164 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE amusingly depicting the confrontations ofauto drivers with animals, peasants, policemen,judges, and other enemies. Some of the stories are hardly credible, probably invented by clever journalists. One wonders about the complaint of some English farmers who alleged that dust raised by autos rushing by on country roads and settled on their fields dulled their scythes and sickles twice as fast as normal. Many of the yarns attributed to the French context are familiar to students of auto history elsewhere, such as the one about the Nor man resident who in 1899 invented an “articulated tree” that was hinged near its base and would be dropped on a motorist. M. Pouzet supplies better documentation for this story than any other, includ ing several photos from a magazine showing the tree and the wind lass used to raise it for another plunge. In the United States someone is supposed to have rigged a similar articulated tree on a road near Toledo. Unsurprising also are the accounts of farmers pushing dis eased cows and chickens onto the road to be dispatched by speeding cars or even throwing themselves under slower-moving vehicles in hopes of minor injury and reimbursement. Common causes such as the early autos’ surprising speed, dust, noise, and smell, along with antagonism of the poor toward wealthy drivers, brought similar results wherever the motor car appeared. This book is in no way scientific or scholarly; there is no effort at quantification; but it is useful for an hour or two of entertainment. It also reminds us of early opposition to a new technology, similar to but stronger than was the case for railroads or computers. James M. Laux Dr. Laux has written extensively on automobile history. His books include The European Automobile Industry (New York: Twayne; Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Can ada, 1992). Holding the Line: The Telephone in Old Order Mennonite and Amish Life. By Diane Zimmerman Umble. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer sity Press, 1996. Pp. xvi+192; illustration, notes, appendix, index. $35.00 (hard cover). Few arguments about technology and culture have been as emo tionally wrenching as the Mennonite and Amish communities’ dis putes about the telephone early this century. On the one side, objec tions: “Telephone lines now form a great network connecting cities, towns, and even Christian people. . . . But spiritually this is a sinful network, as Paul teaches us in 2 Cor. 6,14-17, Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers, etc. Another thing, there is much talking through the phone which amounts to nothing” (p. 119). On the other side, a defense: “The phone is in itself nothing as far as spiritual things are concerned. It is an instrument like many others that we have. If we use it wrong, it is sinful; if we use it right it is not Technology and culture Book Reviews 165 sinful” (p. 124). So serious were these disputes that they hastened permanent schisms among both the Mennonites and Amish. In Holding the Line, Diane Zimmerman Umble recounts the tele phone quarrels that split the Old Order Mennonites and Old Order Amish in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These fights seem to sharply define the clash between modern technology and traditional “community.” The Anabaptist movements tightly bound members together and walled them off from outsiders through distinct doc trine, practice, and appearance, and by strong fellowship and stern group discipline. But disagreements nevertheless repeatedly divided them—for example, over English in prayer services, or the use of farm machinery. The fights resulted in secession and the formation of new subcommunities, each adapting to the modern world to vary ing degrees. The telephone sparked such divisions in both Lancaster County groups (and elsewhere in the United States, too). The telephone was helpful to rural people for handling emergencies, managing a farm, keeping in touch with distant kin, and so on. Conservative members did not quarrel with their fellows using an “English” neighbor’s or a public telephone, but they campaigned against allowing members to have one in the home. A home telephone was an unnecessary and proud indulgence, encouraged intercourse with (and symbolized) the outside world, reduced face-to-face contact, and tempted women...
Read full abstract