Cancer Distress Research Articles

Airway Resistance and Respiratory Distress in Laryngeal Cancer: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Obstructive upper airway pathologies are a great clinical challenge for the airway surgeon. Protection against acute obstruction is critical, but avoidance of unnecessary tracheostomy must also be considered. Decision-making regarding airway, although supported by some objective findings, is largely guided by subjective experience and training. This investigation aims to study the relationship between clinical respiratory distress and objective measures of airway resistance in laryngeal cancer as determined by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and morphometric analysis. Retrospective CT and clinical data were obtained for series of 20 cases, defined as newly diagnosed laryngeal cancer patients who required admission or urgent airway surgery, and 20 controls. Cases and controls were matched based on T-staging. Image segmentation and morphometric analysis were first performed. Computational models based on the lattice Boltzmann method were then created and used to quantify the continuous mass flow, rigid wall, and constant static pressure inlet boundary conditions. The analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between airway resistance and acute obstruction (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.001-1.045). Morphometric analysis similarly demonstrated a significant relationship when relating measurements based on the minimum cross-section, but not on length of stenosis. Morphometric measurements also showed significance in predicting CFD results, and their relationship demonstrated that airway pressures increase exponentially below 2.5 mm. Tumor subsite did not show a significant difference, although the glottic subgroup tended to have higher resistances. Airway resistance analysis from CFD computation correlated with presence of acute distress requiring emergent management. Morphometric analysis showed a similar correlation, demonstrating a radiologic airway assessment technique on which future risk estimation could be performed. 4 (case-control study) Laryngoscope, 133:2734-2741, 2023.

Fear of cancer recurrence therapy (FORT): A randomized controlled trial.

Most fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions have small effects, and few target FCR. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with breast and gynecological cancer survivors evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-existential fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) compared to an attention placebo control group (living well with cancer [LWWC]) on FCR. One hundred and sixty-four women with clinical levels of FCR and cancer distress were randomly assigned to 6-weekly, 120 min FORT (n = 80) or LWWC (n = 84) group sessions. They completed questionnaires at baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2; primary endpoint), 3 (T3), and 6 months (T4) posttreatment. Generalized linear models were used to compare group differences in the fear of cancer recurrence inventory (FCRI) total score and secondary outcomes. FORT participants experienced greater reductions from T1 to T2 on FCRI total with a between-group difference of -9.48 points (p = .0393), resulting in a medium effect of -0.530, with a maintained effect at T3 (p = .0330) but not at T4. For the secondary outcomes, improvements were in favor of FORT, including FCRI triggers (p = .0208), FCRI coping (p = .0351), cognitive avoidance (p = .0155), need for reassurance from physicians (p = .0117), and quality of life (mental health; p = .0147). This RCT demonstrated that FORT, compared to an attention placebo control group, resulted in a greater reduction in FCR posttreatment and at 3 months posttreatment in women with breast and gynecological cancer, indicating its potential as a new treatment strategy. We recommend a booster session to sustain gains. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Using the emotional functioning in clinical practice to detect psychological distress in patients with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer

PurposePatients with advanced cancer suffer significant decline of their psychological state. A rapid and reliable evaluation of this state is essential to detect and treat it and improve quality of life. The aim was to probe the usefulness of the emotional function (EF) subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30) to assess psychological distress in cancer patients.MethodsThis is a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving 15 Spanish hospitals. Patients diagnosed with unresectable advanced thoracic or colorectal cancer were included. Participants completed the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), the current the gold standard, and the EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess their psychological distress prior to initiating systemic antineoplastic treatment. Accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.ResultsThe sample comprised 639 patients: 283 with advanced thoracic cancer and 356 with advanced colorectal cancer. According to the BSI scale, 74% and 66% displayed psychological distress with an EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 accuracy of 79% and 76% in detecting psychological distress in individuals with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer, respectively. Sensitivity was 79 and 75% and specificity was 79 and 77% with a PPV of 92 and 86% and a NPV of 56 and 61% (scale cut-off point, 75) for patients with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer, respectively. The mean AUC for thoracic cancer was 0.84 and, for colorectal cancer, it was 0.85.ConclusionThis study reveals that the EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscale is a simple and effective tool for detecting psychological distress in people with advanced cancer.

