Wave Dominant Follicle Research Articles

Characteristics of corpus luteum formed from the first wave dominant follicle following hCG in cattle

Two experiments were conducted to characterize the development and function of corpus luteum (CL) induced by hCG. In Experiment 1, cows (n = 18) were randomly assigned either to serve as controls (CONT, n = 6) or to receive hCG on Day 7 with (hCG-LUT, n = 6), or without (hCG-CONT, n = 6) surgical removal of the spontaneous CL on Day 12. The diameters of the hCG-induced and spontaneous CL of similar age did not differ (P > 0.05) between Days 1 and 4. At Day 5, the CONT (spontaneous) CL diameter (29.3 ± 1.4 mm) was larger (P < 0.05) than that of the hCG-LUT (24.5 ± 1.5 mm) or the hCG-CONT (24.6 ± 1.7 mm) induced CL. Similarly, induced CL diameter for hCG-LUT and hCG-CONT groups was smaller (P < 0.01) than the CONT (spontaneous) CL between Days 10 to 14. Plasma progesterone (P 4) levels were not different (P > 0.05) among treatment groups until Day 12. On Day 14, the P 4 concentration of hCG-LUT cows decreased (P < 0.01) to 1.1 ± 0.9 ng/ml, then increased to 3.1 ± 0.9 ng/ml by Day 18. Comparative values for hCG-CONT and CONT cows were 5.8 ± 0.8 and 4.2 ± 0.8; 4.5 ± 0.8 and 5.5 ± 0.8 ng/ml, respectively. The onset of regression of CL as well as estrous cycle length were similar (P > 0.05) for all treatment groups. In Experiment 2, the effects of intrauterine infusion of indomethacin on the diameter, function and life span of hCG-induced CL were examined. A slight, albeit not significant, suppression of PGFM levels was observed in indomethacin-infused cows (n = 4) compared with the controls (n = 4) in blood samples obtained once a day during the infusion period. However, in 2 cows from which blood samples were collected every 6 h, the control cow showed several pulses of PGFM while the indomethacin-treated cow exhibited none. Induced CL diameter and lifespan were not affected by indomethacin infusion. However, mean P 4 levels were higher (P < 0.05) between Days 16 and 20 in the indomethacin-infused group. In conclusion, the results suggest that 1) hCG-induced CL are functional but appear to be smaller and secrete less P 4 than spontaneous CL of similar age, and 2) the small size and reduced secretary function observed is not necessarily due to PGF 2α secreted by the uterine endometrium but, probably, to inherent characteristics.

Effect of season on follicular dynamics and plasma concentrations of estradiol-17β, progesterone and luteinizing hormone in lactating Holstein cows

Lactating Holstein cows (n=16), averaging 64.1 d in milk, were utilized over 4 replicate months (April, June, August and November) in a shade management system to examine the effects of season on follicular dynamics and plasma concentrations of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Cows were synchronized to estrus using a combination of Buserelin (GnRH, 8 ug) and prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α, 25 mg) given 7 d apart. Follicular development was monitored daily by ultrasonography, and plasma concentrations of E2, P4 and LH measured by radioimmunoassay. The replicate month had no detectable effects on estrus interval (3.1 ± 0.3 d) or percentage of cows (78.1 ± 9.4%) that expressed estrus following GnRH and PGF2α treatment. Preovulatory follicles grew at faster rates (P<0.01) in June (2.0 ± 0.6 mm/d), than in April (1.1 ± 0.6 mm/d), August (1.0 ± 0.6 mm/d) or November (1.2 ± 0.6 mm/d). First wave dominant follicles were consistently larger in April than in June, August and November. The larger and more persistent size of the first wave dominant follicle in April was associated with an earlier regression of the largest subordinate follicle and a sharper decrease in the number of medium size follicles (6 to 9 mm) by Day 9 of the estrous cycle. Conversely, growth of the first wave dominant follicle was slower and the largest subordinate follicle was more persistent in August than in April, June or November. The proestrous rise in plasma E2 occurred faster (P<0.01) in August (10.1 ± 2.1 pg/d) than in April (4.6 ± 2.1 pg/d), June (5.3 ± 2.1 pg/d) or November (5.9 ± 2.1 pg/d). Concentrations of P4 in plasma increased and reached higher (P<0.01) luteal values in August (15.1 ± 0.6 ng/ml) and November (16.0 ± 0.6 ng/ml) than in April (6.1 ± 0.6 ng/ml) and June (10.6 ± 0.6 ng/ml). There was no detectable effect of month on LH pulse characteristics 48 h post-PGF2α. The maximum size of the corpus luteum (CL) was greatest in November and was related positively to diameter of the ovulatory follicle of the preceding cycle. Results indicated that ovarian follicular development and dominance may be altered during summer months. However, it is uncertain whether these changes can be related to the well-documented low breeding efficiency during warmer months of the year in subtropical environments.

