Distant Recurrence-free Interval Research Articles

Abstract GS02-07: Loco-Regional Irradiation in Patients with Biopsy-proven Axillary Node Involvement at Presentation Who Become Pathologically Node-negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Primary Outcomes of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304

Abstract Background: The benefit of adjuvant regional nodal irradiation including the chest wall after mastectomy (CWI+RNI) and with whole breast irradiation (WBI+RNI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is well established in pts with pathologically positive axillary nodes (pN+). Pts who present with axillary node involvement (cN+), receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), and are found to be pathologically node-negative at surgery (ypN0), have lower loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates compared to those who remain pathologically node-positive (ypN+). This phase III, randomized trial aimed to evaluate whether CWI+RNI after mastectomy or addition of RNI to WBI after BCS significantly improves invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval (IBC-RFI) in cN+ pts found to be ypN0 after NC. Methods: Eligible pts had clinical cT1-3, N1, M0 invasive breast cancer (biopsy-proven N+ by FNA/core needle bx), completed ≥8 wks of NC (and anti-HER2 therapy if HER2+), and were ypN0 after mastectomy or BCS and sentinel node biopsy (SLNB, ≥2 nodes), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or both. Pts were randomized to “No RNI” (i.e., observation after mastectomy or WBI after BCS) vs. “RNI” (i.e., CWI+RNI after mastectomy or WBI+RNI after BCS). Primary endpoint was IBC-RFI. Secondary endpoints reported here: LRR-free interval (LRRFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Study was designed to have 80% power to detect 35% reduction in annual rate of IBC-RFI for an absolute risk reduction of 4.6% (5-yr cumulative rate). Per protocol, final analysis was to occur after 172 events or 10 yrs after study initiation.Here we report the time-driven analysis prespecified in the protocol. Results: From 9/13-12/20, 1,641 pts were enrolled; 1,556 pts were available for primary event analysis; median f/u time 59.5 mos (IQR 40.7-74.1). Pt/tumor characteristics were well balanced between groups. Median age 52 yrs (range 21-84); 31% non-white; 21% cT1, 60% cT2, 19% cT3; 23% triple-negative, 21% HR+/HER2-, 56% HER2+; 58% BCS; 55% SLNB, 45% ALND+/-SLNB; and 78% had breast pathologic complete response. At the time of the analysis, 109 IBC-RFI events (63% of the planned 172) were confirmed (“No RNI”: 59, “RNI”: 50). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for IBC-RFI (HR=0.88, 95%CI 0.60-1.29; p=0.51), 5-yr point estimates: 91.8% for “No RNI” and 92.7% for “RNI.” There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for secondary endpoints. There were no study-related deaths and no unexpected toxicities.Grade 4 toxicity was rare (0.1% with “No RNI”, 0.5% with “RNI”); 6.5% of pts developed grade 3 toxicity in “No RNI” and 10% in “RNI” group. Most common grade 3 toxicity was radiation dermatitis (3.3% in “No RNI,” 5.7% in “RNI”). Conclusion: In pts who present with biopsy-proven axillary node involvement and convert their axillary nodes to ypN0 after NC, CWI+RNI after mastectomy, or WBI+RNI after BCS, did not significantly improve IBC-RFI, LRRFI, DRFI, DFS, or OS. These findings suggest that downstaging involved axillary nodes with NC can result in optimization of adjuvant radiotherapy without adversely affecting oncologic outcomes. Follow-up of pts for long-term outcomes continues. NCT01872975 *EPM and JW are co-first authors. Table 1 Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Hanna Bandos, Julia White, Thomas Julian, Atif Khan, Simona Shaitelman, Mylin Torres, Frank Vicini, Patricia Ganz, Susan McCloskey, Nilendu Gupta, X. Allen Li, Peter Lucas, Nadeem Abu-Rustum, Saumil Gandhi, Rahul Tendulkar, Robert Coleman, Keiichi Fujiwara, Samantha Seaward, William Irvin, Kristin Higgins, Robert Mutter, Jean-Francois Boileau, Andrew Muskovitz, Reshma Jagsi, Anna Weiss, Curran Walter Jr., Norman Wolmark. Loco-Regional Irradiation in Patients with Biopsy-proven Axillary Node Involvement at Presentation Who Become Pathologically Node-negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Primary Outcomes of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS02-07.

Abstract PO5-19-01: The HER2-RADiCAL study (Response ADaptive CAre pLan) – Tailoring treatment for HER2 positive early breast cancer

Abstract Background The presence or absence of residual disease following neoadjuvant systemic anti-cancer therapy (neoSACT) for HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+ EBC) provides powerful prognostic information. Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoSACT, particularly in patients with earlier clinical TNM stage at diagnosis, identifies a population with excellent survival outcomes in whom the balance of toxicity associated with the current treatment pathway may be disproportionate to absolute clinical benefit. Aims >HER2-RADiCAL seeks to reduce the treatment burden and healthcare costs of treating HER2+ EBC by testing the hypothesis that pCR can be used as a functional response biomarker to select patients who can safely receive less systemic therapy with minimal/no loss of efficacy. Trial design and eligibility criteria HER2-RADiCAL is a response-directed interventional cohort/threshold-crossing design study embedded within a real-world data-driven clinical pathway model. Patients with ER-positive or negative HER2+ EBC with cT1N1 or cT2N0-1 stage at diagnosis are eligible after completion of standard of care neoSACT and locally determined pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients with pathological features consistent with previous malignant involvement in >4 nodes are not eligible. Adjuvant trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab may have continued prior to study entry provided no more than 9 cycles of trastuzumab are received. After registration all participants receive a total of 9 cycles of trastuzumab including those administered prior to study entry. Participants receive no further pertuzumab and no adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant endocrine therapy and radiotherapy are given as per standard of care. Central pathology review of pCR status will be conducted in a subset of cases. A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) will explore identification of factors influencing patient decision-making for participation in studies of response-adapted treatment. Statistical methods The primary endpoint is relapse-free interval. Recruitment of 720 participants over 3.5 years will provide 90% power to exclude an event rate >6.5% at 3 years (expected event rate ≤4%). Secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, invasive breast cancer-free survival, invasive disease-free survival, distant recurrence-free interval, breast cancer-free interval, overall survival, treatment pathway adherence and cost-effectiveness. An interventional cohort is preferred to a randomised non-inferiority trial based on the known event rate in this population which is sufficiently low such that any deviation from this expected event rate would indicate failure of the reduced therapy strategy. Real-world data driven clinical pathway model Health economic modelling will compare the protocol-driven study cohort with two comparator pathways: a non-response adapted maximum therapy pathway (the standard clinical pathway prior to the study) and a real-world representative pathway derived from anonymised data for all patients treated for HER2+ EBC within the UK NHS. Patient and public involvement Our PPI partners continue to shape this research, holding key roles as trial management group members, overseeing progress of the study, contributing to protocol amendment development, and design and implementation of the SWAT. Current status The first patient was enrolled in December 2021. At 10th July 2023, 25 research sites have opened with 39 participants recruited. Site opening continues with a minimum target of 40. Responding to continued use of anthracycline-based regimens in UK practice, eligibility criteria have recently been extended to permit entry of patients who have received anthracycline-containing neoSACT. For further information contact her2radical-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk. Citation Format: Iain Macpherson, Stuart McIntosh, Lucy Kilburn, Holly Tovey, Laura Moretti, Katie Goddard, Indrani Bhattacharya, Clinton Boyd, Cliona Kirwan, Ciara O'Brien, Duncan Wheatley, Jennifer Glendenning, Mairead MacKenzie, Hilary Stobart, Claire Snowdon, Andrew Wardley, Abeer Shaaban, Peter Hall, David Cameron, Judith Bliss. The HER2-RADiCAL study (Response ADaptive CAre pLan) – Tailoring treatment for HER2 positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-19-01.

