Distal Radial Fractures Research Articles

Feasibility of Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Algorithms to Predict Outcome in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

Statistical models using machine learning (ML) have the potential for more accurate estimates of the probability of binary events than logistic regression. The present study used existing data sets from large musculoskeletal trauma trials to address the following study questions: (1) Do ML models produce better probability estimates than logistic regression models? (2) Are ML models influenced by different variables than logistic regression models? We created ML and logistic regression models that estimated the probability of a specific fracture (posterior malleolar involvement in distal spiral tibial shaft and ankle fractures, scaphoid fracture, and distal radial fracture) or adverse event (subsequent surgery [after distal biceps repair or tibial shaft fracture], surgical site infection, and postoperative delirium) using 9 data sets from published musculoskeletal trauma studies. Each data set was split into training (80%) and test (20%) subsets. Fivefold cross-validation of the training set was used to develop the ML models. The best-performing model was then assessed in the independent testing data. Performance was assessed by (1) discrimination (c-statistic), (2) calibration (slope and intercept), and (3) overall performance (Brier score). The mean c-statistic was 0.01 higher for the logistic regression models compared with the best ML models for each data set (range, -0.01 to 0.06). There were fewer variables strongly associated with variation in the ML models, and many were dissimilar from those in the logistic regression models. The observation that ML models produce probability estimates comparable with logistic regression models for binary events in musculoskeletal trauma suggests that their benefit may be limited in this context.

Detecting Distal Radial Fractures from Wrist Radiographs Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network with an Accuracy Comparable to Hand Orthopedic Surgeons.

In recent years, fracture image diagnosis using a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been reported. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of CNN to diagnose distal radius fractures (DRFs) using frontal and lateral wrist radiographs. We included 503 cases of DRF diagnosed by plain radiographs and 289 cases without fracture. We implemented the CNN model using Keras and Tensorflow. Frontal and lateral views of wrist radiographs were manually cropped and trained separately. Fine-tuning was performed using EfficientNets. The diagnostic ability of CNN was evaluated using 150 images with and without fractures from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The CNN model diagnosed DRF based on three views: frontal view, lateral view, and both frontal and lateral view. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CNN model, plotted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUC). We further compared performances between the CNN and three hand orthopedic surgeons. EfficientNet-B2 in the frontal view and EfficientNet-B4 in the lateral view showed highest accuracy on the validationdataset, and these models were used for combined views. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the CNN based on both anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were 99.3, 98.7, and 100, respectively. The accuracy of the CNN was equal to or better than that of three orthopedic surgeons. The AUC of the CNN on the combined views was 0.993. The CNN model exhibited high accuracy in the diagnosis of distal radius fracture with a plain radiograph.

Preoperative measures of bone mineral density from digital wrist radiographs.

AimsAssessment of bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-established clinical technique, but it is not available in the acute trauma setting. Thus, it cannot provide a preoperative estimation of BMD to help guide the technique of fracture fixation. Alternative methods that have been suggested for assessing BMD include: 1) cortical measures, such as cortical ratios and combined cortical scores; and 2) aluminium grading systems from preoperative digital radiographs. However, limited research has been performed in this area to validate the different methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the evaluation of BMD from digital radiographs by comparing various methods against DXA scanning.MethodsA total of 54 patients with distal radial fractures were included in the study. Each underwent posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs of the injured wrist with an aluminium step wedge. Overall 27 patients underwent routine DXA scanning of the hip and lumbar spine, with 13 undergoing additional DXA scanning of the uninjured forearm. Analysis of radiographs was performed on ImageJ and Matlab with calculations of cortical measures, cortical indices, combined cortical scores, and aluminium equivalent grading.ResultsCortical measures showed varying correlations with the forearm DXA results (range: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.343 (p = 0.251) to r = 0.521 (p = 0.068)), with none showing statistically significant correlations. Aluminium equivalent grading showed statistically significant correlations with the forearm DXA of the corresponding region of interest (p < 0.017).ConclusionCortical measures, cortical indices, and combined cortical scores did not show a statistically significant correlation to forearm DXA measures. Aluminium-equivalent is an easily applicable method for estimation of BMD from digital radiographs in the preoperative setting.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):830–839.