Effect of mid-luteal phase progesterone levels on the first wave dominant follicle in cattle

A wave-like-pattern of follicular growth and regression during the luteal phase has been described in the bovine. The factors responsible for inducing the onset of regression of nonovulatory dominant follicles are unknown. The present study was designed to examine the effect of progesterone (P4) administration early in the estrous cycle on the first wave dominant follicle. Nine heifers were administered P4 on day 3 (200 mg), day 4 (100 mg) and day 5 (50 mg) of the estrous cycle (Day 0 = day of estrus) and seven heifers received vehicle to serve as controls. All heifers received a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) on day 7. Follicular dynamics were monitored by daily ultrasonography. All seven control heifers ovulated the first wave dominant follicle. In four P4 treated heifers, the first wave dominant follicle regressed prior to PGF2α administration and a dominant follicle from the second pool of follicles ovulated. The remaining five P4 treated heifers ovulated the first wave dominant follicle. However, in these heifers the growth of the first wave dominant follicle was slower (0.65 ± 0.13 mm day−1 between days 3 to 7 for treated vs 1.46 ± 0.23 mm day−1 for control; P &lt; 0.05) and estrus and ovulation were delayed compared to controls (3.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.4 ± 0.2 and 5.2 ± 0.4 vs 3.9 ± 0.2 days after PGF2α, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). The results indicate that P4 administered early in the estrous cycle to mimic the mid luteal phase levels alters follicular dynamics and is capable of inducing premature regression of the first wave dominant follicle. Key words: Progesterone, dominant follicle, cattle, atresia, ovulation

Effects of induction of low plasma progesterone concentrations with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device on follicular turnover and fertility in cattle

The effects of concentration of progesterone in plasma on development and fertility of the first wave dominant follicle were studied in cattle. To identify a source of exogenous progesterone that would permit extension of the first wave dominant follicle, nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 6) received on day 8 of two successive oestrous cycles an injection of PGF2 alpha (25 mg) and a new (1.9 g of progesterone (Period 1)) or used (approximately 1.2 g of progesterone (Period 2)) CIDR-B device that was removed on day 17. Control cows (n = 6) received a new CIDR-B device on day 8 that was removed on day 17 and a PGF2 alpha injection (25 mg) on day 17. Ultrasonography and collection of blood samples were performed on alternate days throughout the experiment. Plasma concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol were different between treatments (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively). The dominant follicle was maintained until day 17 and ovulated upon removal of the intravaginal device in 1 of 6, 6 of 6 and 0 of 6 in new CIDR-B, used CIDR-B and control groups, respectively (P < 0.01). The preovulatory dominant follicles were 14.2 +/- 1.6 mm, 20 +/- 1.3 mm and 10 +/- 1.3 mm, respectively (P < 0.001) on day 17. There were fewer 5-9 mm follicles in cows having a persistent dominant follicle (P < 0.01). The interval to onset of oestrus was negatively correlated with size of the dominant follicle on day 17 (P < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of environmental heat stress on follicular development and steroidogenesis in lactating Holstein cows

Lactating Holstein cows were utilized over two replicate periods (July and September, 1990) to examine the effect of summer heat stress on follicular growth and steroidogenesis. On day of synchronized ovulations, cows were assigned to shade (n=11) or no shade (n=12) management systems. Follicular development was monitored daily by ultrasonography until ovariectomy on Day 8 post estrus. At time of ovariectomy, dominant and second largest follicles were dissected from the ovary. Aromatase activity and steroid concentrations in dominant and subordinate follicles were measured. Acute heat stress had no effects on patterns of growth of first wave dominant and subordinate follicles between Days 1 and 7 of the cycle. Compared with shaded cows, the heat stressed cows did not have suppression of medium size (6 to 9 mm) follicles between Days 5 and 7. A treatment × follicle interaction was detected (P<0.01) for follicular diameter and fluid volume at Day 8. Dominant follicles in shade were bigger (16.4>14.5 mm) and contained more fluid (1.9>1.1 ml) than dominant follicles in no shade. Conversely, subordinate follicles in no shade were bigger (10.1>7.9 mm) and contained more fluid (0.4>0.2 ml) than subordinate follicles in shade. Concentrations of estradiol in plasma and follicular fluid were higher (P<0.01) in July than in September. Heat stress appears to alter the efficiency of follicular selection and dominance, and to have adverse effects on the quality of ovarian follicles.

