INTRODUCTION:In the present development discourse, the debate over livelihood has been considered as an alternative paradigm for developing and underdeveloped countries. The discussion on livelihood gained public recognition in research, academic as well as in planning. Generally, livelihood concern as how people make living, by making enough food on the table, fulfills basic necessity for a good life like shelter, clothing etc. But theoretically, it means gaining a living through the capability, activities and assets. A livelihood is socially and environmentally sustainable which can cope with and recover from stress and shocks, maintains and enhance it capability and assets and provide sustainable livelihood opportunity for the next generation and which contributes net benefit to other livelihoods at local and global levels and in the short and long term (Chambers and Conway, 1992). Ellis (2000) in his study highlight that natural, social, human, financial and physical capitals or assets, activities and access to these together three determined the individual or household livelihood (Mishra, 2009). Further Department for International Development (DFID) in his Sustainable Livelihood Framework guidance note suggests five foremost capitals to livelihood analysis and they are presented as assets pentagon. Chambers and Conway further divide assets and capitals into two types one is tangible assets and intangible assets. Intangible assets it includes resources and stores; like saving, credit, gold, jewelry, land, water, forest, tools, domestic assets, occupational assets, livestock etc and in intangible assets it includes claims and access; like demand and appeals for rights, issues etc. So, the individual or household livelihood is based on the maximum utilization of both the tangible and intangible capitals in their activities to satisfy their needs. The development of capitals in villages, communities, groups, households, and individuals, is not only responsibility of individual but also other stakeholders; like government and non-government organizations. As livelihood framework has been designed to address the issues faced by the rural and underdeveloped people. So, government, voluntary, nongovernment organizations and donor agencies have been continuously introducing different plan, policies and programs for the rural and disadvantage people like tribals for to make their livelihood sustainable. All stakeholders are engaging themselves in infrastructural, educational, occupational, social as such development for betterment these people.The livelihood structure and capital among the rural or disadvantaged people of India, particularly among tribals are largely confined to their socio-cultural, ecological and geographical settings. Agriculture, forest product and forest food collection are constituted major livelihood source and river, land, forest, community living, culture, traditional knowledge, homogeneity are such called as assets or capitals of livelihood generation among the tribals. These ways of livelihood generation among them make them sustainable from generation to generation. But, in order to integrate them into mainstream society, secure their livelihood and to overcome them from poverty trap government and other stakeholders has implemented various programmes, plans, policies and projects in the tribal and backward regions. But, the development services are not reaching nearer to the beneficiaries nor any improvement has been marked in capitals and other services development in these areas. In this context, the present study makes a modest attempt to explain livelihood assets or capitals among the tribals in backward district of Odisha.LITERATURE REVIEW:Chamber and Conway (1992) discuss on capability, equity and sustainability as the base of sustainable livelihood. To focus on the future human needs it suggests sustainability of environment as well as social aspects for the sustainability of livelihood. …