Abstract PO2-19-02: NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET)

Abstract Background: Identifying pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) has been a major research focus over the past 20 years. Development and clinical application of genomic classifiers such as the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) has contributed to the biologic understanding of BC and has refined pt selection for ACT. The TAILORx and RxPONDER clinical trials demonstrated that RS identifies many postmenopausal pts with node-negative and node-positive BC and RS < 25, who do not benefit from the addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET). However, both trials also showed that certain subsets of premenopausal pts (node-negative/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-negative/RS 21-25, and node-positive/RS < 25) benefited from the addition of ACT to ET. Most premenopausal pts in these two trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC in the SOFT and TEXT trials, many questioned whether all or part of the observed ACT benefit in the TAILORx/RxPONDER trials may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this question, OFSET is a Phase III, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the addition of ACT to OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET alone. Methods: We hypothesize that the addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors, and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Eligible pts must be node-negative with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS < 25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 vs pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 vs ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT followed by OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor per investigator discretion, but tamoxifen is allowed if pts do not tolerate the AI or if OFS is incomplete. Radiation therapy will be administered per investigator discretion according to protocol guidelines. The HRQOL sub-study will assess differences in severe menopausal symptoms, measured by the FACT ESS-19 score, between the arms, as well as increased pain severity (PROMIS) during ACT+OFS+ET compared to OFS+ET. Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. The accrual of 3,960 pts is anticipated to be completed in seven years and seven mos. Based on data from NSABP B-28 and RxPONDER, the 5-year IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on data from TAILORx, the 5-year IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ~95%. Assuming 56% of the pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET, with one-sided alpha of 0.025 and 80% power will require 380 IBCFS events, which are expected to occur ~11 years after study initiation. The OFSET study is expected to be activated in the third quarter of 2023. Current accrual (06-19-2023) is 0/3,960 Support: U10CA180868, U10CA180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067. NCT05879926. Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Gong Tang, Shannon Puhalla, Sandra Swain, Patricia Ganz, N. Lynn Henry, Reena Cecchini, Sonya Reid, Priya Rastogi, Charles Geyer, Julia White, Amy Clark, Tufia Haddad, Gregory Vidal, Norman Wolmark. NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-02.

Abstract PO3-29-05: Clinical risk score to predict overall survival and breast cancer recurrence in phase 3 TAILORx trial and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database populations

Abstract Background: Overall survival (OS) is the gold standard and most relevant endpoint in oncology research and patient care. It underscores a need to develop methods to estimate the likelihood of mortality in breast cancer. Methods: We evaluated molecular and clinical measures that predicted mortality risk using multiple logistic regression and developed a clinical risk score (CS) in 8,905 patients from the phase 3 TAILORx trial. Association of CS with mortality in patients at low, intermediate, and high risks was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses. The score was validated in an independent population of 148,301 patients with node-negative, hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer in the SEER database. Likelihood ratio (LR) test and c-index were used to compare prognostic information provided by CS and a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) to OS, invasive disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), and distant recurrence-free interval (dRFI). Results: The 10-year mortality rates in low-risk, intermediate risk, and high-risk groups were 3.9% (95% CI 3.1 to 4.8), 37.2% (95% CI 23.4 to 51.1), and 75.8% (95% CI 54.1 to 97.4), respectively (P< 0.0001). Compared with low-risk score, intermediate (adjusted HR 45.5, 95% CI 32.2 to 64.9) and high-risk scores (HR 2026, 95% CI 1194 to 3483) were associated with risk of mortality, independent of demographics, tumor grade, RS, tumor size, PR, and treatment factors. The algorithm also predicted DFS, dRFI, and RFI outcomes (P< 0.0001 each), outperforming RS by both LR test and c-index estimate. Its validity was corroborated in the SEER population (intermediate risk: HR 9.3, 95% CI 6.7 to 13.3 and high-risk: HR 125.9, 95% CI 85.2 to 189.6). Conclusions: Clinical risk score robustly predicts risk of mortality in early-stage breast cancer populations. It provides more prognostic information than RS to survival and breast cancer recurrences. Citation Format: Sherry Yang, John Yu, Ninet Sinaii. Clinical risk score to predict overall survival and breast cancer recurrence in phase 3 TAILORx trial and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-29-05.

