Do-not-resuscitate Research Articles

Identifying Prevalence and Potential Predictors of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Orders to Facilitate Preoperative Discussions on Code Status.

Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders allow patients with life-threatening conditions to decline resuscitation efforts should the need arise. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends discussions with patients on their code status to clarify and honor their goals of care perioperatively. This project sought to determine the prevalence of DNAR orders and to identify the demographics and potential clinical predictors of DNAR status at the beginning and end of admission, which would help anesthesiologists at our center facilitate these discussions. Factors associated with DNAR status at beginning and at end of hospital stay were determined through univariate logistic regressions. For DNAR status at beginning and end of hospital admission, variables assessed were age at arrival, race, sex, palliative consult, use of palliative care service, length of stay in days, presence of surgery, presence of emergent surgery, care level, and medical service. Approximately 2.4 percent of the sample had an active DNAR order at the beginning of their hospital admission compared to 7.4 percent at the end of hospital admission. Factors significantly associated with DNAR status at the beginning of the hospital stay were consistent with prior literature (age, palliative care consult or service). However, factors significantly associated with DNAR status at the end of hospital stay that were notable included length of stay, undergoing emergent surgery, higher level of care, and being on the oncology service and medical respiratory intensive care unit. This retrospective study allows anesthesiologists at our institution to identify patients who may benefit from a more comprehensive perioperative discussion about code status based on certain clinical characteristics, which may improve quality of care by preventing unwanted resuscitative measures that do not align with a patient's goals of care.

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation decision making: physicians’ recommendations differ from the GO-FAR score predictions

Background and aimIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of mortality globally, and over 50% of the survivors will require institutional care as a result of poor neurological outcome. It is important that physicians discuss the likely outcome of resuscitation with patients and families during end-of-life discussions to help them with decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We aim to compare three consultants’ do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions with the GO-FAR score predictions of the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).MethodsThis is a retrospective study of all patients 18 years or older placed on a DNR order by a consensus of three consultants in a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates over 12 months. Patients’ socio-demographics and the GO-FAR variables were abstracted from the electronic medical records. We applied the GO-FAR score and the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes for each patient.ResultsA total of 788 patients received a DNR order, with a median age of 71 years and a majority being males and expatriates. The GO-FAR model categorized 441 (56%) of the patients as having a low or very low probability of survival and 347 (44%) as average or above. There were 219 patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer, of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the average and above-average probability groups. There were more In-hospital deaths among patients in the average and above-average probability of survival group compared with those with very low and low probability (243 (70%) versus 249 (56.5%) (P < 0.0001)). The DNR patients with an average or above average chance of survival by GO-FAR score were more likely to be expatriates, oncology patients, and did not have sepsis.ConclusionsThe GO-FAR score provides a guide for joint decision-making on the possible outcomes of CPR in the event of IHCA. The physicians’ recommendation and the ultimate patient’s resuscitation choice may differ due to more complex contextual medico-social factors.

Utility of do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill infants in the NICU.

To better understand the value of DNR orders for critically ill infants in the NICU. A prospective mixed-methods approach was utilized including chart review of infants who died in a regional NICU over a twenty-six-month period and surveys of their neonatologists, neonatal fellows, and nurses. 40 infants died during the study period and 120 staff surveys were completed. Infants with DNR orders were of a higher gestational age at birth and a higher chronological age at death. Nurses were more likely to perceive benefit from DNR orders than physicians. Medical staff recollection of the existence of DNR orders was not always accurate. Time and fear of adding unnecessary emotional burden to parents were identified as barriers to DNR order implementation. An advanced care planning model built on open communication instead of DNR order documentation was deemed the best approach. Though DNR orders are beneficial for a subset of infants, DNR orders are likely not applicable for all infants who die in the NICU. More important is supportive, individualized communication between families and the medical team to ensure quality end-of-life care. In the adult and pediatric ICU literature, DNR orders are associated with improved qualitative "good death" assessments and decreased familial decision regret. In the NICU, rates of DNR usage aren't well reported and their overall utility is unclear. Though DNR orders can help guide clinical decision making in the NICU and may be associated with higher quality ethical discussion, our data suggest that they are not applicable in all patient cases. We hope that this work will help guide approaches to end-of-life care in the NICU and underscore the importance of frequent, open communication between families and their medical team.

