The manuscript presents the applicability of the Gumbel distribution in the frequency analysis of extreme events in hydrology. The advantages and disadvantages of using the distribution are highlighted, as well as recommendations regarding its proper use. A literature review was also carried out regarding the methods for estimating the parameters of the Gumbel distribution in hydrology. Thus, for the verification of the methods, case studies are presented regarding the determination of the maximum annual flows and precipitations using nine methods for estimating the distribution parameters. The influence of the variability of the observed data lengths on the estimation of the statistical indicators, the estimation of the parameters, and the quantiles corresponding to the field of small exceedance probabilities (p < 1%) is also highlighted. In each case, the results are analyzed compared to those obtained with the Generalized Extreme Value distribution, the four-parameter Burr distribution, and the five-parameter Wakeby distribution estimated using the L-moments method. The results of the case studies highlight and reaffirm the statistical, mathematical, and hydrological recommendations regarding the avoidance of applying the Gumbel distribution in flood frequency analysis and its use with reservations in the case of maximum precipitation analysis, especially when the statistical indicators of the analyzed data are not close to the characteristic ones and unique to the distribution.