Docetaxel Combination Therapy Research Articles

Modulating versatile pathways using a cleavable PEG shell and EGFR-targeted nanoparticles to deliver CRISPR-Cas9 and docetaxel for triple-negative breast cancer inhibition.

Human antigen R (HuR), an RNA-binding protein, is implicated in regulating mRNA stability and translation in cancer, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive form. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HuR knockout (HuR CRISPR) presents a promising genetic therapeutic approach, but it encounters transfection limitations. Docetaxel (DTX), an effective cytotoxic agent against metastatic breast cancer (BC), faces challenges related to vehicle-associated adverse events in DTX formulations. Therefore, we designed multifunctional nanoparticles with pH-sensitive PEG derivatives and targeting peptides to enable efficient HuR CRISPR and DTX delivery to human TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells and tumor-bearing mice. Our findings indicated that these nanoparticles displayed pH-responsive cytotoxicity, precise EGFR targeting, efficient tumor penetration, successful endosomal escape, and accurate nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. They also demonstrated the ability to spare normal cells and prevent hemolysis. Our study concurrently modulated multiple pathways, including EGFR, Wnt/β-catenin, MDR, and EMT, through the regulation of EGFR/PI3K/AKT, HuR/galectin-3/GSK-3β/β-catenin, and P-gp/MRPs/BCRP, as well as YAP1/TGF-β/ZEB1/Slug/MMPs. The combined treatment arrested the cell cycle at the G2 phase and inhibited EMT, effectively impeding tumor progression. Tissue distribution, biochemical assays, and histological staining revealed the enhanced safety profile of pH-responsive PEG- and peptide-modified nanoformulations in TNBC mice. The DTX-embedded and peptide-modified nanoparticles mitigated the side effects of DTX, enhanced cytotoxicity in TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, and exhibited remarkable antitumor efficacy and safety in TNBC-bearing mice with HuR CRISPR deletion. Collectively, the combination therapy of DTX and CRISPR/Cas9 offers an effective platform for delivering antineoplastic agents and gene-editing systems to combat tumor resistance and progression in TNBC.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of sotorasib versus docetaxel in second line and beyond among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

ObjectivesTo evaluate the comparative effectiveness of sotorasib monotherapy versus docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC in the real-world. MethodsA US-based electronic health record–derived de-identified database was used in this study. Patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who initiated sotorasib between May 28, 2021, and September 30, 2022, and docetaxel between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022 (to enhance sample size), were included, with a minimum of 12-month opportunity for follow-up. Treatment groups were balanced via overlap weighting propensity score methods. Median OS in the 2L and 2L+ settings were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models. ResultsOverall, the clinical characteristics in sotorasib and docetaxel cohorts were balanced after propensity score weighting. At baseline, most patients were > 65 years of age, had ECOG performance status of 0–1, were from the community practice setting, had advanced stage at initial diagnosis, and had prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In the 2L setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=102) and docetaxel (N=58) patients was 10.2 (7.6–16.3) and 6.0 (4.2–11.0) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.62 (0.41–0.93). In the 2L+ setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=164) and docetaxel (N=116) was 10.2 (8.0–14.6) and 7.2 (5.1–10.6) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.65 (0.49–0.87). In patients with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, the mortality HR (95 % CI) in the sotorasib group versus docetaxel was 0.61 (0.39–0.94) and 0.65 (0.48–0.89) in the 2L and 2L+ settings, respectively. Findings from other subgroups were consistent with the primary analyses. ConclusionIn this real-world comparative analysis of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, sotorasib monotherapy demonstrated a longer median OS compared to docetaxel monotherapy or combination therapy.

The efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma: A systematic review and pre-clinical study.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of the bone. There is a lack of effective treatments for patients who experience relapsed osteosarcoma. One treatment for relapsed patients is gemcitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy (GEMDOX). This systematic review aimed to establish the efficacy of this chemotherapy regimen, as well as identify the common severe toxicities that are associated with it. Resistant osteosarcoma cell lines developed from MG-63 and HOS-143B were used to represent relapsed osteosarcoma patients in a pre-clinical study. We identified 11 retrospective and Phase II studies that were suitable for inclusion in our review. 10.65% of patients had a response to gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy and the disease control rate was 35% (n = 197). 36%, 35.3% and 18.04% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia respectively (n = 133). Male patients (X2 = 9.14, p < 0.05) and those below the age of 18 (X 2 = 10.94, p < 0.05) responded better to GEMDOX treatment than females and patients older than 18 years. The resistant osteosarcoma cell lines remained sensitive to either single-agent gemcitabine, docetaxel, and the combination of both. Cisplatin-resistant models (MG-63/CISR8 & HOS-143B/CISR8) were the most responsive to GEMDOX treatment compared to doxorubicin, methotrexate, and triple-combination resistant models. GEMDOX treatment has potential efficacy in relapsed osteosarcoma patients especially those with cisplatin resistance. To directly compare the efficacy of GEMDOX therapy against other therapies randomised phase III clinical trials with adequate patient follow up must be performed to improve treatment options for osteosarcoma.

Comparison of outcomes with docetaxel or ARPI combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) by volume of disease.

Comparison of outcomes with docetaxel or ARPI combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) by volume of disease.

Influence of Previous Therapy for Neutropenia Caused by Combination Therapy of Ramucirumab and Docetaxel.

In the present study, the influence of previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with ramucirumab (RAM) + docetaxel (DTX) therapy on the occurrence of severe neutropenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated, taking into account the influences of cytotoxic chemotherapy used in pretreatment. The study participants included patients who received a combination therapy of RAM and DTX as cancer chemotherapy for NSCLC. The influences of previous ICI treatment and pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia were analysed. A total of 89 patients, including 50 with and 39 without a history of ICI treatment, were analysed. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference in the influence of previous ICI treatment on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.006). Moreover, Cox regression analysis identified a history of ICI treatment and prophylactic administration of G-CSF as factors associated with the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). This study found that previous treatment with ICIs reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia after RAM + DTX therapy in patients with NSCLC, regardless of the influences of pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents.

Abstract 5311: KK2269, an epithelial cell adhesion molecule-targeted CD40 agonist, stimulates anti-tumor immunity resulting in sustained anti-tumor effect against mouse intrahepatic tumor without hepatotoxicity

Abstract Several anti-CD40 agonist antibodies have been evaluated in clinical trials based on their preclinical antitumor activity via generation of antitumor innate and adaptive immunity through activation of antigen-presenting cells. However, conventional monospecific anti-CD40 agonist antibodies have faced limitations in terms of safety margins and clinical efficacy. To address this problem, we developed KK2269, a novel bispecific antibody (REGULGENT™ format) that binds to both CD40 and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which is highly expressed in several types of tumors. KK2269 demonstrated EpCAM-dependent activation of CD40 signals both in vitro and in vivo, confirming that it is a tumor-targeting CD40 agonist. Liver metastasis is common in EpCAM-positive cancers, including colon, stomach, and lung cancers. Intrahepatic tumors can attenuate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the liver tumor-specific suppressive immune milieu. Although CD40 agonists are expected to overcome the immunosuppressive environment, non-tumor-targeting CD40 agonists cause hepatotoxicity. In the present study, we used a syngeneic intrahepatic tumor model to examine whether KK2269 exhibits antitumor efficacy without causing hepatotoxicity. Firstly, we confirmed that KK2269 administration did not increase aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or cause pathological abnormalities in the liver despite Il12b induction in the EpCAM-positive tumor. Additionally, gene expression analysis of peritumoral normal liver revealed that KK2269 did not induce inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, a conventional anti-CD40 agonist antibody increased AST, caused pathological abnormalities, and upregulated inflammatory cytokines in peritumoral normal liver, as reported in the clinical setting. Secondly, the antitumor effect of KK2269 in combination with docetaxel was evaluated. The combination therapy synergistically reduced intrahepatic tumor volume, and the effect persisted even 21 days after the administration. Gene expression analysis revealed a lower immune infiltration in the intrahepatic tumor versus subcutaneous tumor and that KK2269 in combination with docetaxel increased T-cell infiltration and activation even in the immunosuppressive intrahepatic tumor. In summary, our study demonstrated that KK2269 activated dendritic cells in an EpCAM-positive tumor in the liver but did not affect peritumoral normal liver tissues. In addition, KK2269 in combination with docetaxel showed potent antitumor effect accompanied by T-cell infiltration and activation against the intrahepatic tumor, which has a lower immune infiltration. These results suggest that the combination therapy of KK2269 and docetaxel is promising for metastatic EpCAM-positive tumors. Citation Format: Yoshiki Sumitomo, Kyoko Kawasaki, Yuta Tezuka, Masato Saito, Akari Yao, Munetoshi Ando. KK2269, an epithelial cell adhesion molecule-targeted CD40 agonist, stimulates anti-tumor immunity resulting in sustained anti-tumor effect against mouse intrahepatic tumor without hepatotoxicity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5311.