Abstract PO1-03-03: STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival

Abstract Background: Standardized definitions of efficacy endpoints are needed to improve clinical trial designs, data reporting and interpretation of results, and to allow cross-trial comparisons. STEEP (Standardized Definitions for Efficacy Endpoints) criteria were proposed in 2007 by an expert panel from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide common definitions for clinical trials in early breast cancer (BC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was selected as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials and has been widely used in the last 15 years. Advances in BC systemic treatment led to review these criteria (STEEP v2.0), with the definition of a new modified endpoint: invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS). IBCFS excludes second primary non-breast invasive cancers from IDFS which may better detect efficacy effects when the toxicity profile of the intervention is well-known and the risk of second primary cancer is small. Methods: We proposed a multi-trial analysis of 8 adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials from GEICAM and TRIO to evaluate the different surrogate endpoints defined in the STEEP v2.0. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through correlation between the ln hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the ln HR of the different studied endpoints across trials. The correlation was estimated by the weighted, by trial size, least squares regression (WLS) line and evaluated comparing the R2 values between OS and the corresponding endpoint tested. Primary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with IDFS/IBCFS. Secondary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with other STEEP v2.0 endpoints (distant disease-free survival [DDFS], distant relapse-free survival [DRFS], recurrence-free survival [RFS], recurrence-free interval [RFI] and distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI]) and explored the surrogacy between OS and all endpoints in specific groups of patients (pts) according to their risk of relapse: hormone receptors positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) pts with intermediate/high and high-risk and triple negative (TN) pts. Results: A total of 14,473 pts were included. Median age was 50 years (range, 20–82). All were female, and 51.8% were postmenopausal. With a median follow-up of 115 months (range, 0.0–188) we found 2,504 OS events, 4,146 IDFS events (60.9% being distant recurrences) and 3,810 IBCFS events (62.4% being distant recurrences). For each trial, HR of OS, IDFS and IBCFS indicated same conclusions. If HR< 1 for OS, it was also for IDFS and IBCFS and the same was true when HR >1. R2 results of the weighted linear correlations between the ln HR of OS versus (vs) IDFS and OS vs IBCFS were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Confidence intervals (CI) at 95% were both overlapping. All other efficacy endpoints showed strong correlation with OS in the overall analysis. R2 values for HR+/HER2- intermediate/high and high-risk pts were 0.89 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.84 (OS vs IBCFS). For TN pts the correlations were weaker, being 0.63 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.73 (OS vs IBCFS). All WLS R2 values are described in the table. Conclusions: All tested STEEP v2.0 endpoints were strongly correlated with OS (R2 close to 1), meaning that their use as surrogate endpoints for adjuvant CT trials is appropriate. Notably, no differences were found between them in this multi-trial analysis. Therefore, none of them is more appropriate than other to discriminate the value of a new intervention vs comparator in adjuvant CT studies with mature data and long-term follow-up. Table: Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Marina Pollan, Ander Urriticoechea, Eva Carrasco, Gonzalo Spera, Miguel Martín, Begoña Bermejo, Linnea Chap, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, John Crown, Jose Angel García-Sáenz, Arlene Chan, Angel Guerrero, Valerie Bee, Lourdes Calvo, Rodrigo Fresco, Andrea Blasco, Andrés Hernando, Dennis Slamon. STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-03.

Abstract PO2-19-07: PROOFS – Pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- EBC with intermediate to high clinical and low genomic risk, treated by endocrine treatment (ET) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) or chemotherapy followed by ET

Abstract Background During the past years, clinical routine has shifted away from relying solely on clinicopathologic factors toward increasing use of multigene expression assays in guiding treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) with 0 to 3 positive lymph nodes. In case of a low genomic risk, there is strong consensus in favor of endocrine treatment (ET) alone for postmenopausal patients, regardless of clinical risk (supported by data from planB, ADAPT, RxPonder, TailorX, MINDACT). However, there is still uncertainty regarding optimal therapy for pre- and perimenopausal patients with a similar clinical/genomic risk profile. Since the observed benefit of CT in this patient group may be partly attributable to CT-induced ovarian function suppression (OFS), some of these patients could be spared CT by adding OFS to endocrine therapy. The West German Study Group (WSG) initiated the PROOFS-registry to create a real-world database on how to optimally treat these patients. Eligibility Criteria PROOFS (NCT05792150) aims at the long-term follow up of pre- or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- EBC with an intermediate to high clinical risk of recurrence and low genomic risk measured by MammaPrint(R). Additional endocrine response assessment (Ki67) after a short preoperative endocrine therapy is encouraged. Up to 25% of the study population may have node-positive disease. Participants undergo standard-of-care treatment at physician´s discretion and according to clinical routine, which may include CT neoadjuvant or adjuvant + ET, ET + OFS in premenopausal, or ET +/- OFS in perimenopausal women. Specific Aims PROOFS aims to give insights in the real-world use of OFS and to confirm an excellent outcome in pre-/perimenopausal women with HR+/HER2- early BC with an intermediate to high clinical risk of recurrence and low genomic risk treated by ET +/- OFS alone (without CT). In addition, quality of life is captured. Statistical Methods The primary objective is to demonstrate the 5-year distant recurrence-free interval (dRFI) in patients treated by ET +/- OFS alone. The null hypothesis H(0) is: 5-year dRFI < 92%. Secondary endpoints for all patients are 5- and 10-year dRFI, distant disease-free survival (dDFS), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), quality of life (QLQ BR23 and QLQ-C30) and therapy adherence. Cox regression models, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests will be applied for survival analysis. Linear mixed models will be utilized to quantitatively describe the course of quality of life-scores as well as therapy adherence, and to conduct group comparisons. Present and Target Accrual The study is open for recruitment of 1500 patients (approximately 20% receiving CT and 80% receiving ET +/- OFS) at up to 100 centers in Germany (June 2023: 24 open for recruitment). Funding AGENDIA N.V., Amsterdam Contact Information rachel.wuerstlein@med.uni-muenchen.de Citation Format: Rachel Wuerstlein, Lotta Ada Fischer, Nadia Harbeck, Monika Graeser, Ulrike Nitz, Matthias Christgen, Sherko Kuemmel, Christine zu Eulenburg, Matthias Warm, Oleg Gluz. PROOFS – Pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- EBC with intermediate to high clinical and low genomic risk, treated by endocrine treatment (ET) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) or chemotherapy followed by ET [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-07.

