Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Suppression Tuning Curves Research Articles

Signal-Processing Strategy for Restoration of Cross-Channel Suppression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Because frequency components interact nonlinearly with each other inside the cochlea, the loudness growth of tones is relatively simple in comparison to the loudness growth of complex sounds. The term suppression refers to a reduction in the response growth of one tone in the presence of a second tone. Suppression is a salient feature of normal cochlear processing and contributes to psychophysical masking. Suppression is evident in many measurements of cochlear function in subjects with normal hearing, including distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Suppression is also evident, to a lesser extent, in subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. This paper describes a hearing-aid signal-processing strategy that aims to restore both loudness growth and two-tone suppression in hearing-impaired listeners. The prescription of gain for this strategy is based on measurements of loudness by a method known as categorical loudness scaling. The proposed signal-processing strategy reproduces measured DPOAE suppression tuning curves and generalizes to any number of frequency components. The restoration of both normal suppression and normal loudness has the potential to improve hearing-aid performance and user satisfaction.

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f(2) frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L(2) levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q(ERB)) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and Q(ERB) decreased as L(2) increased. T-T differences and Q(ERB) were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L(2) was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L(2) at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L(2)) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning and acoustic admittance in human infants: birth through 6 months.

Previous work has reported non-adultlike distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression in human newborns at f2=6000 Hz, indicating an immaturity in peripheral auditory function. In this study, DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) were recorded as a measure of cochlear function and acoustic admittance/reflectance (YR) in the ear canal recorded as a measure of middle-ear function, in the same 20 infants at birth and through 6 months of age. DPOAE STCs changed little from birth through 6 months, showing excessively narrow and sharp tuning throughout the test period. In contrast, several middle-ear indices at corresponding frequencies shifted systematically with increasing age, although they also remained non-adultlike at 6 months. Linear correlations were conducted between YR and DPOAE suppression features. Only two correlations out of 76 were significant, and all but three YR variables accounted for <10% of the variance in DPOAE suppression tuning. The strongest correlation was noted between admittance phase at 5700 Hz and STC tip-to-tail (R=0.49). The association between middle-ear variables and DPOAE suppression may be stronger during other developmental time periods. Study of older infants and children is needed to fully define postnatal immaturity of human peripheral auditory function.

Effects of middle-ear immaturity on distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in infant ears

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measures of cochlear function, including DPOAE suppression tuning curves and input/output (I/O) functions, are not adultlike in human infants. These findings suggest the cochlear amplifier might be functionally immature in newborns. However, many noncochlear factors influence DPOAEs and must be considered. This study examines whether age differences in DPOAE I/O functions recorded from infant and adult ears reflect maturation of ear-canal/middle-ear function or cochlear mechanics. A model based on linear middle-ear transmission and nonlinear cochlear generation was developed to fit the adult DPOAE I/O data. By varying only those model parameters related to middle-ear transmission (and holding cochlear parameters at adult values), the model successfully fitted I/O data from infants at birth through age 6 months. This suggests that cochlear mechanics are mature at birth. The model predicted an attenuation of stimulus energy through the immature ear canal and middle ear, and evaluated whether immaturities in forward transmission could explain the differences consistently observed between infant and adult DPOAE suppression. Results show that once the immaturity was compensated for by providing infants with a relative increase in primary tone level, DPOAE suppression tuning at f2= 6000 Hz was similar in adults and infants.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1–f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: Evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?

The complete timeline for maturation of human cochlear function has not been defined. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE)-based measures of cochlear function show non-adult-like responses from premature and term-born neonates at high f2 frequencies; however, older infants were not included in these studies. In the present experiment, previously collected DPOAE ipsilateral suppression data from premature neonates were combined with new data collected from adults, term-born neonates, and 3-month-old infants to further examine the time course for maturation of cochlear function. DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STC) and suppression growth patterns were measured in the three age groups at f2 = 6000 Hz, L1 = 65, L2 = 55 dB SPL, with an f2/f1 of 1.2. Results indicate that term-born neonates and 3-month-old infants have non-adult-like STC width, slope on the low-frequency flank, and tip features. However, the two infant groups are not significantly different from one another. Suppression growth patterns for low-frequency suppressor tones show a clear developmental progression. In general, the younger the infant, the more shallow and compressive the suppression growth for the lowest suppressor frequencies. These findings suggest a high-frequency postnatal immaturity in cochlear function as measured by DPOAE suppression. Results may have been influenced by noncochlear factors, such as middle-ear immaturity. These factors are reviewed and considered.

Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor.