In adults, early mobilization may be beneficial for distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesIt remains debatable if early mobilization (EM) yields a better clinical outcome than the late mobilization (LM) in adults with an acute and displaced distal radial fracture (DRF) of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing clinical results with the safety of EM with LM following ORIF.MethodsDatabases such as Medline, Cochrane Central Register, and Embase were searched from Jan 1, 2000, to July 31, 2021, and RCTs comparing EM with LM for DRF with ORIF were included in the analysis. The primary outcome of study included disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at different follow-up times. Wherever the secondary outcomes included patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), grip strength (GS), visual analog scale (VAS), wrist range of motion (WROM), and associated complications, the two independent reviewers did data extraction for the analysis. Effect sizes of outcome for each group were pooled using random-effects models; thereafter, the results were represented in the forest plots.ResultsNine RCTs with 293 EM and 303 LM participants were identified and included in the study. Our analysis showed that the DASH score of the EM group was significantly better than LM group at the six weeks postoperatively (− 10.15; 95% CI − 15.74 to − 4.57, P < 0.01). Besides, the EM group also had better outcomes in PRWE, GS and WROM at 6 weeks. However, EM showed potential higher rate for implant loosening and/or fracture re-displacement complication (3.00; 95% CI 1.02–8.83, P = 0.05).ConclusionFunctionally, at earlier stages, EM for patients with DRF of ORIF may have a beneficial effect than LM. The mean differences in the DASH score at 6 weeks surpassed the minimal clinically important difference; however, the potentially higher risk of implant loosening and/or fracture re-displacement cannot be ignored. Due to the lack of definitive evidence, multicenter and large sample RCTs are required for determining the optimal rehabilitation protocol for DRF with ORIF.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021240214 2021/2/28.

Epidemiology, Treatment, and Treatment Quality of Overriding Distal Metaphyseal Radial Fractures in Children and Adolescents.

The incidence of completely displaced overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures in children is unknown, and the optimal treatment is controversial. All completely displaced distal metaphyseal radial fractures in patients <16 years old treated in our tertiary-level institution from 2014 to 2019 were identified with use of the Kids' Fracture Tool Helsinki. Etiology, fracture characteristics, management, and quality of treatment were assessed. A telephone interview with the guardian of the patient was performed for 100 (89%) of 112 patients at 1.5 to 7.2 years (median, 4.6 years) after the injury. Pain during the last month and forearm function were recorded. Treatment satisfaction was assessed with use of a 7-point Likert scale. A total of 113 completely displaced overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures in 112 patients (81 of whom were residents of Helsinki) were treated during the 6-year-long study period. The mean annual incidence was 1.42 per 10,000 population. Most (73%) of these fractures occurred in children <11 years old, and most fractures were dorsally displaced and located nearly as far proximally from the distal radial physis as the maximum width of the distal metaphysis. Closed manipulation was attempted in two-thirds of cases in the emergency department, with a failure rate of 46%. Strong opioids were administered in 70 of 112 patients. None of the 26 patients whose fractures were immobilized in an overriding position had secondary interventions, pain, or functional disability. The mean satisfaction with treatment on the Likert scale was 6.2. The annual incidence of overriding distal metaphyseal radial fractures patients <16 years old was shown to vary between 0.72 and 2.01 per 10,000 population. Opioids, local and general anesthesia, hospital admission, and secondary interventions can be avoided in prepubescent patients by casting these fractures in an overriding position while the patient is in the emergency department. Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Predictive Factors of Displacement of Adult Distal End Radius Fracture Treated with Casting.

Background: In the conservative management of distal radial fractures (DRFs), the optimal dorsi-volar angulation of the wrist at cast immobilization and proper cast molding to minimize the risk of redisplacement are unclear. This study identified the predictors of fracture redisplacement during cast immobilization for adult DRFs. Methods: We examined for dorsi-volar angulation, gap index, volar tilt (VT), radial inclination (RI), and radial length (RL) in lateral or posteroanterior radiographs of 90 DRFs. We investigated possible predisposition factors for redisplacement including patient age, sex, extra- or intra-articular fracture, metaphyseal comminution, original displacements, dorsi-volar angulation of the wrist at cast immobilization, restoration of the volar cortex at cast immobilization, and gap index of the cast. Results: Neither dorsi-volar angulation nor gap index had significant association with an unacceptable alignment nor decrease of VT, RI, and RL. In multivariate analysis, patient age, original displacement, and intra-articular fracture were the significant predictors of an unacceptable alignment or decrease of VT and RI. Conclusions: Our findings indicate dorsi-volar angulation and cast molding quality have no clinical effect on preventing fracture redisplacement. The predictive factors of the displacement were patient age, original displacement, and intra-articular fracture.

