Donation Rates Research Articles

Rate of Deceased Kidney Donation From Potential In-Hospital Deaths in the US, 2003-2021

This cross-sectional study calculates deceased kidney donation rates in the US using deaths compatible with donation as the metric’s denominator.

A Survey of Community Perceptions on Brain Donation for Research.

Postmortem brain donation for medical research is a little-known form of organ donation. While most brain research is carried out using animal models, many neurological diseases are uniquely human. Greater availability of human postmortem brain tissue from diseased individuals and controls would therefore improve the development of treatments for neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases. Globally, organ donation for medical research is dwarfed by organ donation for transplantation. In 2021, 36% of Australians were registered organ donors for transplantation, with public "in-principle" support even higher, at 76%. In contrast, there are little data on Australian or international brain donation rates for research. A 30-item online survey was conducted to ascertain knowledge of, and attitudes toward, brain donation in Australia. Of the respondents, 12/237 (5%) were current brain donors and excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 225, 75% were registered organ donors for transplant. The vast majority (n = 189/225, 84%) of respondents supported or strongly supported the principle of brain donation. However, of those registered for transplantation or whole-body donors, 93/170 (55%) were not aware that brain donation was possible, while 50%, alternatively or also, thought that registering as an organ donor for transplantation rendered them a brain donor by default. Only 9/225 (4%) respondents indicated that they would definitely not donate their brain in the future, while 27 remained unsure. There is prominent public support for brain donation in Australia, with 84% of respondents willing to donate their brain. Yet, the extent of public misconceptions on brain donation for research suggests the need for further education on all types of organ donation, so individuals may make informed decisions.

Engineered composite dressing with exudate management capabilities for the process of entire wound healing

A timely antibacterial dressing that can adapt to dynamic wound environments poses a significant challenge in burn research and management. Herein, a four-layered composite dressing is reported. At its core, it features a modified micropore arrayed Janus membrane with a super-hydrophobic polyurethane layer on one side and a super-hydrophilic hydrogel on the other. This unique design enables the dressing to maintain stable and durable self-pumping capabilities, effectively transferring wound exudate to the upper foam layer. The self-pumping rate exceeds that of traditional foam dressings, being approximately 1.39 times more efficient in absorbing excess wound exudate. The composite dressing demonstrates an impressive water donation capacity when tested on 45% gelatin-simulated skin, achieving a water donation rate of (59.20 ± 2.66)%. Furthermore, the water vapor permeability of the composite dressing outperforms hydrocolloids by approximately 3.66 times. Additionally, the composite dressing, when loaded with super-hydrophilic nanometer zinc oxide, exhibits a potent antibacterial effect. The dressing's surface reduces cellular, platelet, fibrinogen, and bovine serum albumin adhesion, reducing the risk of tissue adhesion. During a 20-day trial covering deep II-degree burn wounds, the dressing demonstrated excellent biocompatibility. It effectively compresses the inflammatory phase, promotes vascularization, and significantly accelerates the regeneration of skin accessory organs. This innovative dressing exhibits great potential for use throughout the entire wound-healing process in future burn treatments.

(147) Analysis of Sexual Dysfunction Development among Male and Female Living Kidney Donors