Behavioral auditory thresholds of Phyllostomus discolor are characterized by two threshold minima separated by an insensitive region at about 55 kHz (Esser and Daucher 1996). To investigate whether these characteristics are due to cochlear properties, we recorded distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and calculated relative DPOAE threshold curves, which proved to be a good measure of cochlear sensitivity. Our results indicate that in P. discolor, cochlear sensitivity, as assessed by DPOAE recordings, does not show a threshold maximum at 55 kHz. The DPOAE threshold curves display an absolute minimum at approximately 30 kHz, and from that frequency region, the threshold continuously increases without any pronounced irregularities. The frequency tuning properties of the cochlea, as assessed by DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) reveal broad filter bandwidths with Q10dB values between 3.4 and 10.7. There are no frequency-specific specializations of cochlear tuning. The characteristic pattern of subsequent threshold maxima and minima at high frequencies observed in behavioral studies seems to be shaped by transfer characteristics of the outer ear and/or neuronal processing in the ascending auditory pathway rather than by cochlear mechanics.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in the hedgehog tenrec, Echinops telfairi.

The hedgehog tenrec, Echinops telfairi, has certain basal mammalian features, like a cloaca and a sparsely differentiated brain with smooth cerebral hemispheres. The peripheral auditory capabilities of this species were investigated by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). For comparison, we determined auditory evoked potentials (AEP) in the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex. Both methods show that the auditory range of E. telfairi extends well into ultrasonic frequencies, with a region of highest sensitivity at around 16 kHz. The total auditory range spans about 4 octaves at 40 dB SPL. The low-frequency limit of auditory processing is found at frequencies of about 2-3 kHz. The DPOAE and the AEP thresholds of E. telfairi do not run fully parallel in the high-frequency range. For a threshold value of 40 dB SPL, cochlear mechanical thresholds as measured with DPOAE extend up to 50 kHz, whereas neuronal thresholds reach the high-frequency limit at about 30 kHz. Frequency tuning, as assessed from DPOAE suppression tuning curves, was low to moderate with Q(10 dB) values ranging from 1.7 to 8. The lack of discontinuity in the group delay (derived from DPOAE measurements) reveals that cochlear frequency representation is tonotopic without any region of specialized mechanical tuning.

Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Evidence of the compressive growth of basilar-membrane displacement can be seen in distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels measured as a function of stimulus level. When the levels of the two stimulus tones (f1 and f2) are related by the formula L1 = 39 dB + 0.4 x L2 [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] the shape of the function relating DPOAE level to L2 is similar (up to an L2 of 70 dB SPL) to the classic Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 9, 1-10 (1933)] loudness function when plotted on a logarithmic scale. Explicit estimates of compression have been derived based on recent DPOAE measurements from the laboratory. If DPOAE growth rate is defined as the slope of the DPOAE I/O function (in dB/dB), then a cogent definition of compression is the reciprocal of the growth rate. In humans with normal hearing, compression varies from about 1 at threshold to about 4 at 70 dB SPL. With hearing loss, compression is still about 1 at threshold, but grows more slowly above threshold. Median DPOAE I/O data from ears with normal hearing, mild loss, and moderate loss are each well fit by log functions. When the I/O function is logarithmic, then the corresponding compression is a linear function of stimulus level. Evidence of cochlear compression also exists in DPOAE suppression tuning curves, which indicate the level of a third stimulus tone (f3) that reduces DPOAE level by 3 dB. All three stimulus tones generate compressive growth within the cochlea; however, only the relative compression (RC) of the primary and suppressor responses is observable in DPOAE suppression data. An RC value of 1 indicates that the cochlear responses to the primary and suppressor components grow at the same rate. In normal ears, RC rises to 4, when f3 is an octave below f2. The similarities between DPOAE and loudness compression estimates suggest the possibility of predicting loudness growth from DPOAEs; however, intersubject variability makes such predictions difficult at this time.

Ipsilateral distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in children with sensorineural hearing loss.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) ipsilateral suppression has been applied to study cochlear function and maturation in laboratory animals and humans. Although DPOAE suppression appears to be sensitive to regions of specialized cochlear function and to cochlear immaturity, it is not known whether it reflects permanent cochlear damage, i.e., sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), in a reliable and systematic manner in humans. Eight school-aged children with mild-moderate SNHL and 20 normal-hearing children served as subjects in this study. DPOAE (2f1-f2) suppression data were collected at four f2 frequencies (1500, 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz) using moderate-level primary tones. Features of the DPOAE iso-suppression tuning curves and suppression growth were analyzed for both subject groups. Results show that DPOAE suppression tuning curves from hearing-impaired subjects can be reliably recorded. DPOAE suppression tuning curves were generally normal in appearance and shape for six out of eight hearing-impaired subjects but showed subtle abnormalities in at least one feature. There was not one single trend or pattern of abnormality that characterized all hearing-impaired subjects. The most prominent patterns of abnormality included: broadened tuning, elevated tip, and downward shift of tip frequency. The unique patterns of atypical DPOAE suppression in subjects with similar audiograms may suggest different patterns of underlying sensory cell damage. This speculation warrants further investigation.

Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.

