrus, and 2) determining the ability of D(1) and D(2) agonists to suppress pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season. In seasonally anoestrous ewes the D(2) antagonist pimozide increased LH pulse frequency although this effect did not reach significance (P = 0.07). The D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 had no effect on LH pulse frequency. LH pulse amplitude and mean LH were not affected by either treatment. During the breeding season, ovariectomized oestradiol-implanted ewes were injected intracerebroventricularly with vehicle, LY 171555 (dopamine D(2) agonist) and SKF 38393 (D(1) agonist) with each drug tested at 50 mug and 200 mug. At the higher dose, LY 171555 significantly (P<0.05) reduced LH pulse frequency in the 2 h period immediately after treatment. Mean LH declined at both doses but only in the first hour after treatment. SKF 38393 did not affect LH pulse frequency, pulse amplitude or mean LH. These results suggest that the D(1) receptor is not involved in the suppression of pulsatile LH secretion during seasonal anoestrus. Dopaminergic suppression of pulsatile LH secretion is mediated via the D(2) receptor but the significance of this neurotransmitter in the seasonal suppression of LH remains to be elucidated.

Differential agonist profile of the enantiomers of 3‐PPP at striatal dopamine autoreceptors: Dependence on extracellular dopamine

The effects of the enantiomers of 3-hydroxyphenyl-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) at dopamine (DA) synthesis modulating autoreceptors, measured as DOPA accumulation after decarboxylase inhibition, were assessed in vivo and in rat striatal slices. In vivo, (+)-3-PPP inhibited DOPA accumulation in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, and medial prefrontal cortex, whereas (-)-3-PPP either increased (striatal) or had no effect (accumbens, prefrontal cortex), on DOPA accumulation. In vitro, both (+)- and (-)-3-PPP reduced basal DOPA accumulation with a similar order of potency (apparent EC50 = 2.1 and 1.0 microns, respectively) and maximal effect, although they were less potent than the D2 DA receptor agonist quinpirole (EC50 = 0.15 microM). The inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylation was also observed in slices obtained from reserpine-pretreated rats and was blocked by the selective D2 DA antagonist (-)-sulpiride. This suggests that 3-PPP inhibition of DOPA accumulation was mediated directly by stimulation of DA D2 receptors. Increasing the amount of extracellular DA by depolarizing slices with 30 mM K+ did not alter the qualitative effects of either quinpirole or (+)-3-PPP. However, the stimulation of DA autoreceptors by (-)-3-PPP was no longer apparent under conditions of elevated extracellular DA. Under these depolarizing conditions, (-)-3-PPP actually antagonized the inhibitory effect afforded by either quinpirole or pergolide. A similar switch in profile was observed with transdihydrolisuride (TDHL). The data support the notion that (-)-3-PPP and TDHL are partial agonists at synthesis modulating DA autoreceptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cocaine self-administration is increased by both D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists

Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine on a fixed-ratio 5 schedule of reinforcement with a 1-min time-out period following each infusion. Cocaine was available at doses of either 0.1, 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg/infusion. A low dose (3 μg/kg) of the D1 antagonist SCH23390 caused an increase in cocaine self-administration which was more prominent at higher, as compared to lower, doses of cocaine. Higher doses of SCH23390 generally caused decreases in self-administration which may in part be due to the response-decreasing properties of this agent. The D2 antagonist spiperone generally caused an increase in self-administration of cocaine. These data suggest that cocaine reinforcement depends upon both D1 and D2 receptor subtypes.

The amphetamine conditioned place preference: differential involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes and two dopaminergic terminal areas

We investigated involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes and two dopaminergic terminal areas in the acquisition and the expression of the amphetamine conditioned place preference (CPP). When injected systemically before conditioning, both D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists blocked acquisition in a dose-dependent manner. When injected systemically before testing, the effects of the same D1 and D2 antagonists differed. The selective D1 antagonist SCH23390 dose-dependently blocked expression of the previously established conditioned behavior within the dose range that also blocked acquisition. In contrast, D2 antagonists failed to block expression of the amphetamine CPP at doses which blocked acquisition. Expression was, however, blocked by higher doses of D2 antagonists, which may have lost their selectivity for the D2 dopamine receptor. The expression of the CPP was also blocked by microinjections of SCH23390 or sulpiride into nucleus accumbens, but not into striatum. In a control experiment, sodium pentobarbital, which significantly reduced spontaneous locomotor activity in a manner similar to the higher doses of the dopamine antagonists, had no effect on the expression of the amphetamine CPP when given before testing. Finally, electrolytic lesions of the dorsal striatum potentiated the amphetamine CPP. These findings indicate that the dopamine released by amphetamine interacts with both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors to establish a CPP, but that the expression of the CPP may involve activation of the D1 dopamine receptor in the nucleus accumbens.

Selective dopamine antagonists reduce nicotine self-administration

The effects of selective D1 (SCH23390) and D2 (spiperone) dopamine antagonists, as well as of haloperidol, were examined on nicotine self-administration, food-maintained responding, and locomotor activity in rats. Antagonists reduced both operant responding and locomotor activity. Response patterns indicated that motor impairment was not the cause of the decreases, since responding was attenuated only in the latter half of operant sessions. Locomotor activity scores were significantly reduced by SCH23390, but not by spiperone. The effects of dopamine antagonists on nicotine self-administration are different from the effects of these antagonists on cocaine self-administration. Results are discussed in terms of the role of dopamine in drug reinforcement versus its role in sensorimotor integration.