Abstract Introduction The need for kidney donations in patients with end-stage kidney disease has continued to exceed the number of deceased donor transplants, signifying the need for the continued growth, sustainability, and success of living kidney donation. Following donation, living kidney donors have excellent survival rates with mixed data regarding long-term outcomes of renal failure, hypertension, and proteinuria. However, no studies to our knowledge have looked at differences in the development of long-term sexual dysfunction following living kidney donation, a potentially serious quality of life issue. Objective To analyze differences in five-year sexual dysfunction outcomes among male and female living kidney donors using the US Collaborative Network within the TriNetX database, a federated network of EMR data from multiple healthcare organizations across the United States. Methods We used the TriNetX database to perform a propensity score-matched cohort study comparing five-year outcomes of sexual dysfunction development among adult (≥18) male living kidney donors (Male) and female living kidney donors (Female) from December 2013 to December 2022. Living kidney donors were defined as the presence of one diagnostic code and one procedural code. Patients were excluded from the study if they had any instance of diagnosed transplant status (by ICD-10) or transplantation procedures (by CPT) prior to the kidney donor status. Patients were matched on age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, personal history of genitourinary disease, presence of urogenital implants, mood disorders, BMI, tobacco and alcohol use, and problems related to lifestyle and socioeconomic circumstances. Primary outcomes analysis included 5-year hazard ratio of diagnosed decreased libido, sexual dysfunction (composite of new diagnosed male ED, vaginismus/dyspareunia, infertility, orgasmic disorders, arousal/desire disorders, or unspecified), UTI, and STDs. Secondary outcomes included sex counseling or problems in relationship with spouse or partner. Results There were 2,821 patients in each cohort after matching (Male, Female). Mean age of the cohort was 42.7 ± 12.7, 73.3% were White, and 10.8% were Hispanic/Latino (p >0.05). At 5-years, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the Male donor cohort had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) than Female donors for sexual dysfunction (HR: 3.006, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.761,5.131). Between the cohorts, 39 (1%) Male patients developed ED and ~10 (<1%) Female patients developed vaginismus/dyspareunia within 5 years. No significant difference was found for the development of sexual arousal disorders/desire disorders (0.17% vs 0.06%, p = 0.052), orgasmic disorders (0.03% vs 0.03%, p = 0.99), decreased libido (0.48% vs 0.85%, p =0.94) and STD’s (0.72% vs 0.89%, p = 0.70). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found for the 5-year hazard of need for sex counseling or interpersonal relationship issues. Conclusions In our analysis of this large, real-world database, we found that male living kidney donors had higher rates of sexual dysfunction development 5-years post-living kidney donation. While living kidney donation is a safe, viable, and excellent alternative to deceased kidney donation, clinicians and living donors should both be aware about the potential association of developing sexual dysfunction post-donation. Disclosure No.

Overview of the current situation of embryo donation in Belgian fertility centers

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to survey the current situation in Belgium regarding embryo donation (ED) practices and to explore the potential reasons for not offering this treatment option. Study designA questionnaire was sent to all fertility centers in Belgium that are allowed to perform IVF regarding whether or not they perform ED for third parties, their overall experience with ED and the possible reasons for not doing it. The questionnaire was divided into three different sections, depending on whether the center currently performs ED for third parties, has never performed it or once performed it but no longer does. All respondents were anonymized. ResultsThe questionnaire was returned by 16 out of 18 centers.Only three out of 16 centers currently perform ED. All these centers require additional actions before ED can be performed. Sometimes ED is not performed although it was indicated in the contract; the most important reasons are the need for additional investigations, the administrative obstacles and the non-eligibility of the embryos. Between 2017 and 2021, few ED were performed in these centers (n = 2, 38 and 6).Eight out of 16 centers previously offered ED but ceased. In two centers, patients who want to donate their supernumerary embryos are referred for treatment to a center where ED is performed, but none of these centers transfer embryos to a center performing ED.The main reasons for discontinuing ED were the additional investigations required and the unprofitable investment in time and personnel.Five out of 16 centers never offered ED. At one center, patients who still indicate ED for their supernumerary embryos are referred to a center performing ED. The reduction of the administrative burden and avoiding additional testing are the most indicated measures that could facilitate the introduction of an ED program. ConclusionsEmbryo donation, although legally allowed, is currently hardly performed in Belgium. The reasons for this are mainly associated to additional mandatory post-hoc testing and the extra administrative burden which is not financially covered. Poor transparency and communication between Belgian centers may be an additional factor explaining the country’s low embryo donation rate.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Intention to Donate Organs among the Public, Health Sciences Students and Health Personnel: A Scoping Review with a Systematic Review of Malaysian Studies.