The facets of psychopathology in patients with cancer: Cross-sectional and longitudinal network analyses

ObjectiveCancer patients display heterogeneous psychopathology, comprising depressive, anxiety, hostility, and somatic symptoms. Often, clinical pictures evolve over time deteriorating the individual functioning and prognosis. Network models can reveal the relationships between symptoms, thus providing clinical insights. MethodThis study examined data of the Brief Symptom Inventory and the Distress Thermometer, from 1108 cancer outpatients. Gaussian Graphical Models were estimated using regularized and non-regularized Bayesian methods. In addition, we used community detection methods to identify the most relevant symptom groupings, and longitudinal network analyses on 515 participants to examine the connections between symptoms over three months. ResultsThe network models derived from baseline data suggested symptoms clustered into three main complexes (depression/anxiety, hostility, and somatic symptoms). Symptoms related to depression and hostility were highly connected with suicidal and death thoughts. Faintness, weakness, chest pain, and dyspnoea, among somatic symptoms, were more strongly connected with psychopathological features. Longitudinal analyses revealed that sadness, irritability, nervousness, and tension predicted each other. Panic and death thoughts predicted fearfulness and faintness. ConclusionsSomatic symptoms, sadness, irritability, chronic and acute anxiety interact between each other, shaping the heterogeneous clinical picture of distress in cancer. This study, strengthened by robust methods, is the first to employ longitudinal network analyses in cancer patients. Further studies should evaluate whether targeting specific symptoms might prevent the onset of chronic distress and improve clinical outcomes in cancer patients.

Oncology distress screening within predominately Black Veterans: Outcomes on supportive care utilization, hospitalizations, and mortality.

We evaluated whether patients' initial screening symptoms were related to subsequent utilization of supportive care services and hospitalizations, and whether patient-level demographics, symptoms, hospitalizations, and supportive care service utilization were associated with mortality in primarily low-income, older, Black Veterans with cancer. This quality improvement project created collaborative clinics to conduct cancer distress screenings and refer to supportive care services at an urban, VA medical center. All patients completed a distress screen with follow-up screening every 3 months. Supportive care utilization, hospitalization rates, and mortality were abstracted through medical records. Poisson regression models and cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Five hundred and eighty five screened patients were older (m=72), mostly Black 70% (n=412), and had advanced cancer 54%. Fifty-eight percent(n=340) were screened only once with 81% (n=470) receiving ≥1 supportive care service and 51.5% (n=297) being hospitalized ≥1 time 18 months following initial screen. Symptom severity was significantly related to number of hospitalizations. Low mood was significantly related to higher supportive services (p < 0.001), but not hospitalizations (p ≥ 0.52). Pain, fatigue, physical function, nutrition, and physical symptoms were significantly associated with more supportive services and hospitalizations (p < 0.01). Twenty percent (n=168) died; Veterans who were Black, had lower stage cancers, better physical health, and utilized less supportive care services had lower odds of mortality (p ≤ 0.01). Individuals with elevated distress needs and those reporting lower physical function utilized more supportive care services and had higher hospitalization rates. Lower physical function, greater supportive care use, higher stage cancer, and being non-Black were associated with higher odds of death.

Psychological distress and eustress in cancer and cancer treatment: Advances and perspectives.

Facing cancer diagnosis, patients with cancer are prone to psychological stress and consequent psychological disorders. The association between psychological stress and cancer has long been a subject of high interest. To date, preclinical studies have gradually uncovered the promotive effects of psychological distress on tumor hallmarks. In contrast, eustress may exert suppressive effects on tumorigenesis and beneficial effects on tumor treatment, which brings a practicable means and psychosocial perspective to cancer treatment. However, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, by focusing on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system, as well as stress-related crucial neurotransmitters and hormones, we highlight the effects of distress and eustress on tumorigenesis, the tumor microenvironment, and tumor treatment. We also discuss the findings of clinical studies on stress management in patients with cancer. Last, we summarize questions that remain to be addressed and provide suggestions for future research directions.

High Distress Portends Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION: New cancer diagnoses may lead to heightened levels of distress, which may affect quality of life (QoL). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between high distress and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients evaluated for stage 0–III breast cancer at an academic breast center were offered a cancer distress screening survey which measures 4 domains of distress: emotional, health, social, and practical. High distress was defined as a score greater than 5 of 10 in any domain. Immediately after their initial appointment, patients were invited to complete the Breast-Q module, a validated PRO scale evaluating QoL across 4 domains: satisfaction with breasts (SB), psychosocial wellbeing (PsW), physical wellbeing (PhW), and sexual wellbeing (SW). The primary outcomes were scores for each Breast-Q domain. Groups were compared by t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and multiple regression models. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients completed both the distress screen and the PRO survey. Sixty-seven patients (60%) had high distress, whereas 44 patients (40%) did not have high distress. In the univariate analysis (Figure), patients with high distress had lower SB (p < 0.01), PsW (p < 0.01), PhW (p = 0.03), and SW (p < 0.01) scores. In the multiple regression, high distress was an independent predictor of lower score for SB (p = 0.02), PsW (p = 0.02), and SW (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients with high distress at diagnosis report worse QoL compared with their peers. Early intervention should be provided to improve QoL in this patient population.Figure