Factors affecting the origin of the ovulatory follicle in heifers with induced luteolysis

Seventeen nulliparous Holstein heifers were treated with a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F 2α (PGF) on Day 8 (Day 0 = day of pretreatment ovulation) when the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave (Wave 1) was expected to be in the static phase. Wave 2 was first detected on Days 8 or 9 in 2 of the 14 and 3 of the 3 heifers that ovulated from Waves 1 and 2, respectively. That is, most heifers treated with PGF on Day 8 ovulated from the dominant follicle of Wave 1, except when Wave 2 emerged early, in heifers that ovulated from Wave 1, the dominant follicle increased ( P < 0.0001) in diameter from Day 8 to the day prior to post-treatment ovulation (mean increase, 2.3 mm), even though it had apparently reached its maximum diameter before the induction of luteolysis. Heifers ovulating from the dominant follicle of Wave 1 differed from heifers ovulating from the dominant follicle of Wave 2 in the following ways: change in diameter of the ovulatory follicle from day of treatment to day of post-treatment ovulation (means, 2.3 versus 9.0 mm, P < 0.0001), diameter of Wave-1 dominant follicle on the day prior to post-treatment ovulation (means, 17.6 versus 13.7 mm, P < 0.0005); and length of the interval from day of treatment to day of post-treatment ovulation (means, 4.2 versus 6.3 days, P < 0.03). Following ovulation after the PGF-induced luteolysis, 11 heifers had two-wave estrous cycles and 5 had three-wave cycles. Three-wave cycles were associated with an earlier emergence of Wave 2 and a longer luteal phase (onset of luteal regression; Day 20.0 versus Day 17.5; P < 0.03).

Effect of day of prostaglandin F 2α treatment on selection and development of the ovulatory follicle in heifers

In previous studies of heifers with two follicular waves during an estrous cycle, the dominant follicle of Wave 1 was first detected ultrasonically on approximately the day of ovulation (Day 0) when its diameter was 4–5 mm. On average, it grew linearly for 6 days (growing phase), remained the same size for 6 days (static phase), and then regressed (regressing phase). The dominant follicle of Wave 2 was first detected on approximately Day 9 and became the ovulatory follicle. In the present experiment, nonbred and bred heifers were treated with a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F 2α (25 mg) on Days 5, 8, or 12, when the dominant follicle of Wave 1 was expected to be in the growing, static, and regressing phase, respectively. There were no significant effects of breeding status on any end point. The hypothesis that growth of the dominant follicle during Wave 1 and response to prostaglandin F 2α treatment is different between bred and nonbred heifers was not supported. Ovulation occurred from the dominant follicle of Wave 1 in 5 of 5, 6 of 6 and 0 of 4 heifers treated on Days 5, 8, and 12, respectively ( P<0.005). Wave 2 was not detected in the Day-8 heifers, but was the origin of the ovulatory follicle in the Day-12 heifers. The results supported the hypothesis that the dominant follicle of Wave 1 is viable (capable of ovulation) before detection of Wave 2. For heifers treated on Days 5, 8, and 12, the ovulatory follicle had a mean diameter of 13.8, 17.3, and 11.8 mm, respectively, on the day of treatment and a mean diameter of 16.0, 19.5, and 16.4 mm, respectively, on the day prior to ovulation (significant increase between treatment and day prior to ovulation for each group). The results supported the hypothesis that the static-phase dominant follicle of Wave 1 is capable of further growth after luteolysis, even though it has apparently reached maximum diameter. The interval from treatment to ovulation was significantly shorter in Day-5 heifers (mean, 3.0 days) than in Day-12 heifers (mean, 4.5 days). In summary, the viable dominant follicle present at the time of luteolysis increased in diameter and became the ovulatory follicle.

