Distribution Of Rearrangements Research Articles

Somatic rearrangements across cancer reveal classes of samples with distinct patterns of DNA breakage and rearrangement-induced hypermutability

Whole-genome sequencing using massively parallel sequencing technologies enables accurate detection of somatic rearrangements in cancer. Pinpointing large numbers of rearrangement breakpoints to base-pair resolution allows analysis of rearrangement microhomology and genomic location for every sample. Here we analyze 95 tumor genome sequences from breast, head and neck, colorectal, and prostate carcinomas, and from melanoma, multiple myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We discover three genomic factors that are significantly correlated with the distribution of rearrangements: replication time, transcription rate, and GC content. The correlation is complex, and different patterns are observed between tumor types, within tumor types, and even between different types of rearrangements. Mutations in the APC gene correlate with and, hence, potentially contribute to DNA breakage in late-replicating, low %GC, untranscribed regions of the genome. We show that somatic rearrangements display less microhomology than germline rearrangements, and that breakpoint loci are correlated with local hypermutability with a particular enrichment for transversions.

The Main Effect of Chromosomal Rearrangement Is Changing the Action of Regulatory Genes

Effect of chromosomal rearrangements on the expression of mutations was studied in Drosophila melanogaster regulatory genes. These were facultative dominant lethals and recessive lethals on the X chromosome obtained by the classical Muller-5 method. Chromosomal rearrangements drastically changed the expression of regulatory gene mutations. Rearrangements either caused the lethal effect of mutations or suppressed the already present lethality. The action of rearrangements exhibited the maternal or paternal effect. Irrespective of the presence in the genome of mutations at regulatory genes, a rearrangement acted as a factor decreasing fertility of the organism. The rearrangement effect is identical to the expression of regulatory genes per se. It is concluded that the chromosomal rearrangement affects the examined regulatory genes indirectly through a change in the operation of regulatory genes located within the rearrangement. Thus, rearrangements gain great importance for the definition of the pattern of genome functional activity. Widespread distribution of rearrangements in individual genotypes and their effectivity in the process of speciation are thus explained.

Expansions and contractions in 36-bp minisatellites by gene conversion in yeast.

The instability of simple tandem repeats, such as human minisatellite loci, has been suggested to arise by gene conversions. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a double-strand break (DSB) was created by the HO endonuclease so that DNA polymerases associated with gap repair must traverse an artificial minisatellite of perfect 36-bp repeats or a yeast Y' minisatellite containing diverged 36-bp repeats. Gene conversions are frequently accompanied by changes in repeat number when the template contains perfect repeats. When the ends of the DSB have nonhomologous tails of 47 and 70 nucleotides that must be removed before repair DNA synthesis can begin, 16% of gene conversions had rearrangements, most of which were contractions, almost always in the recipient locus. When efficient removal of nonhomologous tails was prevented in rad1 and msh2 strains, repair was reduced 10-fold, but among survivors there was a 10-fold reduction in contractions. Half the remaining events were expansions. A similar decrease in the contraction rate was observed when the template was modified so that DSB ends were homologous to the template; and here, too, half of the remaining rearrangements were expansions. In this case, efficient repair does not require RAD1 and MSH2, consistent with our previous observations. In addition, without nonhomologous DSB ends, msh2 and rad1 mutations did not affect the frequency or the distribution of rearrangements. We conclude that the presence of nonhomologous ends alters the mechanism of DSB repair, likely through early recruitment of repair proteins including Msh2p and Rad1p, resulting in more frequent contractions of repeated sequences.