Intermediate clinical endpoints in early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of individual patient data from the Gruppo Italiano Mammella and Mammella Intergruppo trials

Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) are frequently used as primary endpoint in randomised trials (RCTs). We aim to assess whether changes in different ICEs can be used to predict changes in overall survival (OS) in adjuvant breast cancer trials. Individual patient level data from adjuvant phase III RCTs conducted by the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) and Mammella Intergruppo (MIG) study groups were used. ICEs were computed according to STEEP criteria. Using a two-stage meta-analytic model, we assessed the surrogacy of each ICE at both the outcome (i.e., OS and ICE are correlated irrespective of treatment) and trial (i.e., treatment effects on ICE and treatment effect on OS are correlated) levels. The following ICEs were considered as potential surrogate endpoints of OS: disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS). The estimates of the degree of correlation were obtained by copula models and weighted linear regression. Kendall's τ and R2≥0.70 were considered as indicators of a clinically relevant surrogacy. Among the 12,397 patients enrolled from November 1992 to July 2012 in six RCTs, median age at enrolment was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49-65). After a median follow-up of 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-14.5), 2131 (17.2%) OS events were observed, with 1390 (65.2%) attributed to breast cancer. At the outcome-level, Kendall's τ ranged from 0.69 for BCFI to 0.84 for DRFS. For DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, BCFI, and IBCFS endpoints, over 95% of the 8-year OS variability was attributable to the variation of the 5-year ICE. At the trial-level, treatment effects for the different ICEs and OS were strongly correlated, with the highest correlation for RFS and DRFS and the lowest for BCFI. Our results provide evidence supporting the use of DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, and IBCFS as primary endpoint in breast cancer adjuvant trials. This analysis was supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research ("Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro", AIRC; IG 2017/20760) and by Italian Ministry of Health-5×1000 funds (years 2021-2022).

Multiplexed high-throughput immune cell imaging in patients with high-risk triple negative early breast cancer: Analysis from the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22-00

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype, with dismal prognosis and limited option in advanced settings, yet stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in this subtype has a predictive role. Patients and methods: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22–00 is a randomized phase III clinical trial testing the efficacy of low-dose metronomic oral Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate (CM) maintenance following standard adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for early-stage hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. A case-cohort sampling was used. We characterized immune cells infiltrates in patients with TNBC by 6 plex immunofluorescence (IF) staining for CD4, FOXP3, CD3, cytokeratine and CD8 ResultsWe confirmed that high immune CD3+ T cells as well as stromal and intra-epithelial Tregs (CD4+Foxp3+ T cells) infiltrates were associated with a better Distant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI), especially in LN+ patient, regardless of the treatment. More importantly, we showed that the spatial distribution of immune cells at baseline is crucial, as CM maintenance was detrimental for T cells excluded LN+ TNBC patients. Conclusionsimmune spatial classification on immune cells infiltrates seems crucial and could help patients’ selection in clinical trial and greatly improve responses to specific therapies.

Prognostic relevance of tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes in residual tumor tissue from patients with triple‑negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

Further adjuvant chemotherapy treatment can provide benefits to certain patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that fail to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after the administration of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen. However, biomarkers suitable for identifying patients likely to experience poor prognostic outcomes after undergoing additional adjuvant chemotherapy are currently lacking. Accordingly, the present meta-analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or TIL subtypes (CD4+ or CD8+) in residual tumor (RT) tissue following NAC and TNBC patient prognosis. Relevant studies published through March 2023 were identified in Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases. After excluding irrelevant studies, data were extracted from the remaining reports, while study quality was analyzed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subsequent analyses were performed with Stata 14.0 and Review Manager 5.3. In total, seven relevant studies incorporating 1,202 patients were identified, all of which were retrospective cohort studies. Pooled analyses demonstrated that those patients exhibiting higher levels of RT TIL infiltration following NAC exhibited significantly improved recurrence-free, metastasis-free and event-free survival (RFS/MFS/EFS) compared with patients with lower RT TIL infiltration levels, together with an improved distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.39-0.69; P<0.00001]. In addition, patients exhibiting high RT TIL infiltration exhibited improved overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS; HR=0.49; 95% CI=0.38-0.65; P<0.00001). Additional subgroup analyses revealed that patients with higher TIL infiltration levels or TIL subtype (CD4+ or CD8+) infiltration exhibited improved RFS/MFS/EFS/DRFI as compared with patients with lower levels of overall TIL or TIL subtype (CD4+ or CD8+) infiltration in RT tissue (HR=0.35, 95% CI=0.20-0.59, P<0.0001; HR=0.49, 95% CI=0.33-0.71, P=0.0002). Consistently, the OS/BCSS of patients exhibiting high levels of overall TIL or TIL subtype (CD4+ or CD8+) infiltration was increased compared with patients with lower levels of such infiltration (HR=0.33, 95% CI=0.19-0.59, P=0.0002; HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.41-0.76, P=0.0002). These data thus demonstrate that levels of overall TIL infiltration or infiltration by CD4+ or CD8+ TILs in RT following NAC can be used as a biomarker to reliably predict prognostic outcomes in patients with TNBC, in addition to highlighting possible targets that may guide the further immunotherapeutic management of these patients.

OncotypeDX Testing Does Not Benefit Patients with Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Positive Grade 1 Breast Cancers: A TAILORx Validated Study.

We previously described a predictive AAMC model that identifies patients (grade 1, hormonepositive) who would not benefit from OncotypeDX testing. The purpose of this study was to validate the AAMC model by assessing distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) using TAILORx clinical trial data. We retrospectively analyzed TAILORx trial data and categorized patients based on the AAMC model. AAMC low-risk patients are those with grade 1 and hormone-positive tumors. Kaplan-Meier curves examined DRFI and IDFS. Of the 9195 cases, 2246 (24.4%) were identified by AAMC as low-risk. Among these AAMC low-risk patients, 55.2% had Recurrence Score (RS) 0-15, 42.3% had RS 15-25, and 2.4% had RS > 25. The 10-year DRFI did not differ for those who received adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not (98% vs. 96%, log-rank p = 0.46). Similarly, IDFS was comparable between those who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those that did not (86% vs. 86%, log-rank p = 0.66). Only 2.4% of AAMC low-risk patients were categorized as high-risk (RS > 25). A sensitivity analysis of this discordant group, wherein those with RS > 25 were re-classified into the no-chemotherapy group and assumed to have experienced recurrences at the rate expected without chemotherapy, did not find any difference in DRFI between those who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not (log-rank p = 0.16). OncotypeDX testing does not benefit AAMC low-risk patients with hormone-positive grade 1 tumors. Based on these data, 1 in 4 TAILORx participants would not need OncotypeDX testing.