Exploring Awareness and Perception of Do Not Resuscitate Orders in A Saudi Arabian General Population

Background: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders are crucial, yet often misunderstood, medical directives. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards DNRs in Saudi Arabia. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional web survey was conducted among 416 Saudi residents aged 18 and above. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and emotional responses related to DNR orders. Results: Over half (65.7%) lacked sufficient understanding of DNRs, highlighting a knowledge gap. While 56.8% grasped the meaning, less than half saw DNRs as beneficial for reducing pain or easing burdens on loved ones, indicating mixed attitudes. Decision-making preferences varied, with 49.1% advocating for medical professionals' involvement and 31% favouring family decisions. Personal experiences influenced understanding, with those having a family member's DNR order exhibiting higher comprehension. Conclusion: Significant knowledge gaps and mixed attitudes towards DNRs exist. Public education programs, improved patient communication, and culturally sensitive approaches are recommended to bridge this gap and empower individuals to make informed decisions.

The Effectiveness of Palliative Care Interventions in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review.

The increasing elderly population is driving higher utilization rates of long-term care facilities, where residents often have multiple chronic diseases, making them potential candidates for palliative care. Timely palliative care interventions can improve their quality of life and medical autonomy. This study systematically reviews the effectiveness of palliative care programs in long-term care facilities. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Airiti Library were searched up to 31 December 2023, using PICO criteria and the following keywords: 'care home', 'nursing home', 'residential aged care facility', and 'long-term care facility' for patients; and 'Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes', 'integrated care pathway', 'care home project', and 'palliative care program' for interventions. Seven articles were included. The results indicate that the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) intervention did not significantly influence overall quality of life but did improve the quality of death. There were no statistical differences in comfort or quality of death between the dementia and non-dementia groups. However, PACE significantly reduced healthcare costs. The implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) notably enhanced the control of terminal symptoms, while the Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes (GSFCH) effectively improved end-of-life care rates, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) signing rates, advance care planning (ACP) completion rates, and reduced inappropriate readmission rates. While palliative care interventions are shown to improve the quality of end-of-life care, their practical application should be adapted to fit the implementation conditions and capabilities of domestic long-term care facilities.

The Presence of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators is Rarely Addressed During Code Status Change.

Background: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) are used to prevent sudden cardiac death, but they may provide unwanted shocks during end-of-life care. We aimed to study the frequency at which Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) discussions address ICD preferences in high-risk patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patient hospitalizations with the presence of an ICD, a change in code status to DNR, and a subsequent death during that hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, significant comorbidities, if and when ICD was discussed, and who performed code status discussions, and were analyzed for statistical significance. Results: 129 patients met study criteria, and 110 patients (85.3%) did not have a documented discussion addressing ICD deactivation. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics between patients with ICD addressed or not addressed, nor were there differences noted between discussions performed by residents vs staff or with the presence of cardiology, critical care status, or with palliative care consultation. It was noted that specifically discussing intubation or cardioversion was associated with the discussion of ICD deactivation. Conclusion: ICD discussions were rarely documented in our high-risk population, highlighting a potential need for better in-chart visibility of ICDs and for focused education of clinicians who care for these patients at end of life.

