Research Article| July 01, 1994 Chaotic deposition by a giant wave, Molokai, Hawaii JAMES G. MOORE; JAMES G. MOORE 1U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar WILFRED B. BRYAN; WILFRED B. BRYAN 2Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar KENNETH R. LUDWIG KENNETH R. LUDWIG 3U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (1994) 106 (7): 962–967. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106<0962:CDBAGW>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation JAMES G. MOORE, WILFRED B. BRYAN, KENNETH R. LUDWIG; Chaotic deposition by a giant wave, Molokai, Hawaii. GSA Bulletin 1994;; 106 (7): 962–967. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106<0962:CDBAGW>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract A coral-basalt breccia-conglomerate is exposed >60 m above present sea level and nearly 2 km inland from the present shoreline on the southwest side of East Molokai Volcano, Molokai. The conglomerate is preserved mantling interfluves between gullies and forms a blanket- like deposit 0.5 to 3 m thick. No evidence of a wavecut terrace either within the blanket or at its upper or lower limits of exposure can be found. No coral was found in growth position. Unsorted basalt clasts as large as boulder size are subrounded to angular, randomly oriented, and vary from 2-3 to >50 volume% of the deposit. The size of the largest basalt and coral fragments shows almost no systematic variation with elevation, distance inland, or lateral position parallel to the shore.Two indistinct rock units are present in a few places, a lower carbonate-rich unit that we interpret as an "onwash facies" and an upper basalt-rich unit, an "offwash facies.". The carbonate-rich onwash facies is dominated by biogenic debris, especially fragments of coral and beach rock and gastropod and bivalve shells. The offwash facies contains 40% to >90% basalt cobbles and boulders in a matrix of finely broken biogenic fragments. Where the distinct facies are lacking, the proportion of basalt clasts increases crudely from the lower to the upper part of the conglomerate at a single place and from lower to higher elevation out-crops. Where the deposit overlies a cinder cone, several carbonate-bearing elastic dikes extend from the conglomerate as much as 10 m down into the basalt cinders.This deposit was apparently laid down by a giant wave that broke over an outer reef, similar to the present fringing reef, and advanced as a turbulent bore over the back-reef flat, picking up a slurry of carbonate-rich debris and depositing it on the slopes inland as the wave advanced. The offwash picked up loose basalt debris on its return flow. U-series dating of coral fragments indicates that the age of this deposit is 240-200 ka, indicating the wave is distinct from that which produced a similar deposit on Lanai about 100 ka. This giant wave was most likely caused by one of the many large submarine landslides that have been identified on the lower slopes of the major Hawaiian Islands. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Read full abstract