The purpose of this research is to review and analyze the transformation of the urban structure of Tokyo resulting from the developmental activities by the kashichi-haisyakunin, who are tenants of the kashichi, which means common riverside spaces, during the early meiji period. In particular, this research targets the regions surrounding the riverbank of the Kanda River, which include Kagura-kashi, Ichibei-kashi, and Iida-kashi. In a previous study on this riverbank, the author remarked that the spatial structures existing in these kashichi had been formed by the kashichi-haisyakunin. That is to say, they were private developers of those riverside spaces and were new tenants of the kashichi since the meiji period. Their activities were associated with the process of transformation of regions surrounding those kashichi. Accordingly, this paper aims to focus on their activities in the surrounding regions as well as the riverbank. In this study, the characteristics of the kashichi-haisyakunin is classified into three types: adjacent, periphery, and distant. The classification is based on the positional relation between the kashichi and their location. Additionally, each type was evaluated for the differences in the behavior of the landowners and the developmental activities at their respective locations in order to confirm the land ledger and kashi register from the meiji period. Through this analysis of the activities of the kashichi-haisyakunin, the following characteristics were revealed. First, in the case of adjacent type of kashichi-haisyakunin, which involved several tenants renting the kagura-kashi and ichibei-kashi, the tenants sought to use the adjacent riverbank and were involved in reconstructing the spatial structures in the surrounding region, such as the Kagurazaka area, while using the waterfront and commercial land integrally. Second, in the case of periphery of the adjacent area, which involved several tenants renting the iida-kashi, the tenants emerged be a newly risen landlord class. Thus, they rented the land of the kashichi and acquired land from the periphery of the town adjacent to kashichi. Consequently, the spatial structures in those areas were transformed and a new relation between the land and water was established in the urban structure. Finally, the distant type of kashichi-haisyakunin, which involved commercial tenants renting kashichi, the tenants tended to be companies, such as a timber and rice merchants, that used the river to transport goods. Furthermore, there is also a stock farm, which was converted from bukechi (a district inhabited by the samurais during the edo period). That is to say, they constructed an intimate relation between the kashichi and the production areas or the supply centers for merchandise, using the structure of a channel in Tokyo. It was then conducive to reconstruct the urban structure resulting from the relation between two distant regions Such interactions between the kashichi-haisyakunin's activity and the transformation of the regions surrounding those kashichi show that the urban structure of Tokyo had been reconstructed during the early meiji period. Therefore, these results suggest that the kashichi-haisyakunin was an independent player in the urban transformation, performing roles such as a developer, a newly risen landlord class, or someone engaged in water transport.