Advance Directives Change Frequently in Nursing Home Residents

ObjectivesTo describe the rate, timing, and pattern of changes in advance directives (ADs) of do not resuscitate (DNR) and do not hospitalize (DNH) orders among new admissions to nursing homes (NHs). DesignA retrospective cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsAdmissions to all publicly funded NHs in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. MethodsResidents were followed until discharged from incident NH stay, death, or were still present at the end of study (December 31, 2019). They were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive baseline composite AD groups: Full Code, DNR Only, and DNR+DNH. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the incidence rate ratios of AD change between different AD groups and different decision makers for personal care, adjusted for baseline clinical and sociodemographic variables. ResultsA total of 102,541 NH residents were eligible for inclusion. Residents with at least 1 AD change accounted for 46% of Full Code, 30% of DNR Only, and 25% of DNR+DNH group. Median time to first AD change ranged between 26 and 55 weeks. For Full Code and DNR Only residents, the most frequent change was to an AD 1 level lower in aggressiveness or intervention, whereas for DNR+DNH residents the most frequent change was to DNR Only. About 16% of residents had 2 or more AD changes during their stay. After controlling for covariates, residents with a DNR-only order or DNR+DNH orders at admission and those with a surrogate decision maker were associated with lower AD change rates. Conclusions and ImplicationsMeasuring AD adherence rates that are documented only at a particular time often underestimates the dynamics of AD changes during a resident's stay and results in an inaccurate measure of the effectiveness of AD on resident care. There should be more frequent reviews of ADs as they are quite dynamic. Mandatory review after an acute change in a resident's health would ensure that ADs are current.

Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) Orders in an Older-Age Psychiatric Hospital

Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) Orders in an Older-Age Psychiatric Hospital

Improving Completion Rates, Accuracy and Online Upload of DNA CPR, Adults With Incapacity (AWI) and Hospital Anticipatory Care Plan (HACP) Documentation in Two Old Age Psychiatry Wards in NHS Fife

Improving Completion Rates, Accuracy and Online Upload of DNA CPR, Adults With Incapacity (AWI) and Hospital Anticipatory Care Plan (HACP) Documentation in Two Old Age Psychiatry Wards in NHS Fife

Nurse Practitioner Care, Scope of Practice, and End-of-Life Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

Nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) often receive burdensome care at the end of life. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing share of primary care in nursing homes, but how NP care is associated with end-of-life outcomes for this population is unknown. To examine the association of NP care with end-of-life outcomes for nursing home residents with ADRD and assess whether these associations differ according to state-level NP scope of practice regulations. This cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare claims included 334 618 US nursing home residents with ADRD who died between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from April 6, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Share of nursing home primary care visits by NPs, classified as minimal (<10% of visits), moderate (10%-50% of visits), and extensive (>50% of visits). State NP scope of practice regulations were classified as full vs restrictive in 2 domains: practice authority (authorization to practice and prescribe independently) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) authority (authorization to sign DNR orders). Hospitalization within the last 30 days of life and death with hospice. Linear probability models with hospital referral region fixed effects controlling for resident characteristics, visit volume, and geographic factors were used to estimate whether the associations between NP care and outcomes varied across states with different scope of practice regulations. Among 334 618 nursing home decedents (mean [SD] age at death, 86.6 [8.2] years; 69.3% female), 40.5% received minimal NP care, 21.4% received moderate NP care, and 38.0% received extensive NP care. Adjusted hospitalization rates were lower for residents with extensive NP care (31.6% [95% CI, 31.4%-31.9%]) vs minimal NP care (32.3% [95% CI, 32.1%-32.6%]), whereas adjusted hospice rates were higher for residents with extensive (55.6% [95% CI, 55.3%-55.9%]) vs minimal (53.6% [95% CI, 53.3%-53.8%]) NP care. However, there was significant variation by state scope of practice. For example, in full practice authority states, adjusted hospice rates were 2.88 percentage points higher (95% CI, 1.99-3.77; P < .001) for residents with extensive vs minimal NP care, but the difference between these same groups was 1.77 percentage points (95% CI, 1.32-2.23; P < .001) in restricted practice states. Hospitalization rates were 1.76 percentage points lower (95% CI, -2.52 to -1.00; P < .001) for decedents with extensive vs minimal NP care in full practice authority states, but the difference between these same groups in restricted practice states was only 0.43 percentage points (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.01; P < .04). Similar patterns were observed in analyses focused on DNR authority. The findings of this cohort study suggest that NPs appear to be important care providers during the end-of-life period for many nursing home residents with ADRD and that regulations governing NP scope of practice may have implications for end-of-life hospitalizations and hospice use in this population.