The new selective dopamine D2 antagonist, remoxipride, in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: A Canadian multicenter trial

The new selective dopamine D2 antagonist, remoxipride, in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: A Canadian multicenter trial

Blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys with the D1 dopamine antagonists SCH-39166 and A-66359

Rhesus monkeys were trained in a 2-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate cocaine (0.2 or 0.4mg/kg, i.m., 10min pre-session) from saline. Before test sessions, in which responding on either lever was reinforced, the monkeys were injected with various doses of cocaine alone or in combination with the D(1) dopamine antagonists SCH-39166 or A-66359. Administration of cocaine alone (0.025-0.4mg/kg, i.m.) resulted in a dose-related increase in the percent of responses that occurred on the drug-appropriate lever. Both SCH-39166 (0.05-0.1mg/kg, i.m., 60min pre-session) and A-66359 (0.2-0.4mg/kg, i.m., 30min pre-session) reduced cocaine-appropriate responding from more than 80% to less than 20% at least at one dose combination in all monkeys. Also for both drugs and in all monkeys, the blockade was overcome by increasing the dose of cocaine. SCH-39166 was more potent and longer acting than A-66359. The results provide further evidence that D(1) dopamine receptors are involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and that D(1) antagonists may block the subjective effects of cocaine.

On the selection of mice for haloperidol response and non-response

Mice have been selected over eight generations for response and non-response to haloperidol-induced catalepsy. The selection has been asymmetric, with significantly faster divergence for the haloperidol non-responder (HNR) line as compared to the haloperidol responder (HR) line. After six generations of selection, the ED50 in the HNR line was 4.3 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg in the HR line. Spiroperidol, fluphenazine and trifluoperazine showed a 10-fold or greater discrimination between lines. Raclopride, a specific dopamine D2 antagonist, showed a 7-fold discrimination between lines. Chlorpromazine, thiothixene, (+) butaclamol and cis-flupenthixol showed a 3-4-fold discrimination between lines. The specific D1 antagonist, SCH 23390, was the most potent cataleptogenic agent tested (ED50 = 0.1 mg/kg) and did not discriminate between the lines. The HR and HNR lines did not differ in post-synaptic D2 receptor affinity or density as assessed by quantitative receptor autoradiography and membrane binding assays. However, A-9 somatodendritic receptor density was 80% higher in the HNR line as compared to the HR line.

Effects of dopamine D-sub-1 and dopamine D-sub-2 antagonists on the free feeding and drinking patterns of rats.

In male rats with food and water freely available, the specific dopamine D2 antagonist YM-09151-2 had little effect on total food or water intake across a 24-hr period. However, it produced a substantial dose-related decrease in feeding rate during meals and an enhancement of both meal size and duration. The equivalent parameters for water intake were affected to a much lesser extent. A second dopamine D2 antagonist, remoxipride, had similar effects on feeding patterns and, in addition, raised food intake during the 2 hr after drug administration. A third dopamine D2 antagonist, raclopride, produced a short-lived rise in food intake and a slowing of feeding rate with a nonsignificant increase in meal size at intermediate doses. Higher doses increased the latency to feed and drink. The specific D1 antagonist SCH 23390 had small effects on both total food intake and feeding patterns. Water intake was substantially reduced in the first 2-4 hr after drug administration by an increased latency to drink. The results are interpreted, first of all, in terms of two separate effects of dopamine D2 receptors on feeding behavior: the first mediating positive feedback processes important at meal initiation and the second mediating the preabsorptive effects of food on meal termination. D1 receptors, in contrast, are of greater importance in controlling water intake.

Effects of dopamine D₁ and dopamine D₂ antagonists on the free feeding and drinking patterns of rats.

Effects of dopamine D₁ and dopamine D₂ antagonists on the free feeding and drinking patterns of rats.

2-Phenylethylamine and Methamphetamine Enhance the Spinal Monosynaptic Reflex by Releasing Noradrenaline from the Terminals of Descending Fibers

Experiments were performed on spinalized rats transected at C1. Intravenous administration of 2-phenylethylamine-HCl (PEA-HC1) (0.3 and 1 mg/kg, i.v.) and methamphetamine-HCI (MAP-HC1) (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.v.) increased the amplitude of the monosynaptic reflex (MSR). The increase of the MSR caused by PEA and MAP was antagonized by prazosin-HCl and abolished by the pretreatment with reserpine (i.p.) and 6-hydroxydopamine (intracisternally, 14 days previously). A dopamine D1 antagonist, SK<F 83566-HBr (0.01 mg/kg, i.v.), and a D2 antagonist, YM-09151-2 (0.3 mg/kg, i.v.), did not antagonize the increasing effects produced by PEA and MAP. An inhibitor of type-B monoamine oxidase, (—)deprenyl-HCl (1 mg/kg, i.v.), prolonged the effect of PEA but not that of MAP, suggesting that PEA alone, and not its metabolites, enhanced the MSR. These results suggest that PEA and MAP increase the amplitude of the MSR by releasing noradrenaline from the terminals of descending noradrenergic fibers, and that PEA, an endogenous trace amine, has a mechanism of action similar to that of MAP.