Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction Research Articles

Role of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided biliary drainage with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction

In this editorial, we discuss the article by Peng et al in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery , focusing on the evolving role of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) with electrocautery lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Therapeutic endoscopy has rapidly advanced in decompression techniques, with growing evidence of its safety and efficacy surpassing percutaneous and surgical approaches. While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the gold standard for biliary decompression, its failure rate approaches 10.0%, prompting the exploration of alternatives like EUS-BD. This random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated high technical and clinical success of over 90.0% and an adverse event rate of 17.5%, mainly in the form of stent dysfunction. Outcomes based on stent size were not reported but the majority used 6 mm and 8 mm stents. As the body of literature continues to demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique, the challenges of stent dysfunction need to be addressed in future studies. One strategy that has shown promise is placement of double-pigtail stents, only 18% received the prophylactic intervention in this study. We expect this to improve with time as the technique continues to be refined and standardized. The results above establish EUS-BD with LAMS as a reliable alternative after failed ERCP and considering EUS to ERCP upfront in the same session is an effective strategy. Given the promising results, studies must explore the role of EUS-BD as first-line therapy for biliary decompression.

Covered Versus Uncovered Metal Stents for the Drainage of the Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction With ERCP: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction is a condition that should be treated with drainage and clearance of the biliary duct. self-expanded metal stents (SEMS) are known to be better and more effective than plastic stents because the patency is longer. The actual evidence is insufficient to recommend if it is better the use of SEMSu over SEMSc or vice versa for the drainage of the malignant distal biliary obstruction during ERCP. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to demonstrate if exists superiority between one or other type of SEMS performed by ERCP. We conducted a systematic review in different databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and OVID database. A search was made of all studies published up to May 2023. Seven studies were analyzed. A total of 1070 patients were included. Of the total of patients, 48.9% were male. The cumulative stent patency, the failure rate, the survival probably and the adverse events rate, were similar between SEMSc and SEMSu groups. The stent migration rate was higher in the SEMSc group (RR=2.34 [95% CI: 1.35-4.08]). The tumor overgrowth was higher in the SEMSc group (RR=2.05 [95% CI: 1.13-3.72]). The tumor ingrowth was higher in the SEMSu group (RR=0.25 [95% CI: 0.11-0.61]). The conclusions of our study show that there are no differences between the use of uncovered SEMS and covered SEMS for palliative treatment of distal biliopancreatic obstructions, and it has no impact on mortality or patient survival. New functional studies regarding the type of stent cover, radial force or length thereof are required.

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video).

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and minimally invasive alternative for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) in acute cholecystitis patients with high-surgical risk. Additionally, EUS-GBD serves as a rescue biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Despite its widespread application, data within the Indian context remains sparse. This study aims to report the outcomes of EUS-GBD through the first multi-center study from India. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EUS-GBD at six tertiary care centers of India from March 2022 to November 2023. EUS-GBD was performed by free hand or over-the-guidewire technique with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or large caliber metal stent (LCMS). The primary outcome was technical success (defined as successful deployment of stent between gallbladder and stomach/duodenal lumen). The secondary outcomes were clinical success (defined as resolution of symptoms of acute cholecystitis and more than > 50% reduction in bilirubin level within two weeks in distal biliary obstruction), adverse event rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate. Total29 patients (mean age 65.86 ± 12.91, 11 female) underwent EUS-GBD. The indication for EUS-GBD were acute cholecystitis (79.31%) and rescue biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (20.69%). LAMS was deployed in 92.86%, predominantly by free-hand technique (78.57%). Technical and clinical success rates were 96.55% and 82.75%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 27.59% patients, with severe adverse events (bile leak and bleeding) being uncommon (10%). Both 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate were 13.79% in patients. Cholecysto-duodenal fistula facilitated cholecystoscopic intervention and stone removal in one patient and transgastric EUS-GBD did not hamper bilio-enteric anastomosis during Whipple surgery in two patients. EUS-GBD is a safe and effective technique for managing acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients and for biliary drainage in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Computed tomography-based prediction of pancreatitis following biliary metal stent placement with the convolutional neural network.