De-escalating treatments and transitioning care in a cardiac intensive care units network

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Recent data (1) have shown that end-of-life (EOL) management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in Cardiac Intensive Care Units (CICU) is aggressive, with late or no involvement of palliative care (PC) teams. Purpose To evaluate current PC and EOL practices in a contemporary multicenter registry of patients with ADHF who deteriorated to cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods A survey-based approach was used to collect data on PC and EOL management practices. We enrolled CS patients from 12 participating centers. A subset of 153 patients with ADHF-CS, enrolled between March 2020 and March 2023, was analyzed. We asked participating centers to report their practice regarding de-escalating treatments and transitioning care in the context of EOL, focusing on 1) discussion of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) deactivation with patients, 2) documentation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the patient's medical record, and 3) documentation of advance directives in the patient's medical record. We also examined early PC team involvement and ICD deactivation as indicators of de-escalating treatments and transitional care in ADHF-CS. Results are presented as numbers and percentages (%) for categorical variables and medians (interquartile range, IQR) for continuous variables. Results Baseline characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 describes the practices of the participating centers. DNR was routinely documented in the medical records in only 5 of 12 centers (41.7%). PC teams were involved in 21 of 153 enrolled ADHF-CS patients (13.7%). Of the 51 patients with an ICD, 17 died: 13 patients (76%) died in the hospital and 4 (24%) died within 6 months of discharge. ICD deactivation occurred in 6 of 17 deceased patients (35.3%). One patient had ICD deactivation supported by home PC services. Conclusions This study shows that the practice of de-escalating therapy, including ICD deactivation, is not routine in the participating centers. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating PC as a concurrent process with intensive care to effectively address the unmet needs of these patients and their families.

Factors Associated with Do Not Resuscitate Status and Palliative Care in Hospitalized Patients: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

Patients from diverse sociocultural backgrounds and with differing medical conditions may have varying levels of acceptance of advanced care planning and palliative care. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample for patients discharged from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, with conditions associated with frequently terminal conditions. We recorded demographic variables, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, and palliative care (PC) status and analyzed the associations between outcomes, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). A total of 23,402,637 patient records were included in the study, of which 2% were DNR and PC, 5% were DNR only, and 1% was PC only. From 2016 to 2019, the percentage of patients with PC increased from 2.55% to 3.27% and DNR from 6.31% to 7.7%. Black patients were less likely to have DNR status (odds ratio [OR] 0.72 [0.71-0.72]) but had similar PC rates. Male patients were less likely to have a DNR order in place (OR 0.89 [0.89-0.89]) but more likely to be in PC (OR 1.05 [1.04-1.05]). The diagnoses with the highest association with DNR status were lung cancer (OR 4.1 [4.0-4.5]), pancreatic cancer (OR 4.6 [4.5-4.7]), and sepsis (OR 2.9 [2.9-2.9]) The diagnoses most associated with PC were lung cancer (OR 6.3 [6.2-6.4]), pancreatic cancer (OR 8.1 [7.1-8.3]), colon cancer (OR 4.9 [4.8-5.1]), and senile brain degeneration of the brain OR 6.5 [5.3-7.9]). Mortality and LOS decreased between 2016 and 2019, but hospital charges increased (p < 0.001). Black race and male gender were associated with higher inpatient mortality (OR 1.12 [1.12-1.14]), LOS, and hospital charges. In the United States, the proportion of hospitalized patients with DNR, PC, and DNR with PC increased from 2016 to 2019. Overall, inpatient mortality and LOS fell, but hospital charges per patient increased. Significant gender and ethnic differences emerged. Black patients and males were less likely to have DNR status and had higher inpatient mortality, LOS, and hospital charges.