Knowledge domains and emerging trends in immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors: A bibliometrics and visualized analysis

ObjectiveThe primary objective of this paper is to investigate the research hotspots and future trends of immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, offering valuable insights for researchers in this field. MethodologyUsing the visual analysis software, this study conducted quantitative statistics and visualization research on the relevant literature concerning immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Web of Science Core Collection Database. By evaluating the publication trends, countries, institutions, keywords, research status, cited documents, and document co-citations, among several others, the discussion revolved around the hot spots and future development trends in this field and provided references for future research. Findings and conclusionsA total of 514 English articles were included, and the top three countries in the research field at the time of this study were the United States, Japan, and China. More specifically, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Massachusetts General Hospital have been the top three research institutes with more than 10 publications. The frequency of keyword use linked to immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors in literature research has been steadily growing over the years. Additionally, the research with respect to the disease focuses on melanoma, cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. In the context of drugs, cancer-related research has mainly focused on the combined use of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Meanwhile, research on adverse events has delved into the immune checkpoint inhibitors causing vitiligo, thyroid dysfunction, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and rheumatism. Related studies cover acute arthritis, myositis, acute kidney injury, as well as the combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and docetaxel, management of irAEs in cancer immunotherapy, and biomarkers of immune adverse reactions of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, case report studies of immune adverse reactions caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors could serve as research hotspots in the future.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy, especially when incidence rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) surpasses 20%. While primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has been proven effective in preventing FN in patients with cancer, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy in specifically, lung cancer. Our systematic review focused on the efficacy of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in lung cancer. We extracted studies on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using the PubMed, Ichushi Web, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers assessed the extracted studies for each type of lung cancer and conducted quantitative and meta-analyses of preplanned outcomes, including overall survival, FN incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain. A limited number of studies were extracted: two on NSCLC and six on SCLC. A meta-analysis was not conducted owing to insufficient data on NSCLC. Two case-control studies explored the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with NSCLC (on docetaxel and ramucirumab therapy) and indicated a lower FN frequency with G-CSF. For SCLC, meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant reduction in FN incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.03-5.56, P = 0.48). Outcomes other than FN incidence could not be evaluated due to low data availability. Limited data are available on G-CSF prophylaxis in lung cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may be weakly recommended in Japanese patients with NSCLC undergoing docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy.

Prospective Observational Study of Ramucirumab Plus Docetaxel After Combined Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

A history of pre-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been reported to be associated with good outcomes of ramucirumab (RAM) plus docetaxel (DOC) combination therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, existing knowledge on the clinical significance of RAM and DOC following combined chemoimmunotherapy is limited. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC therapy after combined chemoimmunotherapy and attempted to identify the predictors of its outcomes. This multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC after combined chemoimmunotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events. An exploratory analysis measured serum cytokine levels at the start of treatment. Overall, 44 patients were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions between April 2020 and June 2022. The median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 22.6 months, respectively. Furthermore, the ORR and DCR were 36.4% and 72.7%, respectively. The high vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) group had a significantly shorter PFS and OS. A combination of high VEGF-A and low VEGF-D levels was associated with a longer PFS. Our results showed that RAM plus DOC after combined chemoimmunotherapy might be an effective and relatively feasible second-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting.