Various barriers lead to a shortage of organs for transplantation in Malaysia. One drive to improve the organ donation rate operates through future healthcare practitioners and practitioner advocacy. This scoping review was carried out to establish and summarise findings about organ donation-related articles among the public, health sciences students and health personnel. A further aim was to synthesise the latest data on knowledge and attitudes towards organ donation in the Malaysian population. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Malaysian Medical Repository (MyMedR) were used for a search conducted up to May 2022. Relevant search terms included 'Organ donation' and 'Malaysia'. Journal articles related to knowledge, attitudes and intention were grouped under the general public and health science. Students and health personnel were included. Eligible studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. The 31 included articles revealed an increased level of awareness among the public regarding organ donation. The analysis identified that nonrecognition of brainstem death (38.5%), no knowledge of how to contact the Organ Transplant Coordinator (82.3%) and never approaching the families of a potential donor (63.9%) led to a lack of confidence among healthcare practitioners to promote organ donation. The shortage of organ donors is the result of the failure to identify the expected donor, obtain consent and procure the organs due to the passivity of Malaysian health professionals in promoting the organ donation process.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of blood donation among undergraduate medical students in Syria.

Timely transfusion of blood products is crucial, particularly in critical medical situations. Inadequate blood donation rates pose a significant threat to public health, potentially compromising patient care. This study aims to investigate the attitudes and willingness of Syrian college students to engage in blood donation, assess the prevalence of voluntary blood donation, evaluate their understanding of the determinants and procedures involved in the donation process, and identify the key factors influencing their behavior. A cross-sectional study was conducted employing a self-administered questionnaire, distributed in both electronic and hard copy formats among college students. Data analysis was performed using the R Statistical Software. Results were presented in terms of odds ratios (OR), with statistical significance defined at a P value of .05 and a 95% confidence interval. A total of 673 medical students participated in this study, with an average age of 21.6 years. The majority (59.2%) reported a good economic status, and a high level of knowledge (99.7%). A substantial proportion (40.4%) agreed with the notion that blood donation constitutes a personal duty for every eligible individual. Multiple comparison tests revealed a statistically significant P value of .0009716, specifically concerning individuals with low economic status. Our study demonstrates a positive attitude among college students towards voluntary blood product donation. However, the majority have not engaged in voluntary activities unless mandated for specific certification purposes. Donation rates were relatively higher than the reported rates in other similar studies conducted in Middle Eastern countries.

Voluntary blood donation preferences in China: A discrete choice experiment among experienced and inexperienced donors.

Due partly to an ageing population, China faces an increasingly dire blood shortage crisis requiring greater voluntary blood donations. A better understanding of blood donation preferences can inform blood donation policies and potentially increase donations. We used an online survey and discrete choice experiment to achieve our study objective: identify the most influential structural facilitators and barriers to voluntary blood donation in China. First, we identified six structural attributes (travel time, venue, donation volume, paid leave, scheduling and gifts) that were hypothesized to influence voluntary blood donation; attribute selection was based on a literature review and qualitative interviews. Second, a d-efficient design with 36 choice sets and 9 blocks was developed. Participants were asked to complete four choice sets, and in each choice set, they were asked to choose from three options: two voluntary blood donation scenarios and a 'Do not donate blood' option. Study participants were recruited through an online survey platform company in China. Voluntary blood donation preferences and preferences by blood donation history were estimated with random-parameter logit models and interaction terms. In 2022, 1185 individuals enrolled in the study. Most participants had college education (92%). Generally, participants preferred longer paid leave, lower blood donation volumes and gifts after donation. Based on interaction analyses, experienced and inexperienced donors exhibited similar preferences. Campaigns to increase voluntary blood donation rates in China should consider implementing paid leave after voluntary blood donation, lower blood donation volumes and small gifts conferred after donation.