Evaluation of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) scores in premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer: A secondary analysis of the SOFT trial.

504 Background: The landmark Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) in premenopausal breast cancer patients revealed that the addition of ovarian function suppression (OFS) to adjuvant endocrine therapy with either tamoxifen (T+OFS) or exemestane (E+OFS) reduces the risk of recurrence compared with adjuvant tamoxifen alone. There are no biomarkers to aid decision-making about intensification of endocrine therapy with OFS. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic and predictive ability of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and ROR scores in premenopausal women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer in the SOFT trial. Methods: Gene expression analyses were performed via the NanoString Breast Cancer 360 assay on RNA isolated from FFPE tumor samples from the SOFT trial that were HR+/HER2- (n=1245/3047). PAM50 subtype and ROR score were determined centrally by NanoString Technologies (Seattle, WA, USA), blinded to clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome. Median follow-up was 12 years. Primary endpoint in this study was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Secondary endpoints were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) and disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by prior chemotherapy and lymph node status, were used to evaluate the predictive performance of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and ROR categories (low vs intermediate vs high), and secondarily ROR score as a continuous variable. We also investigated differences between very young (&lt;40yrs) vs young (&gt;40yrs) women. Results: Tumor samples from 1084/1245 (87%) patients successfully completed PAM50 testing and are included in this analysis. Patient characteristics in this cohort were similar to the entire SOFT trial population. Intrinsic subtype and ROR category distribution is described below. Subtype distribution significantly differed between very young vs young premenopausal women, with fewer luminal A and more luminal B and non-luminal tumors seen in the very young (p&lt;0.001). The ROR score distribution also differed significantly: in node-negative patients there were significantly more ROR-high scores amongst very young compared to young women (36% vs 14%, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Breast cancer diagnosed in very young women has aggressive disease biology. Prognostic and predictive analyses of both intrinsic subtypes and the ROR score are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00066690 . [Table: see text]

Ten-year distant-recurrence risk prediction in breast cancer by CanAssist Breast (CAB) in Dutch sub-cohort of the randomized TEAM trial

BackgroundHormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2/neu-negative breast cancers have a sustained risk of recurrence up to 20 years from diagnosis. TEAM (Tamoxifen, Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational) is a large, multi-country, phase III trial that randomized 9776 women for the use of hormonal therapy. Of these 2754 were Dutch patients. The current study aims for the first time to correlate the ten-year clinical outcomes with predictions by CanAssist Breast (CAB)—a prognostic test developed in South East Asia, on a Dutch sub-cohort that participated in the TEAM. The total Dutch TEAM cohort and the current Dutch sub-cohort were almost similar with respect to patient age and tumor anatomical features.MethodsOf the 2754 patients from the Netherlands, which are part of the original TEAM trial, 592 patients’ samples were available with Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). The risk stratification of CAB was correlated with outcomes of patients using logistic regression approaches entailing Kaplan–Meier survival curves, univariate and multivariate cox-regression hazards model. We used hazard ratios (HRs), the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis/death due to breast cancer (DM), and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFi) for assessment.ResultsOut of 433 patients finally included, the majority, 68.4% had lymph node-positive disease, while only a minority received chemotherapy (20.8%) in addition to endocrine therapy. CAB stratified 67.5% of the total cohort as low-risk [DM = 11.5% (95% CI, 7.6–15.2)] and 32.5% as high-risk [DM = 30.2% (95% CI, 21.9–37.6)] with an HR of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.75–4.80; P < 0.001) at ten years. CAB risk score was an independent prognostic factor in the consideration of clinical parameters in multivariate analysis. At ten years, CAB high-risk had the worst DRFi of 69.8%, CAB low-risk in the exemestane monotherapy arm had the best DRFi of 92.7% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11–0.43), P < 0.001], and CAB low-risk in the sequential arm had a DRFi of 84.2% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.28–0.82), P = 0.009].ConclusionsCost-effective CAB is a statistically robust prognostic and predictive tool for ten-year DM for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2−, early breast cancer. CAB low-risk patients who received exemestane monotherapy had an excellent ten-year DRFi.

Abstract LB119: Recurrence score for recurrence over survival outcome in the landmark TAILORx trial

Abstract Overall survival is the most relevant endpoint in clinical research and patient care. Nonetheless, cancer recurrence has been frequently utilized as a surrogate endpoint, particularly in the context of multi-gene assays and molecular signatures. The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) was originally established against distant recurrence for prognosis in breast cancer. However, it is unclear whether RS has a weight for the recurrence over survival prognosis. We investigated RS on the choice of clinical endpoints in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx), which had OS, invasive disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free interval (RFI) in addition to distant recurrence-free interval as the clinical endpoints. Both midrange (11-25) and high-range (26-100) scores were associated with RFI, high-range only with DFS, but not significantly associated with OS in the multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Of 462 death events, 33.1% (153 events) were ascribed to breast cancer and 91.8% (424) were due to DFS-related events that included 24.5% other cancers, 34.2% unknown and 33.1% breast cancer. It is DFS that was wound up as the most representative surrogate endpoint for survival. The lack of survival significance was probably due to the nature of 21-gene assay weighted for recurrence rather than not having enough event numbers in the TAILORx clinical trial. The data call for establishing biomarkers directly towards OS or DFS to increase survival with more precision. Citation Format: Sherry X. Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang. Recurrence score for recurrence over survival outcome in the landmark TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB119.

