Small/flat urothelial lesions are challenging and currently available ancillary immunohistochemistry testing often cannot reliably distinguish between reactive lesions and urothelial carcinoma (UCa). UCa has a characteristic molecular profile, but small/flat urothelial lesions are typically considered too small to perform next generation sequencing (NGS). Herein, we present our institution's experience with utilizing comprehensive DNA-based NGS to evaluate small/flat urothelial lesions (n = 13 cases). NGS was ordered on 7/13 small/flat urothelial lesions initially diagnosed as urothelial atypia, ordered by the pathologist to aid in further diagnosis; the remaining 6/13 cases were diagnosed as urothelial carcinoma in situ (uCIS), ordered by a treating oncologist. The test was considered as adding value if it yielded pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations previously associated with urothelial carcinoma in the literature. Macroscopic dissection was determined necessary in all cases and obtained either by scraping (7), punch biopsy (5) or scooping (1) of paraffin tissue blocks. In 4/13 cases, tumor content was considered low (<25%); in 2/13 cases, DNA quantity yield was considered below optimal (<250 ng); all cases met required DNA quantity for testing (>50 ng). Mean target coverage ranged: 498 to 985 (optimal >500 reads). NGS testing identified mutations compatible with urothelial carcinoma in all 7 cases initially diagnosed as atypical; and in one case, the tumor recurred as a lung metastasis. All 6 uCIS had NGS testing results concordant with UCa. In conclusion, despite small sample quantity with low tumor content and DNA concentration yield, NGS testing with appropriate methodology can be considered in the setting of small/flat urothelial lesions to aid in diagnosis or per oncologist request and yield interpretable results.