Guided imagery for treatment (GIFT): protocol of a pilot trial of guided imagery versus treatment as usual to address radiotherapy-related distress in head and neck cancer

BackgroundCancers of the head and neck region are associated with high symptom burden and elevated levels of psychological distress. Radiotherapy (RT) is a common treatment for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) that is associated with psychological distress related to the immobilizing nature of the treatment, frequency of treatment delivery, and side effects. Guided imagery is a relaxation technique that is beneficial in reducing psychological distress in patients with other cancer diagnoses but has not been studied in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a brief guided imagery intervention (guided imagery for treatment, GIFT) to reduce RT-related anxiety and depression in patients with HNC relative to treatment as usual (TAU).MethodsPatients with HNC planning to receive RT will be recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a brief, two-session guided imagery intervention (GIFT) relative to TAU alone. Primary aims include acceptability and feasibility evaluated through quantitative and qualitative methods. Measures of anxiety and depression, symptom burden, health-related quality of life, and anxiolytic medication use will be collected at baseline, during treatment, and at 1-month follow-up.DiscussionThere are no published interventions of guided imagery for anxiety and depression in patients with HNC despite its efficacy in other populations of patients with cancer. This proposed project evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention that has the potential to reduce psychological distress in a vulnerable population. Additionally, we will preliminarily examine the impact of behavioral intervention on psychological distress and the use of anxiolytic medication, a novel area of study.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03662698; registered on 9/6/2018.

WITHDRAWN: Pathway Linking Emotional Suppression to Depression and Anxiety in Cancer Patients undergoing Chemotherapy: The Mediating Role of Ego-strength

It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to this journal have not been published and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. Furthermore, any data, illustration, structure or table that has been published elsewhere must be reported, and copyright permission for reproduction must be obtained. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden, and by submitting the article for publication the authors agree that the publishers have the legal right to take appropriate action against the authors, if plagiarism or fabricated information is discovered. By submitting a manuscript the authors agree that the copyright of their article is transferred to the publishers if and when the article is accepted for publication.

’Why Mutilate Me Before I Die’: An Emotion-Focused Conceptualization of Breast Cancer Clients’ Experiences of Anxiety and Depression

ABSTRACT The study set out to study the experienced distress of clients with breast cancer who also meet criteria for comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD) from the perspective of emotion-focused case conceptualization. A theoretically informed qualitative case analysis of 15 recorded psychotherapy sessions across three women was conducted using an emotion-focused case conceptualization as domains of inquiry and an interpretative framework. Experiences of mastectomy-related shame appeared to be maintained by cancer side effects, whereas social identities relating to gender and class triggered self-blame for cancer and shame at not functioning as well as expected. Existential fear, worry, and hypervigilance were indicative of cancer as an ongoing trauma. Unmet needs for safety were related to unclear communication with the medical team during treatment, while triggers relating to childhood adversity and insecure attachments perpetuated present-day distress. The findings suggest that emotion-focused treatments in psycho-oncology include a trauma-informed lens that allows for greater processing and integration of past trauma. Future research should explore breast cancer distress in women across different social identities for a broader and more inclusive understanding of distress presentations.

The prevalence of psychological disorders among cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis.

PurposeWe aimed to assess the prevalence rate (PR) of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), insomnia, distress, and fear of cancer progression/recurrence among patients with cancer during the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsStudies that reported the PR of six psychological disorders among cancer patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic were searched in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, from January 2020 up to 31 January 2022. Meta‐analysis results were merged using PR and 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I 2 and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger's tests. All data analyses were performed using Stata14.0 software.ResultsForty studies with 27,590 participants were included. Pooled results showed that the PR of clinically significant depression, anxiety, PTSD, distress, insomnia, and fear of cancer progression/recurrence among cancer patients were 32.5%, 31.3%, 28.2%, 53.9%, 23.2%, and 67.4%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with head and neck cancer had the highest PR of clinically significant depression (74.6%) and anxiety (92.3%) symptoms. Stratified analysis revealed that patients with higher education levels had higher levels of clinically significant depression (37.2%). A higher level of clinically significant PTSD was observed in employed patients (47.4%) or female with cancer (27.9%).ConclusionThis meta‐analysis evaluated the psychological disorders of cancer patients during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Therefore, it is necessary to develop psychological interventions to improve the mental health of cancer patients during the pandemic.

