This paper presents the impact of uncoordinated and coordinated charging management of electric vehicles (EVs) on the loading capability of major distribution system equipment, voltage quality, and energy loss in a distribution system. The main emphasis is given to the overloading of distribution transformers, primary feeders, and a substation transformer. The voltage quality of load points along the feeders and the system energy loss are also underlined. The load profile for uncoordinated EV charging is simulated by a Monte Carlo method with several deterministic and stochastic variables involved. To mitigate the overloading of the system components, a coordinated charging (also known as smart charging) model formulated as a linear programming problem is proposed with the objective of maximizing the total amount of energy consumption by EVs and the sum of all individual final states of charge (SoCs), and minimizing the sum of the absolute deviation of individual SoCs from the overall average SoC. The optimization problem is subject to equipment capability loading and planning criteria constraints with low, medium, and high EV penetration levels. The voltage quality problem and energy loss are also analyzed by an unbalanced three-phased power flow model. A case study of a real and practical 115/22 kV distribution system of the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) with a 50 MVA substation transformer, 5 feeders, and 732 distribution transformers shows that the possibility of overloaded system components, voltage drops along the feeders, and the system energy loss can be identified in the uncoordinated charging scenario and offer the readiness for equipment replacement and network reinforcement planning. The proposed smart charging model allows the distribution system to accommodate more EVs by appropriately managing the power and the start times of charging for the individual EVs over the timeslots of a day. The study results confirm no violation of the system components and voltage regulation imposed by the system planning guidelines. In addition, the system peak demand and the system energy loss are significantly lower in the smart charging scenario, thus deferring investment upgrades, offering better asset utilization, and retaining network security and service quality.
Read full abstract