Background and study aims Pancreatitis is a potentially lethal adverse event of endoscopic transpapillary placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Deep learning-based image recognition has not been investigated in predicting pancreatitis in this setting. Patients and methods We included 70 patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a SEMS for nonresectable distal MBO. We constructed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for pancreatitis prediction using a series of pre-procedure computed tomography images covering the whole pancreas (≥ 120,960 augmented images in total). We examined the additional effects of the CNN-based probabilities on the following machine learning models based on clinical parameters: logistic regression, support vector machine with a linear or RBF kernel, random forest classifier, and gradient boosting classifier. Model performance was assessed based on the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and specificity. Results The CNN model was associated with moderate levels of performance metrics: AUC, 0.67; PPV, 0.45; accuracy, 0.66; and specificity, 0.63. When added to the machine learning models, the CNN-based probabilities increased the performance metrics. The logistic regression model with the CNN-based probabilities had an AUC of 0.74, PPV of 0.85, accuracy of 0.83, and specificity of 0.96, compared with 0.72, 0.78, 0.77, and 0.96, respectively, without the probabilities. Conclusions The CNN-based model may increase predictability for pancreatitis following endoscopic placement of a biliary SEMS. Our findings support the potential of deep learning technology to improve prognostic models in pancreatobiliary therapeutic endoscopy.

Efficacy and safety of uncovered self-expandable metal stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction in unresectable non-pancreatic cancer.

The efficacy of uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMS) versus fully covered self-expandable metal stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction remains controversial. Additionally, the heterogeneity of the disease conditions has been indicated in previous studies because pancreatic and non-pancreatic cancers have different characteristics in clinical course. Therefore, the etiology of biliary obstruction necessitates investigations stratified by primary disease. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of UCSEMS, specifically for non-pancreatic cancer-induced distal malignant biliary obstruction. We conducted a single-center retrospective review to evaluate the time to recurrent biliary obstruction and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving UCSEMS for unresectable non-pancreatic cancer-induced malignant biliary obstruction. Overall, 32 patients were enrolled in the study between January 2016 and December 2023. The median time to recurrent biliary obstructionwas 140 days. AE rates were low at 3.1% for both pancreatitis and cholecystitis, suggesting a potential benefit of UCSEMS in reducing post-procedural AEs. UCSEMS may reduce the risk of post-procedural AEs and should be considered in patients at high risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. However, the patency period may be shorter, necessitating future comparative research with fully covered self-expandable metal stentsto determine the optimal stent choice.

Comparison between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade and Transluminal Stent Implantation in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after Failed ERCP.

Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) can result in obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been an alternative for DMBO after failed ERCP. To compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade and transluminal approaches in patients with unresectable DMBO when ERCP failed. Patients with DMBO leading to obstructive jaundice after failed ERCP were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy between EUS-guided transluminal stenting (TLS group) and antegrade stenting (AGS group). 82 patients were enrolled, of which 45 patients were in TLS group and 37 in AGS group. There were no statistical differences in the malignancy type, baseline common bile duct diameter, total bilirubin level, reason for EUS-BD, and history of biliary drainage between TLS and AGS groups. The technical success rate was statistically higher in TLS group than in AGS group (97.8 vs. 81.1%, P = 0.031). There were no statistical differences in clinical success rate, procedure-related adverse events, stent migration rate, stent dysfunction rate, reintervention rate, and overall patient survival time between TLS and AGS groups. The median time to stent dysfunction or patient death in TLS and AGS groups was 53 and 81 days, respectively (P = 0.017). Although AGS had a lower technical success rate than TLS, it was superior to TLS in stent patency in patients with DMBO.

Primary endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the drainage of distal malignant biliary obstruction: An Egyptian multicenter, prospective, comparative study

Primary endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the drainage of distal malignant biliary obstruction: An Egyptian multicenter, prospective, comparative study

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Guided Biliary Drainage as Primary Approach to Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided transpapillary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches. Electronic databases from January 2005 through December 2023 were searched for RCTs comparing outcomes of EUS-BD and ERCP for treating MDBO. Pooled proportions, risk ratio (RR), and odds ratio were calculated using random-effects models. Five RCTs comprising 519 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled RR for overall technical success with EUS-BD compared with ERCP was 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-1.16, P = 0.246, I2 = 61%) and for clinical success was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.95-1.04, P = 0.850, I2 = 0%). The pooled rate of procedure-related pancreatitis was 7.20% (95% CI = 3.60-13.80, I2 = 34%) in the ERCP group compared with zero in the EUS-BD group. The pooled RR for stent dysfunction with EUS-BD compared with ERCP was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.28-0.83, P = 0.008, I2 = 7%). The weighted mean procedure time was 13.43 (SD = 10.12) minutes for EUS-BD compared with 21.06 (SD = 6.64) minutes for ERCP. The mean stent patency was 194.11 (SD = 52.12) days in the EUS-BD group and 187 (SD = 60.70) days in the ERCP group. EUS-BD is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP in MDBO. An almost nonexistent risk of procedure-related pancreatitis, lower procedure time, and ease of use make this an attractive primary approach to biliary decompression in centers with expertise.