Functional inhibition of the RNA-binding protein HuR sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, chemoresistance compromises its efficacy. The RNA-binding protein Hu antigen R (HuR) could be a potential therapeutic target to enhance the chemotherapy efficacy. HuR is known to mainly stabilize its target mRNAs, and/or promote the translation of encoded proteins, which are implicated in multiple cancer hallmarks, including chemoresistance. In this study, a docetaxel-resistant cell subline (231-TR) was established from the human TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231. Both the parental and resistant cell lines exhibited similar sensitivity to the small molecule functional inhibitor of HuR, KH-3. Docetaxel and KH-3 combination therapy synergistically inhibited cell proliferation in TNBC cells and tumor growth in three animal models. KH-3 downregulated the expression levels of HuR targets (e.g., β-Catenin and BCL2) in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Moreover, KH-3 restored docetaxel's effects on activating Caspase-3 and cleaving PARP in 231-TR cells, induced apoptotic cell death, and caused S-phase cell cycle arrest. Together, our findings suggest that HuR is a critical mediator of docetaxel resistance and provide a rationale for combining HuR inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents to enhance chemotherapy efficacy.

Ramucirumab Plus Docetaxel for Patients with Non-small cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Multicenter, Open-Label Single-Arm Phase II Trial.

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel combination therapy (DOC/RAM) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) achieves favorable outcomes; however, efficacy and safety for patients with brain metastases are still unclear. Eligible patients included those with advanced NSCLC with measurable asymptomatic brain metastases that progressed after chemotherapy. Patients were intravenously administered ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2) every 21-day cycle. Due to difficulties in accumulating the planned 65 participants, enrollment was terminated early when 25 patients were enrolled. Primary endpoint: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-5.3). Secondary endpoints: Median intracranial progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.9); median overall survival was 20.9 months (95% CI, 6.6-not possible to estimate); objective response rate was 20% (95% CI, 6.8-40.7); disease control rate was 68% (95% CI, 46.5-85.1). The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia in 10 patients (40%). Neither intracranial hemorrhage nor grade 5 adverse events were observed. Patients with higher serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 concentrations at the start of treatment had slightly longer PFS. No clinical concerns were identified with DOC/RAM for NSCLC with brain metastases in this study. Further investigation with a larger sample size is needed to determine the tolerability and safety of these populations (Trial Identifiers: University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan [UMIN000024551] and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [jRCTs071180048]).

Curcumin Enhances the Efficacy of Docetaxel by Promoting Anti-Tumor Immune Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This study evaluated the feasibility of curcumin and docetaxel (DTX) combination therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Animal assay demonstrated DTX has certain limitations in improving immunosuppressive microenvironment. Treatment with curcumin overcame this inhibition and reduced tumor progression. Curcumin synergized DTX showed significantly greater reduction in tumor burden than either treatment alone via down-regulation of MDSCs, M2 macrophages and up-regulation of CD8+ T cells, NK cells, M1 macrophages. Meanwhile, the secretion of CXCL1 was decreased in tumor. Conversely, the secretion of interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α were increased. Our study provided a promising therapeutic strategy for HNSCC.

Additional effect of anthracycline in preoperative chemotherapy with a sequential anthracycline‑containing regimen preceded by pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel combination therapy.