Ethical Dilemma Do Not Ressuscitation (DNR) in Nursing Practice

Introduction: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) is a condition where the patient experiences cardiac arrest but chooses not to undergo resuscitation. However, the legal consequences of DNR actions, which may either allow or completely prohibit these actions, can vary in different countries. Nurses frequently encounter ethical dilemmas resulting from DNR situations. This literature review explored nurses' ethical dilemmas regarding DNR and strategies to overcome them.Methods: This literature review examined previous research findings published in articles. Article searches were conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, employing keywords such as "DNR," "Nursing Ethics," and "Ethical dilemma," as well as combinations thereof like "DNR in a nursing ethical dilemma." Fifteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected.Results: Making DNR decisions for patients significantly impacted the continuity of patient care in hospitals. These decisions were influenced by religion/beliefs, life expectancy, limited resources, and past experiences. Nurses stressed the importance of discussing DNR situations openly. Moreover, nurses were crucial in addressing misunderstandings surrounding patient care with DNR orders through practice, education, advocacy, policy implementation, and research.Conclusion: Nurses require adequate training and education in end-of-life ethics and DNR decision-making to prevent detrimental actions and ensure patients' peaceful, dignified terminal care.

Identifying Relevant Topics for Inclusion in an Ethics Curriculum for Anesthesiology Trainees: A Survey of Practitioners in the Field.

Anesthesiology training programs are tasked with equipping trainees with the skills to become medically and ethically competent in the practice of anesthesia and to be prepared to obtain board certification, yet there is currently no standardized ethics curriculum within anesthesia training programs in the United States. To bridge this gap, and to provide a validated ethics curriculum to meet the aforementioned needs, in July 2021, a survey was sent to anesthesia scholars in the field of biomedical ethics to identify key areas that should be included in such an ethics curriculum. The responses were rated on a Likert scale and ranked. This paper identifies the top ten topics identified as high priority for inclusion in an anesthesiology training program and consequently deemed most relevant to meet the educational needs of graduates of an anesthesiology residency: (1) capacity to consent; (2) capacity to refuse elective versus lifesaving treatment; (3) application of surrogate decisionmaking; (4) approach to do not resuscitate (DNR) status in the operating room; (5) patient autonomy and advance directives; (6) navigating patient beliefs that may impair care; (7) "futility" in end-of-life care: when to withdraw life support; (8) disclosure of medical errors; (9) clinical criteria for "brain death" and consequences of this definition; and (10) the impaired anesthesiologist.

Life-Sustaining Treatment and Advance Care Documentation among Chinese American ICU Decedents

ContextDespite being one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the U.S., there exists a gap in how treatment preferences among Chinese Americans are expressed and enacted upon in inpatient settings. ObjectivesTo compare the rates of advance care documentation and life-sustaining treatment between Chinese American and White American ICU decedents. MethodsIn this matched retrospective decedent cohort study, we included four ICUs within a tertiary medical center located in a Chinatown neighborhood. The Chinese American cohort included adult patients during the terminal admission in the ICU with primary language identified as Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese). The White American cohort was matched according to age, sex, year of death, and admitting diagnosis. ResultsWe identified 154 decedents in each cohort. Despite similar odds on admission, Chinese American decedents had higher odds of DNR completion (OR 1.82; 95%CI 0.99–3.40) and DNI completion (OR 1.81; 95%CI, 1.07–1.57) during the terminal ICU admission. Although Chinese American decedents had similar odds of intubation (aOR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.55–1.48), a higher proportion signed a DNI after intubation (41% vs 25%). Chinese American decedents also had higher odds of CPR (aOR 2.03; 95%CI, 1.03–41.6) with three Chinese American decedents receiving CPR despite a signed DNR order (12% vs 0%). ConclusionsDuring terminal ICU admissions, Chinese American decedents were more likely to complete advance care documentation and to receive CPR than White American decedents. Changes in code status were more common for Chinese Americans after intubation. Further research is needed to understand these differences and identify opportunities for goal-concordant care.