Transpapillary biliary drainage using a forward-viewing endoscope for distal malignant biliary obstruction after placement of a duodenal stent for type I duodenal stenosis.

Transpapillary biliary drainage using a forward-viewing endoscope for distal malignant biliary obstruction after placement of a duodenal stent for type I duodenal stenosis.

Risk factors and treatment strategies for cholecystitis after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study

Background and study aimsCholecystitis can occur after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant biliary obstructions (MBO). Furthermore, the best treatment option for cholecystitis has not been determined. Here, we aimed to identify the risk factors of cholecystitis after SEMS placement and determine the best treatment option. Patients and MethodsIncidence, treatments, and predictive factors of cholecystitis were retrospectively evaluated in 1,084 patients with distal MBO (DMBO) and 353 patients with hilar MBO (HMBO) who underwent SEMS placement at the 12 institutions from January 2012 to March 2021. ResultsCholecystitis occurred in 7.5% of patients with DMBO and 5.9% of patients with HMBO. The recurrence rate was significantly lower (p=0.043), and the recurrence-free period was significantly longer (p=0.039) in endoscopic procedures than in percutaneous procedures for cholecystitis treatment. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) was better in terms of technical success, procedure time, and recurrence-free period than endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage. The cases with obstruction across the cystic duct orifice by tumor (p=0.015) and those with obstruction by stent (p=0.037) were the independent risk factors for cholecystitis in DMBO. The cases with multiple SEMS placements (OR 11, 95% CI 0.68–190, p=0.091) and those with gallbladder stones (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.92–5.6, p=0.075) had a higher risk for cholecystitis in HMBO. ConclusionsThe incidences of cholecystitis after SEMS placement for DMBO and HMBO were comparable. EUS-GBD is the optimal treatment option for patients with cholecystitis after SEMS placement for MBO.

Impact of the suprapapillary method on patency in distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) across the duodenal major papilla carries a risk of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR). The suprapapillary method of stent placement may reduce DBR and improve stent patency compared with the transpapillary method. This study compared the clinical outcomes between the suprapapillary and transpapillary methods for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). Between January 2021 and January 2023, consecutive patients with DMBO from 6 centers in South Korea were randomly assigned to either the suprapapillary arm or transpapillary method arm in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency, and secondary outcomes were the cause of stent dysfunction, adverse events, and overall survival rate. Eighty-four patients were equally assigned to each group. The most common cause of DMBO was pancreatic cancer (50, 59.5%), followed by bile duct (20, 23.8%), gallbladder (11, 13.1%), and other cancers (3, 3.6%). Stent patency was significantly longer in the suprapapillary group (median, 369 days [interquartile range, 289-497] vs 154 days [interquartile range, 78-361]; P< .01). Development of DBR was significantly lower in the suprapapillary group (9.4% vs 40.8%, P< .01). Adverse events and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The placement of SEMSs using the suprapapillary method resulted in a significantly longer duration of stent patency. It is advisable to place the SEMS using the suprapapillary method in DMBO. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate the benefits of the suprapapillary method. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0005572.).

Outcomes predictors in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and study aims EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) by transduodenal placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) into the extrahepatic bile duct. To identify factors that contribute to safe and effective EUS-CDS using LAMS, we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods The methodology of our analysis was based on PRISMA recommendations. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to November 2022. Full articles that included patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-CDS using LAMS after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were eligible. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed reporting pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events (AEs) by means of a random model. Multivariate meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to assess possible associations between the outcomes and selected variables to assess the correlation between outcomes and different variables. Results were also stratified according to stent size. Results Twelve studies with 845 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled technical and clinical success rates were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94%-98%; I 2 = 52.29%) and 96% (95%CI 95%-98%), respectively, with no significant association with baseline characteristics, such are sex, age, common bile duct diameter, or stent size. The pooled AE rate was 12% (95%CI: 8%-16%; I 2 = 71.62%). The AE rate was significantly lower when using an 8 × 8 mm stent as compared with a 6 × 8 mm LAMS (odds ratio 0.59, 0.35-0.99; P = 0.04), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). Conclusions EUS-CDS with LAMS is a safe and effective option for relief of MBO. Selecting an appropriate stent size is crucial for achieving optimal safety outcomes.