The proper use of anthracycline-containing regimens in combination with anti-HER2-targeted therapy in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer has not been resolved. Regimens preceded by anthracyclines have become the standard of care, and although the order has no significant impact on HER2-negative breast cancer, it is inconclusive as to whether a taxane-first sequence would have a similar effect on HER2-positive breast cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the benefit of a taxane-first sequence and of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients with non-clinical complete response (non-cCR) to pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel (PTD). The present single-center prospective observational study was performed to investigate PTD followed by AC, and aimed to clarify the cCR rate after PTD alone and the pathological clinical response (pCR) rate after subsequent AC in patients without cCR after PTD alone. A total 24 patients were analyzed; of these, 14 achieved pCR (pCR rate, 58.3%). While four of 14 patients (28.6%) in the intention-to-treat population achieved pCR, nine of 14 patients (64.3%) achieved pCR with AC but not cCR after PTD. The median tumor reduction rate after four cycles of PTD was 58.9% (range, 20.8-100%) in all 24 patients, whereas the reduction rate after PTD-AC was 76.9% (range, 31.1-100%). Cardiac serious adverse events occurred in three patients (12.5%). In conclusion, a high pCR rate was observed for the taxane-first sequence. Patients were highly responsive to PTD, but some cases achieved additional antitumor effects after AC, which resulted in pCR without cCR after PTD alone. Since cardiotoxicity remains a significant problem, a higher risk-benefit treatment strategy is required to aim for AC omission. Trial registration number: UMIN000046338, name of registry: UMIN-CTR, date of registration: December 10, 2021.

Effect of Secondary Prophylactic G-CSF on the Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer.

Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) combination therapy is widely used as adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer and is associated with a high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended in the primary prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN). This study aimed to evaluate the FN-suppressing effect of G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving TC. We performed 272 treatment cycles after FN onset in 106 patients with breast cancer receiving TC. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of G-CSF as secondary prophylaxis. The frequency of FN was calculated based on the treatment cycles to adjust for differences in the number of cycles per case and FN occurrence. FN occurred in 58 cycles (21.3%). The incidence of FN with and without secondary prophylactic G-CSF was 10.1% and 25.9%, respectively (p=0.003). Multivariate analysis showed secondary prophylactic G-CSF administration to be an independent predictor of FN incidence [odds ratio (OR)=0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.14-0.74, p=0.007]. Secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF is recommended for patients with breast cancer undergoing TC chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of FN.

Impact of oral hygiene on febrile neutropenia during breast cancer chemotherapy.

Oral hygiene is crucial in the management of oral and febrile complications during chemotherapy for cancer. This study aimed to investigate the impact of oral hygiene on the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) throughout the course of chemotherapy for breast cancer. A total of 137 patients with breast cancer who underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) combination therapy or docetaxel alone were assessed for oral hygiene by quantifying the number of oral bacteria they harbored. These patients received professional oral health care (POHC). Eighteen patients underwent primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. The relationship between oral bacteria count and FN incidence was retrospectively assessed. The FN incidence rate was 47.4% throughout all treatment cycles (32.8%, 13.5%, 14.3%, and 14.4% in cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The oral bacteria count decreased with each treatment cycle (cycle 1: 9.10 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, cycle 2: 5.89 × 106CFU/mL, cycle 3: 4.61 × 106CFU/mL, cycle 4: 5.85 × 106CFU/mL, P = 0.004). Among 281 treatment cycles, FN occurred in 63 (22.4%). In the treatment cycle-based analysis, high oral bacteria count was an independent risk factor for FN. FN incidence decreased with each treatment cycle and was associated with changes in oral bacteria counts. The oral bacterial count was one of risk factors for FN development in breast cancer.

Sintilimab plus docetaxel as second-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer without targetable mutations: a phase II efficacy and biomarker study

BackgroundSingle-agent immunotherapy is currently the recommended second-line therapy for patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable mutations; however, the objective response rate (ORR) remains low. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of the combination therapy of sintilimab plus docetaxel and explored potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction.MethodsThirty patients with NSCLC without targetable mutations whose disease progressed from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from October 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled in this single-arm, single-center, phase II trial. Sintilimab (200 mg) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) were administered every 3 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Biomarker analyses of blood and tissue samples were also performed.ResultsAmong 30 patients, 11 patients had partial response, resulting in an ORR of 36.7%. The median PFS was 5.0 months (95%CI: 3.9–6.1) and OS was 13.4 months (95%CI: 5.6–21.2). The most common immune-related adverse event of any grade was hepatitis, observed in 23.3% (7/30) of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events were manageable. Patients detected with high PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (cutoff value ≥32.5% based on the median CTC-PD-L1 expression) achieved significantly higher ORR (60% versus 13.3%, p = 0.021) and significantly longer median PFS (6.0 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.011) and median OS (15.8 versus 9.0 months, p = 0.038) than those with low CTC-PD-L1 level. Patients detected with PD-L1 < 1% and CD8 ≥ 1% expression from their baseline tissue samples had significantly higher ORR (83.3% versus 12.5%, p = 0.026) but similar PFS (p = 0.62) and OS (p = 0.15).ConclusionThis study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab plus docetaxel as a second-line treatment of NSCLC without targetable mutations after progression from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Clinical trials registry with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03798743 (SUCCESS).