Supraclavicular block with Mepivacaine vs Ropivacaine, their impact on postoperative pain: a prospective randomised study

BackgroundSupraclavicular block (SCB) with long-acting local anaesthetic is commonly used for surgical repair of distal radial fractures (DRF). Studies have shown a risk for rebound pain when the block fades. This randomised single-centre study aimed to compare pain and opioid consumption the first three days post-surgery between SCB-mepivacaine vs. SCB-ropivacaine, with general anaesthesia (GA) as control.MethodsPatients (n = 90) with ASA physical status 1–3 were prospectively randomised to receive; SCB with mepivacine 1%, 25–30 ml (n = 30), SCB with ropivacaine 0.5%, 25–30 ml (n = 30) or GA (n = 30) with propofol/fentanyl/sevoflurane. Study objectives compared postoperative pain with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and sum postoperative Opioid Equivalent Consumption (OEC) during the first 3 days post-surgery between study-groups.ResultsThe three groups showed significant differences in postoperative pain-profile. Mean NRS at 24 h was significantly lower for the SCB-mepivacaine group (p = 0.018). Further both median NRS and median OEC day 0 to 3 were significanly lower in the SCB-mepivacaine group as compared to the SCB-ropivacaine group during the first three days after surgery; pain NRS 1 (IQR 0.3–3.3) and 2.7 (IQR 1.3–4.2) (p = 0.017) and OEC 30 mg (IQR 10–80) and 85 mg (IQR 45–125) (p = 0.004), respectively. The GA-group was in between both in pain NRS and median sum OEC. Unplanned healthcare contacts were highest among SCB-ropivacaine patients (39.3%) vs. SCB-mepivacaine patients (0%) and GA-patients (3.4%).ConclusionsThe potential benefit of longer duration of analgesia, associated to a long-acting local anaesthetic agent, during the early postoperative course must be put in perspective of potential worse pain progression following block resolution.Trial registrationNCT03749174 (clinicaltrials.gov, Nov 21, 2018, retrospectively registered).

The predictive value of disability at 2 weeks after plating of distal radial fractures: a prospective study of 101 patients.

Assuming that some patients may benefit from early supervised rehabilitation after distal radial fractures, we investigated to what extent self-reported measures of disability, pain and performance of daily activities 2 weeks after anterior locking plating of distal radial fractures could predict long-lasting disability. We included 101 patients in a prediction study and recorded the scores of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, visual analogue scales for pain and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. We found that the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores with a cut-off score of 50 were the best at predicting disability at 6months in patients who did not receive early supervised therapy. The positive predictive value was 65% and the negative predictive value was 71%. We conclude that these scores could be used as a single measure to predict patient disability, although the predictive value was rather weak.Level of evidence: II.

Acceptable Distal Radial Fracture Reduction May Not Be Good Enough: Commentary on articles by C.A. Selles, MD, et al.: "Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures. A Randomized Controlled Trial" and "Cost Analysis of Volar Plate Fixation Versus Plaster Cast Immobilization for Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures".

Acceptable Distal Radial Fracture Reduction May Not Be Good Enough: Commentary on articles by C.A. Selles, MD, et al.: "Volar Plate Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures. A Randomized Controlled Trial" and "Cost Analysis of Volar Plate Fixation Versus Plaster Cast Immobilization for Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures".

Epidemiology and Factors Affecting Functional Outcome of Distal Radial Fracture in an Urban Tertiary Medical Centre in Malaysia.