Suppression of the secondary FSH surge with bovine follicular fluid is associated with delayed ovarian follicular development in heifers

Holstein heifers were given 5 injections (twice/day) of 10 ml charcoal-extracted bovine follicular fluid (bFF; N = 6) or 10 ml saline (N = 5) beginning 12 h after the onset of oestrus. Blood samples were collected for determination of plasma concentrations of FSH, LH, progesterone and oestradiol-17 beta. Treatment with bFF suppressed the secondary FSH surge (P less than 0.01). Cessation of bFF injections was followed by a rebound period during which FSH was elevated compared with controls (P less than 0.01). Daily ultrasonographic examinations revealed that follicular growth occurred in waves, with 4 of 5 control heifers exhibiting 3 waves and the other 2 waves. In contrast, 5 of 6 bFF-treated animals exhibited 2 waves and the other 3 waves. Appearance of follicles in the first wave was delayed in bFF-treated heifers (Day 3.3 +/- 0.3 compared with Day 1.4 +/- 0.2; P less than 0.0001) and appearance of the dominant follicle of the first wave was delayed (Day 4.5 +/- 0.3 compared with Day 1.8 +/- 0.2; P less than 0.0001). Follicles in the second wave appeared later in animals treated with bFF (Day 12.7 +/- 0.4 compared with Day 10.4 +/- 0.6; P less than 0.01), and the dominant follicle of this wave also appeared later (Day 13.0 +/- 0.5 compared with Day 10.6 +/- 0.5; P less than 0.01). Oestradiol-17 beta increased during the early luteal phase, but this increase occurred later in heifers treated with bFF (peak concentrations on Day 6.3 +/- 0.6 compared with Day 4.2 +/- 0.2; P less than 0.05). LH, progesterone and cycle length were not affected by bFF. Delayed follicular growth associated with suppression of FSH suggests that the secondary FSH surge is important in the initiation of follicular development early in the bovine oestrous cycle, and thus may play a role in the regulation of ovarian follicular dynamics.

Ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers during early pregnancy.

Daily ultrasonic monitoring of individual follicles was used to compare follicular wave characteristics of nonbred (n = 6) and pregnant heifers (n = 6). The dominant follicle of the first wave (Wave 1) did not differ significantly between reproductive statuses for any endpoint. The dominant follicle of Wave 2 was the ovulatory follicle in all nonbred heifers. The maximum diameter of the dominant follicle of Wave 2 was greater (p less than 0.05) for the nonbred heifers (14.8 mm) than for the pregnant heifers (13.0 mm). The dominant follicle of Wave 3 was detected later (p less than 0.003; Day 19.7 vs. Day 17.3) and reached a greater diameter (p less than 0.05; 16.6 mm vs. 12.0 mm) in the nonbred than in the pregnant heifers. On the mean day of onset of luteolysis (Day 15.2) in the nonbred heifers, the dominant follicle was similar in diameter for the two groups. Within a few days, the follicle began to regress in the pregnant heifers but maintained or increased in diameter in the nonbred heifers so that a greater maximum diameter was attained. During Days 0 70 of pregnancy, the interval from emergence of a wave to the emergence of the next wave was constant (not significantly different; mean intervals, 8.5 9.8 days). The mean maximum diameter attained by the dominant follicles differed significantly among the first 6 follicular waves; diameter was greatest for Wave 1 (15.7 mm), smallest for Waves 2 (13.1 mm) and 3 (12.6 mm), and intermediate for Waves 4 (14.0 mm), 5 (13.7 mm), and 6 (14.5 mm).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Variability in FSH:LH ratios among batches of commercially available gonadotrophins

The intervals from removal of FSH suppressants by follicle ablation to an increase in FSH and from an increase in FSH to an increase in follicle diameter were determined hourly during follicular wave 1 in a follicles-intact group (n = 7) and a follicles-ablated group (n = 20). Follicles other than the largest subordinate follicle of wave 1 (SF1) were ablated when the dominant follicle of wave 1 (DF1) was about 11 mm (hour 0) and FSH concentration was basal. In an ablated-regressed subgroup (n = 5), SF1 diameter decreased constantly during hours 0 to 8. In an ablated-maintained subgroup (n = 15), SF1 decreased for 2 or 3 hours and then increased (n = 11) or increased constantly (n = 4). Average diameter of SF1 during 8 hours was greater (P < 0.01) in the maintained subgroup (8.3 ± 0.07 mm) than in the regressed subgroup (7.3 ± 0.09 mm). Concentration of FSH increased (P < 0.02) similarly between the two ablated subgroups but did not change during the 8 hours in the follicles-intact group. In each wave in the ablated-maintained subgroup with a decrease and then an increase in SF1 diameter (n = 11), the SF1 increase was preceded by an FSH increase. The interval from hour 0 (removal of source of FSH suppressants) to the beginning of an increase in FSH was 0.8 ± 0.3 hours. The interval from the beginning of an FSH increase to the beginning of an SF1 diameter increase was 2.8 ± 0.4 hours. The immediate coupling and decoupling between follicles and FSH may be essential aspects of follicle deviation during selection of DF1 by impeding the growth rate of the future SF1 before it can attain the developmental stage needed for continued growth during low FSH.