Influence of using history of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for neutropenia caused by combination therapy of ramucirumab and docetaxel.

Recently, pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been shown to enhance the therapeutic effects of the combination therapy of ramucirumab (RAM) and docetaxel (DTX); however, its influence on the drug's side effects remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of pretreatment with ICIs on the incidence of neutropenia caused by RAM + DTX therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC who received RAM + DTX therapy at Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center between April 2016 and December 2020 were enrolled. Retrospective data regarding age, sex, performance status and detailed treatment history, among others, at treatment initiation were collected from the patients' electronic medical records. Additionally, data on the course number of RAM + DTX therapy, supportive therapy and blood biochemical parameters, including leukocyte and neutrocyte counts, during the treatment period were collected. We identified 41 patients receiving RAM + DTX therapy. Among the more than grade 3 adverse events caused by this therapy, neutropenia was the most common (78.1%). Despite the fact that all previous risk factors influencing this incidence rate had corresponded, the only factor influencing the incidence rate of neutropenia more than grade 3 was ICI treatment history. A difference in the incidence of neutropenia more than grade 3 in the Kaplan-Meier curve was observed between patients with and without ICI pretreatment history (p = 0.037). The pretreatment history of ICI therapy affects the incidence of neutropenia caused by RAM + DTX therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Synergistic enhancement of cell death by triple combination therapy of docetaxel, ultrasound and microbubbles, and radiotherapy on PC3 a prostate cancer cell line

The application of ultrasound and microbubbles (USMB) has been shown to enhance both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This study investigated the potential of triple combination therapy comprised of USMB, docetaxel (Taxotere: TXT) chemotherapy and XRT to enhance treatment efficacy. Prostate cancer (PC3) cells in suspension were treated with various combinations of USMB, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cells were treated with ultrasound and microbubbles (500 kHz pulse center frequency, 580 kPa peak negative pressure, 10 μs pulse duration, 60 s insonation time and 2% Definity microbubbles (v/v)), XRT (2 Gy), and Taxotere (TXT) at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 nM for 5- and 120-minutes duration. Following treatment, cell viability was assessed using a clonogenic assay. Therapeutic efficiency of the combined treatments depended on chemotherapy and microbubble exposure conditions. Under the exposure conditions of the study, the triple combination therapy synergistically enhanced clonogenic cell death compared to single and double combination therapy. Cell viability of ∼2% was achieved with the triple combination therapy corresponding to ∼29, ∼37, and ∼38 folds decrease compared to XRT (57%), USMB (74%) and TXT (76%) alone conditions, respectively. In addition, the triple combination therapy decreased cell viability by ∼29, ∼19- and ∼11 folds compared to TXT2hr + USMB (58%), TXT2hr + XRT (37%), and USMB + XRT (22%), respectively.The in vivo PC3 tumours showed that USMB significantly enhanced cell death through detection of apoptosis (TUNEL) with both TXT and TXT + XRT. The study demonstrated that the triple combination therapy can significantly enhance cell death in prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo under relatively low chemotherapy and ionizing radiation doses.

Real-world effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) early (week 1) and late (weeks 2-3) in the cycle for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) after high FN–risk chemotherapy (chemo).