Introduction:Distal radial fracture is a commonly encountered fracture. This study aims to study the epidemiology of distal radial fracture and factors affecting the patients’ functional outcome one to two years after the injury.Materials and methods:This is a retrospective cohort study. The records of patients, fulfilling the radiographical diagnosis of distal radial fracture, and aged 18 and above, who presented to our Emergency Department from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2018 were retrieved. According to AO classification, we grouped our patients into A (extra-articular), B (partial articular) and C (complete articular). Patients with congenital abnormalities were excluded. Epidemiological data and relevant medical history were obtained and tabulated. A Malaysian language translation of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to assess the functional outcome.Results:Out of 168 patients’ data retrieved, only 110 patients’ data were found complete for purposes of this study. The mean DASH score was 13.7 ± 7.87 approximately one to two years post-injury regardless of treatment method. Increasing age was associated with higher DASH score with r=0.407(p<0.001). Several variables had significantly better functional outcome: male gender (p=0.01), Type A fracture configuration (p=0.007) and non-operational treatment (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between treatment modalities in Type A fracture (p=0.094), but Type B (p=0.043) and Type C (p=0.007) had better outcome without surgery. There was no significant difference between different ethnic groups, open or closed fracture and mechanism of injury.Conclusion:Better functional outcome after sustaining distal radial fracture was associated with young age, male gender, type A fracture and treated non-operatively. Interestingly, more complex fracture pattern had better functionality were observed without surgery.

Distal Radial Fracture Fixation in Adults using Intramedullary Elastic Wires Augmented with either Cast Immobilisation or External Fixation.

Introduction:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes following treatment of distal radial fractures using intramedullary elastic wires with a combination of either cast immobilisation or external fixation.Materials and methods:A total of 42 patients (24 females and 18 males) aged 40 to 78 years who presented with displaced and unstable, closed or grade I open, extra- and/or intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were included in the study. Twenty-seven fractures were AO/OTA Type A2-A3 and 15 Type C1-C2. Twenty-four patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary (IM) fixation with elastic wires followed by cast immobilisation and 18 required an external fixator in lieu of casting.Results:Final follow-up evaluation was conducted 12 months post-surgery using Sarmiento's modification of Lindstrom criteria and the demerit point system of Gartland and Werley. Successful fracture union was observed in all patients between eight to 14 weeks. Using Sarmiento's modification of Lindstrom criteria, 12 patients (28.6%) had excellent, 23 (54.8%) had good and 7 (16.6 %) had fair results. Based on the functional evaluation using the demerit point system of Gartland and Werley, 13 patients (31%) had excellent, 25 (59.5%) had good and four (9.5%) had fair results. None of the patients had a poor outcome using either of these criteria. Although a fracture union rate of 100% was confirmed clinically and radiographically, eight out of the 42 patients had minor complications in our study. One patient had uneventful IM migration of the wires, one patient reported a feeling of wire loosening, three patients complained of joint stiffness and soft tissue irritation, and three others reported on-going pain. The total cost of all implants used per case was less than INR 1,000.Conclusions:Good to excellent functional and radiographic outcomes with easy to manage complications are achieved with the techniques described. Patient selection is key to determining which particular method should be prescribed in a given case.

Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Increased Healthcare Utilization after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-Articular and Extra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: An Analysis of 17,482 Cases.

Background The current literature does not contain a quantitative description of the associations between operative time and adverse outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radial fractures (DRF). Questions/Purpose We aimed to quantify associations between DRF ORIF operative time and 1) 30-day postoperative health care utilization and 2) the incidence of local wound complications. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for DRF ORIF cases (January 2012-December 2018). A total of 17,482 cases were identified. Primary outcomes included health care utilization (length of stay [LOS], discharge dispositions, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations) per operative-time category. Secondary outcome was incidence of wound complications per operative-time category. Multivariate regression was conducted to determine operative-time categories associated with increased risk while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and fracture type. Spline regression models were constructed to visualize associations. Results The 121 to 140-minute category was associated with significantly higher risk of a LOS > 2 days (odds ration [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1-2.45; p = 0.014) and nonhome discharge (OR: 1.72; 95% CI:1.09-2.72; p = 0.02) versus 41 to 60-minute category. The ≥ 180-minute category exhibited highest odds of LOS > 2 days (OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.33-3.26; p = 0.001), nonhome discharge disposition (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.05-3.33; p = 0.035), and 30-day reoperation occurrence (OR: 3.52; 95% CI: 1.59-7.79; p = 0.002). There was no association between operative time and 30-day readmission ( p > 0.05 each). Higher odds of any-wound complication was first detected at 81 to 100-minute category (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.08-8.4; p = 0.035) and peaked ≥ 181 minutes (OR: 9.62; 95% CI: 2.57-36.0; p = 0.001). Spline regression demonstrated no increase in risk of adverse outcomes if operative times were 50 minutes or less. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that prolonged operative time is correlated with increased odds of health care utilization and wound complications after DRF ORIF. Operative times greater than 60 minutes seem to carry higher odds of postoperative complications.