Abstract P3-05-03: Long-term survival and intra-tumor heterogeneity of progesterone receptor expression in estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer

Abstract Background: Women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease have a long-term risk of distant recurrence. The poor survival of premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer combined with the otherwise long life expectancy makes it especially important to identify tumor characteristics associated with long-term survival. Intra-tumor heterogeneity, having cancer cells of varying characteristics across the tumor, may promote therapeutic resistance and metastatic capacity. We have previously shown that high intra-tumor heterogeneity of ER increases the risk of fatal breast cancer. To our knowledge, the relation between intra-tumor heterogeneity of progesterone receptor (PR) expression and long-term survival is not known. We aimed to study the association between intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR and long-term survival of premenopausal women in the Stockholm tamoxifen trial (STO-5), with 20-years complete follow-up. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of 504 ER-positive/PR-positive premenopausal women from the STO-5 trial (1990-1997). 451 women had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors. Patients were randomized to receive either 2 years of endocrine treatment (tamoxifen and/or goserelin) or no endocrine treatment. Lymph node-positive patients (n=251) also received standard chemotherapy (CMF). Immunohistochemical analysis, including estimating the proportion of tumor cells for each PR intensity level (0, 1+, 2+, or 3+), was completed in 2020. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR was calculated using Rao’s quadratic entropy and then categorized into low and high intra-tumor heterogeneity groups, using a predefined cutoff at the second tertile. Complete long-term (20 year) follow-up was obtained from high-quality Swedish registries. Long-term distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) was assessed using univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. Results: A statistically significant difference in 20-year DRFI was seen between patients with high and low intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR in the univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank P&amp;lt; 0.01). Survival proportions for DRFI at 20 years were 60.2% (95% CI, 53.2%-68.1%) and 73.3% (95% CI, 68.6%-78.3%) for patients with high and low PR intra-tumor heterogeneity, respectively. Analysis in patients with HER2-negative tumors yielded similar results. In the multivariable analysis, women with high intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR had a significantly increased long-term risk of distant recurrence, compared to women with low intra-tumor heterogeneity, hazard ratio (HR)=1.49 (95% CI, 1.08-2.06). The same pattern was seen in HER2-negative women, HR=1.50 (95% CI, 1.06-2.12), see Table. Conclusions: This study suggests an increased long-term risk of distant recurrences in ER-positive/PR-positive premenopausal women with high intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR as compared to women with low intra-tumor heterogeneity of PR, independent of HER2 status. Ongoing analyses include using deep learning for image analysis of breast cancer tumors to examine intra-tumor heterogeneity at higher resolution and for various tumor characteristics. Better understanding of tumor characteristics associated with long-term risk in premenopausal women is needed, given the poor prognosis and early onset of the disease. Long-term risk of distant recurrence by PR intra-tumor heterogeneity and HER2 status Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modeling of 20-year distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) by high and low PR intra-tumor heterogeneity. ER-positive/PR-positive and ER-positive/PR-positive/HER2-negative premenopausal women were analyzed separately. The crude model was adjusted for age, randomization year, lymph node status, and endocrine treatment. The full model was adjusted for age, randomization year, lymph node status, endocrine treatment, tumor size, Ki-67 status, and HER2 status. Citation Format: Oscar Danielsson, Huma Dar, Gizeh Perez-Tenorio, Anna Nordenskjöld, Christina Yau, Christopher C. Benz, Laura J. Esserman, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Tommy Fornander, Annelie Johansson, Linda S. Lindström. Long-term survival and intra-tumor heterogeneity of progesterone receptor expression in estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-03.

Abstract P2-03-11: Differential Long-Term Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen Therapy in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Tamoxifen is a standard endocrine therapy for both pre- and postmenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients. Patients with ER-positive disease have a long-term risk of distant recurrence, thus, long-term follow-up studies are essential to understand true treatment benefit. Clinically used tumor characteristics are prognostic 5-10 years after primary diagnosis, however, whether these characteristics are predictive of long-term tamoxifen benefit is largely unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to determine the long-term tamoxifen therapy benefit by the clinically used tumor characteristics in pre- vs postmenopausal patients in the Stockholm tamoxifen (STO)-trials with 20-years complete follow-up. Methods: Secondary analysis of 1242 ER-positive/HER2-negative patients from the STO-trials, randomized to at least 2 years of 40 mg tamoxifen vs no endocrine therapy (control). Premenopausal lymph node-positive patients were allocated to chemotherapy as standard of care and postmenopausal high-risk patients were further randomized to chemotherapy vs radiotherapy. Tumor immunohistochemical analysis was recently conducted. Complete 20-year follow-up was obtained from Swedish high-quality registries. Long-term distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and time-varying analysis using flexible parametric modelling. Results: Premenopausal patients showed significantly improved long-term DRFI from tamoxifen vs control if they were lymph node-negative (Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87), PR-positive (HR=0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.91), or of genomic low risk (HR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85), see Table. In postmenopausal patients, significantly improved long-term DRFI from tamoxifen vs control was seen for all good prognosis tumor characteristics, i.e. small tumor size (pT≤20mm: HR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77), tumor grade 1-2 (HR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73), lymph node-negative (HR=0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64), PR-positive (HR=0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.80), Ki-67-low (&amp;lt; 15%: HR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68), and genomic low risk (HR=0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74), see Table. Also, postmenopausal patients with large tumor size (pT&amp;gt;20mm: HR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94) and PR-negative tumors (HR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81) showed significant long-term tamoxifen benefit. Time-varying analysis in premenopausal patients indicated that tamoxifen therapy benefit diminished over time. Significant tamoxifen benefit until year 5, 10, and 15 after primary diagnosis was observed for PR-positive, lymph node-negative, and genomic low-risk patients, respectively. Postmenopausal patients had a significant long-term tamoxifen benefit if they had tumors of small or large tumor size, tumor grade 1-2, lymph node-negative status, PR-positive status, low Ki-67 levels, or genomic low risk. Conclusions: This study suggests a differential long-term tamoxifen therapy benefit in pre- vs postmenopausal patients. Clinically defined low-risk postmenopausal patients have long-term tamoxifen benefit, whereas the benefit is absent or diminish over time for premenopausal patients. Improved long-term prognostic and endocrine therapy predictive markers in premenopausal breast cancer patients with poor prognosis and long life-expectancy is needed, which could involve molecular tools. Long-term tamoxifen benefit in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients by the clinically used tumor characteristics. Table Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of 20-year distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative tumors, comparing patients randomized to tamoxifen vs patients randomized to no endocrine therapy (control). Adjusted for age, randomization year, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, PR status, Ki-67 status, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and type of surgery. Citation Format: Annelie Johansson, Huma Dar, Anna Nordenskjöld, Gizeh Perez-Tenorio, Christina Yau, Christopher C. Benz, Laura J. Esserman, Laura Van’t Veer, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Tommy Fornander, Linda S. Lindström. Differential Long-Term Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen Therapy in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-11.