Safety of biliary drainage with 6-mm metallic stent for preoperative obstructive jaundice in pancreatic cancer: PURPLE SIX STUDY.

The 10-mm self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is the standard for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage before pancreatic cancer surgery. However, the efficacy of stents thinner than 10mm has not been adequately validated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety of a 6-mm fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) during preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. This was a single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II study of endoscopic transpapillary initial biliary drainage for DMBO before pancreatic cancer surgery. The primary endpoint was stent-related adverse events, and the key secondary endpoint was the non-recurrent biliary obstruction (non-RBO) rate during the observation period for both resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancers. The study enrolled 33 patients, among whom 32 received the study treatment. There were 23 and 9 cases of R and BR pancreatic cancers, respectively. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.0% and 90.1%, respectively. The stent-related adverse event rate was 3.1% (n=1, acute pancreatitis) (95% confidential interval, 0.00-16.2), which met the criteria to be considered safe. The overall non-RBO rate during the observation period (median 96days) was 78.1% (82.6% and 66.7% for R and BR pancreatic cancer cases, respectively). The 6-mm FCSEMS is an extremely safe metallic stent with a low stent-related adverse event rate of 3.1% for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. It is considered the optimal stent for preoperative biliary drainage in terms of the non-RBO rate. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR 000041704).

Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy vs. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for jaundice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Retrospective, multicenter study (GALLBLADEUS Study).

The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) vs. EUS-gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for jaundice resulting from malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). This multicenter retrospective study included patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to MDBO who underwent EUS-GBD or EUS-CDS with lumen-apposing metal stents after failed ERCP. The primary end-point was clinical success rate. Secondary end-points were technical success, periprocedural adverse events rate (<24 h), late adverse events rate (>24 h), overall survival, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction. A total of 78 patients were included: 41 underwent EUS-GBD and 37 underwent EUS-CDS. MDBO was mainly the result of pancreatic cancer (n = 63/78, 80.7%). Clinical success rate was similar for both procedures: 87.8% for EUS-GBD and 89.2% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.8). Technical success rate was 100% for EUS-GBD and 94.6% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.132). Periprocedural morbidity (<24 h) rates were similar between both groups: 4/41 (9.8%) for EUS-GBD and 5/37 (13.5%) for EUS-CDS (P = 0.368). There was a significantly higher rate of late morbidity (>24 h) among patients in the EUS-CDS group (8/37 [21.6%]) than in the EUS-GBD group (3/41 [7.3%]) (P = 0.042). The median follow-up duration was 4.7 months. Overall survival and time to recurrent biliary obstruction did not significantly differ between the groups. After failed ERCP for MDBO, EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS show comparable clinical success rates and technical success. EUS-GBD appears to be a promising alternative for MDBO, even as a second-line treatment after failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and compare the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS.

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with antegrade stent placement in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity score–matched case-control study

Background and aimsEndoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a rescue procedure when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Peritonitis and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) are adverse events (AEs) associated with EUS-HGS. Antegrade stenting across a malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) followed by EUS-HGS (EUS-HGAS) creates two biliary drainage routes, potentially reducing peritonitis and prolonging time to RBO (TRBO). We compared the outcomes of the two techniques. MethodsData of consecutive patients with MDBO who underwent attempted EUS-HGS or EUS-HGAS across five institutions from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A matched cohort of the patients was obtained using one-to-one propensity score matching. The primary outcome was TRBO, and secondary outcomes included AEs except for RBO and overall survival (OS). ResultsAmong 360 patients, 283 (176 and 107 in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively) were eligible. The matched cohorts included 81 patients in each group. AEs developed in 10 (12.3%) and 15 (18.5%) patients (p=0.38) in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively. RBO occurred in 18 and 2 patients in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively (p<0.001). TRBO was significantly longer in the HGAS group (median 194 vs. 716 days; hazard ratio [HR]=0.050, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.0066–0.37, p<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (median 97 vs. 112 days; HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.66–1.4, p=0.88). ConclusionsEUS-HGAS extended TRBO compared with EUS-HGS, while AEs, except for RBO and OS, did not differ. The longer TRBO of EUS-HGAS could benefit patients with longer life expectancy.