Longitudinal Changes in Serum Markers of Bone Metabolism and Bone Material Strength in Premenopausal Women with Distal Radial Fracture.

Markers of bone metabolism (MBM) play an important role in fracture evaluation, and changes have been associated with increased fracture risk. The purpose of the present study was to describe changes in MBM in premenopausal women with distal radial fractures. Premenopausal women with distal radial fractures (n = 34) and without fractures (controls) (n = 39) were recruited. Serum MBM in patients with distal radial fractures were obtained at the time of the initial presentation, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. MBM included 25(OH) vitamin D, PTH, osteocalcin, P1NP, BSAP, CTX, sclerostin, DKK1, periostin, and TRAP5b. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was assessed with dual x-ray absorptiometry, and the bone material strength index (BMSi) was assessed with microindentation. Most MBM reached peak levels at 6 weeks after the injury, including osteocalcin (+17.7%), sclerostin (+23.5%), and DKK1 (12.6%). Sclerostin was lower (-27.4%) and DKK1 was higher (+22.2%) at 1 year after the fracture. CTX declined below baseline levels at 6 and 12 months, whereas TRAP5b, BSAP, and periostin did not significantly change. At 12 months, sclerostin was lower (p = 0.003) and DKK1 was higher (p = 0.03) in the distal radial fracture group than in the control group. Greater fracture severity was associated with greater increases in P1NP and BSAP. aBMD and BMSi were not associated with fracture. Distal radial fractures caused increases in several MBM, which typically peaked at 6 weeks after injury and gradually decreased over 6 months. Sclerostin and DKK1 remained below and above baseline at 1 year, respectively. Increasing fracture severity resulted in larger changes in MBM. aBMD and BMSi did not discriminate between patients with distal radial fractures and controls. Continued efforts to identify markers of skeletal fragility in young women are warranted to mitigate future fracture risk. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

206 Audit of Time to Surgical Fixation of Distal Radial Fractures Compared to British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) Guidelines at Busy District General Hospital

Abstract Aim BOAST guidelines state that intra-articular distal radial fractures should be operated on within 72 hours of injury and extra-articular distal radial fractures which require surgical management should be operated on within 7 days. The aim of this audit was to see how the orthopaedic department at a busy district general hospital compared to these guidelines. Method Retrospectively looked at operations carried out over a 10-month period. All Manipulation Under Anaesthesia, K wire and Open Reduction Internal Fixations of distal radial fractures were included. Results Over the 10-month period, 49 intra-articular and 60 extra-articular fractures were operated on. 65% of intra-articular fractures were fixed within 72 hours and 82% of extra-articular fractures were fixed within one week. Mean time from date of injury to operation was 3.88 days for intra-articular and 2.98 days for extra-articular fractures. Mean time from decision of surgery to operation was 2.32 days for intra-articular and 2.18 days for extra-articular fractures. Conclusions Clearly, the management of extra-articular fractures is closer to the standards set by BOAST guidelines. It can be difficult to establish from an x-ray whether a fracture is extending into a joint surface - this can delay the fracture clinic appointment and the operation. The difference between the mean time of injury to operation and mean time of decision of surgery to operation for intra-articular fractures show that once the decision to operate has been made, it is carried out quickly. Educating A+E and orthopaedic staff on recognising intra-articular fractures could expedite the time to surgery.

A prospective study on the surgical management of distal end of radius fractures by various modalities

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of surgical management of distal radial fractures in adults using various methods such as Closed Reduction and External Fixation, External Fixation with Kirschner wire augmentation and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with plate and screw. Methodology: Prospective study was carried out in the Department of Orthopaedics, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital (GEMS), Srikakulam. The assessment of results were made using the demerit score system of Gartland and Werley based on objective and subjective criteria, residual deformity and complications. Results: Using the Demerit score system of Gartland and Werley, we had 5(10%) excellent results, 30(60%) good results, 13 (26%) fair results and 2 (4%) poor results. In our series, we had 10% excellent, 60% good, 26%, fair and 4% poor result. Patients, who obtained excellent results, had no residual deformities or pain. Range of motion was within the normal functional range. They had no arthritic changes or other complications. They were operated within 4 days after injury. Radial length, volar tilt and articular step-off were within acceptable limits. They were co-operative to physiotherapy. Patients with good results had minimal residual deformities, pain and slight limitation. Rest of their findings was within acceptable parameters. Patients with fair results, along with residual deformity, pain and limitation also had pain in the distal radio- ulnar joint and minimal complications. Few of their movements were less than that required for normal function. Conclusion: Distal radial fractures are more common in the 3rd to 5th decades. Male preponderance is due to their involvement in heavy manual labour, outdoor activities and riding vehicles. Most of the fractures are treated with closed reduction and plaster application.