Abstract P2-03-04: Long-Term Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Luminal A and Luminal B Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: The risk for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer remains stable decades after primary diagnosis, with a large proportion of distant metastatic events occurring late. Thus, long-term follow-up studies are essential to understand true treatment benefit. Tamoxifen (TAM) therapy is a fundamental endocrine treatment for ER-positive breast cancer. We have previously shown a long-term tamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with less aggressive tumor characteristics in ER-positive/HER2-negative patients. However, ER-positive breast cancer is highly heterogenous and can be separated into different molecular subpopulations that behave differently during extended follow-up. The long-term tamoxifen benefit by molecular subtype is largely unexplored. We therefore aimed to investigate the long-term benefit from tamoxifen by clinically used tumor characteristics in Luminal A vs Luminal B patients in the Stockholm tamoxifen (STO)-trials with complete 20-years follow-up. Methods: Secondary analysis of ER-positive/HER2-negative patients with Luminal A or B molecular subtype (n=952) from the STO-trials (1976-1997) randomized to TAM (40 mg) vs no endocrine therapy (control). Gene expression data was generated using custom designed Agilent arrays from FFPE breast cancer tumor tissue and was used to define PAM50 molecular subtypes. The clinically used markers were reannotated in 2014 and 2020. Complete 20-year follow-up was obtained from Swedish high-qualitative registries. The long-term distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and time-varying analysis, using flexible parametric modelling. Results: Multivariable analysis showed significantly improved long-term DRFI from TAM vs control for both Luminal A (HR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.81) and Luminal B (HR=0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99) patients. Time-varying analysis showed that patients with Luminal A subtype significantly benefitted from TAM for 15 years (HR=0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.94 at year 15), whereas patients with Luminal B subtype had a significant TAM benefit for 5 years (HR=0.64, 95% CI, 0.42-0.98 at year 5), see Table. Furthermore, a significant long-term TAM benefit for patients with large tumor size (pT&amp;gt;20mm: HR=0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.84), tumor grade 1-2 (HR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.77), lymph node-negative (HR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.34-0.78), PR-positive (HR=0.57, 95% CI, 0.40-0.81) and Ki-67-low tumors (HR=0.55, 95% CI, 0.39-0.77) was seen for Luminal A patients. In Luminal B patients, significantly improved long-term DRFI from TAM vs control was seen for small tumor size (pT≤20mm: HR=0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.80), tumor grade 1-2 (HR=0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.90), lymph node-negative (HR=0.40, 95% CI, 0.19-0.83), PR-positive (HR=0.59, 95% CI, 0.38-0.93) and Ki-67-low tumors (HR=0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.84). Conclusions: This study suggests a 15 years tamoxifen benefit for patients with Luminal A subtype tumors, whereas the benefit for patients with Luminal B tumors is up to five years after diagnosis. Furthermore, our study suggests a long-term tamoxifen benefit for patients with less aggressive tumor characteristics regardless of tumor subtype, except for tumor size in Luminal A patients. ER-positive breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and long-term follow-up studies in molecular subtypes are essential to understand differences in treatment benefit. Table. Time-varying analysis of long-term tamoxifen therapy benefit by PAM50 molecular subtype. Time-varying analysis of distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) to assess how tamoxifen benefit varied over the 20 year of follow-up using flexible parametric survival modelling. Patients included in analyses with no missing values. Estimated hazard ratios (HR) at year 5, 10, 15 and 20 for patients with Luminal A or Luminal B molecular subtype tumors randomized to tamoxifen therapy, as compared with patients randomized to no endocrine therapy (control). Adjusted for age, period of primary breast cancer diagnosis, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, PR status, Ki-67 status, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, type of surgery, and menopausal status. *indicates significant findings P&amp;lt;0.05 Citation Format: Huma Dar, Annelie Johansson, Anna Nordenskjöld, Gizeh Perez-Tenorio, Christina Yau, Christopher C. Benz, Laura J. Esserman, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Tommy Fornander, Linda S. Lindström. Long-Term Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Luminal A and Luminal B Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-04.

Abstract GS1-06: Evaluation of the Breast Cancer Index in premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer in the SOFT trial

Abstract Background: The landmark Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) in premenopausal breast cancer patients revealed that the addition of ovarian function suppression (OFS) to adjuvant endocrine therapy with either tamoxifen (T+OFS) or exemestane (E+OFS) reduces the risk of recurrence compared with adjuvant tamoxifen alone. The benefit from the addition of OFS was most clinically meaningful for patients at higher clinico-pathologic risk of recurrence. There are no biomarkers to aid decision-making about intensification of endocrine therapy with OFS and its resultant toxicities. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression–based signature that stratifies patients based on the risk of overall (0-10 years) and late (post-5 years) distant recurrence (DR) and predicts the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in early stage HR+ breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to assess BCI’s prognostic and predictive ability in premenopausal women randomly assigned to 5-years treatment with E+OFS or T+OFS vs T alone in the SOFT trial. Methods: All available FFPE tumor samples from the SOFT trial (n=1718 of 3047) were included in the study. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome. Median follow-up was 13 years. Primary endpoint was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI). Secondary endpoints were distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models, stratified by prior chemotherapy and lymph node status, were used to evaluate the predictive performance of BCI (H/I) status (High vs Low), and secondarily H/I as a continuous score. Hypothesis testing for interaction was performed by stratified log-rank tests. Results: Tumor samples from 1687 (98%) patients (30.4% &amp;lt; 40 years, 64.1% T1, 50.1% G2, 65.8% N0, 85.5%% HER2-, 53.3% received prior chemotherapy) were successful in BCI testing and included in the final analysis. Patient characteristics in the translational cohort are representative of the parent SOFT trial. 42.4% of patients’ tumors had H/I-High status. Prognostic and predictive analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ruth O’Regan, Yi Zhang, Gini F. Fleming, Prudence Francis, Roswitha Kammler, Giuseppe Viale, István Láng, Meritxell Bellet Ezquerra, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Sherene Loi, Marco Colleoni, Catherine A. Schnabel, Kai Treuner, Meredith Regan. Evaluation of the Breast Cancer Index in premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer in the SOFT trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-06.