Blood transfusions per hospitalization in the local public health network of Belo Horizonte between 2008 and 2021: A time series analysis

Background: Blood transfusion rates are increasing worldwide. This work was a longitudinal retrospective study conducted with data referent to the use of blood components between January 2008 and December 2021 in the local public health network of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, at Hospital Risoleta Tolentino Neves (HRTN), Hospital Metropolitano Dr. Célio de Castro (HMDCC), and Hospital Metropolitano Odilon Behrens (HMOB). Objective: This study sought to describe the time series of the number of blood transfusions and blood transfusion rates per general hospitalization through a time series analysis. Methods: Through data from the Hospital Information System of the Unified Health System (HIS-SUS), this study formulated six monthly time series of the number of blood transfusions and blood transfusion rates per hospitalization. The stationarity, trend, and seasonality of the time series were verified by the unit root test, using the Mann-Kendall and the Fisher tests, respectively. The normality hypothesis of the data was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test. All of the statistical tests considered a significance level of 5%. Results: The average monthly blood transfusion rates per hospitalization observed in this study were 45.5%, 26.9%, and 26.3% at HRTN, HMDCC, and HMOB, respectively. The highest decrease in the number of blood transfusions was observed at HMDCC and the highest decrease in blood transfusion rates was observed at HRTN. Packed red blood cells were the most commonly used blood component at HRTN, HMOB, and HMDCC (54.6%, 58.3%, and 65.4%, respectively). The time series showed that they were non-stationary, with a downward trend and the presence of a 12-month seasonal component. Conclusion: The decline in the number of blood transfusions should be considered a positive phenomenon in public health due to best use and quality management, since a decrease in blood donation rates was also observed.

Old for young kidney transplantation: a responsible option for our patients to reduce waiting time?

PurposeThe Eurotransplant Senior program allocating grafts from donors ≥ 65 years to recipients aged ≥ 65 years has proven good results within the last 20 years. However, “old” grafts are also allocated to younger recipients < 65 years, and this outcome of “old for young” kidney transplantations (KT) still lacks detailed investigations.MethodsAll “old for young” KT performed at four tertiary referral centers were retrospectively compared including a recent follow-up, stratifying for “old for young” (donor ≥ 65 years to recipient < 65 years) vs. “very old for young” KT (donor ≥ 70 years to recipient < 65 years).ResultsOverall, 99 patients were included with 56 (56.6%) “old for young” and 43 (43.4%) “very old for young” KT. The median waiting time did not differ (60.7 vs. 45.8 months, respectively) at comparable living donation rates (57.1% vs. 44.2%) as well as intra- and postoperative results. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 1; 133), the 3-year graft survival of 91% vs. 87% did not significantly vary. In subgroup analyses assessing living donation or donation after brain death (DBD) KT only, the graft survival was significantly longer for “old for young” KT within the living donation subgroup. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the presence of panel-reactive antibodies was the only significant impact factor on graft survival (HR 8.32, p = 0.001).ConclusionThis analysis clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the "old for young" approach, enabling favorable perioperative results as well as comparable data of graft- and overall survival, while reducing waiting time for eligible patients.

The impact of blood donation deferral strategies on the eligibility of men who have sex with men and other sexual risk behavior in Australia.

In Australia, a man cannot donate blood if he has had sex with another man within the past 3 months. However, this policy has been criticized as being discriminatory as it does not consider lower risk subgroups, and led to calls for modifications to the policy that more accurately distinguish risk among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). We used data from a nationally representative survey to estimate the proportion of GBM aged 18-74 years old who would be eligible to donate under current criteria and other scenarios. Among the 5178 survey participants, 155 (3.0%) were classified as GBM based on survey responses, Among the GBM, 40.2% (95% CI 28.0%-53.7%) were eligible to donate based on current criteria, and 21.0% (95% CI 14.5%-29.5%) were ineligible due to the 3 months deferral alone. Eligibility among GBM, all men, and the population increased as criteria were removed. Under the new Australian plasma donation criteria, 73.6% (95% CI 64.4%-81.1%) of GBM, 68.4% (95% CI 65.5%-71.2%) of all men, and 60.8% (95% CI 58.8%-62.8%) of the full population were estimated to be eligible. Only 16.1% (95% CI 8.6%-28.1%) of GBM knew that the male-to-male sex deferral period is 3 months. Changing the deferral criteria and sexual risk evaluation would lead to a higher proportion of GBM being eligible to donate blood. Knowledge of the current GBM deferral period is very low. Improved education about the current criteria and any future changes are required to improve blood donation rates.