Unintended Consequences of Code Status in the Intensive Care Unit: What Happens After a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order Is Placed? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Some clinicians suspect that patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders receive less aggressive care. Extrapolation from code status to goals of care could cause significant harm. This study asked the question: Do DNR orders in the intensive care unit (ICU) lead to a decrease in invasive interventions? Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of ICU patients from three teaching hospitals. All ICU patients were assessed for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were medical futility and death, comfort care, or ICU discharge <48 hours after DNR initiation. Five hundred thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred forty-five were included in the final analysis. Primary outcomes were occurrence of invasive interventions after DNR initiation-surgical operation, central line, ventilation, dialysis, or other procedure. Secondary outcomes were antibiotic administration, blood transfusion, mortality, and discharge location. Results: Patients with DNR orders underwent fewer surgical operations (14.5% vs. 31.1%, p = 0.002), but more central lines (42.1% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.009), ventilator use (49.0% vs. 18.9%, p < 0.001), and dialysis (20.0% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.002), compared with patients without DNR orders. Transfusions and antibiotic use decreased similarly over admission for both groups (transfusions: β = 1.25; p = 0.59; and antibiotics: β = 1.44; p = 0.27). Mortality and hospice discharges were higher for DNR patients (p < 0.001.). Conclusions: DNR status did not decrease the number of nonoperative interventions patients received as compared with full code counterparts. Although differences in populations existed, patients with DNR orders were likely to receive a similar number of invasive interventions. This finding suggests that providers do not wholesale limit these options for patients with code status limitations.

343 Regional Variability in the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage for Black Patients: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and End-of-life Care.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in the care of Black Americans with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have been described. However, regional variations for Black patients with aSAH have yet to be delineated, particularly in end-of-life care. METHODS: We analyzed aSAH data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016-2020. Controlling for covariates, multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess U.S. Census region differences between Black and White patients in treatment, adverse outcomes, mortality, use of palliative care as well as do not resuscitate (DNR) and of life-sustaining interventions (mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, blood transfusion). RESULTS: Black patients in the East-North Central (ENC) division were less likely to have inpatient morality following aSAH (OR 0.68, 95% CI 055 – 0.83, p &lt;0.001), yet more likely to have tracheostomy (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.39 - 2.49, p &lt; 0.001) and gastrostomy (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.31 - 2.11, p &lt; 0.001) tube placement than the national average. Furthermore, Black patients in the ENC were less likely to have palliative care (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22 - 0.80, p = 0.008) This trend continued in the West South-Central (WSC) division for tracheostomy (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.29 - 2.66, p = 0.001), gastrostomy (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.44 - 2.63, p &lt; 0.001), and palliative care (OR .67, 95% CI 0.51 - 0.87, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic variations exist in the treatment of Black patients with aSAH. Nationally and regionally Black patients have lower mortality rates than White patients, due in part to disparities in end-of-life care. Black patients receive more life-sustaining interventions, and less palliative care and DNR; this is most evident in the ENC and WSC regions. Paradoxically, regions with more Black residents fare worse.

Public Attitude towards Implementing DNAR and a Stance on Pediatric DNAR in Poland-A Prospective Survey Study.

