It is commonly believed that measurement error is accounted for when utilizing the LISREL approach. The purpose of the present research was to utilize the expanded factor analysis model to examine the effects of unreliability on the various parameter estimates yielded from structural models. In other words, the relationships between “true score” latent variables was considered under a range of assumed values of reliability. The results indicate that the amount of measurement error, as defined by specific variance, does have certain effects upon the estimates of structural equation models. When the level of specific variance is reduced (due to decreased reliability) for only one of the exogenous variables, the following can occur: Error variance for that variable increases systematically since specific and error variance are analytically, inversely related; the remaining parameters of the measurement models remain unchanged; the maximum-likelihood estimate and standard error for the relevant structure coefficient increase at the same rate; the maximum-likelihood estimate of the disturbance variance also decreases; and goodness of fit of the model is unchanged. Thus, in those situations where indicator variable reliability differs substantially from unity, say 0.8 or less, consideration needs to be given to taking the unreliability into account in the analysis; otherwise, certain important parameter estimates may be biased leading to possible model misinterpretation.
Read full abstract