(269) Analysis of Sexual Dysfunction Development Among Male and Female Living Kidney Donors

Abstract Introduction The need for kidney donations in patients with end-stage kidney disease has continued to exceed the number of deceased donor transplants, signifying the need for the continued growth, sustainability, and success of living kidney donation. Following donation, living kidney donors have excellent survival rates with mixed data regarding long-term outcomes of renal failure, hypertension, and proteinuria. However, no studies to our knowledge have looked at differences in the development of long-term sexual dysfunction following living kidney donation, a potentially serious quality of life issue. Objective To analyze differences in five-year sexual dysfunction outcomes among male and female living kidney donors using the US Collaborative Network within the TriNetX database, a federated network of EMR data from multiple healthcare organizations across the United States. Methods We used the TriNetX database to perform a propensity score-matched cohort study comparing five-year outcomes of sexual dysfunction development among adult (≥18) male living kidney donors (Male) and female living kidney donors (Female) from December 2013 to December 2022. Living kidney donors were defined as the presence of one diagnostic code and one procedural code. Patients were excluded from the study if they had any instance of diagnosed transplant status (by ICD-10) or transplantation procedures (by CPT) prior to the kidney donor status. Patients were matched on age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, personal history of genitourinary disease, presence of urogenital implants, mood disorders, BMI, tobacco and alcohol use, and problems related to lifestyle and socioeconomic circumstances. Primary outcomes analysis included 5-year hazard ratio of diagnosed decreased libido, sexual dysfunction (composite of new diagnosed male ED, vaginismus/dyspareunia, infertility, orgasmic disorders, arousal/desire disorders, or unspecified), UTI, and STDs. Secondary outcomes included sex counseling or problems in relationship with spouse or partner. Results There were 2,821 patients in each cohort after matching (Male, Female). Mean age of the cohort was 42.7 ± 12.7, 73.3% were White, and 10.8% were Hispanic/Latino (p &amp;gt;0.05). At 5-years, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the Male donor cohort had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) than Female donors for sexual dysfunction (HR: 3.006, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.761,5.131). Between the cohorts, 39 (1%) Male patients developed ED and ~10 (&amp;lt;1%) Female patients developed vaginismus/dyspareunia within 5 years. No significant difference was found for the development of sexual arousal disorders/desire disorders (0.17% vs 0.06%, p = 0.052), orgasmic disorders (0.03% vs 0.03%, p = 0.99), decreased libido (0.48% vs 0.85%, p =0.94) and STD’s (0.72% vs 0.89%, p = 0.70). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found for the 5-year hazard of need for sex counseling or interpersonal relationship issues. Conclusions In our analysis of this large, real-world database, we found that male living kidney donors had higher rates of sexual dysfunction development 5-years post-living kidney donation. While living kidney donation is a safe, viable, and excellent alternative to deceased kidney donation, clinicians and living donors should both be aware about the potential association of developing sexual dysfunction post-donation. Disclosure No.

Factors influencing deceased organ donation rates in OECD countries: a panel data analysis

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate factors with a significant influence on deceased organ donation rates in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and determine their relative importance. It...

Improving value delivery in living donor kidney transplant through process improvement.