599 Background: G-CSF mitigates chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and reduces FN risk. G-CSF moves the nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) earlier (to week 1) in the chemo cycle and shortens nadir duration (Crawford, NEJM 1991), suggesting the potential for suboptimal CIN protection early (week 1) in the chemo cycle. The relative FN risk in week 1 vs. weeks 2-3 of the cycle with G-CSF is unknown and was analyzed compared with no G-CSF in the real-world setting with high FN risk chemo. Methods: Using a database of administrative claims representing 100% of fee-for-service Medicare, we analyzed BC pts who initiated docetaxel (T), doxorubicin (A), or cyclophosphamide (C) monotherapy or combination therapy between 01/01/2015 – 12/31/2019. Sample pts included adults aged ≥ 65 years with continuous coverage in Medicare Parts A, B, and D for 6 months before and 20 days after chemo initiation. Pts were categorized as receiving vs. not receiving G-CSF therapy within 3 days after chemo. Rate of FN events starting in week 1 vs. weeks 2-3 in cycle 1 was calculated. We defined FN as an inpatient admission with a primary or secondary diagnosis of neutropenia and measured the interval between chemo initiation and FN admission. Results: Among 18,788 Medicare beneficiaries with BC treated with T, A, and/or C, 72% received G-CSF therapy. More pts receiving G-CSF were treated with ≥ 2 of T, A, and/or C compared to pts who did not receive G-CSF (71% vs. 51%). Overall FN incidence in cycle 1 was significantly lower among pts receiving G-CSF (4.0%; n=546) compared to pts not receiving G-CSF (8.8%; n=462) (p&lt;0.0001). In pts with G-CSF, 81% (440/546) of all 1st-cycle FN events started in week 1 vs. 19% (106/546) in weeks 2-3. In pts not receiving G-CSF, the start of 1st-cycle FN events was more equally distributed: 41% (190/462) started in week 1 vs. 59% (272/462) in weeks 2-3. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses restricted to pts receiving ≥ 2 of T, A, and/or C. The rates of 1st-cycle FN events starting in weeks 1 and 2-3 with and without G-CSF following chemo initiation is shown below. Conclusions: Prophylactic G-CSF was highly effective for the prevention of FN in weeks 2-3, but relatively ineffective in week 1 of cycle 1 in the real-world setting, leaving pts largely unprotected during the first week. This represents an unmet medical need in week 1 of the cycle, despite use of G-CSF. Clinical trial information: NCT03294577. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (HGCSG1903).

TPS4152 Background: Paclitaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy had become a standard regimen in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, since RAINBOW trial showed paclitaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy increased overall survival compared with paclitaxel monotherapy. However, the incidence of neuropathy in paclitaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy has been reported 70.6% and 38.3% in Japanese and western patients, and the toxicity sometimes disturbs treatment continuation. Whereas docetaxel monotherapy used to be one of standard second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer as well as paclitaxel monotherapy because the phase III trial, COUGAR-2 showed clinical benefit of docetaxel monotherapy. In addition, the combination therapy of docetaxel and ramucirumab was reported to cause neuropathy at an incidence of 21.3% in patients with lung cancer. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination therapy of docetaxel and ramucirumab for patients with gastric cancer could be as effective as the paclitaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy and could reduce the incidence of neuropathy. Therefore, we planned to develop new combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and ramucirumab for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: To evaluate efficacy and safety of docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy, HGCSG1903 study started as a multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, prospective, phase II study in November 2020. The patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma that were refractory or intolerant to initial chemotherapy are eligible. Docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy is administered as follows; an intravenous infusion of docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 on day 1, an intravenous infusion of ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg on day 1 and day 15 of each 4-week cycle is performed. The therapy is repeated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary endpoint is response rate, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. The response rate is calculated based on the RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Adverse events are evaluated using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria. A hypothesis test of binary probability was performed, with condition that threshold of response rate was set to 10.7% of docetaxel monotherapy in phase III trial and the expected response rate was set to 27.9% of paclitaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy in RAINBOW trial. A minimum number of cases that achieved a detection power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 5% was calculated to be 32 cases. In anticipation of dropouts, the total number of registration cases was set to 35. Sixteen institutions are participated, and the registration period is 2 years. This study is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs011200010). Clinical trial information: jRCTs011200010.