Symptom burden and emotional distress in advanced lung cancer: the moderating effects of physicians' communication skills and patients' disease understanding.

The elevated physical symptom burden in advanced lung cancer can disrupt patients' emotional well-being, and current literature suggests that physicians' good communication skills might be a buffer. However, little is known about for which group of patients this buffering effect is most effective. Based on a cross-sectional study in patients with advanced lung cancer, the present study examined whether the moderating effect of physicians' communication skills on the association between physical symptoms and emotional distress would further depend on patients' perceived disease understanding. Patients with advanced lung cancer (n = 199) completed a questionnaire including measures of physical symptoms related to lung cancer, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, perceptions of physicians' communication skills, and self-reported understanding of their disease. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated a significant three-way interaction among physical symptoms, perceptions of physicians' communication skills, and perceived disease understanding on both anxiety and depression. Specifically, physicians' good communication skills exerted a buffering effect only for patients with lower levels of disease understanding. Our findings indicate that improving physicians' communication skills may be especially beneficial for reducing the maladaptive emotional reactions to symptom burden for patients with limited disease understanding. When time and resources for communication are restricted, enhanced awareness and focused training may be directed at communicating with patients who possess limited knowledge about their disease.

Emotion Regulation Flexibility and Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Framework for Understanding Symptoms and Affect Dynamics in Pediatric Psycho-Oncology.

Simple SummaryThe individual’s ability to conceive and regulate the broad spectrum of their human emotions is closely linked to their mental health. The implications of a serious disease such as cancer represent an extraordinary burden to these internal coping mechanisms, especially in the case of young patients. Regarding their well-being and support, it is therefore of particular interest for caregivers to be able to follow the dynamics of the patient’s emotional world and perceptions. Technical progress enables new possibilities for data collection through tools for digital patient self-reports while simultaneously creating new challenges. Within the scope of this article, we provide an overview of the literature on this topic, outlining the current strengths and weaknesses and possible perspectives on digital aids, especially in terms of capturing the flexibility, fluctuations and early detection of symptom changes.Emotion dysregulation is regarded as a driving mechanism for the development of mental health problems and psychopathology. The role of emotion regulation (ER) in the management of cancer distress and quality of life (QoL) has recently been recognized in psycho-oncology. The latest technological advances afford ways to assess ER, affective experiences and QoL in child, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer patients through electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) in their daily environment in real-time. Such tools facilitate ways to study the dynamics of affect and the flexibility of ER. However, technological advancement is not risk-free. We critically review the literature on ePRO in cancer existing models of ER in pediatric psycho-oncology and analyze strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of ePRO with a focus on CAYA cancer research and care. Supported by personal study-based experiences, this narrative review serves as a foundation to propose a novel methodological and metatheoretical framework based on: (a) an extended notion of ER, which includes its dynamic, adaptive and flexible nature and focuses on processes and conditions rather than fixed categorical strategies; (b) ePRO as a means to measure emotion regulation flexibility and affect dynamics; (c) identifying early warning signals for symptom change via ePRO and building forecasting models using dynamical systems theory.

Early Diagnosis of Melanoma and Breast Cancer in Women: Influence of Body Image Perception.

The diagnosis of melanoma and breast cancer may impact many aspects of life with significant reductions in emotional functioning and quality of life. The aim of the study was to analyze the emotional traits of female patients with oncological in early-stage diagnosis, investigating predictors for psychological distress and analyzing body image perception. An observational study was conducted, A sample of 84 female cancer patients (age range 30–55 years) with melanoma (n = 42) and breast cancer diagnosis (n = 42). The examined emotional variables were psychological distress; depression, stress, and anxiety; metacognitions; and body self-perception. Findings showed higher psychological distress in breast cancer than in melanoma patients (p = 0.00), which was related to lower positive self-perception of body image (p = 0.03). Furthermore, psychological distress was negatively correlated with consequences of clinical treatment on body image, and low well-being affected the social interaction and well-being with own body. There was no significant difference between cancer staging and timing from diagnosis. Prevention and therapeutic psychological protocols might be adapted and tailored to the unmet needs of the patients in medical treatments to promote and enhance the Quality of Life in survivorship.