Living donor kidney evaluation has substantial time variations with significant intercenter variation. One-day donor evaluation has shown to be clinically efficient and improve transplant rates. However, patients' perception of 1-day evaluation is unknown. We hypothesized that 1 day LKD evaluation will improve patient satisfaction and improve living donation rates. All interested LD candidates from April 2018 to May 2020 were enrolled in the study. Non-directed donors, donors greater than 60 years old, and recipients with more than three donors underwent multi-day evaluation (control group) while the rest underwent 1-day evaluation (intervention group). An anonymous survey was filled by both groups to assess their perceptions on different areas including time, communication, experience, information provided, and their preferences on living donor evaluation. Donor candidates in the 1-day evaluation group selected that the time from the questionnaire to clinic evaluation took "under 1 month" or "less than 3 months" (62.5%vs. 15.8%, p=.002), with "excellent" for both scheduling process (65%vs. 31.6%, p=.03) and communication (82.5%vs. 57.9%, p=.09) when compared to candidates in the multiple-days evaluation group. One-day candidates felt "very satisfied" with the overall experience (95%vs. 68.4%, p=.02) and felt "extremely well" with the information provided regarding the living donor process (87.5%vs. 47.4%, p=.003) when compared to multiple-day evaluation group. Regardless of the group, 53 (89.8%) patients preferred 1-day evaluation. We demonstrate 1-day living donor evaluation is efficient, patient preferred, and adds value through improved communication, and better overall patient satisfaction.

Combining living and deceased donation for pediatric first isolated liver transplantation: A win-win even in countries with high deceased donor donation rates.

Split and living donor liver transplantations are both key surgical strategies for development of pediatric liver transplant programs. Often, however, teams tend to prioritize only one preferentially. In the context of a very active national split liver graft allocation program (Italy), retrospective study of 226 consecutive pediatric first isolated liver transplants performed by a single team using organs from both deceased and living donors. Clinical characterisitics and outcome were compared. In the context of a steadily slowly decreasing split graft offer, living donation activity steadily increased. Deceased and living donation accounted for 52.6% and 47.4% of transplantations, respectively. Both strategies were equally used for transplanting patients up to 30 kg of weight, while deceased donors were predominantly used for older recipients. Technical variants represented 86% of all transplants, with 183 conisting of left lateral segment grafts (76 split liver grafts and 107 left grafts from living donors). Outcome of both surgical strategies was similar, with excellent outcomes at early, mid-, and long-term. Splitting livers of deceased donors and using living donation were complementary and non-competitive strategies for developping pediatric liver transplant activity. Implementing both activities in parallell allowed to maintain stable the number of annual transplant in Italy and allowed to reach superior outcomes. This analysis provides evidence that living donation plays a role in Italy despite an existing very active "mandatory-split" national policy.

Motivational Factors in Blood Donation - A Systematic Review

The primary motivating factor for blood donation is altruism and its derivatives, such as empathy and social responsibility. However, no conclusive answers were obtained from the analysis of these articles, indicating the need for further studies focused on this topic. In Brazil, blood donation is voluntary, unpaid, and anonymous. Despite being a reference in Latin America for improving voluntary donation rates and expanding the age range of potential donors, there are still many challenges related to this practice, as only 1.9% of the Brazilian population are blood donors. This article aims to identify, through a literature review, the main motivations for blood donation. For this purpose, a systematic review was conducted, including studies published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish between 2013 and 2023, from the PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS databases, using MeSH queries with the descriptors “blood donors,” “donor motivation,” and “motivation.” Original articles and review articles were included. A total of 207 articles were identified in February and March 2023, and after applying the inclusion criteria, 25 articles were selected for the study. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO- CRD42023431808) and concluded that the main motivator for blood donation was altruism and its “derivatives,” such as empathy and social responsibility. No conclusive answers were obtained from the analysis of these articles, which necessitates further studies on this topic

Impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Final Rule on Organ Procurement Organization Metrics and Procedural Trends in the Procurement of Pancreata for Research.