Abstract P3-05-49: Number of involved organs at baseline is prognostic for overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Results from the AGMT_MBC-Registry

Abstract Background: Hormone-receptor (HR) status, HER2 Status, de novo metastatic disease, distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), and visceral disease are known prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Therefore, in the majority of clinical trials, randomization is stratified for these parameters. Whether the number of involved organs at baseline has an additional prognostic value was examined in this analysis. Patients and methods: The AGMT-MBC-Registry is a multicenter nationwide ongoing retrospective and prospective registry for MBC patients in Austria. In this analysis, patients with known HR status, HER2 status, and available survival data were included. Multivariable hazard ratios were estimated by COX proportional hazard models. For variable selection a backward stepwise model selection using the Akaike information criterion was performed. Results: As of 04/05/2022, 2,235 patients have been included in the registry, of which 1,840 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In two different multivariable COX proportional hazard models for overall survival, the number of involved organs was a highly statistically significant independent prognostic factor: (1) a model including the number of involved organs at baseline together with known prognostic factors (see Table 1); (2) a stepwise selection model additionally including menopausal status and involved metastatic organ sites (bone, liver, lung, brain, and lymph nodes) separately. This effect was maintained in sensitivity analysis taking different breast cancer subtypes as well as visceral and non-visceral disease into account. Conclusion: The number of involved organs at baseline is an independent prognostic factor in MBC and should be considered as a stratification factor in randomized trials. Table 1. Multivariable Model for overall survival. Citation Format: Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Simon P. Gampenrieder, Christoph Tinchon, Andreas Petzer, Marija Balic, Sonja Heibl, Margit Sandholzer, August F. Zabernigg, Daniel Egle, Christopher Hager, Petra Pichler, Florian Roitner, Johannes Andel, Kathrin Strasser-Weippl, Michael Knauer, Michael Hubalek, Christian F. Singer, Richard Greil. Number of involved organs at baseline is prognostic for overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Results from the AGMT_MBC-Registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-49.

Abstract P2-11-09: Association of 21-gene recurrence score with overall survival in phase 3 TAILORx trial

Abstract Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is a prognostic measurement originally established for distant recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive and node-negative breast cancer. Retrospective studies and the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00310180) validated its significance besides testing chemotherapy benefit in patients with midrange RS (11-25). However, unclarity remains as to whether RS has comparable prognostic value for overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population. Methods: Association between the recurrence scores (midrange or high-range 26-100 vs. low-range 0-10) and OS was evaluated in all eligible patients with clinicopathological and treatment information by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model including RS, tumor size, tumor grades, chemotherapy, endocrine regimens, surgery type, progesterone receptor and demographics. We also evaluated the association between RS and invasive disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI) or distant recurrence-free interval (dRFI) by multivariable Cox analysis. Results: Median follow-up was 95.5 (range 0.1 to 138.6) months for OS, 89.6 months (range 0 to 134.8) for DFS, 87.7 (range 0 to 134.8) months for RFI or 87.6 (range 0-134.8) months for dRFI. Compared with low score group, midrange and high-range scores were associated with RFI and dRFI, respectively (P≤0.01 each). However, midrange score was neither associated with OS (adjusted HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.87-1.52; P=0.33) nor associated with DFS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.97-1.38; P=0.11). High-range score was associated with DFS (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.21-2.06; P&amp;lt; 0.01) and had a trend towards association with OS (HR 1.44; 95% CI 0.95-2.19; P=0.08). Conclusions: The data indicate that the recurrence scores provide independent prognosis for breast cancer recurrence at both distant and locoregional sites and for distant recurrence, respectively. High-range score is prognostic of disease-free survival, with the midrange score showing marginal association. Midrange and high-range recurrence scores do not provide independent prognostic information for overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer in the TAILORx trial population. Citation Format: Sherry X. Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang. Association of 21-gene recurrence score with overall survival in phase 3 TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-09.

Genomic characterisation of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer arising in very young women

Very young premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) have higher rates of recurrence and death for reasons that remain largely unexplained. Genomic sequencing was applied to HR+HER2- tumours from patients enrolled in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) to determine genomic drivers that are enriched in young premenopausal women. Genomic alterations were characterised using next-generation sequencing from a subset of 1276 patients (deep targeted sequencing, n= 1258; whole-exome sequencing in a young-age, case-control subsample, n= 82). We defined copy number (CN) subgroups and assessed for features suggestive of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Genomic alteration frequencies were compared between young premenopausal women (<40 years) and older premenopausal women (≥40 years), and assessed for associations with distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS). Younger women (<40 years, n= 359) compared with older women (≥40 years, n= 917) had significantly higher frequencies of mutations in GATA3 (19% versus 16%) and CN amplifications (CNAs) (47% versus 26%), but significantly lower frequencies of mutations in PIK3CA (32% versus 47%), CDH1 (3% versus 9%), and MAP3K1 (7% versus 12%). Additionally, they had significantly higher frequencies of features suggestive of HRD (27% versus 21%) and a higher proportion of PIK3CA mutations with concurrent CNAs (23% versus 11%). Genomic features suggestive of HRD, PIK3CA mutations with CNAs, and CNAs were associated with significantly worse DRFI and OS compared with those without these features. These poor prognostic features were enriched in younger patients: present in 72% of patients aged <35 years, 54% aged 35-39 years, and 40% aged ≥40 years. Poor prognostic features [n= 584 (46%)] versus none [n= 692 (54%)] had an 8-year DRFI of 84% versus 94% and OS of 88% versus 96%. Younger women (<40 years) had the poorest outcomes: 8-year DRFI 74% versus 85% and OS 80% versus 93%, respectively. These results provide insights into genomic alterations that are enriched in young women with HR+HER2- EBC, provide rationale for genomic subgrouping, and highlight priority molecular targets for future clinical trials.