Adverse events following immunization and psychological distress among cancer patients/survivors following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

PurposeThis study aims to describe the adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients/survivors associated with their psychological distress.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted to assess AEFIs after the receipt of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients/survivors attending a university hospital in Malaysia. Psychological distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before and after the first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccine.ResultsA total of 217 complete responses were received. Compared with before vaccination, both HADS Anxiety (HADS-A) and HADS Depression (HADS-D) scores were significantly reduced after the first and second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Most of the participants had mild-or-moderate systemic and local AEFIs, with the most common being pain at the injection site, tiredness, and headache for both the first and second doses of the vaccine. Positive correlations between the total AEFI score and HADS-A (r = 0.309, p < 0.001) and HADS-D (r = 0.214, p = 0.001) scores were observed after the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similarly, positive associations were observed between the total AEFI score and HADS-A (r = 0.305, p < 0.001) and HADS-D (r = 0.235, p < 0.001) scores after the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.ConclusionMild-to-moderate AEFIs found in this study help address vaccine hesitancy in cancer patients/survivors. Receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine had a positive effect on decreasing psychological distress in cancer patients/survivors. High severity of an AEFI was associated with higher anxiety and depressive symptoms.

NRG-CC008: A nonrandomized prospective clinical trial comparing the non-inferiority of salpingectomy to salpingo-oophorectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer among BRCA1 carriers [SOROCk

TPS10615 Background: Studies of ovarian cancer screening in the general population have not demonstrated a reduction in ovarian cancer mortality. High-grade pelvic serous carcinomas (HGSCs) have traditionally been thought to originate from the ovarian surface epithelium. However, more recent data strongly suggests that most HGSCs originate from precursor lesions found in the distal fallopian tube. Serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions are found in association with HGSCs in 50-60% of cases and other early serous precursor lesions can be identified in an additional 25% of cases. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology has recently issued recommendations that salpingectomy can be considered at the completion of childbearing in indiviuals at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer who do not agree to salpingo-oophorectomy. They also indicated that approximately 30% of BRCA1 mutation carriers choose not to remove their ovaries, and the mean age at RRSO for those who do is in the late 40s, much later than recommended age per guidelines. The purpose of this study is to compare risk-reducing approaches in high-risk women with deleterious germline BRCA1mutations; specifically, to demonstrate the non-inferiority of bilateral salpingectomy compared to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer among deleterious germline BRCA1mutation carriers. Methods: This is a non-randomized prospective trial to determine if bilateral salpingectomy is non-inferior to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in terms ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer risk among gBRCA1m carriers between 35 and 50 years old. Individuals choose the treatment they want to receive in collaboration with their physician(s). The primary endpoint is the time to development of incident HGSC, specifically ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers. Secondary endpoints include measurement of health-related quality of life, estrogen deprivation symptoms, sexual function, menopausal symptoms, cancer distress, Medical Decision Making, and adverse events. Results: As of 1/31/2022, 116 individuals have been enrolled into this trial. A recent amendment was put forward to allow the following individuals to also participate in this trial: 1) Individuals who are receiving hormonal therapy for maintenance therapy (eg, tamoxifen, AIs, etc), 2) Individuals with a history of any prior cancer and have completed chemotherapy, at least 30 days ago, and 3) Individuals who are considering Assisted Reproductive Technologies (eg, IVF). Furthermore, there is ongoing consideration of allowing general Ob/Gyn providers to recruit patients to this trial and perform procedures, with proper pathology training and sign off at their hospitals. NCI grant UG1CA189867. Clinical trial information: NCT04251052.