194 Challenging the Dogma of Radiographs a Joint Above and Below a Suspected Fracture: Quantification of Waste in Wrist Fracture Evaluation

The dogmatic teaching and practice to obtain X-ray imaging of the joint above and below every suspected wrist fracture is ingrained in emergency medicine and orthopedics. Originally recommended in a 1975 abstract, based on no data, this idea has been perpetuated to the present. In the interest of patient cost, resource management, and throughput we questioned the utility of this knee jerk radiographic exploration. We assessed the probability of identifying fractures outside of the wrist x-ray when no tenderness to palpation was elicited beyond the wrist. We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients diagnosed with wrist fractures at an urban public aid academic hospital. Inclusion criteria: was ICD diagnosis of distal radius, distal ulna, or carpal bone fractures at discharge between April 2019 and April 2020. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, GCS <15, documented tenderness to the hand, proximal forearm, elbow, or humerus, or follow up visits. The documented physical exams performed by ED providers and Orthopedic consults were reviewed to identify location of tenderness both at the wrist and elsewhere. Undocumented tenderness was assumed to be negative. Analysis was performed with descriptive statistics including 95% confidence intervals. 716 patient encounters were identified. After exclusions, the cohort included 345 unique patients who presented with only wrist tenderness. Of the 345 patients, 113 were between the ages 18-40, 193 were between 40-65, and 39 patients were over 65. 177 (51%) were female. Based on our exclusion criteria, this sample had no tenderness outside of the wrist. Still, there were 268 hand x-rays, 284 forearm x- rays, 77 elbow x-rays, and 21 humerus x-rays performed. There were zero additional fractures identified in this imaging beyond the wrist. Analysing the frequency and outcome of these additional x-rays allowed estimation of the upper limit of the 95% CI as a way of estimating the probability of identifying an additional fracture. Forearm radiographs identified 0 % additional fractures, (95% CI (0.0 to 1.3%)). Hand x-rays 0% (95% CI (0.0 to 1.4%). Wrist x-rays alone identified 345 distal radial fractures, 184 distal ulna fractures, 14 carpal bone fracture/dislocations, and 1 proximal metacarpal fracture. The proportion of patients with additional radiographs that identified a fracture not identified on wrist x-ray in this sample was zero. Based on sample size the potential miss rate is likely less than 2%. This argues against default image ordering above and below tenderness and may provide savings on time, radiation, and cost.

Outcome of Plaster Splintage in the Management of Closed Extraarticular Fracture of Distal Radius

Aim: To determine the outcome of extra-articular distal radius fracture treated with plaster splintage. Methodology: This descriptive case series study was done in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore from 01-08-210 to 31-01-2011 which includes 50 patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria of age 40-80 years of either sex. After the approval of Hospital Ethical Committee, informed consent taken from every patient. Results: The average age was 63.70±11.64 years. Seventeen (34%) patients were male and 33 (66%) patients were female. On visual analogue scale of pain, 23 (46%) patients had no pain and 27 (54%) patients had mild pain. Forty six percent patients shows excellent results and 54% patient shows good results. Conclusion: Closed reduction and plaster splintage was used to assess the functional outcome in distal radius extraarticular fractures. Overall results were excellent in 64% cases and good in 54% cases in the distal radial extraarticular fractures treated with plaster splintage. Keywords: Distal radius extraarticular fractures, Plaster splintage, Visual deformity, Pain and grip strength.

Osteoporosis: Prevalence, awareness and pertinent risk factors in a cohort of elderly Asian population presenting with low-energy distal radius fractures.