Background: Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) is a document signed by a patient, which states that they do not want to be resuscitated. In Poland, DNAR is not regulated by law. We aimed to assess people's perceptions on DNAR and pediatric DNAR in Poland. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed via the snowball sampling method in different voivodeships in Poland in the years 2014-2018. The survey consisted of questions regarding knowledge and attitudes towards DNAR and pediatric DNAR. Results: A total of 1049 responses were collected. Moreover, 82% support introducing DNAR in Poland, but 78% believe that this is not a pressing issue. In a general question, 46% of respondents believe that DNAR should be obtainable only for adults. However, in a specific question, this number drops to 17%, with people agreeing for pediatric DNAR if it contains a boundary-23% agree if both parents agree to the solution and 45% if both parents and the child's doctor agree to it. Conclusions: Even though someone supports DNAR, it does not mean that they support pediatric DNAR. People outside the medical community are more likely to be against DNAR. Giving a boundary in using pediatric DNAR may lead to the ease of its implementation in a legislative manner.

The Attitude of Healthcare Providers and the General Population on the Concept of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Order in End-Stage Patients

Background: The do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order in end-stage patients constitutes a critical medical decision, directing healthcare providers to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest upon the patient's request. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the attitudes of healthcare providers and the general population toward the concept of DNR orders in end-stage patients. Methods: Conducted from September 2021 to May 2022, this cross-sectional study aimed to gauge the attitudes of healthcare providers and the general population toward DNR orders in end-stage patients using a questionnaire assessing attitudes toward DNR. The research population included healthcare providers—physicians and nurses—from healthcare centers affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences, selected through convenience sampling, and the general population comprising individuals frequenting parks near these healthcare centers within the relevant municipal districts. Results: Among the 164 participating healthcare providers, 139 (84.8%) were female. Participants' ages ranged from 21 to 57 years, with an average age of 36.78 ± 7.79 years. The study found that healthcare providers had a significantly higher average attitude score toward DNR (29.85 ± 9.46) compared to the general population (27.08 ± 9.78). Healthcare providers with adequate financial status exhibited a more positive attitude toward DNR in end-stage patients compared to those with excellent or poor economic status (P = 0.001). Additionally, the relative frequency of individuals experiencing a poor prognosis of disease was significantly lower among healthcare personnel than the general population (P = 0.018). Healthcare providers without family members or friends in their end-stage of life demonstrated a more favorable attitude toward DNR for these patients (P = 0.001). Conclusions: The study revealed that healthcare providers exhibited a significantly more positive attitude toward DNR compared to the general population. Furthermore, healthcare providers experienced a lower relative frequency of individuals facing a poor prognosis of disease compared to the general population. However, the relative frequency of experiencing family members or friends in the end stage did not significantly differ between healthcare providers and the general population. Healthcare providers with less than 2 years or more than 20 years of experience in the medical field demonstrated a more positive attitude toward DNR.

Associations between Present-on-Admission Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Pneumonia.

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are used to express patient preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study examined whether early DNR orders are associated with differences in treatments and outcomes among patients hospitalized with pneumonia. This is a retrospective cohort study of 768,015 adult patients hospitalized with pneumonia from 2010 to 2015 in 646 US hospitals. The exposure was DNR orders present on admission. Secondary analyses stratified patients by predicted in-hospital mortality. Main outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, cost, intensive care admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, vasopressors, and dialysis initiation. Of 768,015 patients, 94,155 (12.3%) had an early DNR order. Compared with those without, patients with DNR orders were older (mean age 80.1 ± 10.6 years vs 67.8 ± 16.4 years), with higher comorbidity burden, intensive care use (31.6% vs 30.6%), and in-hospital mortality (28.2% vs 8.5%). After adjustment via propensity score weighting, these patients had higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33-2.45) and lower use of intensive therapies such as vasopressors (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85) and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.70). Although there was little relationship between predicted mortality and DNR orders, among those with highest predicted mortality, DNR orders were associated with lower intensive care use compared with those without (66.7% vs 80.8%). Patients with early DNR orders have higher in-hospital mortality rates than those without, but often receive intensive care. These orders have the most impact on the care of patients with the highest mortality risk.