Psychosocial Distress of Head Neck Cancer (HNC) Patients Receiving Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Background: Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients are at increased risk of psychosocial distress compared with patients with other forms of cancer. Various symptoms of the disease and side effects of treatment are attributing factors for distress. This systematic review aimed to identify the prevalence of psychosocial distress among HNC patients receiving radiotherapy. Methods:The following search engines from 2000-2021 were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, and Embase. Citation checking and extensive reference checking were also conducted. Cross-sectional, longitudinal, cohort, exploratory and prospective, repeated measure studies published in English were included. Newcastle Ottawa Scale assessed the quality, and the data were extracted on a validated data extraction form. Results:Out of 782 articles, eleven records met the eligibility criteria, including 776 HNC patients receiving radiotherapy. Data were synthesized and summarized descriptively as measurements were not homogenous. Prevalence estimates of depression or depressive symptoms were calculated. Outcomes were measured with various measuring tools and reported in frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation in various studies. All studies reported depression ranging from 9.8% to 83.8%, and pooled estimated prevalence of depression among HNC patients receiving radiotherapy is 63% (95% CI 42-83) with significant heterogeneity (I2= 97.66%; p<0.001). An increase in the trend is observed along with treatment progression. Another three studies reported anxiety along with depression. Physical symptoms, body image, low social support, fatigue specific radiotherapy regimens were the predictive factors of depression. Conclusion:HNC patients are psychosocially distressed during radiotherapy, and the distress is steadily increased during the therapy. The predictive factors could serve as potential areas of intervention and supportive therapy during radiotherapy.

Electronic capture of cancer-related distress in a community oncology program.

1577 Background: Cancer related distress can be seen in as many as one in two patients. Many organizations such as the Commission on Cancer require distress screening. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer is a common tool used for screening. We studied feasibility of embedding the NCCN thermometer into oncology electronic health record (EHR) for routine patient care. We concurrently studied feasibility of using a mobile health tool for serial evaluation of cancer related distress. Methods: A flowsheet containing NCCN distress thermometer questions was created in Epic EHR (Epic Systems, Verona, WI). Oncology nurses used the flowsheet for routine patient assessment. Patients with distress level ≥ 4 answered additional questions. Ancillary care providers such as palliative care nurses or social workers addressed the identified needs by providing appropriate ‘services’. A field to capture these interventions was created. We also adapted our previously reported web based mobile tool [1] for monitoring cancer distress. Patients rated their distress on a 1-10 scale and highlighted the distress domain (physical, emotional, practical, family). Distress level ≥ 4 generated a color-coded flag for provider review and intervention. Data from both electronic tools was periodically analyzed to inform patient care and quality improvement. Results: Between January and December 2021, Epic EHR based distress flowsheet collected 28,594 distinct responses in 911 patients. 57.4%, 14.9%, 14.1%, 9.4% and 2.3% of the responses were in the physical, emotional, practical, familial and spiritual domains respectively. ‘Other’ responses were 1.4%. Cumulative frequency of non-physical problems was 42.5%. 1819 ‘services’ were provided with 357 emotional, 351 work, 351 housing, 350 transportation and 350 financial need-based interventions. Of 1231 patients who used the distress scale and provided additional comments, 315 (25.5%) had distress levels ≥ 4. The mobile tool captured 849 unique patient responses to the distress question between April 2020 and February 2022. Distress level ≥ 4 was flagged by 281 unique patients (33.09%). Average distress level was 2.7. Emotional domain problems generated the greatest distress level followed by family, physical and practical problems in decreasing order. Conclusions: We demonstrate feasibility of electronic capture of cancer related distress to facilitate holistic patient care in a community-based oncology program. EHR based and mobile tool distress evaluations generated concordant results. Distress caused by emotional, practical and familial domain problems was nearly as frequent and often more severe than distress caused by physical problems, underscoring the need for comprehensive cancer care.

Event-correlated trajectories of bio-psycho-social distress in breast cancer and its predictors

Event-correlated trajectories of bio-psycho-social distress in breast cancer and its predictors

Screening for Distress and Health Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Head and neck cancers (HNC) have higher rates of emotional distress than other cancer types and the general population. This paper compares the prevalence of emotional distress in HNC across various distress screening measures and examines whether significant distress or distress screening are associated with cancer-related survival. A retrospective observational cohort design was employed, with data collected from the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (DART) and linkages to administrative databases from 2010 to 2016. Descriptive and prevalence data were reported using multiple concurrently administered distress tools, including the Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorders-7 (GAD-7), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-revised (ESAS-r), and MD Anderson Symptom Index-Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN). Across measures, 7.8 to 28.1% of the sample reported clinically significant emotional distress, with PHQ-9 and GAD-7 identifying lowest prevalence of moderate/severe distress, and the ultrashort distress screens within ESAS-r and MDASI-HN performing equivalently. Cox hazards models were used in univariate and multivariate survival analyses. ESAS depression (≥4), but not anxiety, was associated with increased risk of cancer-related mortality and patient completion of DART was associated with greater cancer-related survival. The findings underscore the importance of implementing routine distress screening for HNC populations and the utility of ultra-brief screening measures.