This study aims to evaluate the awareness of osteoporosis and related risk factors in elderly Asian patients who present with distal radius fractures. The distal radius fracture is one of the most frequent fractures in the elderly cohort, owing to osteoporosis, and maybe a harbinger for further fractures, however, data is scarce regarding awareness of this condition among these patients. This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients aged 45 and above that presented in the emergency department with low-energy distal radial fractures in Karachi from January-December 2018. Data were collected via a self-designed questionnaire, assessing the demographic information, knowledge about osteoporosis and its risk factors. The data was analysed using SPSS 20 for statistical significance. From a total of 550 patients with a mean age of 70.5±32.82years, there were 442 (80.36%) females and 108 (19.63%) males. On educational consideration, 243 (44.18%) patients could not read or write and only 110 (20%) of the patients received secondary school education. Only 123 (22.36%) were well informed about osteoporosis, the predominant source of information being their physician. There were 427 (77.63%) patients who were unaware of osteoporosis, 16% of which were smokers, 26% indicated they exercised at least 30minutes daily, and 2% reported drinking alcohol occasionally. On dietary supplements, 24.27% of patients reported calcium and 17.81% reported vitamin D supplement consumption on regular basis. We found a positive correlation between a patient's education status and osteoporosis awareness We believe that the role of the physician could be crucial in preventing further fractures in such patients via physician lead educational campaigns to target modifiable risk factors.

Patient Perspectives on the Cost of Hand Surgery.

Health-care expenditures in the U.S. are continually rising, prompting providers, patients, and payers to search for solutions to reduce costs while maintaining quality. The present study seeks to define the out-of-pocket price that patients undergoing hand surgery are willing to pay, and also queries the potential cost-cutting measures that patients are most and least comfortable with. We hypothesized that respondents would be less accepting of higher out-of-pocket costs. A survey was developed and distributed to paid, anonymous respondents through Amazon Mechanical Turk. The survey introduced 3 procedures: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, and open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radial fracture. Respondents were randomized to 1 of 5 out-of-pocket price options for each procedure and asked if they would pay that price. Respondents were then presented with various cost-saving methods and asked to select the options that made them most uncomfortable, even if those would save them out-of-pocket costs. There were 1,408 respondents with a mean age of 37 years (range, 18 to 74 years). Nearly 80% of respondents were willing to pay for all 3 of the procedures regardless of which price they were presented. Carpal tunnel release was the most price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 17% at the highest price ($3,000) and 6% at the lowest ($250). Open reduction and internal fixation was the least price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 11% and 6% at the highest and lowest price, respectively. The use of older-generation implants was the least acceptable cost-cutting measure, at 50% of respondents. The present study showed that most patients are willing to pay a considerable amount of money out of pocket for hand surgery after the condition, treatment, and outcomes are explained to them. Furthermore, respondents are hesitant to sacrifice advanced technology despite increased costs.

A Modified Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis with the Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure.

Background: Since the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure was introduced in 1936, many modifications were created using dynamic stabilizer, such as the ECU (extensor carpi ulnaris), the FCU (flexor carpi ulnaris), pronator teres to solve proximal ulnar stump pain. We believe that this modification is also another option for distal ulnar stump instability. Methods: From January 1998 to February 2017, there were 13 patients received the Sauvé-Kapandji (S-K) procedure with tenodesis of the ECU to the carpus and interosseous membrane. The average age at operation was 52 years (range, 28 to 63 years). Four had traumatic arthritis (two from distal radial fracture malunion, two had instability of distal radioulnar joint from Essex-Lopresti injury), four had primary osteoarthritis of the distal radio-ulnar joint, two had rheumatoid arthritis, one had gouty arthritis, two had madelung deformity. The average follow-up was 30 months (range, 15 to 72 months). Results: Postoperative pronation/supination of the forearm had significantly improved with the exception of the wrist flexion/extension. After surgery, the mean radioulnar distance was narrowed from 11 mm to 9 mm, but no significant difference in 12 patients. All patients had improved in wrist pain, 10 patients had no pain and 3 patients with mild pain over the distal ulnar stump. The mean grip strength had significantly improved from 51% of the contralateral side to 75%. The lateral and stress X-ray films showed no instability of the distal ulnar stump after surgery. Conclusions: In conclusion, the modified S-K procedure using the tenodesis of ECU provides a multi-directional stability and is a reliable surgical procedure for distal radioulnar disorders.