Pancreata recovered for research are included as a success (or positive) in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) donation and organ transplantation rate metrics for recertification of organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Given these metrics directly incentivize recovery of pancreata for research, this study tracks trends in recovery of pancreata for research across the implementation of the CMS metrics. In the 26 months before the December 2, 2020, publication of the CMS metrics, research pancreata as a percent of organs transplanted, including research pancreata, was 1.7% nationally, including as much as 10.8% of organs transplanted within any OPO. In the 26 months after the CMS metrics were published, research pancreata increased to 5.1% of organs counted as transplants nationally, including as much as 20.3% within any OPO. If research pancreata were excluded from the CMS metrics, 6 OPOs would change their CMS evaluation status for recertification purposes: 2 would move up a tier and 4 would move down a tier. Procurement of research pancreata has increased since the publication of the CMS performance metrics, OPOs vary in their recovery of pancreata for research, and recovery of pancreata for research can affect recertification of OPOs.

The right to know from the opt-out effectiveness system perspective in organ transplantation cases.

Aim: This article examines the legal challenges associated with opt-out and opt-in systems in transplantation cases. It focuses on the low public knowledge and awareness of the national transplantation system, assessing its compliance with international prerequisites for an opt-out system. The analysis centres on the "right to know" perspective and the effectiveness of opt-out in organ transplantation. . Materials and Methods: The research methodology includes scientific principles, public surveys, relevant regulations from the Republic of Latvia and EU, and grey literature on the health system and organ donation in the EU. Scientific articles from databases such as Scopus and WOS were selected based on criteria such as language (English and Latvian) and focus on living wills and comparisons of organ donation systems. Previous EU and national studies, reports, and court judgments were used to analyse data on opt-in and opt-out transplantation systems and policy efficiency in organ transplantation. Conclusions: Individuals' right to autonomy over their bodies extends even after death, encompassing the right to integrity. Organ donation, being a deeply personal choice reflecting one's values and beliefs, plays a crucial role in saving lives through transplantation. To enhance cooperation and donation rates, international regulations stress the significance of public awareness regarding organ and tissue transplantation. Unfortunately, inadequate compliance by authorities and low awareness pose ethical and legal dilemmas, potentially violating constitutional rights. Reports highlight limited public understanding of transplantation systems, raising concerns, particularly in opt-out systems. National governments bear the responsibility of safeguarding these rights and addressing challenges beyond legal means, thus establishing a more ethical organ donation system that upholds voluntariness, generosity, and individual autonomy.

Knowledge Exchange Program to Increase the Organ Donation Rates in Saudi Arabia.

The present study presents the results of a collaborative program in Saudi Arabia, aiming to improve deceased organ donation rates. Launched in 2017, the program involved implementing a training program and quality management system in conjunction with the Donation and Transplantation Institute and the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation. The study summarizes 2 phases of the program, including the implementation of key performance indicators and a continuous improvement plan. Results revealed a 198% increase in potential donor detection and a 44% increase in donation rates in the pilot program. The second phase, applying a 3-level methodology in selected hospitals, led to a 40% increase in utilized organ donors. The creation of in-hospital organ donation units showed the best results, and the program emphasizes the importance of continuous training and quality management to achieve optimal organ donation outcomes.

Are Differences in Living Kidney Donation Rates a Sex or a Gender Disparity?

Sex-disaggregated data reveal significant disparities in living kidney donation, with more female than male living kidney donors in most countries and proportions over 60% in some countries. We summarize the present state of knowledge with respect to the potential drivers of this disparity and argue that it is primarily driven by gender-related factors. First, we present the differences between sex and gender and then proceed to summarize the potential medical reasons that have been proposed to explain why males are less likely to be living kidney donors than females, such as the higher prevalence of kidney failure in males. We then present counterarguments as to why biological sex differences are not enough to explain lower living kidney donation among males, such as a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease among females, which could affect donation rates. We argue that gender differences likely provide a better explanation as to why there are more women than men living kidney donors and explore the role of economic and social factors, as well as gender roles and expectations, in affecting living kidney donation among both men and women. We conclude with the need for a gender analysis to explain this complex psychosocial phenomenon in living kidney donation.