Will Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Choledocoduodenostomy with Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement Replace Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography When Treating Distal Malignant Biliary Obstructions?

Malignant distal biliary obstructions are becoming increasingly common, especially in patients with cancers of the pancreatic head, despite progress in medical oncology research. ERCP is the current gold standard for management of such strictures, but the emergence of EC-LAMS has rendered EUS-CDS both safe and efficient. It is a "game changer"; originally intended for ERCP failure, two randomised clinical trials recently proposed EUS-CDS as a first-intent procedure in palliative settings. For resectable diseases, the absence of iatrogenic pancreatitis associated with a lower rate of postsurgical adverse events (compared with ERCP) leads us to believe that EUS-CDS might be used in first-intent as a pre-operative endoscopic biliary drainage.

Endoscopic drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction. Will ERCP no longer be necessary?

We read with interest the Editorial by Vila et al. on the paradigm shift for endoscopic biliary drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) which places Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) drainage as the first option instead of traditional ERCP drainage. The modern biliary endoscopist must have the duodenoscope in one hand and the therapeutic echoendoscope in the other. ERCP training alone is no longer appropriate because the goal is to drain the obstruction during a single session. That is why in more and more centers the patient signs a single consent for endoscopic biliary drainage, whether by ERCP, EUS or combined. Should EUS drainage be used first for MDBO without attempting ERCP? A possible protocol for endoscopic drainage of MDBO could be to start with the duodenoscope for ERCP. If the papilla of Vater is accessible, try cannulation considering the ESGE criteria for a difficult cannulation: more than 5 contacts with the papilla; more than 5 minutes spent attempting to cannulate following visualization of the papilla; more than one unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification. If biliary cannulation is not achieved, immediately switch to EUS drainage during the same session. Occasionally, the double guidewire technique or even transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy could be used, but not needle-knife precut.

Is ERCP still the elective primary biliary drainage technique in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction? Response to Garcia-Cano et al.

We have read the letter from García-Cano et al. regarding our Editorial and are very grateful for the response as it contributes to deepening the debate we aim to generate on the topic. We are aware that changing a paradigm is always difficult, takes years, and requires publication of good quality studies. However, the way to progress in medicine and provide the best for patients involves questioning existing paradigms and considering the possibility of changing them. Currently, the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography guided transmural biliary drainage (EUS-TBD) have been progressively improving and the rate of adverse events (AE) has considerably decreased. The data currently available suggest that primary EUS-TBD in a specific setting is not inferior to ERCP drainage and may even entail a lower rate of AE.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the preferred technique for better outcomes has not yet been evaluated. We compared the long-term outcomes between the techniques. Retrospective comparative study. We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS with transmural stent placement for distal MBO between 2009 and 2022. The primary outcome was the stent patency. The secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs) of each technique, and independent risk factors for stent dysfunction. In all, 115 patients were divided into EUS-CDS (n = 56) and EUS-HGS (n = 59) groups. Among them, technical success was achieved in 98.2% of EUS-CDS and 96.6% of EUS-HGS groups. Furthermore, clinical success was 96.4% in EUS-CDS and 88.1% in EUS-HGS groups, without significant difference (p = 0.200). The mean duration of stent patency for EUS-CDS was 770.3 days while that for EUS-HGS was 164.9 days (p = 0.010). In addition, the only independent risk factor for stent dysfunction was systematic treatment after EUS-BD [hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval 0.238 (0.066-0.863), p = 0.029]. The incidence of stent dysfunction of EUS-HGS was higher than EUS-CDS (35.1% versus 18.2%, 0.071), despite no significant differences even in late AEs. In distal MBO, EUS-CDS may be better than EUS-HGS with longer stent patency and fewer AEs. Furthermore, systematic treatment after EUS-BD is recommended for the improvement of stent patency.

Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstructions.

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), both distal and hilar, represents an ensemble of different clinical conditions frequently encountered in everyday practice. Given the frequent unresectability of the disease at presentation and the increasing indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endoscopic biliary drainage is generally required during the course of the disease. With the widespread use of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the introduction of dedicated devices, EUS-guided biliary drainage has rapidly gained acceptance, together with transpapillary endoscopic biliary drainage and the percutaneous approach. This comprehensive review describes the current role of endoscopy for distal and hilar MBO supported by evidence, with a focus on the current hot topics in this field.