Psychophysical, basilar-membrane (BM), and single nerve-fiber tuning curves, as well as suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), all give rise to frequency tuning patterns with stereotypical features. Similarities and differences between the behaviors of these tuning functions, both in normal conditions and following various cochlear insults, have been documented. While neural tuning curves (NTCs) and BM tuning curves behave similarly both before and after cochlear insults known to disrupt frequency selectivity, DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) do not necessarily mirror these responses following either administration of ototoxins [Martin et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 972-983 (1998)] or exposure to temporarily damaging noise [Howard et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 285-296 (2002)]. However, changes in STC parameters may be predictive of other changes in cochlear function such as cochlear immaturity in neonatal humans [Abdala, Hear. Res. 121, 125-138 (1998)]. To determine the effects of noise-induced permanent auditory dysfunction on STC parameters, rabbits were exposed to high-level noise that led to permanent reductions in DPOAE level, and comparisons between pre- and postexposure DPOAE levels and STCs were made. Statistical comparisons of pre- and postexposure STC values at CF revealed consistent basal shifts in the frequency region of greatest cochlear damage, whereas thresholds, Q10dB, and tip-to-tail gain values were not reliably altered. Additionally, a large percentage of high-frequency lobes associated with third tone interference phenomena, that were exhibited in some data sets, were dramatically reduced following noise exposure. Thus, previously described areas of DPOAE interference above f2 may also be studied using this type of experimental manipulation [Martin et al., Hear. Res. 136, 105-123 (1999); Mills, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2586-2602 (2002)].

DPOAE suppression tuning: cochlear immaturity in premature neonates or auditory aging in normal-hearing adults?

Previous work has shown that distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) recorded from premature neonates are narrower than adult STCs at both low and high frequencies. This has been interpreted to indicate an immaturity in cochlear function prior to term birth. However, an alternative explanation for this finding is that adult DPOAE STCs are broadened and reflect cochlear hair cell loss in normal-hearing adults due to aging, and natural exposure to noise and ototoxins. This alternative hypothesis can be tested by studying suppression tuning in normal-hearing school-aged children. If normal-hearing children, who have not aged significantly or been exposed to noise/ototoxins, have DPOAE suppression tuning similar to adults, the auditory aging hypothesis can be ruled out. However, if children have tuning similar to premature neonates and dissimilar from adults, it implicates aging or other factors intrinsic to the adult cochlea. DPOAE STCs were recorded at 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz using optimal parameters in normal-hearing children and adults. DPOAE STCs collected previously from premature neonates were used for age comparisons. In general, results indicate that tuning curves from children are comparable to adult STCs and significantly different from neonatal STCS at 1500 and 6000 Hz. Only the growth of suppression was not adultlike in children and only at 6000 Hz. These findings do not strongly support the auditory aging hypothesis as a primary explanation for previously observed neonatal-adult differences in DPOAE suppression tuning. It suggests that these age differences are most likely due to immaturities in the neonatal cochlea. However, nonadultlike suppression growth observed in children at 6000 Hz warrants further attention and may be indicative of subtle alternations in the adult cochlea at high frequencies.

Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.

The cochlear amplifier shows level-dependent function and works optimally at low levels. For this reason, manipulation of stimulus level is a route through which the human cochlear amplifier can be investigated in a noninvasive manner. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) evoked as a function of stimulus level provide a tool for exploration of human cochlear amplifier function and, when applied to neonates, for investigation of cochlear maturation. The current experiment generated 2f1-f2 DPOAE ipsilateral suppression tuning curves (STCs) at three primary tone levels and five f2 frequencies in a large group of premature and term neonates and adults. The differences between tuning generated with low- and high-level primary tones was measured to provide a gross estimate of the "tuning enhancement effect" attributed to the cochlear amplifier. Other features of the DPOAE suppression tuning curves were measured as well. Consistent with previous reports, at 1500 and 6000 Hz, STCs were narrower, with a steeper slope on the low-frequency flank of the tuning curve in premature neonates versus adults. Additionally, only DPOAE STCs from adults and term neonates became markedly broader and more shallow when recorded with high-level primary tones. It has been hypothesized that the excessive narrowness of suppression tuning and the absence of a level effect on DPOAE STCs recorded in premature neonates reflects a subtle immaturity in cochlear amplifier function just prior to term birth.

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in subjects with auditory neuropathy.

The objective of this experiment was to address: 1) whether normal efferent system function is required for normal cochlear tuning as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression in humans and 2) whether cochlear function, assessed by DPOAE suppression tuning, is normal in a small group of patients with auditory neuropathy. DPOAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) are similar to other physiologic measures of tuning. They are generated by evoking a DPOAE with two simultaneously presented pure tones and then suppressing the distortion product with a third tone of varying frequency and level. In this study, DPOAE STCs were generated with f2 frequencies of 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz in 15 normal-hearing adults and four subjects with documented auditory neuropathy. Tuning curve width, slope and tip characteristics, as well as rate of suppression growth were measured in each group. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) was also recorded as an index of medial efferent function. Results show that the four subjects with auditory neuropathy lacked efferent suppression of OAEs. However, these four subjects showed normal estimates of cochlear tuning as measured by DPOAE suppression results. This finding suggests that normal efferent system function is not required at the time of test for normal DPOAE suppression tuning. It also suggests that cochlear function as evaluated by detailed measures of DPOAE suppression, is normal in these "typical" patients with auditory neuropathy.